Jump to content

'Small Government' Pierre Poilievre wants you to show your ID to watch Internet Porn


Recommended Posts

Just now, eyeball said:

So they're both apples after all.

 

Oh  look - Eyeball made up something i never said and then decided that what i REALLY meant by what i didn't say is something i also didn't say.

Yawn.  I bet you win all kinds of arguments after everyone else is gone and it's just you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

But at least he's laid out a way for us to win.

Kind of like driving a stake through a vampire's heart... or maybe 🤔...

yeah ..

...killing a dodo bird by clubbing it with a stale baguette.

Fight stupid...with stupid?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

Or maybe fight smart with smartr 

Awww look - the 'cdnfox made us cry' group is having a hug in :)      LOL

Lie less - think more - you won't get made fun of.  Not complex.

39 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

This is your entire existence on this forum, you dumb muppet.  

Aww - here you go little guy - looks like you need one of these. :) 

 

 

6usxms.thumb.png.eb4386e0a60da6d6261a988ee2022217.png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 3:12 PM, Michael Hardner said:

No... it's completely logical that because I don't want to scan my driver's license to a porn site to watch, I have NEVER HEARD OF A PG 18 film.

 

Quote

 

When asked whether his government would require porn websites to verify the age of users, Poilievre gave a one-word answer: “Yes.”

He didn't offer further explanation, and his office quickly followed up with a clarifying statement asserting that the Tories don't believe in the imposition of a digital ID.

 

The above was taken from the source ALREADY provided, has anyone actually read the source document...i didn't think so....

Today most porn sites are already restricted and ask the question are you 18 or older...some ask for a credit card number to confirm age...it is already law that porn sites are restricted to 18 years old,,,that being said answer yes to the question and boom your phone is now full of porn....this is non news...has anyone heard of anyone having troubles accessing porn... No...3 things Canadians hold near and dear, beer , hockey, porn...not in that order...

Edited by Army Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Army Guy said:

this is non news...has anyone heard of anyone having troubles accessing porn... No...3 things Canadians hold near and dear, beer , hockey, porn...not in that order...

Yeah, we know it's non-news, but it's funny to see PP playing for the dumdums in his audience who don't understand, whilst his office has to play damage control after the fact.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yeah, we know it's non-news, but it's funny to see PP playing for the dumdums in his audience who don't understand, whilst his office has to play damage control after the fact.  

 

I see he's up in the polls again - in quebec too of all places where he's now tied with the libs.

LOL :)   If that's the kind of humour you like then prepare for more belly laughs moving forward  :)  your lib and dip friends are trying to turn the next election into a culture war and they're failing horribly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Okay? I've already said I'm probably voting for him, and that I think Trudeau is the worst PM we've ever had. 

That doesn't make you any less cringe.  🙃

You say all kinds of shit - mostly in support.  But you expect people to disregard and disbelieve the 1000 times you defend the libs but accept the rare occasion you say they're bad as verbatum and gospel.  Your regular posts say all that there is to say about which 'side' you're on, even if you don't like justin himself.  And i never actually brought justin up, that was you,

Anyway - their attempt to spin this and the other culture war issues simply aren't working this time.  Sorry for your luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 1:00 PM, CdnFox said:

Not giving minors access to porn?  And you feel we ARE protecting children by letting them access porn?

So - 10 year old walks into a 7/11 and wants to buy a copy of 'back door badonkadonk' and we're ok with that? There's no such thing as appropriate age restrictions on sexual content?I think you're going to have a tough sell arguing that 7 year olds should have a basic right to watch gay 3 way sex if they want to.

Holy shit, boy. How old are you!? I don't think any of the corner stores - now all corporate owned - have had any porn, even soft porn, for years. There was a time, though, when I would indeed go to my corner store - named Sams - and grab the nasty stuff. 

Sams was in a small clearing on the corner (literally a corner store) with trees all around it and nothing but trees on all four corners. It now has shopping malls on three corners, and a large seniors building on the fourth. I doubt there's porn to be had anywhere.

