Why Leftists Are So Unhappy

[Deluge]

38 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

1. All this statement proves is that there's no evidence you would accept because you're impervious to any statement that threatens your worldview/preexisting beliefs and ideology.

2. Once again, you're simply projecting here. You and your fellow travellers in this thread all believe you are victims and white conservative males are an oppressed minority. True or false?

3. So are toddlers and people with oppositional defiant disorder.

1. Sorry pal, I know bullshit when I see it, and your leftist overlords did zilch to curb BLM's racial rioting. 

2. How can we be projecting when you diaper dopers came up with "systemic racism" first? lol

There's only side that "projects" and it's you race hustlers all day, every day.  

3. The point is, you degenerates sh*t your pants when you don't get your way.

[Black Dog]

22 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Is this your final answer then?

You want to accept a single quote by Biden in 3 years, merely saying: "It's really important to protest against police injustice & brutality, but breaking windows isn't ok", as evidence that he denounced the rioting?

Thanks for coming out, dummy. 

In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.” ” 

At a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 2, he said, “There’s no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses […] we need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction

After protests in downtown Portland, Ore., for every night for nearly three months following Floyd’s killing, Biden said Aug. 30 in a statement while campaigning: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right."

That's three different statements condemning and denouncing violence within the span of a few months but don't let facts penetrate your thick skull.

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Sorry pal, I know bullshit when I see it, and your leftist overlords did zilch to curb BLM's racial rioting. 

2. How can we be projecting when you diaper dopers came up with "systemic racism" first? lol

There's only side that "projects" and it's you race hustlers all day, every day.  

3. The point is, you degenerates sh*t your pants when you don't get your way.

Your projecting right now, right here. lmao.

[CdnFox]

52 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The cops couldn't stop the riots, what actions were BLM supposed to take?

There's tonnes of things they could do, most of which was discussed at the time, but first and easiest denounce it loudly and constantly and the people who do it as well.  But sure, there's lots of things you can do

54 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

 

Of the 18 shooters listed, 13 were right wingers.

Right winger means nothing. You had claimed the shootings were politically motivated. 

Not that it matters - 13 people over 35 years?  In a country with nearly 400 million people?  Blm burnt 2.5 billion dollars of material and there were 25 people dead in ONE YEAR just from the riots alone.  And that doesn't include the injured who survived.

58 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You're literally lying to me and to yourself here. 

No - i've told the truth.  Again - you're projecting your own failings on to me.

The left didn't denounce the people or the actions. Want proof? You can't either.

Quote

Your response here is literally just "I know you are but what am I

it's very common for the left to blame others for what they themselves do.  Antifa is the largest operational group of facists out there at the moment.  You make low IQ posts, accuse others of making low IQ posts, and then act surprised when someone points that out? LOL - hoookaaaayy there little guy  

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

ike i said to the other one of you nitwits:  there's no evidence you would accept

Sure there is. I gave examples.

And .. you still refuse yourself.  So there you go.

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.” ” 

At a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 2, he said, “There’s no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses […] we need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction

After protests in downtown Portland, Ore., for every night for nearly three months following Floyd’s killing, Biden said Aug. 30 in a statement while campaigning: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right."

1. Just remember that the only reason there was such outrage at the time is that the bodycam footage hadn't been leaked yet. The Dems (AG Keith Ellison) were still hiding it. Once that was out, even black activists had a completely different take on what happened. The rioting could have been ended by the letting the truth out instead of pimping the false narrative.
2. That's only 2 weak comments in 3 months when there was billions of dollars in damage and thousands of assaults, plus 1 generic sentence from his campaign - saying: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right." That was NOT a specific comment against violent rioting. A whole sentence. WOW!

You just made the case again: Dems love rioting. 

[Deluge]

17 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Your projecting right now, right here. lmao.

What am I projecting? 

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

There's tonnes of things they could do, most of which was discussed at the time, but first and easiest denounce it loudly and constantly and the people who do it as well.  But sure, there's lots of things you can do

Wouldn't have mattered and you would just pretend they didn't do it even if they had (which they probably did, I'm not bothering to waste time producing more evidence for you to ignore).

 

Quote

Right winger means nothing. You had claimed the shootings were politically motivated. 

