blackbird Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 18 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: You changed your tune. Earlier you spoke like this below not Conservative party of Canada. This is copied and pasted from your post. First and foremost they believe in Christian principles, which involves worshiping the true God of the Bible and shunning evil. Above is not Conservative party of Canada. Read my whole comment which was 10 hours ago. I never changed my tune. You misunderstood what I said. I said " I think I already said what social conservatives believe. First and foremost they believe in Christian principles, which involves worshiping the true God of the Bible and shunning evil. " I was referring to social conservatives. I was describing "Social conservatives". Social conservative believe in Christian principles. They are a very small part of the Conservative Party of Canada. So you are correct, social conservatives are not the Conservative Party of Canada. Quote
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: It's literally the same thing. Before you say anything else I would go look up the word hierarchy in the dictionary if I were you Ah yes you're doing the same "a grocery list and Schindler's list are both lists" thing that other retarded ape tried, very deep stuff. Now get back to work. 1 Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 34 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Ah yes you're doing the same "a grocery list and Schindler's list are both lists" t Are you claiming they're NOT both lists? The difference between them ISN"T that they're not both lists, but rather that you've emotionally invested in one and not the other. In this case tho they really are exactly the same thing. They're both lists of people who someone feels is more important and deserving than someone else. A 'hierarchy'. They are both hierarchal lists that give certain people an excuse to treat some better than others and attack or repress people they don't like. They're ... the... same... thing. One one list - "this person is better than that person because i perceive their ethnicity or genetics to be of greater significance". Not them as a person, but as a group. The other is "this person is better than that person because i perceive their ethnicity or genetics to be of greater significance". Not them as a person but as a group. Like the meme says - "its the same picture". All you've done is re-invented racial/ethnic supremacy in a format you find socially acceptable, but it's the same thing Quote
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Are you claiming they're NOT both lists? The difference between them ISN"T that they're not both lists, but rather that you've emotionally invested in one and not the other. In this case tho they really are exactly the same thing. They're both lists of people who someone feels is more important and deserving than someone else. A 'hierarchy'. They are both hierarchal lists that give certain people an excuse to treat some better than others and attack or repress people they don't like. Actually the key similarity between the hierarchy of racial supremacy and the leftist hierarchy of victimhood is that only fascists believe in them. 1 Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 8 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Actually the key similarity between the hierarchy of racial supremacy and the leftist hierarchy of victimhood is that only fascists believe in them. Sigh. You don't know what a 'facist' is do you. Please don't use words just because you think they sound cool. If by 'believe' in them you mean give them any stock or value, and if by 'facists' you mean authoritarians in general, then your statement is probably true. People who are authoritarian tend to believe in such things, and often come up with their own hierarchies based on their own preferences. But if you're the kind of person who likes to control others then you definitely want them broken down into categories so you can appeal to one group or the other as needed. Quote
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Sigh. You don't know what a 'facist' is do you. Please don't use words just because you think they sound cool. Well I know how to spell it, that's a start. Quote If by 'believe' in them you mean give them any stock or value, and if by 'facists' you mean authoritarians in general, then your statement is probably true. No, I mean that the leftist "hierarchy of victimhood" is a figment of the febrile minds of right wing nutcases projecting their own anxieties outward. I can find multiple examples here of lead-poisoned boomers lamenting how straight white men are the real victims of society today. 1 Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: Well I know how to spell it, that's a start. No, I mean that the leftist "hierarchy of victimhood" is a figment of the febrile minds of right wing nutcases projecting their own anxieties outward. I can find multiple examples here of lead-poisoned boomers lamenting how straight white men are the real victims of society today. Oh - well then you're an !diot. Sorry - i thought you might have an actual point for a change, that's my bad The intersectional hierarchy has been written about in vast volumes by the left, its recognized constantly, you will frequently see left wing gatherings organizing people's speaking order based on that and in fact even the last ndp convention did that where your turn to speak was based 100 percent on your position on the intersectional hierarchy. LOL - I have no idea why i thought you'd actually know something about what you were talking about. All i can say is i'm rarely that unreasonably optimistic Sorry for the inconvenience. Quote
User Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 35 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Actually the key similarity between the hierarchy of racial supremacy and the leftist hierarchy of victimhood is that only fascists believe in them. So, now you are playing dumb on the leftist hierarchy of victimhood... You yourself play this game on the forum pushing it. 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Michael Hardner Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 14 minutes ago, User said: So, now you are playing dumb on the leftist hierarchy of victimhood... You yourself play this game on the forum pushing it. @Black Dog ... you see, you're dumb in not believing in this made up game. And so paradoxically you are playing a game yourself. 🤔 When did we first start getting these people on here... Anthony come back 😭 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
User Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 20 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: When did we first start getting these people on here... Anthony come back 😭 Oh please... you are cheering on someone who had just said: "only fascists believe in them." Give me a break. 1 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 (edited) 1 hour ago, User said: So, now you are playing dumb on the leftist hierarchy of victimhood... You yourself play this game on the forum pushing it. Cite required. 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Oh - well then you're an !diot. Sorry - i thought you might have an actual point for a change, that's my bad The intersectional hierarchy has been written about in vast volumes by the left, its recognized constantly, you will frequently see left wing gatherings organizing people's speaking order based on that and in fact even the last ndp convention did that where your turn to speak was based 100 percent on your position on the intersectional hierarchy. LOL - I have no idea why i thought you'd actually know something about what you were talking about. All i can say is i'm rarely that unreasonably optimistic Sorry for the inconvenience. "Intersectional hierarchy" lmfao did you read that somewhere or did you come up with it yourself, like do you not understand how those two concepts are mutually exclusive lol KYS. Edited July 4 by Black Dog Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: @Black Dog ... you see, you're dumb in not believing in this made up game. And so paradoxically you are playing a game yourself. 🤔 When did we first start getting these people on here... Anthony come back 😭 LOL mikey - just can't resist jumping in to promote a hard left agenda when it's in trouble eh? Mr "i am a conservative" Like i said tonnes of stuff written on this and practiced by the left. But can't let facts or reason hold you back can you Quote