But now I can just google it on my phone if I wanted to see it. Which, for the most part, I don't.

Edited by I am Groot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tories have reiterated that they're opposed to any sort of digital ID. And I can't see them passing a law requiring people to give their private ID to a porn site. Though I believe the nastier ones all require you to pay to become a member anyway. So evidently people DO, in fact, give them their credit cards.

I don't believe Poilievre came out and intended to support this but he was asked and he just said yes. Most likely his advisors are now trying to figure out how to reconcile this as it's not actually possible anyway, technically speaking. I think the NDP and BQ both supported the bill that passed the senate - unanimously, I believe, so while I haven't read it I doubt it's going to do much even if implemented, which it won't be. 

On the other hand, the Liberals apparently are readying their own version which would be more restrictive, so we'll have to see what happens with that. They've already tossed one internet control bill due to massive opposition. We'll see how the next goes.

I think this is all a stupid distraction anyway. Nobody thinks the government can do anything about porn and a sizeable number - like me - don't want them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You say all kinds of shit - mostly in support. 

No.  I think Trudeau is a dumb fool and I've said next to nothing positive about him, ever.  Pointing out that you're much dumber shouldn't be confused with support for Trudeau, but the nature of your disability is such that it leads you there anyways.  😑 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

No.  I think Trudeau is a dumb fool and I've said next to nothing positive about him, ever.  Pointing out that you're much dumber shouldn't be confused with support for Trudeau, but the nature of your disability is such that it leads you there anyways.  😑 

You defend him and the liberals constantly.  All the time. Now - i realize one of your favourite games is to make statements and then pretend you never said anything of the kind and that english words don't mean what they do and that might work great with the kindergarteners you argue with at school but it doesn't' fly here.

That's the problem with running your credibility into the  ground the way you do - nobody really believes what you say much. The good part is they don't really care what you say either so there you go.

Case in point - i never mentioned trudeau. YOU brought him up.

And your attempt to deflect the discussion away from the fact that the libs and the dips are failing in their efforts to turn this into a culture war issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You defend him and the liberals constantly.  All the time.

No, I don't.  I make fun of you, because you're even dumber than Trudeau.  They are not the same thing, but like I said, the nature of your disability prevents you from understanding it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

No, I don't.

Constantly and all the time. Everyone sees you do it, i point it out all the time, its constant.

You dont' make fun of anyone. You just backtrack and whine when you get caught and try to blow it off.  And you wind up looking like a doof doing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Yeah, we know it's non-news, but it's funny to see PP playing for the dumdums in his audience who don't understand, whilst his office has to play damage control after the fact.  

 

Just curious what would have been your answer to the question...Do you think porn should be restricted to those over 18 years of age....

His answer was a short yes....Liberals are making it into more than it was intended ...thats there thing, lying and making shit up...being that far down in the poles this is only going to get worse...we the readers need to see past the liberal magic, and lies to see the truth

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Holy shit, boy. How old are you!?

I don't know - what year is it now again? :) 

3 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I don't think any of the corner stores - now all corporate owned - have had any porn, even soft porn, for years. There was a time, though, when I would indeed go to my corner store - named Sams - and grab the nasty stuff. 

LOL - well i will admit it's been a while since i checked on availability ;)

But the point was they wouldn't (or shouldn't) hand it over to a 7 year old and i think most people would have been ok with that :)

Quote

Sams was in a small clearing on the corner (literally a corner store) with trees all around it and nothing but trees on all four corners. It now has shopping malls on three corners, and a large seniors building on the fourth. I doubt there's porn to be had anywhere.

It is a different world.

Quote

But now I can just google it on my phone if I wanted to see it. Which, for the most part, I don't.

Sure. And just like when we were young and someone stole their daddy's playboy, kids are going to access porn one way or another at least a bit. But there's nothing wrong with saying dedicated sites should make some effort to restrict access

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,744
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Mark Partiwaka
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Proficient
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...