A Catastrophic Climate ‘Tipping Point’ Is Imminent

[Aristides]

1 minute ago, taxme said:

But i am open minded. There is nothing wrong with questioning or challenging anything told to us by either NASA, our politicians or the MSM. Why is there so many silly ass people like you around who seems to think that if someone questions something they somehow are conspiracy nutters? 

If some NASA official told you that the moon was really made out of cheese, would you just go along with it and not question or challenge it? Knowing you of course, you would probably ask NASA as to what kind of cheese is the moon made of. 🤣 And just how would you know if any of those astronauts flying around in space have not suffered from radiation poisoning? They do not have to fall down dead right away. Anyway, believe what you want to believe and so will I. 

Well according to you some NASA official said way back at the beginning of the program they thought radiation levels were too high for space travel. In spite of 60 years experience to the contrary, you are still stuck 60 years ago. Like I said, as long as something fits your conspiracy, you hang on to it like a dog with a bone in spite of everything to the contrary. Radiation may very well affect astronauts. Are you aware of any studies that compare their cancer rates with non astronauts? Wouldn't matter, you wouldn't believe them anyway unless they told you what you wanted to hear. Are you aware that 3/4 of the earth's atmosphere is below 36,000 ft (5.8 miles) so high flying airliners are also exposed to most of any radiation. Probably not.

[herbie]

 

[taxme]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

FFS man,  because it's a desolate lifeless barren wasteland devoid of any interesting features or reasons to visit, other than being able to say you did once.

I haven't gone back to moosejaw since the 60's for much the same reason, but that doesn't mean nobody was ever there!

So, they sent astronauts to the moon, land on it's surface, pick up a few rock samples, and then fly back home to earth and then brag about America being the first country to send and land a man on the moon and that is it? Okay, whatever you say, NASA. 😁

So, they must have gone to the moon just to find out if the moon was made of rock or cheese i guess, eh? I thought that the whole idea was to put space stations on the moon, as a stopover for the astronauts to take a coffee break, before any further space travel would be done. I just do not see the point of going to the moon and then stop any more flights to the moon. If exploration of outer space is such a big deal with NASA, why the stoppage of man made flights to the moon? 

Who would want to go to Moosejaw anyway? So, what do you call yourselves? Moosejawians? 🤣 

[Aristides]

6 minutes ago, taxme said:

So, they sent astronauts to the moon, land on it's surface, pick up a few rock samples, and then fly back home to earth and then brag about America being the first country to send and land a man on the moon and that is it? Okay, whatever you say, NASA. 😁

So, they must have gone to the moon just to find out if the moon was made of rock or cheese i guess, eh? I thought that the whole idea was to put space stations on the moon, as a stopover for the astronauts to take a coffee break, before any further space travel would be done. I just do not see the point of going to the moon and then stop any more flights to the moon. If exploration of outer space is such a big deal with NASA, why the stoppage of man made flights to the moon? 

Who would want to go to Moosejaw anyway? So, what do you call yourselves? Moosejawians? 🤣 

Never heard of the Cold War and the space race with the Soviet Union? Guess not.

[Hodad]

18 minutes ago, taxme said:

So, they sent astronauts to the moon, land on it's surface, pick up a few rock samples, and then fly back home to earth and then brag about America being the first country to send and land a man on the moon and that is it? Okay, whatever you say, NASA. 😁

So, they must have gone to the moon just to find out if the moon was made of rock or cheese i guess, eh? I thought that the whole idea was to put space stations on the moon, as a stopover for the astronauts to take a coffee break, before any further space travel would be done. I just do not see the point of going to the moon and then stop any more flights to the moon. If exploration of outer space is such a big deal with NASA, why the stoppage of man made flights to the moon? 

Who would want to go to Moosejaw anyway? So, what do you call yourselves? Moosejawians? 🤣 

We did go back to the moon. Multiple Apollo missions returned. 12 Americans set foot on the surface. 

There is really no reason to doubt the moon landings. Governments/militaries (and others) around the world tracked the missions and "watched" it happen. The Russians gave up when we won the race. They would have loved nothing more than to call us out on a fake, but they also knew the rest of the world was watching and tracking the Apollo missions. 

IIRC, a couple of years ago an Indian spacecraft actually photographed the original landing site with our discarded modules still there. Moon litter!

