Jump to content

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY – A DEMONIC CULT OF DEATH


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I think you're moving some goalposts around a bit there :)  Your original question was much more specific.

Then answer to this one is not if it's done legally :)   I mean it depends on what you mean. 

First off - the electoral college vote and the count and such has NOTHING to do with the transfer of power.  And it's not the first time the results were contested in some way. So - your question is faulty on the face of it. 

Consider for example the nighmare a few years back over the hanging chads. If there is some question as to the outcome of an election it is not unreasonable. It was like 5 weeks of fighting with lawyers and everything with neither party conceding, and the US on pins and needles  wondering who the next president would be.

Was that illegal? No - there is nothing illegal about challenging the results.  Did the transfer of power still happen once the issue was resolved? Yes.

You need to stop being so partisan and think these things through a bit more before you present your questions.

What? that made no sense.  "activities" in attempting to commit a 'felony' that isn't a 'felony'?  If it's not a felony then it isn't a felony. Reword that in english and i'll take a crack at it :P

You really need to write better, it is brutally hard to understand what you're trying to say.  So - if i guess correctly you're asking "if biden attempted to change the college voters would that be ok'?  Well probably not, it didn't work when trump did it and i suspect the colleges would complain as they did this time and that would be the end of it. 

first off, i'm no partisan... i'm anti-Trump. i think he's a huge goof. i would have no issue voting for Haley.

you have good points about delaying the transfer of power. but in the past they have been legal avenues of delaying the transfer of power. in this case, we already have electors pleading guilty to creating illegal documents. documents that they created at request of Trump himself (they have him on the phone in Michigan).

and more importantly... we have three defendants in Georgia that have plead guilty. admitting that it is illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, godzilla said:

first off, i'm no partisan... i'm anti-Trump.

That's actually pretty much what a partisan is.

Quote

i think he's a huge goof. i would have no issue voting for Haley.

Well you're not alone but i dont' think haley's going to be on the menu this time around.

Quote

you have good points about delaying the transfer of power. but in the past they have been legal avenues of delaying the transfer of power. in this case, we already have electors pleading guilty to creating illegal documents.

well.... not quite. We'll have to see what the judge says in the end.

 

Quote

and more importantly... we have three defendants in Georgia that have plead guilty. admitting that it is illegal.

There is only one person who can say if a thing is illegal or not or if the law has been offended.  And that would be a judge. To date nobody has been convicted of anything that i'm aware of, certainly not trump.

I would say the evidence that he did somthing wrong is strong, but that's for judges to decide. It sounds at some points like he though the was pursuing a legit legal technicality - other times that less clear.  We'll see how it shakes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's the demonic dems that want you to hate your neighbour, starve the poor, shoot the stranger and if they smite you on the cheek give them a double tap to the head.

The lying, fraud rapist and his cabal of suck-holes are the Good Guys...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, herbie said:

So it's the demonic dems that want you to hate your neighbour, starve the poor, shoot the stranger and if they smite you on the cheek give them a double tap to the head.

The lying, fraud rapist and his cabal of suck-holes are the Good Guys...

Funny enough the dems cancelled Gina Carerro for exactly saying that the nazis won because they first turned neighbours against each other and we must be careful not to let that happen  again.  They went after her tooth and nail for daring to suggest that we shouldn't turn on our neighbours over politics or beliefs. :) 

So yea.  Looks that way.  Skimped on the research there a bit i take it :) LOLOLOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Funny enough the dems cancelled Gina Carerro for exactly saying that the nazis won because they first turned neighbours against each other and we must be careful not to let that happen  again.  They went after her tooth and nail for daring to suggest that we shouldn't turn on our neighbours over politics or beliefs. :) 

So yea.  Looks that way.  Skimped on the research there a bit i take it :) LOLOLOL

You mean Carano? Disney is NOT "dems." LMAO

However, during the hiatus between seasons, Carano was fired by Lucasfilm in February 2021 for sharing a series of offensive posts on social media, including one implying that being a Republican today is like being Jewish during the Holocaust. Carano was also dropped by United Talent Agency.Mar 1, 2023
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You mean Carano? Disney is NOT "dems." LMAO

"Disney" didn't do it - a malicious democrat biatch who wormed her way into a position of power and almost destroyed the franchise and whom has now been fired for her actions did it. Disney was actually a little upset over it.   And it was the dem supporters who were crying for it and the dem community that supported it.

Geez robodolt - first time you work up the courage to actually talk to me in ages instead of hiding and you got it wrong. Surely you can do better than that :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

"Disney" didn't do it - a malicious democrat biatch who wormed her way into a position of power and almost destroyed the franchise and whom has now been fired for her actions did it. Disney was actually a little upset over it.   And it was the dem supporters who were crying for it and the dem community that supported it.

