Why Are Libs So Mean?

[gatomontes99]

Senator Harris vocally throws around “F-bombs” and other profanity constantly in her berating of staff and others. The staff is in complete fear of her and she uses her profanity throughout the day.

As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she entered the office and say, “Good Morning General.

”Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor look her in the eye as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members.

Hillary and Joe are rumored to be the same way, along with Klobuchar.

[Fluffypants]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Senator Harris vocally throws around “F-bombs” and other profanity constantly in her berating of staff and others. The staff is in complete fear of her and she uses her profanity throughout the day.

As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she entered the office and say, “Good Morning General.

”Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor look her in the eye as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members.

Hillary and Joe are rumored to be the same way, along with Klobuchar.

Don't forget about the late Sheila Jackson Lee she was infamous for mistreating, well, pretty much everyone in her orbit, her staff and service workers especially treated poorly.

Edited August 2, 2024 by Fluffypants

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Senator Harris vocally throws around “F-bombs” and other profanity constantly in her berating of staff and others. The staff is in complete fear of her and she uses her profanity throughout the day.

As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she entered the office and say, “Good Morning General.

”Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor look her in the eye as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members.

Hillary and Joe are rumored to be the same way, along with Klobuchar.

That's nothing. Trump demands his cabinet sit around a table and make speeches about how grateful they are that he's so great. 🤮

Unlike your RUMORS, that was actually recorded on video.

Edited August 2, 2024 by robosmith

[herbie]

Perhaps they seem mean because facts, reason and common sense don't work on retreads.

[Matthew]

This method of attack reeks of desperation. Keep up the good work. 👍

[Deluge]

On 8/2/2024 at 4:18 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Senator Harris vocally throws around “F-bombs” and other profanity constantly in her berating of staff and others. The staff is in complete fear of her and she uses her profanity throughout the day.

As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she entered the office and say, “Good Morning General.

”Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor look her in the eye as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members.

Hillary and Joe are rumored to be the same way, along with Klobuchar.

Libs are mean because they hate people. They also hate life, freedom, God, and anything else that doesn't fit in their narrow minded point of view. 

[Nationalist]

43 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Libs are mean because they hate people. They also hate life, freedom, God, and anything else that doesn't fit in their narrow minded point of view. 

Oh I think they believe in a Gawd. The one that wants us all dead.

The Libbies are "mean" because they have no answers for the destruction they've delivered...so they attack people. 

[gatomontes99]

On 8/2/2024 at 6:30 PM, robosmith said:

That's nothing. Trump demands his cabinet sit around a table and make speeches about how grateful they are that he's so great. 🤮

Unlike your RUMORS, that was actually recorded on video.

That's just good team building:

13 Positive affirmation activities 1. Affirmation Circle

[CdnFox]

14 hours ago, Deluge said:

Libs are mean because they hate people. They also hate life, freedom, God, and anything else that doesn't fit in their narrow minded point of view. 

I honestly believe joking aside that it's not the liberals hate people, but rather that they define people in a very narrow way.  They completely demonize anybody who does not believe their way and their leaders have learned that the best way to keep control over their masses is to dehumanize anyone who doesn't agree with them.

You don't have to care about the opinions of anybody that isn't a human after all. Nobody would blame you for not caring about what a Nazi says. So all you have to do is make everyone who disagrees with you and Nazi. Or find another way to dehumanize them in a similar fashion.

So in their minds the only true people, the only true humans, are people who believe exactly as they do. The others are monsters and people don't need to worry about the opinions of monsters or worry about being nice to them.

 

[eyeball]

Why Are Libs So Mean? You mean like Mr Socks Lib? Seriously?

LMAO! Conservatives just like being overly sensitive - like soccer-player drama-queens putting on a spectacle of wounded agony.

[Nationalist]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Why Are Libs So Mean? You mean like Mr Socks Lib? Seriously?

LMAO! Conservatives just like being overly sensitive - like soccer-player drama-queens putting on a spectacle of wounded agony.

So you don't think the gas tax is mean spirited?

How about the freezing of bank accounts? Seems pretty mean to me.

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Why Are Libs So Mean? You mean like Mr Socks Lib? Seriously?

