CBC journalist deletes post saying Trump assassination attempt “could have been better”

[Legato]

2 minutes ago, reason10 said:

It is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Why do Canadian couples only have sex doggie style?

So they can screw and watch the hockey game at the same time.

Woof!

[herbie]

Yeah he worked for CBC.

His Boss was probably ROTFL.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, herbie said:

Yeah he worked for CBC.

His Boss was probably ROTFL.

One more reason to defund them. Not that we needed any more. 

[BeaverFever]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No you did not, you posted a couple of pretty mild republican statements

So in your world an elected official calling for Obama to be executed is a mild statement but saying Trump should have to pay for his own private security is an undeniable death threat. Seriously. 
 

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

If we wanted to go down THAT route i'd REALLY cream you - How many republican  'influencer's for example staged getting beaten up by two white thugs scream

Lol no you wouldn’t. Cable TV and the internet are CRAWLING with right wing trolls and influencers they must outnumber liberals 10:1. And are there any influencers  more vile than Alex Jones?  Jussie Smollett is not a Democrat influencer he was just an actor seeking attention. When he starts going on tour with AOC and speaking at Democrat rallies give me a call. Also he didn’t call for anyone to be executed he just falsely claimed he was attacked by bigots. Your standard for what constitutes hate speech is ridiculously low when it come to alleged Democrats and ridiculously high when it comes to Republicans. Do you honestly think you apply the same standards across the board??

 

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Saying trump doesn't deserve to be protected from being killed isn't a schoolyard insult.

Sorry YOU’RE the liar. That’s not what was said at all. What was said is that people convicted of a felony shouldn’t be entitled to taxpayer funded Secret Service protection, and that Trump can certainly afford his own private protection. Considering Republicans don’t believe people convicted of felonies should be allowed to vote or own firearms it’s not an unreasonable policy. Honestly you ought to be ashamed of yourself the way you misrepresent things   I tell you what silly boy you better support giving  me taxpayer funded 24/7 security otherwise I’ll complain that you’re calling for my death. Seriously you should just drop the dumb arguments they’re not helping you. BTW the schoolyard insult I was referring to was the politician who allegedly joked that trump wasn’t human  The motion to ban SS protection from convicted felons - which you would totally 100% support if Obama or Biden - were a convicted felon - wasn’t a joke or insult  

 

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - i remember that - kid you made a claim and i said  it wasn't true and you couldn't find ANY example of him saying what you said. 

That makes me right. 

LMAO you’re pathetic. Are trying to claim that calling someone a communist is completely different from calling them a Marxist and somehow my point about his verbal attacks has been disproven?    Are you suggesting that if I had said PP’s  got a long track record of insulting  Liberals by calling them Communists and Marxists you would have wholeheartedly agreed?   Are you even claiming there’s a difference?  You were proven wrong and a like typical conservative loser you respond to defeat and humiliation by denying reality  You’re like Donald Trump correcting that hurricane map with a friggin magic marker because he couldn’t admit he accidentally included a wrong state in a hurricane tweet   Or like Donald Trump denying he lost the 2020 election  You make us laugh but your ridiculous assertions like this convince nobody  

 

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But i don't just accuse you of lying. I demonstrate it. For example as noted i very clearly did say republicans do make those kinds of statements but that the dems are worse - YOU claimed i said they don't at all.  Thats a lie.  There you go 

No, you were vague and poorly articulated  what you meant by “worse”. How can it be the same but also worse?  Excessive accusations of lying when clearly that’s not what happened is also a sign of your shitty debating skills.   I mean in your earlier post when you incorrectly stated I didn’t provide a single example of a Republican politician making hateful comments when I actually had….were you lying?

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The dems and their supporters are FAR worse at inflammitory rhetoric - and look at the glee they're taking over this assassination attempt and how many are saying "awww too bad he missed". 

But you’ve already established that random people commenting on the internet don’t count you only want elected officials. In which case ZERO democrats said “too bad he missed.” If you want to include any random tweeter or YouTube personality the Republicans have LEGIONS of trolls who have been screaming vile things about Obama, Biden, Pelosi, AOC, Schiff, Schumer for years and there is equivalent on the left. Let’s not forget all the right wing hate groups like Patriot Front who police caught mustering in a Uhaul truck in full riot gear about to attack a nearby LGBTQ picnic . A smaller vile crowd also exists on the far right in Canada. No no you want all those excluded because you have one politician who joked trump wasn’t human and some politicians who understandably argue it’s absurd to deny felons the right to vote for the rest of their lives but to pay for their lifelong 24/7 security….which you think is worse than calling for Obama and others to be executed 

Edited July 18 by BeaverFever

[BeaverFever]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Listen  to yourself.  Trying to down play it as being "edgy". 

