Jack Smith Admits FBI Added Classified Sleeves To Documents

[gatomontes99]

 

The FBI brought their own classified document sleeves, added them to documents and then took pictures that they leaked to the press.

Everything the Democrats do is a lie. Everything.

How could they know of the documents were classified? They can't. Even if the document was marked classified, it might have been declassified prior to that day. They added the sleeves to make the case look better.

Don't forget that Smith has a history of setting up Republican politicians for prosecution.

[robosmith]

"Evidence" presented to the press means NOTHING.

Except that your "gotcha" failed, because an exhibit that accurately represents REALITY for show, is not even misleading let alone a lie. LMAO

Just like the documents being misordered when put back in the boxes means NOTHING.

Desperation REVEALED. 

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"Evidence" presented to the press means NOTHING.

Except that your "gotcha" failed, because an exhibit that accurately represents REALITY for show, is not even misleading let alone a lie. LMAO

Just like the documents being misordered when put back in the boxes means NOTHING.

Desperation REVEALED. 

Indeed. You reveal your own stoopidity on an hourly basis around here.

Oh well...

What comes around...goes around.

[gatomontes99]

25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"Evidence" presented to the press means NOTHING.

Except that your "gotcha" failed, because an exhibit that accurately represents REALITY for show, is not even misleading let alone a lie. LMAO

Just like the documents being misordered when put back in the boxes means NOTHING.

Desperation REVEALED. 

Yes. You did reveal your desperation.

Fyi, Some of the "props" from the "show pics" ended up in evidence.

[CdnFox]

42 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"Evidence" presented to the press means NOTHING.

Except that your "gotcha" failed, because an exhibit that accurately represents REALITY for show, is not even misleading let alone a lie. LMAO

Just like the documents being misordered when put back in the boxes means NOTHING.

Desperation REVEALED. 

If you tamper with the evidence at the scene, the evidence chain is compromised. That creates some pretty serious problems for them moving forward

[robosmith]

51 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Indeed. You reveal your own stoopidity on an hourly basis around here.

Oh well...

What comes around...goes around.

Indeed, YOU NEVER provide reasons for ^these STUPID OPINIONS OF YOURS. AKA BANKRUPT. LMAO

38 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yes. You did reveal your desperation.

I'm not the one who's pretending mockups for the press mean something. Duh

38 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Fyi, Some of the "props" from the "show pics" ended up in evidence.

Prove it.

[gatomontes99]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Indeed, YOU NEVER provide reasons for ^these STUPID OPINIONS OF YOURS. AKA BANKRUPT. LMAO

I'm not the one who's pretending mockups for the press mean something. Duh

Prove it.

I don't have to prove it. It was widely reported.

 

But here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/newly-released-photos-from-fbis-mar-a-lago-search-show-trump-boxes/ar-BB1oSzdP

It was revealed some time ago that the FBI team left placeholders.

 

[robosmith]

53 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I don't have to prove it. It was widely reported.

 

But here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/newly-released-photos-from-fbis-mar-a-lago-search-show-trump-boxes/ar-BB1oSzdP

It was revealed some time ago that the FBI team left placeholders.

 

NOTHING ^HERE about mocked up photos being included as evidence in court filings.

This is the last time I will EVER click on your naked empty links. Next time, quote your evidence HERE.

 

[gatomontes99]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NOTHING ^HERE about mocked up photos being included as evidence in court filings.

This is the last time I will EVER click on your naked empty links. Next time, quote your evidence HERE.

 

No, that proves the point that the FBI left nonevidentuary objects in with evidence. Not some rando point you decided you wanted me to prove. Contaminated evidence should be thrown out. Jack Smith should get the maximum sentence of 10 years for falsifying evidence.

Edited June 26, 2024 by gatomontes99

[WestCanMan]

Whaddya know... The FBI is lying and committing crimes for the DNC again. 

And make no mistake: if any of those doctored photos were provided as evidence, without disclosing to the judge that the pics were staged, that's yet another FBI crime. 

This is also the FBI working with the media, just like with the raid at Roger Stone's home.

[Rebound]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

The FBI brought their own classified document sleeves, added them to documents and then took pictures that they leaked to the press.

Everything the Democrats do is a lie. Everything.

