gatomontes99 Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 FORMER GOV. ANDREW CUOMO (D-NY): That case, the Attorney General's case in New York, frankly should have never been brought. And if his name was not Donald Trump, and if he wasn't running for president from the former AG in New York, I'm telling you that case would have never been brought. And that's what is offensive to people. And it should be. Because if there's anything left, it's belief in the justice system. It would not have been brought if his name wasn't Trump? AKA banana republic tactics. 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 A rare moment of honesty. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
myata Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
gatomontes99 Posted June 25, 2024 Author Report Posted June 25, 2024 5 minutes ago, myata said: Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. Ok ok.. your appeal to authority fallacy is noted. But if the grand jury is hyperpartisan as well, does your statement hold water? 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
ironstone Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 1 hour ago, myata said: Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. Speaking of Alvin Bragg and the notion that no one is above the law... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/outrage-as-manhattan-da-bragg-s-office-drops-nearly-all-cases-from-columbia-university-s-anti-israel-protest/ar-BB1oBDB4 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
myata Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: if the grand jury is hyperpartisan as well, does your statement hold water? What better option do we have? One fat mouth professing all-time truths? An unquestionable Idol? A pharaoh? The democracy is not perfect and it can be dysfunctional too. But if the next choice is authoritarianism or totalitarian cult I would take one long and hard thought. Not like we didn't know what it entails and how it ends. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Fluffypants Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 It was selective prosecution as well, Hilary Clinton did what they accuse Trump of doing by hiding campaign expenses and calling them legal expenses around the same time and unlike Trump used campaign funds got hammered by the FEC and fined for it. Quote
Nationalist Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 2 hours ago, myata said: Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. Except hundreds of people who violently blocked a synagogue in L.A. Instead Garland used the FACE laws to jail a 75 yr old lady. The bottom line is... What comes around...goes around. 22 minutes ago, myata said: What better option do we have? One fat mouth professing all-time truths? An unquestionable Idol? A pharaoh? The democracy is not perfect and it can be dysfunctional too. But if the next choice is authoritarianism or totalitarian cult I would take one long and hard thought. Not like we didn't know what it entails and how it ends. Equal application of the law would be a good idea. But then you fcking Libbies couldn't cheat. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 2 hours ago, myata said: Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. It is a long-standing joke that you can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich. Quote
myata Posted June 25, 2024 Report Posted June 25, 2024 1 hour ago, User said: It is a long-standing joke that Then you don't have a working justice system. Is a joke? Iran, Russia or North Korea, better? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
robosmith Posted June 26, 2024 Report Posted June 26, 2024 2 hours ago, Fluffypants said: It was selective prosecution as well, Hilary Clinton did what they accuse Trump of doing by hiding campaign expenses and calling them legal expenses around the same time and unlike Trump used campaign funds got hammered by the FEC and fined for it. You keep spreading this BULLSHIT with ZERO evidence. Hillary had no businesses in NY, so there was no falsified business records. Duh The DNC hired lawyers who hired a researcher for OPPOSITION research. NOTHING like what Trump did. AKA, no business records involved. Quote
WestCanMan Posted June 26, 2024 Report Posted June 26, 2024 3 hours ago, myata said: What better option do we have? One fat mouth professing all-time truths? An unquestionable Idol? A pharaoh? The democracy is not perfect and it can be dysfunctional too. But if the next choice is authoritarianism or totalitarian cult I would take one long and hard thought. Quit lying, weasel. If you cared about the end of democracy then you'd care about FBI crimes, DOJ show trials, TNI's complete domination & disinformation campaigns, etc. You wouldn't be waving pom-poms for it all. Trump is closer to an FBI-financed bullet, fired to intentionally usher in a new era of 1-party rule, than he is to becoming an autocrat. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted June 26, 2024 Report Posted June 26, 2024 Leftards: you're completely underestimating the massive implications of what's being said. HIGH-PROFILE LEFTISTS ARE OPENLY STATING THEIR SINCERE BELIEF THAT THE DOJ HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED POLITICALLY. NO ONE FORCED CUOMO AND MAHER TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION. AGAIN: HIGH-PROFILE LEFTISTS ARE OPENLY STATING THEIR SINCERE BELIEF THAT THE DOJ HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED POLITICALLY. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted June 26, 2024 Author Report Posted June 26, 2024 4 hours ago, myata said: What better option do we have? One fat mouth professing all-time truths? An unquestionable Idol? A pharaoh? The democracy is not perfect and it can be dysfunctional too. But if the next choice is authoritarianism or totalitarian cult I would take one long and hard thought. Not like we didn't know what it entails and how it ends. So you want to throw the guy in jail that reduced your tax liability, made starting a small business easier, protected you from dishonest foreign practices for a guy that used every resource he had to put his political opponent in jail, suppress free speech, jail citizens for attending school board meetings, and sold out the foreign countries that hate us? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted June 26, 2024 Report Posted June 26, 2024 7 hours ago, myata said: Fact: Grand Jury approved the charges. In a free country, citizens own and defend their democracy. No one is above the law. Grand juries make decisions based on the information they are fed. If you control the flow of information you can leave a grand jury around by the nose. They're not lawyers 5 hours ago, myata said: What better option do we have? Democracy. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.