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Deluge said:

Uh, oh. It's cold outside and it's snowing. Looks like we need to shut fossil fuels down completely and also cut lots of trees down so we can make room for lots of windmills. 

-- the Left

If it's NOT an historical record (like 5 days of RECORD HEAT last summer), it means NOTHING about climate. Duh

Thanks for revealing once again how LITTLE you know about the science. LMAO

[robosmith]

52 minutes ago, taxme said:

But i am open minded. There is nothing wrong with questioning or challenging anything told to us by either NASA, our politicians or the MSM. Why is there so many silly ass people like you around who seems to think that if someone questions something they somehow are conspiracy nutters? 

If some NASA official told you that the moon was really made out of cheese, would you just go along with it and not question or challenge it? Knowing you of course, you would probably ask NASA as to what kind of cheese is the moon made of. 🤣 And just how would you know if any of those astronauts flying around in space have not suffered from radiation poisoning? They do not have to fall down dead right away. Anyway, believe what you want to believe and so will I. 

Problem is, you don't understand the difference between believing what EXPERTS SAY, and believing random Interwebz conspiracy theories. 🤮

[robosmith]

41 minutes ago, taxme said:

So, they sent astronauts to the moon, land on it's surface, pick up a few rock samples, and then fly back home to earth and then brag about America being the first country to send and land a man on the moon and that is it? Okay, whatever you say, NASA. 😁

So, they must have gone to the moon just to find out if the moon was made of rock or cheese i guess, eh? I thought that the whole idea was to put space stations on the moon, as a stopover for the astronauts to take a coffee break, before any further space travel would be done. I just do not see the point of going to the moon and then stop any more flights to the moon. If exploration of outer space is such a big deal with NASA, why the stoppage of man made flights to the moon? 

Who would want to go to Moosejaw anyway? So, what do you call yourselves? Moosejawians? 🤣 

Here's a better conspiracy theory for you: NASA moon mission was just a secret technology program for developing ICBM's. Of course it never fooled the Russians. LMAO

[taxme]

40 minutes ago, herbie said:

 

Such nasty language coming from such a hot looking babe like her. She said the "phukin  word so many times, I wonder if she got phukd that night? Lucky guy. Just wondering. 

Well, there is no need for me to start to worry about climate change. By 2050 i should be looking up at the grass, and not looking down on the grass anymore. So, fuk it. 🤣

[Aristides]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Here's a better conspiracy theory for you: NASA moon mission was just a secret technology program for developing ICBM's. Of course it never fooled the Russians. LMAO

The Russians were out front in the space race for years and there certainly was a concern about ICBM's but they are sub orbital and really have nothing to do with orbital or moon missions. 

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

The Russians were out front in the space race for years and there certainly was a concern about ICBM's but they are sub orbital and really have nothing to do with orbital or moon missions. 

Rocket tech is rocket tech. Any rocket which can boost a satellite into orbit can deliver a bomb with a parabolic trajectory.

At least the upper stages by themselves can, cause you don't want them reaching orbital SPEED.

[taxme]

19 minutes ago, Hodad said:

We did go back to the moon. Multiple Apollo missions returned. 12 Americans set foot on the surface. 

There is really no reason to doubt the moon landings. Governments/militaries (and others) around the world tracked the missions and "watched" it happen. The Russians gave up when we won the race. They would have loved nothing more than to call us out on a fake, but they also knew the rest of the world was watching and tracking the Apollo missions. 

IIRC, a couple of years ago an Indian spacecraft actually photographed the original landing site with our discarded modules still there. Moon litter!

Hollywood is well known for making movies that can make people and things appear as though to be quite real, when in fact, we know that it is not all for real. It's just a movie. Maybe the man on the moon was all just part of a make believe movie. The Russians probably know themselves that the landing of astronauts on the moon was all just a fake. But then again, who would believe the Russians? There was a cold war going on between Russia and America. Anything information coming out of Russia in those cold war days were not going to be seen on American TV. It was all just Russian bull shiot. 

Did that Indian spacecraft happen to take any pictures of the astronauts foot prints on the moon? Now that would be worth while seeing. But i can believe that there is now plenty of junk litter on the moon. I won't deny that. 

[taxme]

12 hours ago, Aristides said:

Trips to the moon stopped because the US had won the race to get there and no longer wanted to absorb the huge cost for what at the time was considered limited benefits The shuttle and space station became their priority. That decision has been debated ever since.

