CdnFox Posted April 8 Report Posted April 8 15 minutes ago, Aristides said: Kinda makes you sound like a super patriot big guy Quote
eyeball Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 7 hours ago, CdnFox said: Yeah, neither of those things is true. Words not matching actions is hypocrisy. Not manipulation. Sure, it's simply not practicing what you preach. Preaching with false pretenses is pretty much the textbook definition of gaslighting. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Goddess Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Not now, biotech company, we kinda got a lot going on here right now. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
gatomontes99 Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Sure, it's simply not practicing what you preach. Well that's a nice way of saying hypocrisy but sure 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Preaching with false pretenses is pretty much the textbook definition of gaslighting. It's not even remotely close. Gaslighting involves manipulating people so that they doubt their own perception of events usually with sinister intent. Preaching, with or without pretenses, is simply trying to convince people of YOUR perception of things. they're worlds apart. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 Repolitics exclusive Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 2 hours ago, Aristides said: You know why all of that is a lie right? I mean we've gone over it before. Are you truly saying you can't find something honest to say? Quote
Aristides Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 (edited) 36 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You know why all of that is a lie right? I mean we've gone over it before. Are you truly saying you can't find something honest to say? https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/us-debt-by-president.html https://www.self.inc/info/us-debt-by-president/ Edited April 9 by Aristides 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 1 hour ago, Aristides said: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/us-debt-by-president.html https://www.self.inc/info/us-debt-by-president/ Dude we've been over this. Would be easy to understand you were just simply mistaken originally but at this point you're just a liar. Reposting someone else's lives doesn't make it truth Quote
Aristides Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 22 hours ago, CdnFox said: Dude we've been over this. Would be easy to understand you were just simply mistaken originally but at this point you're just a liar. Reposting someone else's lives doesn't make it truth When presented with facts your fall back is always to call someone a liar. Some things never change. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 16 minutes ago, Aristides said: When presented with facts your fall back is always to call someone a liar. Some things never change. I'm the one that presented you with the facts. What you presented was propaganda. When called out for your dishonesty it's the other person's fault. Some things never change. Oh and may I point out that currently in Canada you personally are trying to elect a rich person to appoint other rich people to fix the system that was broken by the rich people What did you say you were a special kind of again? Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.