They were, hence the manifestos.

Quote

Not that it matters - 13 people over 35 years?  In a country with nearly 400 million people?  Blm burnt 2.5 billion dollars of material and there were 25 people dead in ONE YEAR just from the riots alone.  And that doesn't include the injured who survived.

No that's 13 people who left manifestos. There have been numerous other shootings committed by individuals with right-wing beliefs, to say nothing of the various plots that have been foiled, or the constant flood of death threats by right wing folks. Not for nothing have right wing extremists been identified as the number one domestic terrorist threat.

Quote

 

No - i've told the truth.  Again - you're projecting your own failings on to me.

The left didn't denounce the people or the actions. Want proof? You can't either.

 

Constantly repeating a false claim doesn't make it suddenly true.

Quote

 

it's very common for the left to blame others for what they themselves do.  Antifa is the largest operational group of facists out there at the moment.  You make low IQ posts, accuse others of making low IQ posts, and then act surprised when someone points that out? LOL - hoookaaaayy there little guy  

Sure there is. I gave examples.

And .. you still refuse yourself.  So there you go.

 

"antifa are fascist" and we have rightwing ****** bingo!

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Just remember that the only reason there was such outrage at the time is that the bodycam footage hadn't been leaked yet. The Dems (AG Keith Ellison) were still hiding it. Once that was out, even black activists had a completely different take on what happened. The rioting could have been ended by the letting the truth out instead of pimping the false narrative.
2. That's only 2 weak comments in 3 months when there was billions of dollars in damage and thousands of assaults, plus 1 generic sentence from his campaign - saying: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right." That was NOT a specific comment against violent rioting. A whole sentence. WOW!

You just made the case again: Dems love rioting. 

Ohhhhhh your a George Floyd truther, makes sense. Must chap your ass that pig Chauvin is rotting in jail for the rest of his life, huh.

As for the rest, you continue to prove my point that no level of evidence will ever be accepted by people like you who's entire worldview is predicated on ignoring evidence.

[Legato]

On 1/26/2024 at 5:47 PM, Black Dog said:

The headline of the article is literally "Why Leftists Are So Unhappy" you numbskull.

Look at all these happy-go-lucky-right wingers:

 

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/08/allen-mall-shooting-right-wing-death-squad/

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/suspect-named-fatal-shooting-california-store-owner-pride-flag-rcna101085

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/27/us/jacksonville-florida-shooting-sunday/index.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/pittsburgh/news/walmart-shooter-beavercreek-ohio-motivated-racial-extremism/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pittsburgh-synagogue-mass-shooting-jury-reaches-verdict-death/story?id=101220141

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/gunman-racist-buffalo-shooting-faces-life-without-parole-sentencing-2023-02-15/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/photos/sadness-shock-charleston-church-shooting-31848275/image-slideshow-back-charleston-sc-church-shooting-31909496

 

Whatsup. Someone put kale instead of kibble in your bowl. Now your nose is dry and the tail won't wag.

Like everyone has said, lefties are are a miserable bunch of which you sir are the epitome.

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Wouldn't have mattered and you would just pretend they didn't do it even if they had (which they probably did, I'm not bothering to waste time producing more evidence for you to ignore).

 

You have a remarkable ability of self-delusion.  I tell you what post where ANY of those people did that and we'll see how i actually react.

Oh - and can you explain why Kamala harris helped raise money for the rioter's bail if the dems were so against it?

If that's all you've got, then you've got nothing.

Quote

No that's 13 people who left manifestos. There have been numerous other shootings committed by individuals with right-wing beliefs,

And there's the problem. You think everyone who has right wing beliefs and kills someone else is a political killer.

And yet - when someone who has left leaning beliefs kills someone you deny it ever happened.

A crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people - but the media glosses over that when it's the left When it's the right your people insist it MUST be because they like trump.

Sorry - swing and a miss there too.

Quote

Constantly repeating a false claim doesn't make it suddenly true.

It was true to begin with - and look how hard it is even for you to denounce it.  Kinda proves my point.

15 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

"antifa are fascist" and we have rightwing ****** bingo!

Ahhh yes - when you know you've lost the point you just say any old thing.  I get it, the truth hurts.