This is why people are turning away from the left. 

It is edgy. The photographer who planned and took the phot is described as some known for edgy photos. If it was Republican standing with an Obama head you would say it’s all in harmless good fun and controversial views shouldn’t be silenced no matter whose feelings get hurt and Dems are just trying to stifle free speech   That’s what Republicans have said in the past. 

[Nationalist]

13 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

So in your world an elected official calling for Obama to be executed is a mild statement but saying Trump should have to pay for his own private security is an undeniable death threat. Seriously. 
 

Lol no you wouldn’t. Cable TV and the internet are CRAWLING with right wing trolls and influencers they must outnumber liberals 10:1. And are there any influencers  more vile than Alex Jones?  Jussie Smollett is not a Democrat influencer he was just an actor seeking attention. When he starts going on tour with AOC and speaking at Democrat rallies give me a call. Also he didn’t call for anyone to be executed he just falsely claimed he was attacked by bigots. Your standard for what constitutes hate speech is ridiculously low when it come to alleged Democrats and ridiculously high when it comes to Republicans. Do you honestly think you apply the same standards across the board??

 

Sorry YOU’RE the liar. That’s not what was said at all. What was said is that people convicted of a felony shouldn’t be entitled to taxpayer funded Secret Service protection, and that Trump can certainly afford his own private protection. Considering Republicans don’t believe people convicted of felonies should be allowed to vote or own firearms it’s not an unreasonable policy. Honestly you ought to be ashamed of yourself the way you misrepresent things   I tell you what silly boy you better support giving  me taxpayer funded 24/7 security otherwise I’ll complain that you’re calling for my death. Seriously you should just drop the dumb arguments they’re not helping you. BTW the schoolyard insult I was referring to was the politician who allegedly joked that trump wasn’t human  The motion to ban SS protection from convicted felons - which you would totally 100% support if Obama or Biden - were a convicted felon - wasn’t a joke or insult  

 

LMAO you’re pathetic. Are trying to claim that calling someone a communist is completely different from calling them a Marxist and somehow my point about his verbal attacks has been disproven?    Are you suggesting that if I had said PP’s  got a long track record of insulting  Liberals by calling them Communists and Marxists you would have wholeheartedly agreed?   Are you even claiming there’s a difference?  You were proven wrong and a like typical conservative loser you respond to defeat and humiliation by denying reality  You’re like Donald Trump correcting that hurricane map with a friggin magic marker because he couldn’t admit he accidentally included a wrong state in a hurricane tweet   Or like Donald Trump denying he lost the 2020 election  You make us laugh but your ridiculous assertions like this convince nobody  

 

No, you were vague and poorly articulated  what you meant by “worse”. How can it be the same but also worse?  Excessive accusations of lying when clearly that’s not what happened is also a sign of your shitty debating skills. 
 

But you’ve already established that random people commenting on the internet don’t count you only want elected officials. In which case ZERO democrats said “too bad he missed.” If you want to include any random tweeter or YouTube personality the Republicans have LEGIONS of trolls who have been screaming vile things about Obama, Biden, Pelosi, AOC, Schiff, Schumer for years and there is equivalent on the left. Let’s not forget all the right wing hate groups like Patriot Front who police caught mustering in a Uhaul truck in full riot gear about to attack a nearby LGBTQ picnic . A smaller vile crowd also exists on the far right in Canada. No no you want all those excluded because you have one politician who joked trump wasn’t human and some politicians who understandably argue it’s absurd to deny felons the right to vote for the rest of their lives but to pay for their lifelong 24/7 security….which you think is worse than calling for Obama and others to be executed 

While it's true that Obama's 2 terms were polluted by a number of hate-driven scum posting and making all sorts of purely racial garbage...the same can be said about Trump. The only one to escape the racial attacks is Brandon...for the most part. He did stick his foot in his mouth in the 2019 campaign though. That was funny.

Anyway... is that what this TDS sh1t is about? Retribution for Obama? Dude...someone tried to assassinate the Republican candidate! Not hang his effigy...assassinate!

