Jump to content

GOP Emoluments Investigation finds Biden free of foreign funding; uncovers Trump accepted over $7.8 million from foreign governments during his Presidency


Recommended Posts

The GOP  set up a Committee to Investigate and find some evidence that Joe Biden, President of the USA has been accepting foreign money, it found none. ......But what those investigations DID find on further investigation is that Donald Trump, while president during his term.of Office in the White House DID accept  money, " at least $7.8 million dollars, from foreign dignitaries who stayed at Trumps hotels ( just 4 were investigated and only over a two year period of the originally scheduled 4 year intended ) the GOP investigators being told to stop any further investigation after that....the hotels involved in this GOP Investigation were the Trump International hotel which was just 1/2 mile from the white House in Washington, D. C., Trump Tower on 5th Avenue in New York City, Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, and Trump International Hotel on United Nations Plaza in New York City.  On being questioned, Trump gave his usual answer that " the investigation was " phony" and a witch hunt", seemingly unaware he was disparaging his own party's facts gathering Investigation!  

 

Apparently Donald Trump believes that ANY investigation or questions regarding the many times he violated the U. S. Constitution's Emoluments Clause in that as an Official of the U. S. Government he was absolutely, by law, forbidden to accept ANY money from any foreign government ...and receiving millions of dollars in these violations, he was "immune" from any prosecution for said crimes simply because he was President.  

SOURCE. Mazars USA Donald Trump's previous financial services firm and,   the New York TIMES. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other news, some people stayed at Trump's hotels.

Biden's a little ticked because Hunter never thought of that, he just thought selling influence would not be investigated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Legato said:

In other news, some people stayed at Trump's hotels.

Biden's a little ticked because Hunter never thought of that, he just thought selling influence would not be investigated.

Don't you know that "selling influence," is NOT illegal? Do you even have a copy of the contract for that "sale"? LMAO

Only delivering OFFICIAL POLICY FAVORS is illegal WHEN there is BRIBERY. AKA, payments TO JOE and EVIDENCE of DELIVERY after.

Otherwise Kushner could be prosecuted for the $2B BRIBE given him by MBS and his Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, these lucrative arrangements have been public knowledge for years. Republican voters didn't care about this transgression any more than they cared about the sexual assaults, the extortion, the insurrection, the fraud, or any of the other deplorable behavior. 

Trump is and always has been a corrupt con man. They're just into it. People without morals like people without morals.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Hodad said:

Eh, these lucrative arrangements have been public knowledge for years. Republican voters didn't care about this transgression any more than they cared about the sexual assaults, the extortion, the insurrection, the fraud, or any of the other deplorable behavior. 

Trump is and always has been a corrupt con man. They're just into it. People without morals like people without morals.

Well if you can't beat em, join em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s new evidence of foreign money going to a president: Trump

The heart of the Republican effort to potentially (or probably: inevitably) impeach President Biden are business agreements involving his son Hunter Biden. Even before Republicans took control of the House a year ago, party leaders, such as then-incoming House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), announced their intention to explore how money from foreign actors might have made its way through Hunter Biden to his father. When then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) opened an impeachment inquiry in September, he cited a need to figure out how money might have flowed to the president — though he did not claim, as others have, that this had already been demonstrated.

On Thursday, members of the Oversight Committee finally offered actual concrete evidence of a president benefiting from an influx of foreign money. This isn’t particularly useful for the Republican impeachment effort, though: The president at issue was Donald Trump.

It’s worth pointing out that this has always been the problem with the Republican targeting of Biden. Their insistence on the nefariousness of layered corporations or money from overseas was always more applicable to Trump and his family than to Biden and his. Comer repeatedly claimed that one of his desired goals is to come up with rules governing how presidential family members might leverage their relationships, but he has also repeatedly ignored evidence of how Trump’s family — and Trump himself — did so. 

 

18.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2024 at 3:45 PM, robosmith said:

Don't you know that "selling influence," is NOT illegal? Do you even have a copy of the contract for that "sale"? LMAO

Only delivering OFFICIAL POLICY FAVORS is illegal WHEN there is BRIBERY. AKA, payments TO JOE and EVIDENCE of DELIVERY after.

Otherwise Kushner could be prosecuted for the $2B BRIBE given him by MBS and his Sovereign Wealth Fund.

