What is the Republican platform?

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

1. LMAO, is that really how you want to start this?

Yes. Because your original claim is ridiculous. There’s no shortage of anti-biden lunatics on social media that’s their natural home.  What minimal fake news factchecking happens there isn’t Biden. Meanwhile Musk is now personally censoring and banning people from Twitter if they offend his period politics or ego. 
 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

2. Trump. And how many of those was he actually removed from office for? Zero. They were both b.s.

The reason they failed is because the vote was along party lines as expected and there was not enough of a majority. But it’s clear he did so the things he was accused of:  withholding Ukraine aid in exchange for non-existent dirt on Biden and inciting Jan 6 attack. 
 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

3.No collusion: Key takeaways from Mueller’s Russia findings

Only those that are lost in liberal lala land think Trump colluded with Russia.

From your own link: “Barr’s letter didn’t say what Mueller learned that fell short of a crime about a broad range of Trump associates who had Russia-related contacts. It also didn’t answer why several of those people lied to federal investigators or Congress during the Russia probe since there wasn’t any direct coordination going on.”

It is a fact they discussed releasing Hillary’s hacked emails and terms for a Trump presidency to stop supporting Ukraine’s resistance to Russias proxy invasion.  Lacking further details due to obstruction it was unclear if either of those or others constituted a crime  

 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

No they didn't: Morell was the one who organized the letter after a call from now-Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He said he did it to give Biden a 'talking point' in the lead-up to the 2020 election when Trump attacked him for the laptop that was later verified to be his son's.

First let’s be clear the letter said;

“We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails … are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement — just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.”

Second Biden didn’t get them to write and sign the memo. Your own link says Morrell, one of the intelligence officials, got his colleagues to sign. 
 

Third let’s set the record straight that other Russian disinfo about the Bidens has been proven such as Alexander Smirnov, a key source of Republican accusations was exposed as having fabricated his claims and working with Russian intelligence. 
 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

5. Trump Really Was Spied Upon

Your link is to an opinion piece in a conservative newspaper. Nothing in the actual set of facts proves he was spied upon and nobody was charged with that. Amd Sussman was acquitted. 
 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

6. By a vote of 6-3, the justices ruled that the Biden administration overstepped its authority last year when it announced that it would cancel up to $400 billion in student loans. The Biden administration had said that as many as 43 million Americans would have benefitted from the loan forgiveness program; almost half of those borrowers would have had all of their student loans forgiven.

Yeah so?  That doesn’t contradict any of what  I said. SCOTUS took issue with the specific legislation that was passed, which they claimed was outside presidential authority. So Biden took another route with a smaller program that was well within his authority and has nothing to do with the SCOTUS ruling, which is why it actually happened 

 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

8. So what if he qualified it? Look at his actions. He sent the #3 at the DOJ to be a prosecuter in NY. He met with the prosecutors in GA. He illegally appointed Jack Smith to be a special counsel. So what if he qualified it?

Huh? Qualified it?   The arguments about special prosecutors that Trump lawyer made have tried before in previous cases and were  thrown out. Cannons ruling is just another example of Republican judges ignoring all past legal precedents to achieve their own personally desirable outcomes. 
 

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

9. Special Counsels are supposed to be approved by Congress. Jack Smith was not.

Tjat is Cannon’s new made up argument. As one legal expert pointed out:

 

What are the regulations under which special counsels are appointed?

Special counsels have been around for decades. From the 1970s until the late ’90s there was the independent counsel statute, which provided for a much more independent special prosecutor than what Attorney General [Merrick] Garland authorized in this matter. The Supreme Court upheld the statute in Morrison v. Olson, but it expired in 1999. After its expiration, DOJ implemented its own regulations providing for the appointment of special counsels who possess functions similar to U.S. attorneys. In 2020, in an Appointments Clause case involving the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Supreme Court essentially reaffirmed Morrison v. Olson as a valid exception to a general rule about appointments.

What surprised you most about the decision?