Geez robodolt - first time you work up the courage to actually talk to me in ages instead of hiding and you got it wrong. Surely you can do better than that :)

I didn't get ANYTHING WRONG. You however dldiot.

image.jpeg.6cc83ec4e1c17f381cf42401ae0a1bcb.jpeg
It has been a subsidiary of Walt Disney Studios since 2012 and is best known for creating and producing the Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises, as well as ...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

I didn't get ANYTHING WRONG. You however dldiot

LOL - i've already upset you to the point where you're studdering apparent :)

You got it entirely wrong :) you momor0n :) 

She was fired as  it turns out without direction or discussion with disney or lucasfilms execs by kathleen kennedy.  And when the truth came out, the fans had had enough of kathleen and so had the execs.  Many within the star wars team wanted her back but the studio felt they just wanted it gone under the rug.

https://gamerant.com/star-wars-mandalorian-gina-carano-kathleen-kennedy-south-park-episode/

Kathleen Kennedy fired Gina Carano BEFORE Cara dune

Kathleen kennedy was a notorious social justice warrior leftist who HATED that Gina was a republican.  And the firing was entirely politically motivated, not the decision of the board at lucas.  in the backlash that followed kathleen herself was fired.  Kathleen fired Gina in a tweet. That's how 'official' it was.  But once it was done it was done.

So while kathleen worked for lucasfilm - it wasn't really lucasfilm that agreed to it. They had to live with it after one of their top people did it on her own but that's not the same.

 

So we're back to the same thing. A far left democrat supporter and social justice freak along with a cadre of lefties took action to fire someone for DAAARRING to say the horrible words:

“Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…. even by children. Because history is edited, most people today don’t realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbours hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?”

An absolutely 100 percent true statement.  IF we let the gov't turn us against each other for our political views we'll wind up in the same place.

And for saying we shouldn't turn on our neighbours - she was cancelled by the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Of course, one side is going to view the other as a death cult or something extreme like that. 

Tribal and extreme polerization always leads to that.  For both sides as a rule.  One will rise to the bar the other sets.  Probably too late to worry about it now, might as well have some fun with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Tribal and extreme polerization always leads to that.  For both sides as a rule.  One will rise to the bar the other sets.  Probably too late to worry about it now, might as well have some fun with it.

The OP is not just poking fun at something.. he is 100% serious. That being said, that's why I like South Park, nothing is safe. It tears everything down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

The OP is not just poking fun at something.. he is 100% serious. That being said, that's why I like South Park, nothing is safe. It tears everything down. 

I meant WE should have fun with it.

HEY ROBOSMITH - I HEAR TRUMP"S TAXES ARE CLEAN AS A WHISTLE, CARE TO COMMENT?

i'll get us some popcorn....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

IMG_0653.thumb.jpeg.d9c25ae79c63861eab1454d23e16619b.jpeg

Yeah - that happens when you pour massive amounts of stimulous money into the economy. But it drives your debt and deficit through the roof. which is precisely what's happened.

Biden is borrowing from the future to prop up his economy now to look good for an election - he doesn't give a crap after that because he can't run again, so if it tanks so be it.

How are none of you smart enough to notice this? Like - it's not complicated or anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

If anyone cares to know the nitty gritty details of the number in the graph... I can give it. Little secret.. I am 8 feet away from the person that processes the nevada version of that number. 

meh, why not? Information is a good thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

meh, why not? Information is a good thing

the jobs number that everyone talks about is called Current Employment Statistics. First and foremost... it is an estimate. This is why it gets revised monthly. What goes into the model? Surveys, past CES data, QCEW data. and some Census data. Next thing,, it is a top down calculation. Meaning that the national numbers are created first and then the individual states numbers are forced to sum up to that national number. Lastly, it is an estimate not a population count (unlike QCEW) but because it is monthly, folks prefer it over the other (QCEW) which has a six to eight month lag. 2023 q3 data for QCEW will come out in March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

the jobs number that everyone talks about is called Current Employment Statistics. First and foremost... it is an estimate. This is why it gets revised monthly. What goes into the model? Surveys, past CES data, QCEW data. and some Census data. Next thing,, it is a top down calculation. Meaning that the national numbers are created first and then the individual states numbers are forced to sum up to that national number. Lastly, it is an estimate not a population count (unlike QCEW) but because it is monthly, folks prefer it over the other (QCEW) which has a six to eight month lag. 2023 q3 data for QCEW will come out in March.

I think it's the same for ours actually. the monthly employment 'rate' guesses how many people there are and what percentage of teh working age population is looking for work, then guesses how many of them have work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CdnFox said:

I think it's the same for ours actually. the monthly employment 'rate' guesses how many people there are and what percentage of teh working age population is looking for work, then guesses how many of them have work.

The jobs number is CES. Now the unemployment rate is part of Local Area Unemployment Statistics. CES is a job count and LAUS is a people count. The two are only marginally connected. What you describe is similar to LAUS. CES breaks job down by industry sector where LAUS just wants to know if a person is employed, unemployed, or unemployed but looking for work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2024 at 11:36 PM, herbie said:

he lying, fraud rapist and his cabal of suck-holes are the Good Guys...

You need to get past the idea that there actually are "good guys". It's like saying there are friends in the realm of global international trade and politics. There are no good guys, only the one who serves people's best interests and needs for a particular time. Once they no longer serve that need they should be discarded. That which was venerated, upon becoming useless must be trampled on and burned, like straw dogs.

And by that I mean, modern Liberalism...

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

When Rebound gets stomped in a debate or when his faith in the democrat party begins to waver, he just pulls some bullshit jobs graph out of his ass, and everything starts feeling better. lol

well.... better that than drugs i guess. Mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Deluge said:

When Rebound gets stomped in a debate or when his faith in the democrat party begins to waver, he just pulls some bullshit jobs graph out of his ass, and everything starts feeling better. lol

When DELUGINAL is clueless about how to respond to ACTUAL EVIDENCE he just posts ANOTHER ^lDIOTIC RANT here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,750
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Betsy Smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...