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 4 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Cite required. he's talking about you. If you can't be bothered to read your own crap then I don't know why you expect anyone else will. Quote kys Awww no i've made you cry again . Poor little guy, reduced to wishing others would die like that. Must be so hard for you maybe you should consider just telling the truth and using facts and reason. You will wind up crying to yourself a lot less. Quote
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 (edited) 43 minutes ago, CdnFox said: he's talking about you. If you can't be bothered to read your own crap then I don't know why you expect anyone else will. lol i'm sure he's happy you've come along to try and wipe his ass. Quote Awww no i've made you cry again . Poor little guy, reduced to wishing others would die like that. Must be so hard for you the emojis are out which means you're shitting your pants rn, possibly literally. Such an obvious tell and yet you can't stop doing it. You should absolutely kys. Quote maybe you should consider just telling the truth and using facts and reason. You will wind up crying to yourself a lot less. Rich coming from a pissy little twat who has to lie about his opponent's positions to "win" arguments. Loser. Edited July 4 by Black Dog Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: lol Sure you say that now, but will you remember it later? Quote
User Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Cite required. LOL, sure. Pretend like you were not pushing this nonsense in the "Are You Racist?" thread. Where you clearly were playing the hierarchy of victimhood game. Unless you are now saying there is white culture, have no issues with a white pride month, it is not stupid to be proud to be white etc... And to the point of this thread, we are talking about a special carve out in the law to ignore naked people in public... well, because it is an LGBTQ event and they are special people. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Black Dog Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 (edited) 8 minutes ago, User said: LOL, sure. Pretend like you were not pushing this nonsense in the "Are You Racist?" thread. Where you clearly were playing the hierarchy of victimhood game. Unless you are now saying there is white culture, have no issues with a white pride month, it is not stupid to be proud to be white etc... Saying white people don't need a white history month and there's no such thing as white culture has nothing to do with a "hierarchy of victimhood" but then you never understood the argument in that thread either ('cause you're dumb). Quote And to the point of this thread, we are talking about a special carve out in the law to ignore naked people in public... well, because it is an LGBTQ event and they are special people. Who is saying their should be a special carve out of LGBTQ people? 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Sure you say that now, but will you remember it later? Since when has what people actually said ever mattered to you, we know you just make up whatever you want. Edited July 4 by Black Dog Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Michael Hardner Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 10 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Who is saying their should be a special carve out of LGBTQ people? I already pointed out that there are non LGBTQ naked events but since that disproved a point, it was ignored. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
CdnFox Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 17 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Since when has what people actually said ever mattered to you, we know you just make up whatever you want. I'm sure the voices in your head tell you that's true This is why you always wind up looking stupid when we talk. You can't stick to facts, you can't use reason or logic, and then you just make shit up whenever you have nothing intelligent to say, which is most of the time. Quote
User Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 6 hours ago, Black Dog said: Saying white people don't need a white history month and there's no such thing as white culture has nothing to do with a "hierarchy of victimhood" but then you never understood the argument in that thread either ('cause you're dumb). Oh, really. So why do black people "need" a black history month? Why do black people get to have a "black culture" and white people don't? LOL 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
User Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 6 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: I already pointed out that there are non LGBTQ naked events but since that disproved a point, it was ignored. I am not sure you did more than make a couple of vague claims that there were... did you offer a specific example? 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Michael Hardner Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 (edited) 7 hours ago, User said: I am not sure you did more than make a couple of vague claims that there were... did you offer a specific example? Oh, ok fair. The Naked Bike Day was mentioned... That's not a gay event. People ride naked through the streets. Why is it not a big thing? Because there's no Press machine or money attached to it. There's also a nude beach, toplessness... nudity isn't as taboo as it used to be. Edited July 5 by Michael Hardner Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Black Dog Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 13 hours ago, User said: Oh, really. So why do black people "need" a black history month? Why do black people get to have a "black culture" and white people don't? LOL I already explained this to you, you stunned c*nt, I'm not going to waste time trying to explain it again. 19 hours ago, CdnFox said: I'm sure the voices in your head tell you that's true Get a new bit. Quote This is why you always wind up looking stupid when we talk. You can't stick to facts, you can't use reason or logic, and then you just make shit up whenever you have nothing intelligent to say, which is most of the time. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Get a new bit Get a brain. I've told you before, your stupid isn't my fault Quote
Black Dog Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 39 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Get a brain. I've told you before, your stupid isn't my fault This weekend looks like it's gonna be beautiful, you should head to the lake, get some sun, drown yourself. 1 Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.