Jump to content

Bragg is Guilty of Suborning Perjury


Recommended Posts

This whole case has been a joke from day one, there is a reason the Federal Government and the FEC wouldn't touch it and a reason Bragg didn't want to touch from the beginning, I think he was enticed to do it by the Biden administration.

All the case needed to go up in flames was Cohen not being able to to tell the truth and Cohen isn't the brightest man in the world either and couldn't keep his lies straight. That cross was like something you would see in a bad court TV show it was obvious and brutal.

When Anderson Cooper is like whoa that was bad you know it was devastating.

I hope the bring Costello in he will not only decimate Cohens testimony further but will force the jury to question the motives of the prosecution to boot.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Depends a little on your definition of lying. 

"I Did not have sexual relations with that lewinski woman".  Lie?  Most people would say a bj is "sexual relations" but TECHNICALLY it's not sex. So when he was impeached he was able to get off on that. (so to speak)

I personally believe lying by omission or speaking the truth in such a way as to give a false impression is still a lie, but from a technical legal point of view not so much. People even get off legal charges because they answered "yep" or 'uh huh" instead of "yes" and in court argued that while the person may have taken those words to mean yes they didn't actually say yes. 

As noted in oliver twist - the law is an ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I'm an ass, your an ass, everyone's an ass. What is needed is an ass who will turn this lawfare garbage on the perpetrators. 

Are.... are you talking about..  holding the CRIMINALS MISUSING THE SYSTEM RESPONSIBLE?!!?!

What are you,  a witch!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Are.... are you talking about..  holding the CRIMINALS MISUSING THE SYSTEM RESPONSIBLE?!!?!

What are you,  a witch!?!?!

Absolutely. 

Spare the rod and spoil the child.

Which witch?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Depends a little on your definition of lying. 

"I Did not have sexual relations with that lewinski woman".  Lie?  Most people would say a bj is "sexual relations" but TECHNICALLY it's not sex. So when he was impeached he was able to get off on that. (so to speak)

 

I wouldn't say that he got off due to a technicality. Everyone knew he lied. When someone is regularly dousing someone else with their spermatozoa it's the dictionary definition of having sexual relations.  

It was just too small of an infraction to have such monumental consequences for an entire country. The whole notion is absurd. No reasonable human could be the vote to get that impeachment across the finish line. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I wouldn't say that he got off due to a technicality. Everyone knew he lied. When someone is regularly dousing someone else with their spermatozoa it's the dictionary definition of having sexual relations.  

It was just too small of an infraction to have such monumental consequences for an entire country. The whole notion is absurd. No reasonable human could be the vote to get that impeachment across the finish line. 

I suppose that's one perspective, but it was the excuse used by those who didn't vote to find him guilty. 

I would agree that it's clearly a lie but it was enough of a 'technicality' that those who said it wasn't a lie could offer a reasonable excuse as to why they didn't impeach him for lying.  The sex wasnt' a big deal but the lying to congress about it was, and they needed an 'out' for why it was ok to dismiss lying.  "well because it's not TECHNICALLY a lie". 

Interestingly while the dictionary says it can mean any sexual acts between people it also can specifically refers to coitus as a specific act, and theres' your technical 'out'. 

What we're talking about here really is how some people use technical definitions to get away with lying. And that is a thing

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2024 at 5:41 PM, gatomontes99 said:

You don't even specify the "be lying" that Bragg supposedly knew about. Duh

In FACT, Cohen has already testified that he lied to Costello because he didn't trust Costello due to his connections with Trump, and at that time Cohen was still trying to maintain his role as a Trump loyal servant.

Costello even suggested that Cohen NOT FLIP cause he had "friends in high places."

AKA, Cohen knew about Trump's role in, and knowledge of, the payoff, and lied to Costello when he said there was none, solely to avoid alienating Trump. He was still maintaining the charade at that time BEFORE he flipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

You don't even specify the "be lying" that Bragg supposedly knew about. Duh

In FACT, Cohen has already testified that he lied to Costello because he didn't trust Costello due to his connections with Trump, and at that time Cohen was still trying to maintain his role as a Trump loyal servant.

Costello even suggested that Cohen NOT FLIP cause he had "friends in high places."

AKA, Cohen knew about Trump's role in, and knowledge of, the payoff, and lied to Costello when he said there was none, solely to avoid alienating Trump. He was still maintaining the charade at that time BEFORE he flipped.

Lol...so Cohen is innocent because Costello suggested Trump would save him and that led Cohen to lie to Costello because Costello gave him advice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...so Cohen is innocent because Costello suggested Trump would save him and that led Cohen to lie to Costello because Costello gave him advice?

Yes - it makes PERFECT sense if you drop acid first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...so Cohen is innocent because Costello suggested Trump would save him and that led Cohen to lie to Costello because Costello gave him advice?

Whatever that was, it looks like something they'd say on CNN and MSNBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...so Cohen is innocent because Costello suggested Trump would save him and that led Cohen to lie to Costello because Costello gave him advice?

Don't ever bother TRYING to ^restate what I write, cause YOU SUCK AT IT.

You got PART of it right. Cohen KNEW that Costello was testing his loyalty to Trump and and that's WHY HE LIED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So you're saying he got it right and now you're pissed? ;) 

He doesn't know what he's saying. It's all just irrational mumbo-jumbo. 

The Libbies are on the ropes and panicking. That's what this nonsense is about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Don't ever bother TRYING to ^restate what I write, cause YOU SUCK AT IT.

You got PART of it right. Cohen KNEW that Costello was testing his loyalty to Trump and and that's WHY HE LIED.

Yeah...ok...so why was he convicted of perjury then? Why did he tell this court a phone call was made to Trump's body guard to tell Trump about the payment when it was actually about some kid that was harassing him?

You are making excuses. The reality is that Cohen was the defense's star witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yeah...ok...so why was he convicted of perjury then?

Because he lied to Congress. Duh

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

Why did he tell this court a phone call was made to Trump's body guard to tell Trump about the payment when it was actually about some kid that was harassing him?

It was about both. But that has nothing to do with what he told Costello in 2018 in a separate meeting.

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You are making excuses. The reality is that Cohen was the defense's star witness.

Cohen is a minor witness which only serves to tie all the OTHER FACTS together, including 3 instances where he confirmed Trump KNEW ABOUT the payments to Daniels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

Cohen is a minor witness which only serves to tie all the OTHER FACTS together, including 3 instances where he confirmed Trump KNEW ABOUT the payments to Daniels.

How stupid can you be? If those other facts are not tied together then there's no case. The whole thing literally hinges on this guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

How stupid can you be? 

He can make oysters look brilliant.

He can make AOC seem enlightened and wise.

If stupidity was an Olympic sport, he'd win by so much that he'd be accused of taking performance enhancing drugs.

He's about tied with Biden.

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

He can make oysters look brilliant.

He can make AOC seem enlightened and wise.

If stupidity was an Olympic sport, he'd win by so much that he'd be accused of taking performance enhancing drugs.

He's about tied with Biden.

Yes, granted people like him are the reason we need instructions on shampoo bottles. 

But still...  this seems pretty cut and dry even for someone who can't get the water out of their boot with the instructions written on the heel. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because he lied to Congress. Duh

It was about both. But that has nothing to do with what he told Costello in 2018 in a separate meeting.

Cohen is a minor witness which only serves to tie all the OTHER FACTS together, including 3 instances where he confirmed Trump KNEW ABOUT the payments to Daniels.

Have you ever seen what's written on the bottom of a Guinness bottle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,752
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dorai
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...