 

Edited July 18 by Nationalist

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Not at all.

So then what’s your point exactly? 

[BeaverFever]

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

While it's true that Obama's 2 terms were polluted by a number of hate-driven scum posting and making all sorts of purely racial garbage...the same can be said about Trump. The only one to escape the racial attacks is Brandon...for the most part. He did stick his foot in his mouth in the 2019 campaign though. That was funny.

Anyway... is that what this TDS sh1t is about? Retribution for Obama? Dude...someone tried to assassinate the Republican candidate! Not hang his effigy...assassinate!

 

Yeah a Republican gun nut whose phone search history revealed he was researching public appearances of other public figures including Biden, Merrick Garland and members of the British royal family in the days before the murder, in addition to researching his mental health. Sounds like he just wanted to kill a famous or powerful person. 

Edited July 18 by BeaverFever

[Perspektiv]

3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

And it is the opinion of millions of others.

Thats also your opinion. 

3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

This is his demographic. 

Yup, and white women and people over 50 years of age.

3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

if the shoe

The internet bandwidth would explode if Biden had someone shoot him due to a lapse of security.

Whoopi Goldberg would be making an hour special about it.

Heavy coverage, and there would be no doubt that Biden didn't deserve to be shot, in them not even questioning his divisive rhetoric as a potential cause.

[CdnFox]

48 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

So in your world an elected official calling for Obama to be executed is a mild statement but saying Trump should have to pay for his own private security is an undeniable death threat. Seriously. 

Which elected official called for obama to be executed.  You dumped a lot of useless trash there so maybe you buried something important and didn't realize it till now. 

And yes that was absolutely a death threat.  If you can't be honest there's no point in talking. Hell they even called it the "Disgraced" act.  

Again and again - you have to lie and pretend.  One person does a mock up of lynching obama and it's obviously intended to be funny and you call it a death threat or incitement to kill him.  A left wing person has a grotesque severed head of trump and you think it's comedy gold. 

I noted they're both horrible.  Neither are democrat elected officials but they're both wrong  but for you - ONLY the republican is wrong.  Despite they both intended them to be art or humor clearly. 

ANd not to mention you're having to go back more than 10 years to try to find examples of what the dems are doing now. 

54 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

o, you were vague and poorly articulated  what you meant by “worse

There was nothing vauge.  I was clear the republicans do it .  I was as straight up as humanly possible.  I gave them a  5 and the dems a 9.  5 is NOT zero. 

You claim i said they don't. It's as clear as that. 

You have to lie about what i said to make your point which is an outrageously common theme with you on the left. its' like you have to lie to get into the club or something 

56 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

But you’ve already established that random people commenting on the internet don’t count

No, i said you can't compare the two.  A democrat supporter is not the same as a democrat lawmaker. So if i give you a bunch of exaples of actual lawmakers doing it and say the party is doing it, you can't substitute people you think might be republican supporters but have nothing to do with the party. 

But you brought up supporters - even if it was from 10 - 20 years ago in your words. I"m pointing out what dem supporters are doing right this second.  And comparing suppoters with supporters is actually fair. 

Again - you've got to lie and twist to make your point. I don't. Which of us do you think is more likely on the right side of history here. 

42 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Yeah a Republican gun nut whose phone search history revealed he was researching public appearances of other public figures including Biden, Merrick Garland and members of the British royal family in the days before the murder, in addition to researching his mental health. Sounds like he just wanted to kill a famous or powerful person. 

A democrat donor you mean.  And of all his choices - he chose trump.  Why it's almost as if he heard something bad about trump from someone. Who do you think that would have been?

A man is dead here. You don't give a shit as long as the dems don't get blamed for it.  You're fine with the rhetoric that likely got that man killed.  That's what democrats are like. 

[CdnFox]

57 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

It is edgy.

it's not edgy at all.  It's a call to violence.  And she got in major shit for it. 

 

Quote

The photographer who planned and took the phot is described as some known for edgy photos.

Now he's known for a call to violence that proves the dem supporters are violent hate filled people. He should have stuck with edgy. 

Quote

If it was Republican standing with an Obama head you would say it’s all in harmless good fun and controversial views

Nope, i'd say it was horrible and that person should be considered for charges. 

That's the difference between your kind and my kind. I always think that kind of thing is wrong. You only do when it supoorts your narrative 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

So then what’s your point exactly? 