Four countries have landed spacecraft on the moon. I guess they are all lying about what it is made of. 60 years ago someone from NASA may have said something and you haven't learned anything since. Yes, radiation is an issue in space flight but the space station orbits well above the earths atmosphere and astronauts have spend over a year there with no ill effects. 

That's a problem with you conspiracy nutters, you latch on to something that fits your conspiracy and close your mind to anything else. You claim to be open minded when in fact, you are the opposite.

Do you work for NASA? Maybe those so called trips were stopped because there were already too many questions being asked as to whether their was a real man landing on the moon. As i asked already. Why no man landings since the 60's unless the whole space landing story was all just a fake. 

You see, you must try and understand, if that is possible for you to do, is that if there is just one question being asked about the moon landing then there has to be a reason for that questioning? Maybe there was something in there that did not appear to be quite real about the whole moon landing story. Anyway, we have gone way off topic. I say no more. 

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

But i am open minded. There is nothing wrong with questioning or challenging anything told to us by either NASA, our politicians or the MSM. Why is there so many silly ass people like you around who seems to think that if someone questions something they somehow are conspiracy nutters? 

If some NASA official told you that the moon was really made out of cheese, would you just go along with it and not question or challenge it? Knowing you of course, you would probably ask NASA as to what kind of cheese is the moon made of. 🤣 And just how would you know if any of those astronauts flying around in space have not suffered from radiation poisoning? They do not have to fall down dead right away. Anyway, believe what you want to believe and so will I. 

To challenge something you need facts, just saying you don’t believe it means nothing.

I know you will believe what you want  to believe in spite of everything to the contrary, that’s what conspiracy nutters do,

[taxme]

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Problem is, you don't understand the difference between believing what EXPERTS SAY, and believing random Interwebz conspiracy theories. 🤮

There must be a good reason as to why so many people questioned and did not believe that a man landing on the moon did really happen. Unlike you, i decided to question the landing story myself by reading as to what others had to say about the man moon landings. They did come up with some interesting questions. Let's just say, for argument sake, that i am not really sure today as to whether or not a man moon landing had taken place. My right to do so. 

Unfortunately, for you and me, we will never actually know ourselves what really happened because in reality we were both not there for the landing of men on the moon. We can only go by from what others have to say. 

[Rebound]

48 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Here's a better conspiracy theory for you: NASA moon mission was just a secret technology program for developing ICBM's. Of course it never fooled the Russians. LMAO

Except… that’s the truth.

19 minutes ago, taxme said:

Do you work for NASA? Maybe those so called trips were stopped because there were already too many questions being asked as to whether their was a real man landing on the moon. As i asked already. Why no man landings since the 60's unless the whole space landing story was all just a fake. 

You see, you must try and understand, if that is possible for you to do, is that if there is just one question being asked about the moon landing then there has to be a reason for that questioning? Maybe there was something in there that did not appear to be quite real about the whole moon landing story. Anyway, we have gone way off topic. I say no more. 

They stopped because the program was incredibly expensive, we nearly lost Apollo 13, and the American public was no longer captivated by flights to the moon. We did it, we beat Russia, we didn’t need fifty more trips. 

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, taxme said:

There must be a good reason as to why so many people questioned and did not believe that a man landing on the moon did really happen. Unlike you, i decided to question the landing story myself by reading as to what others had to say about the man moon landings. They did come up with some interesting questions. Let's just say, for argument sake, that i am not really sure today as to whether or not a man moon landing had taken place. My right to do so. 

Unfortunately, for you and me, we will never actually know ourselves what really happened because in reality we were both not there for the landing of men on the moon. We can only go by from what others have to say. 

I watched the moon landing ON TV. Sorry you missed it.

I am ALSO certain that if it was FAKED, the secret would have gotten out.

You can't fake something like that without leaving evidence behind and hundreds of people who know the secret means it wouldn't stay secret.

Did you ever see a Saturn 5 rocket take off. Millions did. Makes no sense to develop that just for a show.

[Rebound]

13 minutes ago, taxme said:

There must be a good reason as to why so many people questioned and did not believe that a man landing on the moon did really happen. Unlike you, i decided to question the landing story myself by reading as to what others had to say about the man moon landings. They did come up with some interesting questions. Let's just say, for argument sake, that i am not really sure today as to whether or not a man moon landing had taken place. My right to do so. 

Unfortunately, for you and me, we will never actually know ourselves what really happened because in reality we were both not there for the landing of men on the moon. We can only go by from what others have to say. 