One very surprising thing is how Cannon deals with the Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Nixon. There’s a sentence in that 9-0 opinion which resolves this issue entirely. The sentence says that Archibald Cox, who was one of the prosecutors of Nixon, was appropriately appointed pursuant to the statute. And you would have thought that would have ended this inquiry. Cannon does something I think I’ve never seen a district judge do before, which is that she looks into the history of the Nixon case, decides the issue wasn’t particularly briefed, and as a result determines that a sentence in a Supreme Court opinion that was decided 9-0 was, in fact, “dicta,” which means that it is not binding in subsequent cases as legal precedent. And as a result, she as a district judge was entitled to disregard it. I’ve never seen a district court conclude that a portion of a Supreme Court opinion is not binding; that was a first for me.

In my seminar at Harvard Law School, I teach that portion of the Nixon opinion, and the beginning of it is essentially whether the matter is justiciable and whether the case is properly in the court, partially because it’s an intra-branch fight — it’s two parts of the executive branch that are litigating against each other. It was important to the court to point out that the special counsel was validly appointed and validly in the court, because if they thought he had not been, then the matter would not have been justiciable. The entire first part of the Nixon opinion is really about justiciability….

An appeal in the 11th Circuit would take roughly a year to decide. If Trump is elected president, after his inauguration he will certainly order the Department of Justice to dismiss the federal cases against him. The Department of Justice would then dismiss those cases and there would not be an appeal.

If Trump is not elected, there’s a strong chance that the 11th Circuit will reverse Cannon’s decision. Whichever way the 11th Circuit ruled, I suspect the issues would then be decided in the Supreme Court. I’m not going to predict what the Supreme Court would do.

 

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2024/07/what-the-judge-was-thinking-and-whats-next-in-trump-documents-case/
 

In other words another criminal republican president already tried and failed with that argument a half century ago

[Deluge]

19 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

LMAO it’s 100% correct and you unhinged response only proves me correct.  You’re just another delusional right wing internet kook threatening violence in the name of national greatness….the key feature of the 20th century fascists. 

PS no way I want to be under the same flag as you American nutjobs or any other foreigners. That’s just more of your absolute batshit

You are so full of shit. lol

You a$$holes are guilty of every f*cking thing you accuse us of being. 

-- Think we're racists? lol. You slavers have been keeping inner city blacks down for decades. If they keep voting democrat, those poor bastards will never find a way out of your slums. 

-- Think we're fascists? Look no further than DEI: the only movement on this planet that exalts EVERYONE above straight white males - ESPECIALLY straight white conservative males. 

-- Think we're anti-women's rights? Try saying that to every female that is shutdown for opposing the tranny invasion of their sports and locker rooms/bathrooms - we sure as hell aren't doing that, and they know it.

Democrats/leftists are the only group that actively fights for EVERYTHING that is wrong in this world - it isn't even a debate. 

 

[herbie]

Listen to these brainwashed imbeciles dictionaries and encyclopedias lie, fascism is on the left of the political spectrum.
Bloody well defining themselves as fascist as they accused everone else of it. Convinced right and correct mean the same thing in politics Denying all facts and evidence.

Bet they'll all deny that 50% of Americans are below average in intelligence/

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, herbie said:

Listen to these brainwashed imbeciles dictionaries and encyclopedias lie, fascism is on the left of the political spectrum.
Bloody well defining themselves as fascist as they accused everone else of it. Convinced right and correct mean the same thing in politics Denying all facts and evidence.

Bet they'll all deny that 50% of Americans are below average in intelligence/

we've asked you not to huff and post pls. 

[BeaverFever]

On 7/21/2024 at 1:19 PM, Deluge said:

You are so full of shit. lol

You a$$holes are guilty of every f*cking thing you accuse us of being. 

-- Think we're racists? lol. You slavers have been keeping inner city blacks down for decades. If they keep voting democrat, those poor bastards will never find a way out of your slums. 

-- Think we're fascists? Look no further than DEI: the only movement on this planet that exalts EVERYONE above straight white males - ESPECIALLY straight white conservative males. 

-- Think we're anti-women's rights? Try saying that to every female that is shutdown for opposing the tranny invasion of their sports and locker rooms/bathrooms - we sure as hell aren't doing that, and they know it.

Democrats/leftists are the only group that actively fights for EVERYTHING that is wrong in this world - it isn't even a debate. 