 

So to sum up - you've failed to prove all your points. The rioters appear to be BLM members and supporters - and the riots themselves show how many 'lefties' are unhappy. Ready to violently protest to be mad on someone else's behalf .

Your argument that 13 people over 30 years is somehow representative of the almost 200 million right leaning voters out there is clearly nuts.

And as a fun aside neither the dems NOR you are willing to condemn left wing violence.  Which is weird - iv'e got no problem condeming right wing violence, those guys are scum what they did was wrong entirely there's no excuse for it and they should be dead or in jail.  See? Pretty simple ,

[godzilla]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You have a remarkable ability of self-delusion.  I tell you what post where ANY of those people did that and we'll see how i actually react.

Oh - and can you explain why Kamala harris helped raise money for the rioter's bail if the dems were so against it?

If that's all you've got, then you've got nothing.

And there's the problem. You think everyone who has right wing beliefs and kills someone else is a political killer.

And yet - when someone who has left leaning beliefs kills someone you deny it ever happened.

A crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people - but the media glosses over that when it's the left When it's the right your people insist it MUST be because they like trump.

Sorry - swing and a miss there too.

It was true to begin with - and look how hard it is even for you to denounce it.  Kinda proves my point.

Ahhh yes - when you know you've lost the point you just say any old thing.  I get it, the truth hurts.

 

So to sum up - you've failed to prove all your points. The rioters appear to be BLM members and supporters - and the riots themselves show how many 'lefties' are unhappy. Ready to violently protest to be mad on someone else's behalf .

Your argument that 13 people over 30 years is somehow representative of the almost 200 million right leaning voters out there is clearly nuts.

And as a fun aside neither the dems NOR you are willing to condemn left wing violence.  Which is weird - iv'e got no problem condeming right wing violence, those guys are scum what they did was wrong entirely there's no excuse for it and they should be dead or in jail.  See? Pretty simple ,

please cite the 2023 "left leaning" shootings. a google search of "left wing shooting 2023" does not initially provide anything.

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You have a remarkable ability of self-delusion.  I tell you what post where ANY of those people did that and we'll see how i actually react.

Oh - and can you explain why Kamala harris helped raise money for the rioter's bail if the dems were so against it?

Because not everyone arrested was a rioter.

Quote

 

If that's all you've got, then you've got nothing.

And there's the problem. You think everyone who has right wing beliefs and kills someone else is a political killer.

And yet - when someone who has left leaning beliefs kills someone you deny it ever happened.

 

No I've specifically talked about killings where there's an obvious political motivation, not Joe blow Republican voter shoots his neighbour type stuff.

Quote

A crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people - but the media glosses over that when it's the left When it's the right your people insist it MUST be because they like trump.

A crap tonne you say? Name some then.

Quote

 

Sorry - swing and a miss there too.

It was true to begin with - and look how hard it is even for you to denounce it.  Kinda proves my point.

Ahhh yes - when you know you've lost the point you just say any old thing.  I get it, the truth hurts.

 

You're babbling.

Quote

So to sum up - you've failed to prove all your points. The rioters appear to be BLM members and supporters - and the riots themselves show how many 'lefties' are unhappy. Ready to violently protest to be mad on someone else's behalf 

Gee i wonder why a people who subscribe to an authoritarian, reactionary ideology like you would be uninterested in rising up against injustice.

Quote

Your argument that 13 people over 30 years is somehow representative of the almost 200 million right leaning voters out there is clearly nuts.

Not my argument but I understand why you have to misrepresent it to avoid the painful truth. Also the irony of you whining about this when you're literally claiming a few hundred people arrested in connection with rioting (guilty or not) are representative of millions of left-leaning voters.

Quote

And as a fun aside neither the dems NOR you are willing to condemn left wing violence.  Which is weird - iv'e got no problem condeming right wing violence, those guys are scum what they did was wrong entirely there's no excuse for it and they should be dead or in jail.  See? Pretty simple ,

Hard to take this seriously when you won't even admit there's a political angle to those crimes.

 

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, godzilla said:

please cite the 2023 "left leaning" shootings. a google search of "left wing shooting 2023" does not initially provide anything.

I'm guessing they're going to claim, without evidence, that a couple of recent school shootings perpetrated by LGBTQ people were politically motivated.

