The Sound Of Freedom is for real

[reason10]

Originally I wasn't going to bother seeing this movie. It meant sitting through a good 45 minutes of adolescent ads that my adult daughters would feel too old for. But it was well worth the wait.

This movie is about the true story of Tim Ballard, an agent with the US Department of Homeland Security, who arrested pedophiles and decided to quit his job and go after the children who had been kidnapped and were made to have sex for money. In other words. SLAVES. The girl's picture you're looking at was kidnapped along with her brother. I'll leave that story there because it's worth watching.

There was NO religious undertone in this flick. It was not a RUSH LIMBAUGH Institute For Advanced Conservative Studies type of thing. Of course, the left wing PRO PEDOPHILE rags like Slate and NPR (National Pedophile Radio) were quick to bash this movie. If you EVER wondered how the left feels about pedophilia and child trafficking (and didn't get a hint with the Unelected Joe regime) the left's reaction to this movie says all that needs to be said.

The movie would have SUCKED if it had been political. It had not on iota of politics in it, whatsoever. (Benji was more political, by contrast.) And it was very tastefully done. (as in no lurid overtones of actually children being raped.) The movie was dark. It wasn't a rousing and uplifting adventure flick. It was just a story that needed to be told.

Three points to take away from this flick.

1. God's children should not be for sale.

2. Jim Caviezel (in a message after the credits) said the MESSAGE was the true star of this show. Just as Harriet Beecher Stowe gave a message with Uncle Tom's Cabin, which led to the overturning of slavery in the United States, he hopes the message of this movie will lead to overturning the SLAVERY OF THE 21ST CENTURY.

3. For the idi0ts who are STILL whining about slave reparations, just remember that Africans sold Africans into slavery, adults as well as children. And Africa is STILL engaged in slave trade. MILLIONS of CHILDREN are being trafficked into sex slavery and they were kidnapped into it. And it is a greater evil than any other slavery of the past.

 

Liberals, the movie won't make you uncomfortable. It's not a political screed for some conservative candidate. Unless you support having sex with children and child trafficking, you'll want to see this. (I won't say you'll like it, because there's no much to LIKE about this story. I didn't like the story.  It was very skillfully and expertly produced. And it had to be told. )

 

 

 

 

[Michael Hardner]

God's children ARE for sale, because States are loosening child work regulations.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/teen-poultry-factory-child-worker-deaths_n_64b7ecbce4b0ad7b75f67af7

If you care about children, then care about child labour, education and healthcare not just abortion, Pride Flags and Democrat (but not Republican) pedophiles.  Sorry to those offended if I got political... maybe have a sit down and catch your breath...

[reason10]

16 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

God's children ARE for sale, because States are loosening child work regulations.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/teen-poultry-factory-child-worker-deaths_n_64b7ecbce4b0ad7b75f67af7

If you care about children, then care about child labour, education and healthcare not just abortion, Pride Flags and Democrat (but not Republican) pedophiles.  Sorry to those offended if I got political... maybe have a sit down and catch your breath...

Huffing on a crack pipe POST? Seriously?  What's next? The National Enquirer? The View?

 

Child labor? At age 14, I was a paperboy. I had to get up at the crack of dawn, get the newspapers (and this was in North Carolina where the winters are pretty awful) and had to collect for the subscriptions at NIGHT. No 40 hour work week, no time and a half. This was in the Sixties, when there were plenty of child labor laws on the books. Of course, these days your wonderful and politically correct electric cars are made possible by THIS child labor.

If you are equating CHILD TRAFFICKING with child labor, you are clearly missing the point.

Frankly, child labor deserves a thread of its own, especially since liberals who are pushing electric cars on us are creating a demand for this CHILD SLAVERY in the Congo. (Remember, Slavery was only outlawed in the United STates, and it took a CIVIL WAR to do that.

But THIS thread is about SOUND OF FREEDOM, a movie that exposes a very DARK child sex trafficking industry, and is based on a true story. Maybe you should leave your left wing bigotry at the door and try to focus on the actual subject of this thread.

Nobody mentioned queer pride fags, abortion, health care, or child labor. This is about THE SOUND OF FREEDOM and the CHILD TRAFFICKING it exposes.

 

Edited July 24, 2023 by reason10

[Michael Hardner]

Nobody cares about your stupid film.  They have convinced people to buy tickets even if they don't attend.

What is the legal limit for gullability?

[reason10]

18 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Nobody cares about your stupid film.  They have convinced people to buy tickets even if they don't attend.

What is the legal limit for gullability?

Right now, the film is outgrossing all the others. We'll all wait while you produce PROOF that people buying tickets aren't attending. Then again,  if you're dumb enough to post from Huffing ON A Crack Pipe Post, you'll believe anything.

That faggy Indiana Jones farce has crashed and burned. And that lesbianish Barbie will be lucky to earn back the production costs.

Oh, and the true story about a TRIUMPH in the war against child trafficking is hardly stupid, UNLESS YOU SUPPORT CHILD TRAFFICKING.

[WestCanMan]

23 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Nobody cares about your stupid film.  They have convinced people to buy tickets even if they don't attend.

What is the legal limit for gullability?

WTF do you mean nobody? What's wrong with you? 

Why are you so adamantly against a movie exposing pedophilia and human trafficking that you just can't help but chime in to go against it? 

FYI the top grossing films of 2022 were:

Avatar: The Way of Water

Top Gun: Maverick

Jurassic World: Dominion

Dr strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Minions: The Rise of Gru

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

The Batman

Thor: Love and Thunder

(It was a good year for the colon. It's in 6 of the top 8 movies lol)

Are you trying to say that Sound of Silence isn't worth watching compared to the shit above?