 

What a load of made up crap. Republicans are Pro-pollution, pro-mass incarceration, anti-consumer, anti-worker, anti-woman, anti-black, corporatist AT BEST….and that’s before we get to the ACTUAL Nazis amd klansmen who also vote republican. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

What a load of made up crap. Republicans are Pro-pollution, pro-mass incarceration, anti-consumer, anti-worker, anti-woman, anti-black, corporatist AT BEST….and that’s before we get to the ACTUAL Nazis amd klansmen who also vote republican. 

ROFLMAO!!!! Wow. 

Honestly kid, get out of your basement and go talk to people.  Your delusions are getting scary.  We don't need you on a slightly sloped roof one of these days. 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

What a load of made up crap. Republicans are Pro-pollution, pro-mass incarceration, anti-consumer, anti-worker, anti-woman, anti-black, corporatist AT BEST….and that’s before we get to the ACTUAL Nazis amd klansmen who also vote republican. 

Beaver's scrambling but that's only because we both know he's full of shit. lol

Pro-pollution: You f*cking hypocrites are driving the same cars and flying in the same planes we are. In fact there isn't one f*cking thing you do that helps the screaming moonbats in the forests. 

Pro-mass incarceration: Yes, if you break laws; something of which you law bending degenerates know nothing. 

Anti-consumer. lol. Sorry, pervert - we're not the party that's driving businesses out of their cities. NYC is turning into a ghost town. lol

Anti-worker: Sorry, numbnuts; raising the minimum wage to $20 hr. only drives prices up. In essence, you're right back where you started. 

Anti-woman: Already refuted. We defend women; you exploit them. Abortion is the sacrament of the cult - you f*ckers really should be charged with murder. 

Anti-black: No, that's you slavers. You hate blacks. 

Corporatist: Nope, just pro-American.  

 

 

 

Edited July 23, 2024 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Beaver's scrambling but that's only because we both know he's full of shit. lol

Pro-pollution: You f*cking hypocrites are driving the same cars and flying in the same planes we are. In fact there isn't one f*cking thing you do that helps the screaming moonbats in the forests. 

Pro-mass incarceration: Yes, if you break laws; something of which you law bending degenerates know nothing. 

Anti-consumer. lol. Sorry, pervert - we're not the party that's driving businesses out of their cities. NYC is turning into a ghost town. lol

Anti-worker: Sorry, numbnuts; raising the minimum wage to $20 hr. only drives prices up. In essence, you're right back where you started. 

Anti-woman: Already refuted. We defend women; you exploit them. Abortion is the sacrament of the cult - you f*ckers really should be charged with murder. 

Anti-black: No, that's you slavers. You hate blacks. 

Corporatist: Nope, just pro-American.  

Well obviously it's almost entirely hate based propaganda. As I have noted many times in order to dismiss people's arguments you first have to dehumanize them. That way you can say that you don't waste your time trying to refute the arguments of monsters and ignore the fact that you don't actually have any counter arguments.

So this is the kind of thing we see the left teaching its people. The right is pro firearm not because it believes in freedoms or the rights for self-defense but because it hates children. Therefore we don't have to listen to their ideas about gun control. Is not in favor of screening immigrants because they feel it will weed out Bad actors and help pick good future citizens, they just hate all immigrants because they're xenophobic scumbags so we don't have to listen to them on immigration

Etc etc 

It's an age-old tactic. If you want the people to approve of you attacking the neighbor, you have to first convince them that the neighbor is out to get them and they aren't real humans anyway.

I'm afraid he's a little bit of the product of his programming here

[SNOWFLAKE]

On 7/20/2024 at 7:57 AM, gatomontes99 said:

no libs

Yup, either round up the "vermin" or strip them of the vote. 

 

 

 

Edited July 23, 2024 by SNOWFLAKE

[SNOWFLAKE]

[gatomontes99]

10 hours ago, SNOWFLAKE said:

Yup, either round up the "vermin" or strip them of the vote. 

 

 

 

Libs have zero sense of humor.

[BeaverFever]

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Pro-pollution: You f*cking hypocrites are driving the same cars and flying in the same planes we are. In fact there isn't one f*cking thing you do that helps the screaming moonbats in the forests. 

