Jump to content

Trump claims immunity from ANYTHING!


Recommended Posts

On 12/11/2023 at 10:17 AM, godzilla said:

this is kind of hilarious... doesn't Trump's request for SCOTUS to declare him immune from prosecution kinda admit that he broke crimes?

more importantly, if SCOTUS determines that the president is above prosecution for crimes then doesn't that allow Biden to take full autocratic control of the US? and provide mass pardons for those who assist him?

Special counsel Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to rule quickly on whether Trump can be prosecuted

What crimes has Trump committed? Have any to show us here? Just asking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2023 at 12:57 PM, godzilla said:

and its after the Trump presidency.

but to your point... if Biden were to dissolve congress and the senate and put his cabinet in direct control of the country, then that doesn't threaten national security in any way. i don't think most people would agree that thats cool.

in fact, he could just say that "he believes" there is an outside government controlling congress and that his intent is in the interest of national security!

But it's during another presidential campaign, which means the democrats are engaging in election interference. They need to wait until after Trump's second term in office. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, taxme said:

What crimes has Trump committed? Have any to show us here? Just asking. 

It's not even relevant tho, his original statement is entirely flawed.  Saying "i can't be prosecuted' is not the same as saying "i broke the law but you can't touch me, neener neener".

If it is true that he cannot be prosecuted then that's the end of the discussion - nobody wants to go through a prosectution, ESPECIALLY if they're innocent. Of course his lawyer would try to get it thrown out. It's silly to suggest that defending yourself in court proves you're guilty, yeash!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2023 at 11:59 AM, Deluge said:

And the left is trying like hell to derail his campaign for a second term. 

What's your point? 

As Trump said already. If he were not running for President there would be no campaign to try and stop him or try and charge him with anything. The Demonrats are running scared and have to find someway in trying to stop Trump from becoming the next President of the USA.

They know that if Trump becomes the next President, their demonrat asses are in big time trouble. Trump will exact revenge on those that tried to nail Trump on something. The demonrats do not know as to how to play fair ball. They prefer to cheat. When Trump becomes the President in the next election, that is when i will get the popcorn out and get ready for the demonrat slaughter. 2024 cannot get here soon enough. LOL.

On 12/11/2023 at 11:10 AM, CdnFox said:

No no, no apology required at all, its pretty easy to post a topic wihtout realizing someone else had, everyone does that once in a while.

If god were for real, god should apologize for allowing you to be hatched. ?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2023 at 1:29 PM, herbie said:

If grovelling to the Court the demented lout personally stacked fails, you'll just have to re-elect him so he can pardon himself from all past present and future charges.
Which he would do quickly.

Trump is not going to be found guilty of anything. Trump will beat all charges laid against him because they are all just manufactured bogus charges made up in order to try and stop Trump from becoming the next American President. It's for sure that if traitor to America BiDumb, or his corrupt kid should ever go to jail for their crimes, Trump will never give that senile old phuk and his punk kid a pardon for what old BiDumb has done to Trump. Orange suits would look great on old BiDumb and his kid. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's not even relevant tho, his original statement is entirely flawed.  Saying "i can't be prosecuted' is not the same as saying "i broke the law but you can't touch me, neener neener".

If it is true that he cannot be prosecuted then that's the end of the discussion - nobody wants to go through a prosectution, ESPECIALLY if they're innocent. Of course his lawyer would try to get it thrown out. It's silly to suggest that defending yourself in court proves you're guilty, yeash!!!!!

We will never see the day when Trump gets prosecuted for anything because he has not committed any crime. All charges being brought against Trump will go nowhere. Apparently the lying prosecutor Smith wants to have a speedy trial set up and over before the next election rolls around to see if he can nail Trump on something before the next election. Under normal circumstances this trial should go ahead way after the election. But the rats like Smith have to try and nail Trump before the election. Fools like you just seems to be everywhere. The world will always be in trouble with fools like you around. So, go away with your anti-Trump bullshit. Trump will be the next President of the USA. Live with it, drip-drip-drip. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It's not just me, robotriggered; I share the thinking of millions of Americans and we all know you f*ckers need to be neutralized in this next election. 

Trump will take his rightful place as President of this country, and I can't wait to see what he does with the democrat vermin. :D

 

I don't doubt that the MAGA CULT has been assimilated like Qanon and The BORG. LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, taxme said:

And of course BiDumb is squeaky clean, eh, drip-drip-drip. ?

Republicans in the House were asked to detail the offense for which Biden would potentially be charged in impeachment and NONE of them could name the "high crime and misdemeanor."

Several Republicans have said there is NO EVIDENCE and that's why they need a fishing expedition.

Fishing expedition refers to someone overly investigating or demanding information from an individual or organization. In law, the term is most used to describe using the discovery phase of a lawsuit to demand too much information based on hunches and accusations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Republicans in the House were asked to detail the offense for which Biden would potentially be charged in impeachment and NONE of them could name the "high crime and misdemeanor."

Several Republicans have said there is NO EVIDENCE and that's why they need a fishing expedition.

Fishing expedition refers to someone overly investigating or demanding information from an individual or organization. In law, the term is most used to describe using the discovery phase of a lawsuit to demand too much information based on hunches and accusations.

I guess every president will now be subject to an impeachment inquiry the day they take office.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxme said:

We will never see the day when Trump gets prosecuted for anything because he has not committed any crime.