"... and Kushner could...", yes, he could.  And Trump could be made to.pay restitution for all the money he has scammed out of others alleged to be campaign " donations" if any of them are linked to any promise of a pardon for same as that would not only violate federal election law, but also be transactional fraud if he fails to come through. So, if he doesn't win he must repay every dollar to the people he promised pardons to who gave him a donation if they say that us why they gave him one. Plus interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2024 at 6:29 PM, Legato said:

In other news, some people stayed at Trump's hotels.

Biden's a little ticked because Hunter never thought of that, he just thought selling influence would not be investigated.

Hunter Biden was not an Officer of the United States. Donald Trump was.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Admit that you do not know the meaning of the word “Emolument.”  (Hint: It does not mean “gift”). 

Holy reality warp Batman!

You stay at a hotel...you pay the bill.

Tell me now...what service did Hunter provide for his payola?

Edited by Nationalist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Holy reality warp Batman!

You stay at a hotel...you pay the bill.

Tell me now...what service did Hunter provide for his payola?

He gave them a painting, we all know he is world renowned painter whose talent has been recognized by multiple foreign governments and Democrat donors.

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Holy reality warp Batman!

You stay at a hotel...you pay the bill.

Tell me now...what service did Hunter provide for his payola?

Jesus Christ man, look up the meaning of the word!  How hard is that?

Hunter Biden is exempt from the emoluments clause because he was not an officer of the United States. There’s no equivalency. All you have is, “Hunter Biden worked for Burisma and I’m going to pretend that he performed corrupt acts events though I have no evidence whatsoever.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...they stayed at his hotels and paid for that service.

Swing...and a miss.

Have you even read the emoluments clause? It is YOU who is flailing WILDLY.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Holy reality warp Batman!

You stay at a hotel...you pay the bill.

Tell me now...what service did Hunter provide for his payola?

Hunter has NOTHING to DO with Trump violating the emoluments clause in the Constitution. Duh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Have you even read the emoluments clause? It is YOU who is flailing WILDLY.

 

Yes I have and its you who flailing wildly. Unless you can show that these foreign governments paid waaaaaay over and above what it normally costs then no harm no foul. They came to DC and stayed in his hotel, do you really think the piddly money Trump made by them staying there would change his opinion of world leaders? Yes it is piddly if you separate out the stays and individual government officials along with the profit margin of the hotel.

Now if they stayed in his hotel and tipped a bellboy named Ronald Crump a million dollars then you would have a real case.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Yes I have and its you who flailing wildly. Unless you can show that these foreign governments paid waaaaaay over and above what it normally costs then no harm no foul. They came to DC and stayed in his hotel, do you really think the piddly money Trump made by them staying there would change his opinion of world leaders? Yes it is piddly if you separate out the stays and individual government officials along with the profit margin of the hotel.

Now if they stayed in his hotel and tipped a bellboy named Ronald Crump a million dollars then you would have a real case.

 

Yes, I really believe that Trump tracks those who stay at his properties and he was personally involved in insisting that Pence stay at HIS property which was on the OTHER SIDE of Ireland from where his official meetings were held.

He has also directed the Air Force to get planes refueled near the towns where his properties are. Why else would they do that when they NEVER did it before?

The thing you don't understand is that Trump is cheap and micromanages his properties.

A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms

Quote

groups tried to curry favor with Trump by booking rooms at his hotels but never using them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rebound said:

Jesus Christ man, look up the meaning of the word!  How hard is that?

Hunter Biden is exempt from the emoluments clause because he was not an officer of the United States. There’s no equivalency. All you have is, “Hunter Biden worked for Burisma and I’m going to pretend that he performed corrupt acts events though I have no evidence whatsoever.”

And 10% for the big guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Yes, I really believe that Trump tracks those who stay at his properties and he was personally involved in insisting that Pence stay at HIS property which was on the OTHER SIDE of Ireland from where his official meetings were held.

He has also directed the Air Force to get planes refueled near the towns where his properties are. Why else would they do that when they NEVER did it before?

The thing you don't understand is that Trump is cheap and micromanages his properties.

A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms

 

 

You sure try hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Rebound said:

Jesus Christ man, look up the meaning of the word!  How hard is that?

Hunter Biden is exempt from the emoluments clause because he was not an officer of the United States. There’s no equivalency.

There absolutely was if biden got a nickle. And there is evidence and testimony that he got a lot of nickles.

Clinton was smarter - she had all the money go to her husband.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...