[Yakuda]

11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm guessing they're going to claim, without evidence, that a couple of recent school shootings perpetrated by LGBTQ people were politically motivated.

If not political then it's just pure demented hatred. Why haven't they released the manifesto of the twisted tranny that shot up the Christian school? If it had been a trump supporter the thing would have been plastered everywhere the next day. 

Edited January 29, 2024 by Yakuda

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Just remember that the only reason there was such outrage at the time is that the bodycam footage hadn't been leaked yet. The Dems (AG Keith Ellison) were still hiding it. Once that was out, even black activists had a completely different take on what happened. The rioting could have been ended by the letting the truth out instead of pimping the false narrative.
2. That's only 2 weak comments in 3 months when there was billions of dollars in damage and thousands of assaults, plus 1 generic sentence from his campaign - saying: "I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right." That was NOT a specific comment against violent rioting. A whole sentence. WOW!

You just made the case again: Dems love rioting. 

Has Biden pardoned any BLM-related rioters? Cause Trump has promised to pardon all of the January 6 rioters, and he calls these convicted insurrectionist traitor criminals "hostages." 

Donald Trump is disgusting.

[Black Dog]

13 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

If not political then it's just pure demented hatred. Why haven't they released the manifesto of the twisted tranny that shot up the Christian school? If it had been a trump supporter the thing would have been plastered everywhere the next day. 

Because the families of the victims and the school itself are suing to prevent its release. Ask them why.

[Yakuda]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Because the families of the victims and the school itself are suing to prevent its release. Ask them why.

Maybe they just don't want vile tranny hatred released to the public. 

Edited January 29, 2024 by Yakuda

[CdnFox]

43 minutes ago, godzilla said:

please cite the 2023 "left leaning" shootings. a google search of "left wing shooting 2023" does not initially provide anything.

And it won't - the media does not treat left leaning shooters the same way.  The right does but they tend to dismiss it in BOTH cases unless their politics is specifically a major issue in the shooting.

So there are many but how about this one to start, you probably heard about it at the time:

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/27/1166268762/nashville-school-shooting-covenant

And a little more info about the shooter:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/nashville-shooter-audrey-hale/story?id=98166039

Now her facebook account which was taken down did contain strong support for the dems.  And he's a transgender graphics designer with cats.  Not exactly the profile of a republican so that's believable

Now we never did learn what the motive was of course, but given the circumstances it could very well have been political - certainly she was left wing and the target she chose would have been predominantly right leaning.  But the media handles it very very differently than if they were a conservative equivilant.

You can find a bunch more if you start to look.

You'll even see false claims of being right wing which get retracted quietly much later.

The man who attacked nanci pelosi's  hubby was initially reported as a right wing nutjob with a facebook or social media site at all. However  it turned out that site had just been activated and filled with content and it was taken down by someone a day after that was pointed out. Further it turned out he was associated with the democrats AND ultra left wing political groups, and was a stauch nudist's rights defender who sold hemp for a living.

If a white man goes to a predominantly black church and shoots up the place it WILL be called a racist attack and he will be pained as a conservative - without any quesiton about other possible motive.  IF a black man goes to a white church and does that it will NOT be called racsim unless clear evidence surfaces. It'll be speculated that it might be revenge for some wrongdoing or in retaliation to white violence or the like and the fact he's a registered dem won't be mentioned.

Just so we're clear - i don't think it should be mentioned. People's politics rarely have anything to do with this kind of thing, and if it specifically does then fine report that.

But if the person is right leaning at all that will be discovered and presented as relevant regardless, and if they're left leaning it'll be quietly covered up and not mentioned.

 

 

47 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

If not political then it's just pure demented hatred. Why haven't they released the manifesto of the twisted tranny that shot up the Christian school? If it had been a trump supporter the thing would have been plastered everywhere the next day. 

LOL - you're faster than me - i just posted a bunch of info on that myself.

[CdnFox]

34 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Because the families of the victims and the school itself are suing to prevent its release. Ask them why.

Illegal copies were circulating. It's probably because it was full of crap like Wanna kill all you little c*******," "Bunch of little f****** w/ your white privlages f*** you f****** etc etc.