Republicans oppose pollution laws, deny climate change, oppose and reverse restrictions on poisoning the air and water, and try to  prevent pollution regulatory agencies from doing their jobs or enforcing existing laws.  The Trump White House literally legalized a pollutant known to cause brain damage….gotta grow your base somehow amirite?
 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Pro-mass incarceration: Yes, if you break laws; something of which you law bending degenerates know nothing. 

Mass incarceration wants the maximum number of people charged w the maximum possible penalty and sentenced to the maximum amount of time such that people (often with mental health or addiction issues) literally get life in prison for shoplifting or petty theft.   And whenever possible privately run prisons of course, like when a cohort republican judges and prosecutors were literally secretly selling kids to a private prison they were secretly invested in…and a Myspace Page mocking your principal got young elementary school kids sent to jail FOR REPUBLICAN PROFITS, another kid caught with a weed pipe got locked away and  committed suicide  They actually made a movie about it  

 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Anti-consumer. lol. Sorry, pervert - we're not the party that's driving businesses out of their cities. NYC is turning into a ghost town. lol

Yeah Republicans protect predatory lenders, false advertisers, always trying to remove labeling requirements…for a time they made it illegal in some states for milk not containing artificial hormones to label themselves as such, or compelled the producers to say on their label that nothing is wrong with artificial hormones in milk…..until a non-Republican court intervened).  The list is endless 

 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Anti-worker: Sorry, numbnuts; raising the minimum wage to $20 hr. only drives prices up. In essence, you're right back where you started. 

Anti/union, anti-worker, anti -workplace safety, threatening to go after social security, medicare, Obamacare. It goes way beyond minimum wage.  
 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Anti-woman: Already refuted. We defend women; you exploit them.

Lmao. That’s what the Taliban and the Saudis say with their “male guardianship” system. Republicans prescription for women to be stay-at-home baby machines and unpaid housekeepers is not “protecting” them. Nor is helping them defeat your insidious agenda “exploiting” them 

 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Anti-black: No, that's you slavers. You hate blacks. 

LMAO literally Republicans want to preserve monuments and honours for actual slavers. And openly despise and fear blacks in general to the point where they bemoan not being able to freely use the N word, deny racism exists and believe that the entire black race is so intelligent inferior they can’t form opinions for themselves or understand their own interests so have been tricked by evil Democrats. And then there’s the inconvenient truth that KKK and neo Nazis openly support Trump and have voted republican for many years. 
 

On 7/22/2024 at 11:25 PM, Deluge said:

Corporatist: Nope, just pro-American.

Republicans oppose corporate taxes, regulations on business, unions, consumer protections, environmental protections, etc. Republicans wee the ones pushing the “corporations are people “ argument and pushed for 2 separate landmark SCOTUS rulings tjat newly granted human-like attributes to corporations. Republicans argued corporations have the same rights as people and political contributions are free speech therefore limiting corporations political contributions equals free speech. The spigot has been wide open ever since. I 

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Republicans oppose pollution laws, deny climate change, oppose and reverse restrictions on poisoning the air and water, and try to  prevent pollution regulatory agencies from doing their jobs or enforcing existing laws.  The Trump White House literally legalized a pollutant known to cause brain damage….gotta grow your base somehow amirite?
 

The only brain damage here is yours. 

I get that you're a bit of a product of the dem brainwashing machine and as a result think all republicans are evil people who want to see the earth polluted, kids shot dead by free guns, and everyone making less than a million a year sold into slavery to reduce the national deficit. 

But that's STUPID.  Think for yourself kid. Seriously.  Living a life of hatred and anger based on a lie is not a good idea if you can avoid it. 

[Matthew]

On 7/19/2024 at 11:35 AM, West said:

 the Democrats act much like a cult.

I love when right wing people are oblivious to their own projection.

There is plenty to dislike about the Democratic party, how it operates, and it's consensus on certain issues. But it's a pretty big tent of different viewpoint and people who do not agree on fundamental issues. For example it has distinct left wing socialists camp and a centrist liberal capitalist camp. As well as caucuses of different labor and social groups. The republicans used to have a big tent coalition of different groups but the trump people gradually took over and have largely purged anyone who isn't a trump loyalist. Sounds a lot more like a cult to me.