My point is that the Trump severed head effigy isn't ok either. Not at all.

The Obama hanging effigy isn't ok, neither is the Trump effigy. 

The difference is that Hannity, Levin, Limbaugh, etc didn't call that kind of thing "humor". It's inexcusable, period. Leftist leaders didn't condemn it. 

Why does Obama chime in about J6 but never had anything to say about riots at the WH 6 months earlier? 

Demis are vile. 

[DUI_Offender]

22 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

 

Heavy coverage, and there would be no doubt that Biden didn't deserve to be shot, in them not even questioning his divisive rhetoric as a potential cause.

Do you consider Trump the second coming of Jesus Christ?

[Perspektiv]

2 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Do you consider Trump the second coming of Jesus Christ?

Nope, just an incredibly narssisstic man, with a half dozen horse shoes up his a**.

Jesus died for people. For humanity. The epitome of selflessness.

Trump avoided military conflict and threw his most loyal foot soldiers under the bus because the refused to be yes men when it conflated with their morals.

I just think he is a better candidate than Biden.

That's not an endorsement. Its pointing to the obvious. 

If Biden was a car tire, he would be so bald, explosion would be imminent. 

It literally is like picking between between a vacation in Haiti, or one in Somalia.

Both suck. One does less, but envy isn't what people would be feeling about the pick you made.

[DUI_Offender]

43 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Nope, just an incredibly narssisstic man, with a half dozen horse shoes up his a**.

Jesus died for people. For humanity. The epitome of selflessness.

Trump avoided military conflict and threw his most loyal foot soldiers under the bus because the refused to be yes men when it conflated with their morals.

I just think he is a better candidate than Biden.

That's not an endorsement. Its pointing to the obvious. 

If Biden was a car tire, he would be so bald, explosion would be imminent. 

It literally is like picking between between a vacation in Haiti, or one in Somalia.

Both suck. One does less, but envy isn't what people would be feeling about the pick you made.

Well, I think Biden is headed to defeat. The Democrats know something that the public does not. It would make no sense for some of Biden's most influential allies to start calling on him to resign. I am convinced Biden is in cognitive decline, and it will just get worse from here.

The problem with the Democrats, is they either chooses great candidates that can win (Clinton, Obama, etc) or candidates who had no business leading the party (i.e Hilary Clinton- voted most unpopular first lady in US history in 2001).  I am still convinced that the only Democrat who can sink Trump, would be Obama, and he cannot run. 

[CouchPotato]

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Trump avoided military conflict and threw his most loyal foot soldiers under the bus because the refused to be yes men when it conflated with their morals.

I just think he is a better candidate than Biden.

That's not an endorsement. Its pointing to the obvious.

In Trump's defense though, in spite of all his failings, some of his bad qualities turned out to be positives for him. The media was kind of skewering guys like Romney and McCain. McCain was the one that the progressives were supposed to like, but once he was running against a Democrat it was gloves off. Trump was a loudmouth who was louder than the media. He also seems to be pretty stubborn, and the lawfare of the past couple years hasn't made him back off.  In that sense, he has been more effective than any other Republican. He says some really dumb stuff sometimes, though. I mean I think some people love that he speaks like a regular Joe talking to his friends at a bar, and not like a politician, but sometimes the stuff some regular Joe says to his friends at a bar after a few drinks are things that don't go over well publically.

[Perspektiv]

6 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

He says some really dumb stuff sometimes, though. I mean I think some people love that he speaks like a

He has actually done some brilliant things with some of his policies. He will not get credit for it, because in times of greatness, he tends to shoot himself in the foot.

He is incredibly vindictive and petty.

Instead of focusing on making America great, he would get bogged down by Twitter wars.

Desperately trying to get the last word in against media trying to take him down. 

He would make it too easy for them to get their "clip of the day", wasting countless time.

[CouchPotato]

9 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

He has actually done some brilliant things with some of his policies. He will not get credit for it, because in times of greatness, he tends to shoot himself in the foot.

He is incredibly vindictive and petty.

Instead of focusing on making America great, he would get bogged down by Twitter wars.

Desperately trying to get the last word in against media trying to take him down. 

He would make it too easy for them to get their "clip of the day", wasting countless time.