It was pretty clear.

 

[Black Dog]

56 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And it won't - the media does not treat left leaning shooters the same way.  The right does but they tend to dismiss it in BOTH cases unless their politics is specifically a major issue in the shooting.

So there are many but how about this one to start, you probably heard about it at the time:

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/27/1166268762/nashville-school-shooting-covenant

And a little more info about the shooter:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/nashville-shooter-audrey-hale/story?id=98166039

Now her facebook account which was taken down did contain strong support for the dems.  And he's a transgender graphics designer with cats.  Not exactly the profile of a republican so that's believable

Now we never did learn what the motive was of course, but given the circumstances it could very well have been political - certainly she was left wing and the target she chose would have been predominantly right leaning.  But the media handles it very very differently than if they were a conservative equivilant.

You are aware the killer attended the school, right? Like they didn't just randomly select a Christian school. 

Quote

The man who attacked nanci pelosi's  hubby was initially reported as a right wing nutjob with a facebook or social media site at all. However  it turned out that site had just been activated and filled with content and it was taken down by someone a day after that was pointed out. Further it turned out he was associated with the democrats AND ultra left wing political groups, and was a stauch nudist's rights defender who sold hemp for a living.

He was a nutjob who followed right wing political commentators and believed in Q Anon adjacent conspiracy theories.

Quote

 

The man accused of attacking former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a hammer last year told jurors at his federal trial Tuesday how he went to the Pelosis’ San Francisco home as part of a bigger plan to end corruption in the United States.

David DePape spoke for more than an hour in which he tearfully recounted about how his political leanings went from leftist to right-wing after reading a comment on a YouTube video about former President Donald Trump. He did not deny bludgeoning Paul Pelosi, saying he reacted after realizing his larger plan might be unraveling.

...

DePape testified he first was drawn to right-wing conspiracies after learning about “Gamergate,” an online harassment campaign against women in the video gaming community that took place about a decade ago. He said he often played video games for up to six hours a day while listening to political podcasts.

He heard about one of his targets, a University of Michigan professor, while listening to conservative commentator James Lindsay.

“The takeaway I got is that she wants to turn our schools into pedophile molestation factories,” he said.

 

 

Quote

If a white man goes to a predominantly black church and shoots up the place it WILL be called a racist attack and he will be pained as a conservative - without any quesiton about other possible motive.  IF a black man goes to a white church and does that it will NOT be called racsim unless clear evidence surfaces. It'll be speculated that it might be revenge for some wrongdoing or in retaliation to white violence or the like and the fact he's a registered dem won't be mentioned.

Difference here is one of those things has happened multiple times and the other is just a figment of your imagination.

Quote

 

Just so we're clear - i don't think it should be mentioned. People's politics rarely have anything to do with this kind of thing, and if it specifically does then fine report that.

But if the person is right leaning at all that will be discovered and presented as relevant regardless, and if they're left leaning it'll be quietly covered up and not mentioned.

 

You said "a crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people" so let's see some examples where there' sany evidence of political motivation.

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Ohhhhhh your a George Floyd truther, makes sense.

Everybody with an IQ over 80 is a "G Floyd truther" now. You're only a couple standards of deviation away being part of the "in" crowd>

Quote

Must chap your ass that pig Chauvin is rotting in jail for the rest of his life, huh.

It was definitely an injustice, so if you don't care, that's just a sad reflection of your abysmal character.

Quote

As for the rest, you continue to prove my point that no level of evidence will ever be accepted by people like you who's entire worldview is predicated on ignoring evidence.

It's the height of hypocrisy for you to call other people ignorant you willing little mushroom. 

You just acknowledged that you have no clue what happened in the G Floyd killing, which is arguably one of the main events within our culture in the last 20 years. You have zero room to talk. 

FYI people like me are here trying to educate you but you're too busy own-ass spelunking to take advantage of the information being presented to you. 

If you wanna get back on topic, this thread is about the reasons that leftards cite for their own unhappiness, and it seems to be well-established here now that, for the most part, they're butt-hurt whiners who prefer blaming society at large for their own issues instead of taking accountability.