Did you know that Ytou can measure the exact distance from the earth to the moon using a laser beam? And the reason why is because astronauts put a laser reflector on the surface of the moon. So there’s your proof. Point the laser at the reflector, and the light will reflect back.

Beyond that? We’ve orbited people around Earth for years at a time. You can point a dish into space and receive TV signals from it. We get weather forecasting from satellites. Satellite radio. Satellite internet. With all that, there’s no reason at all to believe that we cannot send people a little bit further and reach the moon. And, yes, it’s only a little bit farther, because once you’re in space, it takes virtually no fuel at all to move anywhere. 

Edited January 10, 2024 by Rebound

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Except… that’s the truth.

Every conspiracy theory has a nugget of truth.

[taxme]

5 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Did you know that Ytou can measure the exact distance from the earth to the moon using a laser beam? And the reason why is because astronauts put a laser reflector on the surface of the moon. So there’s your proof. Point the laser at the reflector, and the light will reflect back.

Beyond that? We’ve orbited people around Earth for years at a time. You can point a dish into space and receive TV signals from it. We get weather forecasting from satellites. Satellite radio. Satellite internet. With all that, there’s no reason at all to believe that we cannot send people a little bit further and reach the moon. And, yes, it’s only a little bit farther, because once you’re in space, it takes virtually no fuel at all to move anywhere. 

So, what has this have to do with climate change? Are those laser beams possibly causing climate crisis by chance? 😁

[Aristides]

49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Rocket tech is rocket tech. Any rocket which can boost a satellite into orbit can deliver a bomb with a parabolic trajectory.

At least the upper stages by themselves can, cause you don't want them reaching orbital SPEED.

ICBM’s were in service by the Cuba missile crisis, long before moon missions.

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Every conspiracy theory has a nugget of truth.

They are based on nuggets, not truth.

[taxme]

13 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Except… that’s the truth.

They stopped because the program was incredibly expensive, we nearly lost Apollo 13, and the American public was no longer captivated by flights to the moon. We did it, we beat Russia, we didn’t need fifty more trips. 

Excuses-excuses. So, in other words America went to the moon, landed on the moon, and now say phk it, we do not want to go back to the moon anymore. I don't get it at all. Personally the moon landing appears to be a movie made in Hollywood. Hey, we never know, eh? 

[Hodad]

38 minutes ago, taxme said:

Hollywood is well known for making movies that can make people and things appear as though to be quite real, when in fact, we know that it is not all for real. It's just a movie. Maybe the man on the moon was all just part of a make believe movie. The Russians probably know themselves that the landing of astronauts on the moon was all just a fake. But then again, who would believe the Russians? There was a cold war going on between Russia and America. Anything information coming out of Russia in those cold war days were not going to be seen on American TV. It was all just Russian bull shiot. 

Did that Indian spacecraft happen to take any pictures of the astronauts foot prints on the moon? Now that would be worth while seeing. But i can believe that there is now plenty of junk litter on the moon. I won't deny that. 

Jeebus, man. People watched them board the shuttle and watched it launch. Third parties tracked the mission. At the same time the world watched the broadcast as the astronauts walked in the moon. And then the world tracked the journey home and watched splash down  And they brought home souvenirs, which again the world has studied. 

You think they went to the moon and just didn't go outside? Multiple countries can share the ISS, but you think we can't go to the moon? What you're proposing is just insanity. The thinking is so poor and disordered it seems impossible that it comes from a functional human being.

 

[robosmith]

 

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

ICBM’s were in service by the Cuba missile crisis, long before moon missions.

They are based on nuggets, not truth.

Those were short range missiles, NOT Inter-continental. 

That's why they needed to be in Cuba.

 

[Hodad]

24 minutes ago, taxme said:

There must be a good reason as to why so many people questioned and did not believe that a man landing on the moon did really happen. Unlike you, i decided to question the landing story myself by reading as to what others had to say about the man moon landings. They did come up with some interesting questions. Let's just say, for argument sake, that i am not really sure today as to whether or not a man moon landing had taken place. My right to do so. 

Unfortunately, for you and me, we will never actually know ourselves what really happened because in reality we were both not there for the landing of men on the moon. We can only go by from what others have to say. 

Yes, the reason is that there are a lot of dumb people in the world. With small imaginations. Half of the population is below average intelligence.