Absolutely agree. I like that he is combative and off-the-cuff. But sometimes he really just doesn't think before he speaks. He speaks in generalizations all the time, too. He could change a few things about his communication style and become far more effective.

As for the vindictiveness and pettiness, no disagreement there, but he oddly also comes across to me as a very likeable person too at times and kind of a pussycat. He has a big mouth. He has insulted half the politicians in his own party. At the same time, he seems to be able to put some disputes behind him pretty fast. No matter what you think of him, the guy is a character.

[robosmith]

On 7/17/2024 at 2:10 PM, Legato said:

Then why are they always shut.

How can you tell? You can see THROUGH "dustbin lids"? No, you're just TROLLING as USUAL.

[BeaverFever]

On 7/18/2024 at 5:22 PM, WestCanMan said:

Not at all.

So when did Fox News or a member of the GOP leadership say that it was just humour? Because the problem here isn't with Kathy Griffin, it's with the insistence that it was humour. 

https://fstoppers.com/news/bill-maher-interviews-kathy-griffin-about-her-infamous-beheaded-trump-photoshoot-231628

Listen to Maher and Griffin just keep insisting it was nothing more than a bad joke, and people were being babies for being offended by it. Then they acted like the Trump administration was somehow fascist because she got investigated for it.

Who said that the Obama lynching effigies were jokes? I've never said that is funny to me, or that I could see how someone else would find that funny. 

So the Republican Obama lynching effigies were legitimate hateful right/wing threats?  What about the “Hang Trudeau” T-shirts and hoodies?

 

 

[BeaverFever]

Laura Loomer Cheers Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s Death in Racist Rant

 

Laura Loomer, a white nationalist and Donald Trump’s one-time favored pick for a campaign role, sparked outrage on social media by metaphorically dancing on a Black Congresswoman’s grave.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), a progressive voice in Congress who fought for civil and women’s rights, died Friday evening at 74, shortly after she announced she was battling pancreatic cancer.

 

 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

So the Republican Obama lynching effigies were legitimate hateful right/wing threats?  What about the “Hang Trudeau” T-shirts and hoodies?

Listen up stupid.

There's a difference between 1. "Some outliers lumped into but not accepted into a group did something " and 2. "The leaders of a group did something, so anyone who still follows them is, at the very least, giving their tacit approval of it" and 3. "Members of a group said/did something and the leaders of the group endorsed it".

1. FYI just because people are voting for Trump or Biden doesn't mean that Trump or Biden like them. It's a binary choice, dingus. There are all kinds of people who have to plug their nose to vote for one or the other of those two for their own reasons, but whose views aren't fully aligned with the leader of the party. All racists will choose the party of less immigration, that doesn't mean Trump agrees with everything that they say and do. All islamic terrorists will choose the party that's more tolerant of their propaganda and lets more terrorists into the country, that doesn't mean Biden agrees with everything that they say and do.
2. How passionately you follow someone like Jesus, mohammed, Trump or Biden is a good indicator of how much you support the things that they say and do. If you follow mohammed devoutly, you can't really pretend that you're opposed to violent religious bigotry or forcing people into slavery. If you support Biden you can't pretend that you care about the southern border or integrity. Still, you could be a partial follower, and not engage in chopping the heads off of people for not converting your religion. Or you could be a partial follower of a religion and not live up to all of it's obligations.
3. When there are riots going on, it makes no difference whether you incited the violence (like Obama did), or you endorse it (like Kamala did by actively encouraging people to bail out the scant few rioters were arrested), you are still guilty of it. If the leaders of the GOP and Conservatives endorsed effigies of Obama/Trudeau being lynched, then you need to provide a cite for that, because I'm unaware of GOP/PC leaders endorsing that type of thing. 

Edited July 21 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

So the Republican Obama lynching effigies were legitimate hateful right/wing threats?  What about the “Hang Trudeau” T-shirts and hoodies?

 

 

Every time you refuse to address your own 'teams' failings and try to deflect. 

YOUR people have done what they have done.  RIGHT NOW your people are using emotional and violent language calling for violence against trump saying that 'if he isnt' stopped it's the end of democracy' etc etc. 

That is happening RIGHT NOW.  But you want to blow that off and LIE about what  the republicans do.  Meanwhile the last politicans shot have all been republicans - a bunch at a ball game by someone quoting bernie sanders and now this kid deciding to kill trump. 

It's not republican rhetoric that's getting people killed or shot at, it's democrat.