Got it, puppy? Good boy. Go chew a slipper. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Has Biden pardoned any BLM-related rioters? Cause Trump has promised to pardon all of the January 6 rioters, and he calls these convicted insurrectionist traitor criminals "hostages." 

Donald Trump is disgusting.

The difference between Jan 6thers and BLMers is that a lot of Jan 6thers were locked up for years without trial despite never committing a violent or destructive act, and the Dems' Jan 6th committee also falsified evidence to get them convicted, while almost no BLMers were ever locked up at all, even the arsonists and violent criminals. 

You're disgusting. 

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

Sorry pal, I know bullshit when I see it, and your leftist overlords did zilch to curb BLM's racial rioting. 

Maybe we should add: "Always having to watch conservatives bringing facts to debates which leftists can only lie about" to the laundry list of reasons why they're so unhappy. 

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

The difference between Jan 6thers and BLMers is that a lot of Jan 6thers were locked up for years without trial despite never committing a violent or destructive act, and the Dems' Jan 6th committee also falsified evidence to get them convicted, while almost no BLMers were ever locked up at all, even the arsonists and violent criminals. 

You're disgusting. 

You didn’t see any violent acts on Jan 6? 

[WestCanMan]

25 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You didn’t see any violent acts on Jan 6? 

Yes, there were some violent acts on Jan 6th, and I never said that there weren't. You'd know that if your reading comprehension was up to snuff.

I said "a lot of Jan 6thers were locked up for years without trial despite never committing a violent or destructive act", it's just a few posts up. Look again. 

Notice that I didn't say "all of the Jan 6thers locked up" at the beginning and I didn't say "no one committed any violent or destructive acts...." at the end.

No conservative that I know of denies that there was violence, and none of them ever said that committing acts of violence was the right thing to do either. That's strictly a leftist phenomenon at this point. Leftists do it a lot.

For 3 of the 6 years from summer 2014 to summer 2020, leftist leaders, their media partners and their brainwashed horde alike universally applauded all of the violence and destruction. It was only on very rare occasions that one of them would break ranks and insert a bit of mild condemnation into their hearty approval of it.  

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

You are aware the killer attended the school, right? Like they didn't just randomly select a Christian school. 

sure - they usually go where they're familiar.  You're aware his manifesto made it clear that he was there to kill kids with white privlidge etc and that he was a dem supporter right? That was the point. I was asked for an example - here's a trans male shooting up a school with full remediation who's a known dem supporter who specifically offered left wing talking points about white privledge and the like as his reasoning.  Mischief managed i'd say  

 

Quote

He was a nutjob who followed right wing political commentators and believed in Q Anon adjacent conspiracy theories.

Nope. that angle has been disproven many many many times.  He belonged to far left groups, was a hemp farmer and nudist, and while he might well get sucked in to qanon theories the fact is that happens to democrats more often than you'd think. Sorry.
 

 

Quote

Difference here is one of those things has happened multiple times and the other is just a figment of your imagination.

Ohhh - sorry little guy it's happened many times.  Here's one

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A prosecutor said Monday that a black man charged with fatally shooting a woman and wounding seven people at a Nashville church aimed to kill at least 10 white churchgoers and cited a 2015 massacre at a black church in South Carolina.

https://apnews.com/article/religion-f3d7b3eed1f7450bac1bc78caf61d4c6

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A prosecutor said Monday that a black man charged with fatally shooting a woman and wounding seven people at a Nashville church aimed to kill at least 10 white churchgoers and cited a 2015 massacre at a black church in South Carolina.

Dont you get tired of being wrong? Like ever?

 

Quote

You said "a crap tonne of the recent shootings in 2023 were by leftleaning people" so let's see some examples where there' sany evidence of political motivation.

Ahhh - so i said left leaning, and you're trying to change it to "politically motivated'.   I"m going to have to ask you to get back here with those goalposts  

I've posted one which is a great example.

Sorry kiddo, once again you've been proven wrong.  If you took the time to do the research before making statements that are clearly not real you'd be better off.

As it is, i can tell you're thinking about transiting into full on sealion mode.  Just remember there's no surer way to say you're wrong with thout saying it than that  

[WestCanMan]

9 hours ago, Deluge said:

 

Lefties Losing it is a great segment lol 

 

Edited January 30, 2024 by WestCanMan