The Democrat Party has become a lie machine. What a degradation!

[CdnFox]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

The tooth fairy isn't giving any money for his meth-strangled teeth. 

It doesn't have to be normal money, it could be something that's worth a lot of money -  I got a bunch of these:

[WestCanMan]

55 minutes ago, herbie said:

You think not publicizing what you want to be real is a lie?

Kamala, is that you?

Quote

Ignoring the while the ravings of a true madman that speaks nothing but lies?

You have Biden syndrome now, and you still haven't acknowledged that you are finally aware of all the Demi lies I cited for you.

Do you still think that the Dems told you the truth about those things herbie?

How old are you, really? Just a ballpark figure... Under 16? Under 25? Over 90? 

Why are you afraid to say? I'm 56. Was that so hard?

Quote

Keep it up defending a pervert criminal liar.

The jig is up. No one is defending the influence-peddling kid-sniffer anymore. 

Quote

Tape a maxipad over your ear. c'mon show us you're a True Believer.

You should wear a diaper over your mouth to stop some of the shit from coming out. 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Nice try tweenkle-toes but you can't warp this with me.

Libbie DAs and judges are responsible for the mess and Kamala supports the crap.!

😵‍💫 I didn't think anyone knows WTF you're on about now, debate Biden.

[robosmith]

On 8/1/2024 at 2:44 PM, CouchPotato said:

He meant he will fix the problems so that it won't be necessary for them to vote next time around. You don't like to vote, but we need your help this time.

Everyone in the audience understood that.

You know why I think people on your side don't. Because they really, really don't want to. They are so locked in. And I understand it. I've seen our side locked in like this before. The big concern is not that Trump will be a terrible tyrant. That's not what really scares the left. They are scared he won't be a tyrant. They are scared their team will be wrong. That is more important.

Thanks for your OPINION about what others are scared about. 

You should ask questions instead of ASSuming you know what others are thinking. Duh

Meanwhile your clairvoyance about what Trump meant as well as what the "audience understood," has failed you, too.

Just check Trump's Project 2025 and past attempts to destroy democracy to actually understand what he's thinking.

The evidence is not on your side of understanding.

[CouchPotato]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for your OPINION about what others are scared about.

You're welcome. 😊

Edited August 3, 2024 by CouchPotato

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

As always, you are being dishonest and accusing someone else of it.

• We all know that the Senator from CALIFORNIA wasn't just randomly advocating for a MINNESOTA BAIL FUND just to get run-of-the-mill violent criminals back on the streets of Minnesota. 
• The senator from California was trying to get violent rioters back on the streets of Minnesota.

You can decide for yourself whether or not it was a bonus that the money she helped raise went towards bailing out random rapists and murderers as well. I don't really understand all of the various malfunctions of the leftard "brain" yet.

Can you imagine if a Texas senator just randomly started advocating for a bail fund to get criminals back on the street in California? 

 

Is your final answer really gonna be: "THE SENATOR FROM CALIFORNIA WAS SOLICITING (again?) DONATIONS FOR A MINNESOTA BAIL FUND TO GET RANDOM VIOLENT CRIMINALS BACK ON THE STREETS IN MINNESOTA"?

Can you type that out in your own words Hodad? I wanna see you write that stupid shit down all by yourself, I don't wanna just explain to you what your own stupid words mean. 

You are completely DISHONEST when you refer to bailees as criminals. BAIL is for PRE-TRIAL detainees, lDIOT.

AKA, STILL PRESUMED INNOCENT. Duh

[CouchPotato]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

The evidence is not on your side of understanding.

If you say so.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

 

Quote

 

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

The evidence is not on your side of understanding.

 

 

If you say so.

Which isn't to say that the evidence isn't on your side.  Just not your side of understanding. Which basically means he can't understand it. 

[Nationalist]

6 hours ago, Hodad said:

😵‍💫 I didn't think anyone knows WTF you're on about now, debate Biden.

Hilarious. 

A cornered Libbie can't justify an argument, so he plays dumb.

Just another of the daily examples of how stoopid these simps are.

[User]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hilarious. 

A cornered Libbie can't justify an argument, so he plays dumb.

Just another of the daily examples of how stoopid these simps are.

He also hides from me because he can't stand that I pick apart his lousy arguments on here. 

[CouchPotato]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

Meanwhile your clairvoyance about what Trump meant as well as what the "audience understood," has failed you, too.

Nuh uh.

[robosmith]

25 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Nuh uh.

Just check Trump's Project 2025 and past attempts to destroy democracy to actually understand what he's thinking.

[CouchPotato]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Just check Trump's Project 2025 and past attempts to destroy democracy to actually understand what he's thinking.

I just read speed read Project 2025 and it said "robosmith is lying".

Fox News said you're lying about what Trump thinks.

Edited August 3, 2024 by CouchPotato

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

You are completely DISHONEST when you refer to bailees as criminals.

You are completely dishonest when you open your mouth. 

FYI only a very small percentage of rioters, looters and even rioters who assaulted police officers were ever arrested. 

For Kamala et al to take the position that even those ones needed to be back on the streets was absolutely disgusting and there's no excuse. 

Quote

BAIL is for PRE-TRIAL detainees, lDIOT.

Right. But all of the actual criminal rioters were offered bail. Why was getting rioters back on streets a high priority for Demonrats? 

Did you want rioters back on the streets? Did you? I'm asking. Just f'ing man up for once. 

Quote

AKA, STILL PRESUMED INNOCENT. Duh

Under normal circumstances people are presumed innocent, but when the country is burning and literally being torn apart, that ignorant c--t should have been calling for restraint, not doing her level best to get rioters back out there. 

If I was a Minnesotan, and a California senator was trying to get criminals back on the streets of my city, I'd be enraged. 

Kamala is a f'ing lowlife piece of garbage. At the very best she belongs at a drive-thru window of a Wendy's, not in the WH. 

[CouchPotato]

"Nancy Pelosi suggests adding Biden to Mount Rushmore"

https://www.foxnews.com/media/nancy-pelosi-suggests-adding-biden-mount-rushmore-such-consequential-president

 

Edited August 5, 2024 by CouchPotato