Edited July 25, 2024 by Matthew

[Matthew]

How has this thread made it this far without anyone quoting republicans little napkin-length platform that they passed at their convention?

[West]

48 minutes ago, Matthew said:

I love when right wing people are oblivious to their own projection.

There is plenty to dislike about the Democratic party, how it operates, and it's consensus on certain issues. But it's a pretty big tent of different viewpoint and people who do not agree on fundamental issues. For example it has distinct left wing socialists camp and a centrist liberal capitalist camp. As well as caucuses of different labor and social groups. The republicans used to have a big tent coalition of different groups but the trump people gradually took over and have largely purged anyone who isn't a trump loyalist. Sounds a lot more like a cult to me.

Okay. So would I be welcomed in the party for believing that sex should be between one man and one woman in the context of marriage, and that abortion is wrong? 

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, West said:

Okay. So would I be welcomed in the party for believing that sex should be between one man and one woman in the context of marriage, and that abortion is wrong? 

SURE you would!!!  Absolutely, in fact they've got a special place reserved for you right over here by the edge of this cliff, lets just get you over there and settled in right now.... 

[Deluge]

On 7/24/2024 at 12:10 AM, BeaverFever said:

1. Republicans oppose pollution laws, deny climate change, oppose and reverse restrictions on poisoning the air and water, and try to  prevent pollution regulatory agencies from doing their jobs or enforcing existing laws.  The Trump White House literally legalized a pollutant known to cause brain damage….gotta grow your base somehow amirite?
 

2. Mass incarceration wants the maximum number of people charged w the maximum possible penalty and sentenced to the maximum amount of time such that people (often with mental health or addiction issues) literally get life in prison for shoplifting or petty theft.   And whenever possible privately run prisons of course, like when a cohort republican judges and prosecutors were literally secretly selling kids to a private prison they were secretly invested in…and a Myspace Page mocking your principal got young elementary school kids sent to jail FOR REPUBLICAN PROFITS, another kid caught with a weed pipe got locked away and  committed suicide  They actually made a movie about it  

 

3. Yeah Republicans protect predatory lenders, false advertisers, always trying to remove labeling requirements…for a time they made it illegal in some states for milk not containing artificial hormones to label themselves as such, or compelled the producers to say on their label that nothing is wrong with artificial hormones in milk…..until a non-Republican court intervened).  The list is endless 

 

4. Anti/union, anti-worker, anti -workplace safety, threatening to go after social security, medicare, Obamacare. It goes way beyond minimum wage.  
 

5. Lmao. That’s what the Taliban and the Saudis say with their “male guardianship” system. Republicans prescription for women to be stay-at-home baby machines and unpaid housekeepers is not “protecting” them. Nor is helping them defeat your insidious agenda “exploiting” them 

 

6. LMAO literally Republicans want to preserve monuments and honours for actual slavers. And openly despise and fear blacks in general to the point where they bemoan not being able to freely use the N word, deny racism exists and believe that the entire black race is so intelligent inferior they can’t form opinions for themselves or understand their own interests so have been tricked by evil Democrats. And then there’s the inconvenient truth that KKK and neo Nazis openly support Trump and have voted republican for many years. 
 

7. Republicans oppose corporate taxes, regulations on business, unions, consumer protections, environmental protections, etc. Republicans wee the ones pushing the “corporations are people “ argument and pushed for 2 separate landmark SCOTUS rulings tjat newly granted human-like attributes to corporations. Republicans argued corporations have the same rights as people and political contributions are free speech therefore limiting corporations political contributions equals free speech. The spigot has been wide open ever since. I 

1. Republicans oppose climate activists. You moonbats have been given all kinds of shit in the way of the Clean Air Act, land restrictions, and your stupid assed windmills. You've been given enough. Now it's time to stfu. 

2. Prisons aren't meant to be day camps; they're made to punish people who break the law. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. 