MANY people who have never committed a crime get prosecuted.  Often they are found innocent, but they still have to go through being prosecuted.

When someone deliberately puts someone through the pain and cost of prosecution even though they know they'll be found innocent in the end just to make life tough for them, we call that 'punishment by process'.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone forgets the simplest concepts of how law works. If there's evidence of lawbreaking then you investigate. You don't fish for evidence without any idea of what crime was committed.

When a court finds you guilty of fraud, you are guilty. When you claim your house was worth $1 million dollars on your 1973 taxes when it wasn't and plead it is worth that now you admit to have committed fraud.

and if the 'sins of the father' accusation wasn't low enough for the the deplorables push 'the sins of the son' as an excuse.

HTG Trumo must have more dirt on these spineless GOP sycophants than J Edgar Hoover ever had on anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, herbie said:

Someone forgets the simplest concepts of how law works. If there's evidence of lawbreaking then you investigate. You don't fish for evidence without any idea of what crime was committed.

You do if you hate trump and want to find any reason to cause him legal grief.  Hell then you can FAKE data - steel dossier anyone?

Quote

When a court finds you guilty of fraud, you are guilty

The court never found him guilty of fraud. This is not a criminal case.  the court never even heard arguments regarding that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry if someone has outlined this in another post but... what the hell is Trumps excuse at the moment? why is he not guilty of the crime of directing the forging of documents to circumvent the transfer of power?

we have three guilty pleas in Georgia now including the person who came up with the plan.

the plan involves getting sets of electors in to sign Electoral College certificates of ascertainment in select states that Trump needed to win. Chesebro is now spilling the beans about this and how he briefed Trump himself:

Recordings describe 2020 Oval Office photo-op where Trump was briefed on fake electors and January 6

sending those certificates to congress and then having Pence delay certification based on the existence of those certificates.

all with the intention of preventing the lawful certification of Biden.

where is the legality in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, taxme said:

Trump is not going to be found guilty of anything. Trump will beat all charges laid against him because they are all just manufactured bogus charges made up in order to try and stop Trump from becoming the next American President. It's for sure that if traitor to America BiDumb, or his corrupt kid should ever go to jail for their crimes, Trump will never give that senile old phuk and his punk kid a pardon for what old BiDumb has done to Trump. Orange suits would look great on old BiDumb and his kid. ?

If that’s true, then why has Trump been spending tens of millions of dollars filing non-stop frivolous motions to delay his trials? If they’re bogus, why not just jump into court and prove it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, godzilla said:

What is it called then? cause everybody says its fraud.

Not everybody. People who want to sell papers :) always read the cases yourself, it's interesting.

And it is generally referred to as civil fraud - but that has nothing to do with "fraud" as we know it.  It's not a criminal case.

In fact in this case there isn't even an offended party. This is strictly a fine from the state, no bank or lender or anyone else at all is claiming there was any problem here. And as i noted - the judge did not hear evidence on whether or not it was fraud, civil or otherwise.  The  judge accepted the state's claim that it was a case of civil fraud without challenge and moved on to determining what the penalty should be, which is what the case was about.

Tonnes of actual real estate experts have come out and said the claim he overvalued the property is not credible, and that properties like that are almost impossible to assess because they're so unique and that the state tax department uses an ENTIRELY different valuation method including what the income from the property is. So if the club doesn't make money one year the valuation nosedives. They also noted that while there were factual errors in his submissions thats pretty common and the banks were allowed to verify the physical properties if they wished and in any case you still can't assess it's value like a normal property.

So - not convicted of fraud, not even tried for fraud, the judge accepted the state's claim that it was 'civil fraud' meaning nobody was actually defrauded, but you can face penalties.

But people with motive to dislike him say things like "He was CONVICTED of FRAAAAUUUUUDDDDD'!!!!!!!! (hang him!!!!)

You can't get 'convicted ' of a civil offense. He was not tried for fraud, the judge was there to assess penalties for what the state claimed was civil fraud and that was never tried in court.

This is like getting a speeding ticket and having to pay a fine,  and someone claiming you were convicted of criminal negligence operating a motor vehicle :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You do if you hate trump and want to find any reason to cause him legal grief.  Hell then you can FAKE data - steel dossier anyone?

The court never found him guilty of fraud. This is not a criminal case.  the court never even heard arguments regarding that.

Yes, Judge Engoron found Trump guilty of fraud.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, taxme said:

And of course BiDumb is squeaky clean, eh, drip-drip-drip. ?

Irrelevant.  Anyone who commits a crime should be prosecuted.  You can read the Trump indictments for yourself. They’re all public record and the prosecutors explain the crimes, list the evidence and state which laws were broken in commission of the crime.  
 

Donald Trump is currently facing 91 felony indictments, and it’s time for you to ask yourself: Why has this never happened before? If this is a “weapon,” why has no politician been charged so widely? And the answer is simple: Trump committed these crimes.  He mentions lawbreaking all the time. He said he’d maybe remain President a third term, that he would be a dictator on his first day in office and so on. And you can either excuse it as joking or realize that a person who wants to be the most powerful man in the world shouldn’t joke about being a dictator and breaking laws.  

Edited by Rebound
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,742
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    CrazyCanuck89
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • DACHSHUND went up a rank
      Rookie
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      First Post
    • aru earned a badge
      First Post
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...