WestCanMan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 Just now, Nationalist said: Which is exactly why Satan wants her so badly. Little crooks...they cook fast like a nice minute steak. Nancy's a whale. Easily one of the biggest crooks in NA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 1 minute ago, WestCanMan said: Nancy's a whale. Easily one of the biggest crooks in NA. Then fry her down for the whale fat. It burns well and keeps the environment comfy-cozy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 52 minutes ago, Yakuda said: I did articulate it. It's not my fault you're a plastic crack ho who can't find where. How about this? Lay off the freaking crack! I said a "reasonable" explanation. You've just thrown insults and name-calling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: What did Satan say to Nancy Pelosi? She never used God as an excuse for anything she has done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 34 minutes ago, Aristides said: She never used God as an excuse for anything she has done. No one would believe her if she said that she was motivated by God instead of Satan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: No one would believe her if she said that she was motivated by God instead of Satan. This has nothing to do with Boebert and gods special relationship, where God tells Boebert to change districts, then boebert loses. My guess is God doesn't like Boebert as much as she thinks he does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 53 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: I said a "reasonable" explanation. You've just thrown insults and name-calling. Fine I'll be nice. Lets watch what happens. Your question was did God set her up to fail? My answer is, I don't know but your assuming that her not winning is a failure. Did God send her there to win? 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: What did Satan say to Nancy Pelosi? "Yes boss" 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 54 minutes ago, Yakuda said: your assuming that her not winning is a failure. What else would her losing be, if not a failure? If she fails to win, that is a definite failure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 (edited) 30 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: What else would her losing be, if not a failure? If she fails to win, that is a definite failure. What else could it be? The way it's supposed to be. As you understand things that is likely true. When Jesus said he must go to Jerusalem and be put to death Peter said to him "God forbid, Lord. Such a fate must never happen to you." Jesus said in reply, "Get behind me, Satan. You are an obstacle to me. You are thinking not as God does but as men do". I suspect that means nothing to you but what you think about it isnt relevant to the point I'm making. Edited March 6 by Yakuda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 7 minutes ago, Yakuda said: What else could it be? The way it's supposed to be. So you agree my "assumption" was correct. Thank you for the verification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: So you agree my "assumption" was correct. Thank you for the verification. No I don't agree. I am trying to remain polite. IF it's a failure it's because YOU think its a failure. You realize that just because you think something that doesn't automatically make but true, right? Lie if you have to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 29 minutes ago, Yakuda said: No I don't agree. I am trying to remain polite. IF it's a failure it's because YOU think its a failure. You realize that just because you think something that doesn't automatically make but true, right? Lie if you have to. Please explain how a loss for boebert is a win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 17 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Please explain how a loss for boebert is a win. Where did I make that claim? This is why talking to you people is useless. You really to what's in your head and. It wasn't actually being said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Yakuda said: Where did I make that claim? This is why talking to you people is useless. You really to what's in your head and. It wasn't actually being said. Forgive me if I'm not grasping the point your attempting to make. Would you please explain in a clear concise manner so someone like me can understand. Edited March 6 by CrakHoBarbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: No one would believe her if she said that she was motivated by God instead of Satan. You can't seriously believe Boebert. Even you are not that gullible. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 6 Author Report Share Posted March 6 24 minutes ago, Aristides said: You can't seriously believe Boebert. Well, I think her Christian fundamentalist followers will believe her. And I think that's exactly what she's counting on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 Lauren Boebert, michelle bachmann, marianne williamson.. all just a few crayons short of a full box 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 1 hour ago, Aristides said: You can't seriously believe Boebert. Even you are not that gullible. I don't know anything about her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted March 7 Author Report Share Posted March 7 4 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Forgive me if I'm not grasping the point your attempting to make. Would you please explain in a clear concise manner so someone like me can understand. Crickets..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 6 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Forgive me if I'm not grasping the point your attempting to make. Would you please explain in a clear concise manner so someone like me can understand. I can't be more concise. Show me where I said a a loss for her is a win. That's simple and straight toward. The crack must getting in the way ho. 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Crickets..... Some of us aren't free to sit around and just smoke crack all day ho. I'm still trying to be polite but plastic crack hos don't make it easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godzilla Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 36 minutes ago, Yakuda said: I can't be more concise. Show me where I said a a loss for her is a win. That's simple and straight toward. The crack must getting in the way ho. Some of us aren't free to sit around and just smoke crack all day ho. I'm still trying to be polite but plastic crack hos don't make it easy. @Yakuda... um, thats a funny avatar. its not a real person. just so you... know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caswell Thomas Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 On 3/5/2024 at 7:39 PM, Moonlight Graham said: If she has a direct communication line to God then she should probably be the President. If she does, why would she need to? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 (edited) 14 hours ago, WestCanMan said: I don't know anything about her. Sure. That must be why you have to talk about Pelosi on a thread about Boebert. 18 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Please explain how a loss for boebert is a win. It must be a win if God told her to do it. It would be a win but not for her. Maybe God is setting her up. Edited March 7 by Aristides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Aristides said: Sure. That must be why you have to talk about Pelosi on a thread about Boebert. It's got nothing to do with Boebert, whoever she is. It has to do with how butthurt leftards are that she said God. I'm not a believer in any gods myself, but I do appreciate it when people are inspired by 'good' ones, and Nancy is not. Edited March 7 by WestCanMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: It's got nothing to do with Boebert, whoever she is. It has to do with how butthurt leftards are that she said God. I'm not a believer in any gods myself, but I do appreciate it when people are inspired by 'good' ones, and Nancy is not. Maybe read the title of this topic before you say stupid stuff like this. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.