3. Sounds way, WAY too biased, so I'll get back to you on that one. 

4. Anti-communist/marxist/socialist. The whole thing needs an overhaul. 

5. I'm sorry, pervert, but you lost everyone with a soul at "Taliban". lol.

The truth is, you hate women; you hate anyone that doesn't fall in line with your globalist masters. It's not even a discussion. 

6. Wrong again, rainbow cult. The truth is, Republicans want to preserve US history, not destroy it like you wokejobs have been trying to do. It wasn't until about 2015 (when the woke virus went supernova) that you diaper dopers decided to trash those statues - everything was fine until then. Now some of you psychopaths even want to tear down Washington and Jefferson. LOL!!!

7. You bet your ass we oppose corporate taxes. We oppose a lot of taxes. If your hive masters can't run this country on a strict budget then it's time for them to go. It's that simple. 

 

Edited July 25, 2024 by Deluge

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, West said:

Okay. So would I be welcomed in the party for believing that sex should be between one man and one woman in the context of marriage, and that abortion is wrong? 

Maybe.  My parents were in that camp...

[Matthew]

3 hours ago, West said:

Okay. So would I be welcomed in the party for believing that sex should be between one man and one woman in the context of marriage, and that abortion is wrong? 

This may sound strange given the degree of right wing purity tests and RINO accusations etc, but no one in the Democratic Party is policing its members for their views. There is a policy consensus on many issues and some of them one agrees with and others one doesn't agree with. You're not forced to believe anything lest you get cast out. Literally the only thing Democrats have in common is that they aren't Republicans.

About 20% of people who lean Democrat are against gay marriage. My wife is in this boat. Obviously most democrats are ok with gay people having freedom to get married. Those democrats wanting to use state power to discriminate against them will probably not have their views represented.

[West]

18 minutes ago, Matthew said:

This may sound strange given the degree of right wing purity tests and RINO accusations etc, but no one in the Democratic Party is policing its members for their views. There is a policy consensus on many issues and some of them one agrees with and others one doesn't agree with. You're not forced to believe anything lest you get cast out. Literally the only thing Democrats have in common is that they aren't Republicans.

About 20% of people who lean Democrat are against gay marriage. My wife is in this boat. Obviously most democrats are ok with gay people having freedom to get married. Those democrats wanting to use state power to discriminate against them will probably not have their views represented.

I've experience the opposite with hardcore liberals. Lots are demanding you use your pronouns in your bio, demanded you take a covid vax/wear a mask, and are generally irrational when it comes to sharing your views that contradict theirs

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, Matthew said:

This may sound strange given the degree of right wing purity tests and RINO accusations etc, but no one in the Democratic Party is policing its members for their views. There is a policy consensus on many issues and some of them one agrees with and others one doesn't agree with. You're not forced to believe anything lest you get cast out. Literally the only thing Democrats have in common is that they aren't Republicans.

About 20% of people who lean Democrat are against gay marriage. My wife is in this boat. Obviously most democrats are ok with gay people having freedom to get married. Those democrats wanting to use state power to discriminate against them will probably not have their views represented.

They are absolutely policing members for their views, and a significant number of moderate left supporters have commented on it. 

And there are major policy divisions, for example issues surrounding jews and israel. 

Sorry but i think your vision of the democratic party right now is a little idyllic. 

[Black Dog]

4 hours ago, West said:

Okay. So would I be welcomed in the party for believing that sex should be between one man and one woman in the context of marriage, and that abortion is wrong? 

Would I be welcome in the Republican Party if I believed trans kids are entitled to gender affirming medical care, abortion should be legal at any stage of pregnancy and Donald Trump should be in jail? If not, why not?

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Would I be welcome in the Republican Party if I believed trans kids are entitled to gender affirming medical care, abortion should be legal at any stage of pregnancy and Donald Trump should be in jail? If not, why not?

Sure. The right doesn't burn people at the stake for having a different opinion. 

[West]

25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Would I be welcome in the Republican Party if I believed trans kids are entitled to gender affirming medical care, abortion should be legal at any stage of pregnancy and Donald Trump should be in jail? If not, why not?

Maybe be the more libertarian types but I would consider that child abuse and baby murder

Edited July 25, 2024 by West