How could they know of the documents were classified? They can't. Even if the document was marked classified, it might have been declassified prior to that day. They added the sleeves to make the case look better.

Don't forget that Smith has a history of setting up Republican politicians for prosecution.

You do understand that they cannot give photographs of the actual classified information to the media, because it's classified.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

No, that proves the point that the FBI left nonevidentuary objects in with evidence. Not some rando point you decided you wanted me to prove. Contaminated evidence should be thrown out. Jack Smith should get the maximum sentence of 10 years for falsifying evidence.

Or they can just remove the mocked up folder sleeves, since they are obvious and easily removed. Duh

Good thing you backtracked on your claim they were included in court filings. LMAO

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Fyi, Some of the "props" from the "show pics" ended up in evidence.

"in evidence" means it was filed with the court. Duh

Edited June 26, 2024 by robosmith

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You do understand that they cannot give photographs of the actual classified information to the media, because it's classified.

Did they give the media the same kind of doctored photos of Joe's classified docs? 

[gatomontes99]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Or they can just remove the mocked up folder sleeves, since they are obvious and easily removed. Duh

Good thing you backtracked on your claim they were included in court filings. LMAO

Oh, lucky you. JK just posted a video explaining that those photos with doctored and staged docs were used as evidence.

BTW, they did white out the other docs, so it's not like they needed the covers. They did it for show.

 

Edited June 26, 2024 by gatomontes99

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Did they give the media the same kind of doctored photos of Joe's classified docs? 

Did Joe refuse to return his docs and LIE about not having them?

No search warrant was necessary to search Joe's properties.

Edited June 26, 2024 by robosmith

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh, lucky you. JK just posted a video explaining that those photos with doctored and staged docs were used as evidence.

Your video says nothing about staged docs filed as evidence. Duh

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

BTW, they did white out the other docs, so it's not like they needed the covers. They did it for show.

Always make a good presentation to the press. LMAO

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did Joe refuse to return his docs and LIE about not having them?

No search warrant was necessary to search Joe's properties.

No one asked.

Joe had docs all over his home and garage, etc, for years and no one bothered to ask or to check. 

When the FBI found them, did they put sexy "CONFIDENTIAL"sleeves on them and take photos of them, and then leak the pics to the media? And did they present the pics to a judge as evidence without telling the judge that the sleeves were added?

If it's standard practice then there's nothing to see here, right?

If they did it to Trump but not to Biden then this is a big deal right?

Also, Biden pimped his confidential docs at his home to get a lucrative book deal signed. He actually made money off of his illegal document storage. He wasn't "reel reel innosint compaired to Twump", as you'd like to pretend.

[gatomontes99]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No one asked.

Joe had docs all over his home and garage, etc, for years and no one bothered to ask or to check. 

When the FBI found them, did they put sexy "CONFIDENTIAL"sleeves on them and take photos of them, and then leak the pics to the media? And did they present the pics to a judge as evidence without telling the judge that the sleeves were added?

If it's standard practice then there's nothing to see here, right?

If they did it to Trump but not to Biden then this is a big deal right?

Also, Biden pimped his confidential docs at his home to get a lucrative book deal signed. He actually made money off of his illegal document storage. He wasn't "reel reel innosint compaired to Twump", as you'd like to pretend.

The FBI didn't find them. Someone tipped off the FBI that the docs existed. That was the beginning of the Dump Joe campaign.

 

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your video says nothing about staged docs filed as evidence. Duh

Always make a good presentation to the press. LMAO

Yes she did. They used one picture in particular. It was used to persuade Cannon that a third party review wasnt necessary.

[Aristides]

If a document is marked classified, it makes sense to put it in a classified cover does it not. 

[robosmith]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No one asked.

Joe had docs all over his home and garage, etc, for years and no one bothered to ask or to check. 

When the FBI found them, did they put sexy "CONFIDENTIAL"sleeves on them and take photos of them, and then leak the pics to the media? And did they present the pics to a judge as evidence without telling the judge that the sleeves were added?

If it's standard practice then there's nothing to see here, right?

If they did it to Trump but not to Biden then this is a big deal right?

Also, Biden pimped his confidential docs at his home to get a lucrative book deal signed. He actually made money off of his illegal document storage. He wasn't "reel reel innosint compaired to Twump", as you'd like to pretend.