LMAO! Conservatives just like being overly sensitive - like soccer-player drama-queens putting on a spectacle of wounded agony.

Absolutely!  it's not like they get worked up over IMPORTANT issues, like which bathroom you get to pee in.    

[eyeball]

10 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So you don't think the gas tax is mean spirited?

If you mean the carbon tax -  no, I think its an effective way to help deal with climate change.

Quote

How about the freezing of bank accounts? Seems pretty mean to me.

Compared to strapping people to gurneys and sticking needles into them?

Pfffft.

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So you don't think the gas tax is mean spirited?

How about the freezing of bank accounts? Seems pretty mean to me.

All the bank accounts were owned by nazis.  (See how easy that is? It just works so well.... )

And the ones that weren't owned by nazis were owned by Chuds, so they should get seized TWICE!

And the only people who complain about the carbon tax are far alt-right super facists who hate the planet!

So no, why would that stuff be mean? You can't be 'Mean" to a subhuman!  (also, eat the rich!) 

[Nationalist]

44 minutes ago, eyeball said:

If you mean the carbon tax -  no, I think its an effective way to help deal with climate change.

Compared to strapping people to gurneys and sticking needles into them?

Pfffft.

Climate change has been found to NOT be a crisis. Why impose such taxes on folks for an issue that is not threatening anyone? To feel good? Do you feel good when you pay your bills?

Who strapped people to gurneys and stuck needles in them?

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Climate change has been found to NOT be a crisis. Why impose such taxes on folks for an issue that is not threatening anyone? To feel good? Do you feel good when you pay your bills?

Who strapped people to gurneys and stuck needles in them?

Even if you accept the climate change is an emergency, if anything that makes it worse. We know the carbon tax is ineffective, it's been clear that the carbon tax is ineffective for some time, and even the government has admitted that they had no targets for the carbon tax and hasn't been tracking if it's been working.

So if climate change is indeed a crisis as suggested then why wouldn't the government at least care to see whether or not it's program was working? Surely if it's a crisis any responsible government would care to monitor whether or not it's response was achieving the desired results.

So how important can it be if they don't even bother to monitor if their primary solution 'works'?

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Even if you accept the climate change is an emergency, if anything that makes it worse. We know the carbon tax is ineffective, it's been clear that the carbon tax is ineffective for some time, and even the government has admitted that they had no targets for the carbon tax and hasn't been tracking if it's been working.

So if climate change is indeed a crisis as suggested then why wouldn't the government at least care to see whether or not it's program was working? Surely if it's a crisis any responsible government would care to monitor whether or not it's response was achieving the desired results.

So how important can it be if they don't even bother to monitor if their primary solution 'works'?

True.

But...I don't think this gross abuse of power has anything to do with climate...but more it has to do with income and debt. Pixie-Dust managed to spend like my daughter with my credit card in a mall. Hell some in my own family were collecting CERB. And why not if they wanna just heap it on? And why all the closures? The masking too? None of that made any sense. And don't go outside??? WTF??? So its done and what was the effect?

Small business closures all over the place. Bigger BigBox stores. A massive government debt. They claim they saved lives. Did they? Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada. Has been for a long time. Check this out.

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/CAN/canada/death-rate

There's a sliding graph in there that shows a startling thing. Our average death rate from 2019 to 2023 was lower than it was before that and less than projected in the near future.

I think they spent so much that they have to tax the hell out of us to recover. But why did we spend so much and do so much damage, if the death rate hardly noticed The Rona?

[Goddess]

18 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

But why did we spend so much and do so much damage, if the death rate hardly noticed The Rona?

Excuse me, Sir, but you are not allowed to ask those questions.  Nor are you an "expert", so you should be ignoring any datasets.

Just trust your government.

Trust "The Science."

[Goddess]

59 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

But why did we spend so much and do so much damage, if the death rate hardly noticed The Rona?

Seriously, though....

A “people” version of an avalanche we call a “mass movement,” “mass hysteria,” “groupthink,” “riot,” “moral panic,” “stampede,” etc.

Although there are crucial similarities between an avalanche of rocks and a mass hysteria (or one of these other variants) of people, one key difference is that people, but not rocks, have free will, and can choose not to be part of it.