Joe didn't hide his documents and LIE about not having them.

That is Trump's obstruction of justice and why he is being charged for lying about them for 2 years necessitating a search warrant. Duh

12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The FBI didn't find them. Someone tipped off the FBI that the docs existed. That was the beginning of the Dump Joe campaign.

 

Yes she did. They used one picture in particular. It was used to persuade Cannon that a third party review wasnt necessary.

They showed a pic in the video because they were released TO THE PRESS. Nothing was said about it being filed AS EVIDENCE.

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Joe didn't hide his documents and LIE about not having them.

That is Trump's obstruction of justice and why he is being charged for lying about them for 2 years necessitating a search warrant. Duh

They showed a pic in the video because they were released TO THE PRESS. Nothing was said about it being filed AS EVIDENCE.

No they talked about it being an exhibit.

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Aristides said:

If a document is marked classified, it makes sense to put it in a classified cover does it not. 

Of course they HAVE TO to make it public. Because it's CLASSIFIED.

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

No they talked about it being an exhibit.

The only thing that matters is EVIDENCE to be used against Trump.

NO ONE was representing mock ups for press release as EVIDENCE.

https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/how-introduce-exhibits-trial#:~:text=Documents%2C photographs%2C or other items,your trial to do this.

Quote

Documents, photographs, or other items you bring to trial to help prove your case are called exhibits. The judge must to allow you to admit the exhibit as evidence in order for you to use it in your case. The court has specific rules and procedures you must follow during your trial to do this.

 

Edited June 26, 2024 by robosmith

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

If a document is marked classified, it makes sense to put it in a classified cover does it not. 

That's neither here nor there.

If a document is classified, and the FBI finds it, they should treat it the same way whether it's in Biden's home, from an anonymous tip, or at Trump's home, after he was asked to return it, because in both instances the exact same laws have been broken.

If docs at Trump's home are slipped into classified jackets and photographed as such, and then the photos are leaked to the media and sent to a judge as evidence without telling anyone that the cover was put there by the FBI, then the same should happen to docs at Biden's place.

Does that makes sense? Does it make sense for the FBI to gather evidence and present it to a judge in the same way in both instances? When there's a glaring difference, isn't that significant?

In this case, it appears as though there's a massive difference between the way the FBI treated Trump, against whom they've already been convicted of committing crimes, and the way they treated Biden. It seems as though they were protecting Biden again, just like they got caught doing with the laptop and diary incidents.

[Fluffypants]

30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course they HAVE TO to make it public. Because it's CLASSIFIED.

The only thing that matters is EVIDENCE to be used against Trump.

NO ONE was representing mock ups for press release as EVIDENCE.

https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/how-introduce-exhibits-trial#:~:text=Documents%2C photographs%2C or other items,your trial to do this.

 

Lets make it easy, what law enforcement reason was there to take pictures of them like that at all.

Its obvious they put the sleeves on them to make them look sexy for the press.

[Aristides]

26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's neither here nor there.

If a document is classified, and the FBI finds it, they should treat it the same way whether it's in Biden's home, from an anonymous tip, or at Trump's home, after he was asked to return it, because in both instances the exact same laws have been broken.

If docs at Trump's home are slipped into classified jackets and photographed as such, and then the photos are leaked to the media and sent to a judge as evidence without telling anyone that the cover was put there by the FBI, then the same should happen to docs at Biden's place.

Does that makes sense? Does it make sense for the FBI to gather evidence and present it to a judge in the same way in both instances? When there's a glaring difference, isn't that significant?

In this case, it appears as though there's a massive difference between the way the FBI treated Trump, against whom they've already been convicted of committing crimes, and the way they treated Biden. It seems as though they were protecting Biden again, just like they got caught doing with the laptop and diary incidents.

So you know for a fact that the documents Biden had weren't already in classified folders? Biden reported he had them and turned them over voluntarily, he didn't refuse to hand them over, brag about them or show them to people without security clearances.

If document is marked classified, you put it into a classified folder, not leave it out where anyone can read it or take pictures of the document itself for the press. IT'S CLASSIFIED!

Edited June 26, 2024 by Aristides