By refraining to “slide” despite being pressed to do so, a person not only doesn’t end up part of the mass hysteria, but also doesn’t further its spread.

A small number of folks in March of 2020 were such “steady rocks.” They never got swept up into calling for lockdowns. Not for a minute, and not for two weeks. But most slid, at least for a while. Some slid for only a short stint and “woke up.” Others slid for many months before digging their heels in. And others are still sliding to this day, pressuring their neighbors on the mountainside (the social network) to continue sliding. Some will never join "Team Reality".

Unlike rocks, these human sliders bear responsibility for the mass hysteria. And the “larger” the social forces the person could impart (the bigger the “boulder”), the more responsibility he or she bears.

Their largest blind spot is themselves: they are among those culpable.

They contributed to the very mass hysteria that bred entirely ill narratives and civil-liberties-violating interventions that it will take a generation to recover from. They are the boulders at the bottom of the mountain side who started near the top, helped ensure that the avalanche was as large as it was by their early pronouncements of fear and demands for interventions.

The huge numbers of small pebbles were a bigger problem than the visible boulders here and there.  I know many people who NOW say they only supported the first 2 weeks. They still don’t get it -  all was lost there and then.

It was a pandemic of cowardliness.

Edited August 6, 2024 by Goddess

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Seriously, though....

A “people” version of an avalanche we call a “mass movement,” “mass hysteria,” “groupthink,” “riot,” “moral panic,” “stampede,” etc.

Although there are crucial similarities between an avalanche of rocks and a mass hysteria (or one of these other variants) of people, one key difference is that people, but not rocks, have free will, and can choose not to be part of it.

By refraining to “slide” despite being pressed to do so, a person not only doesn’t end up part of the mass hysteria, but also doesn’t further its spread.

A small number of folks in March of 2020 were such “steady rocks.” They never got swept up into calling for lockdowns. Not for a minute, and not for two weeks. But most slid, at least for a while. Some slid for only a short stint and “woke up.” Others slid for many months before digging their heels in. And others are still sliding to this day, pressuring their neighbors on the mountainside (the social network) to continue sliding. Some will never join "Team Reality".

Unlike rocks, these human sliders bear responsibility for the mass hysteria. And the “larger” the social forces the person could impart (the bigger the “boulder”), the more responsibility he or she bears.

Their largest blind spot is themselves: they are among those culpable.

They contributed to the very mass hysteria that bred entirely ill narratives and civil-liberties-violating interventions that it will take a generation to recover from. They are the boulders at the bottom of the mountain side who started near the top, helped ensure that the avalanche was as large as it was by their early pronouncements of fear and demands for interventions.

The huge numbers of small pebbles were a bigger problem than the visible boulders here and there.  I know many people who NOW say they only supported the first 2 weeks. They still don’t get it -  all was lost there and then.

It was a pandemic of cowardliness.

Perfect.

Now...lets bring this back to Climate Change.

Is the climate changing? It appears it is a little.

Is that a reason to freak out and start, yet another avalanche?

Not according to "The Science".

So why are we bleeding the middle-class like this?

Money and power consolidation.

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Is that a reason to freak out and start, yet another avalanche?

Thank you, that was my point - we're going down the same road to avalanche, as we just did.  

It seems (judging by the people on this forum) - it's the same people, too.

[Nationalist]

36 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Thank you, that was my point - we're going down the same road to avalanche, as we just did.  

It seems (judging by the people on this forum) - it's the same people, too.

I call them "Tweenkies" but...you know...that's just me...

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Climate change has been found to NOT be a crisis.

LMAO!

Quote

Who strapped people to gurneys and stuck needles in them?

The same people freezing everyone's bank accounts.

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

LMAO!

The same people freezing everyone's bank accounts.

👆  Oh look, here's one of those human rocks now, trying to cause another avalanche of hysteria. 👆

[Nationalist]

16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

LMAO!

The same people freezing everyone's bank accounts.

Think that's funny.

OK...find me a peer reviewed scientific paper that concludes we have a climate crisis. Go ahead.

The those folks belong in jail.