I saw Avatar, Top Gun, Gru and Thor and that was 4 movies too many. None of them were really worth watching with the benefit of hindsight. I just went out of habit.

Are you gonna go see Barbie instead MH?

[WestCanMan]

[West]

On 7/24/2023 at 4:02 PM, reason10 said:

Originally I wasn't going to bother seeing this movie. It meant sitting through a good 45 minutes of adolescent ads that my adult daughters would feel too old for. But it was well worth the wait.

This movie is about the true story of Tim Ballard, an agent with the US Department of Homeland Security, who arrested pedophiles and decided to quit his job and go after the children who had been kidnapped and were made to have sex for money. In other words. SLAVES. The girl's picture you're looking at was kidnapped along with her brother. I'll leave that story there because it's worth watching.

There was NO religious undertone in this flick. It was not a RUSH LIMBAUGH Institute For Advanced Conservative Studies type of thing. Of course, the left wing PRO PEDOPHILE rags like Slate and NPR (National Pedophile Radio) were quick to bash this movie. If you EVER wondered how the left feels about pedophilia and child trafficking (and didn't get a hint with the Unelected Joe regime) the left's reaction to this movie says all that needs to be said.

The movie would have SUCKED if it had been political. It had not on iota of politics in it, whatsoever. (Benji was more political, by contrast.) And it was very tastefully done. (as in no lurid overtones of actually children being raped.) The movie was dark. It wasn't a rousing and uplifting adventure flick. It was just a story that needed to be told.

Three points to take away from this flick.

1. God's children should not be for sale.

2. Jim Caviezel (in a message after the credits) said the MESSAGE was the true star of this show. Just as Harriet Beecher Stowe gave a message with Uncle Tom's Cabin, which led to the overturning of slavery in the United States, he hopes the message of this movie will lead to overturning the SLAVERY OF THE 21ST CENTURY.

3. For the idi0ts who are STILL whining about slave reparations, just remember that Africans sold Africans into slavery, adults as well as children. And Africa is STILL engaged in slave trade. MILLIONS of CHILDREN are being trafficked into sex slavery and they were kidnapped into it. And it is a greater evil than any other slavery of the past.

 

Liberals, the movie won't make you uncomfortable. It's not a political screed for some conservative candidate. Unless you support having sex with children and child trafficking, you'll want to see this. (I won't say you'll like it, because there's no much to LIKE about this story. I didn't like the story.  It was very skillfully and expertly produced. And it had to be told. )

 

 

 

 

Liberals are trynna distract from real life pedos doing sick things. 

Republicans have ALWAYS been anti slavery including this while Democrats have ALWAYS been pro sicko

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

WTF do you mean nobody? What's wrong with you? 

Why are you so adamantly against a movie exposing pedophilia and human trafficking that you just can't help but chime in to go against it? 

FYI the top grossing films of 2022 were:

Avatar: The Way of Water

Top Gun: Maverick

Jurassic World: Dominion

Dr strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Minions: The Rise of Gru

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

The Batman

Thor: Love and Thunder

(It was a good year for the colon. It's in 6 of the top 8 movies lol)

Are you trying to say that Sound of Silence isn't worth watching compared to the shit above?

I saw Avatar, Top Gun, Gru and Thor and that was 4 movies too many. None of them were really worth watching with the benefit of hindsight. I just went out of habit.

Are you gonna go see Barbie instead MH?

The movie doesn’t “expose” anything.  I’s more made up Q-anon pizzagate nonsense from the far right know-nothing conspiracy mor0ns, complete with their beloved old “evil dark-skinned foreigner”and “white Jesus saviour” tropes  

Even experts in human trafficking have said the movie lacks even a basic understanding of human trafficking and child sex trafficking. 
 

Children are far more likely to be abused by their the priests and pastors in their own church than by anything shown in this movie 

Edited July 26, 2023 by BeaverFever

[Michael Hardner]

5 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

The movie doesn’t “expose” anything. 

I have known for a long time that people believe that the things they see in action movies are realistic.

Not the stunts and explosions but the social commentary, especially explanations of how governments and large organizations work.

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, West said:

Liberals are trynna distract from real life pedos doing sick things. 

Republicans have ALWAYS been anti slavery including this while Democrats have ALWAYS been pro sicko

Republican speaker of the house during the Clinton years Dennis Hastert was a lifelong pedophile.
 

Jeffrey Epstein was represented by Republican Ken. Starr and given a sweetheart plea deal by Republican AG Anthony Alito. 
 

Ken Starr then went on to cover up sex crimes at Baylor University when he was president there and was forced to resign as a result. 

[BeaverFever]

6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I have known for a long time that people believe that the things they see in action movies are realistic.

Not the stunts and explosions but the social commentary, especially explanations of how governments and large organizations work.

Yeah where else would the kind of people we find on this site get their info from?

[WestCanMan]

54 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

The movie doesn’t “expose” anything.  I’s more made up Q-anon pizzagate nonsense from the far right know-nothing conspiracy mor0ns, complete with their beloved old “evil dark-skinned foreigner”and “white Jesus saviour” tropes  

Have you seen the movie or are you just regurgitating crap that you read in Vox? 

FYI the movie is apolitical, according to the guy who wrote the OP, and he saw the movie. 

Why don't you stop trying to tell us what's in the movie if you haven't seen it, dummy?

Quote

Even experts in human trafficking have said the movie lacks even a basic understanding of human trafficking and child sex trafficking. 

We went down this road with "50 former intel officials", remember? We went down this road with "the entire medical community and the covid pseudovax", remember? Your experts aren't "experts", they're Manchurian candidates. 

And FYI you're not a guy who's famous for being open-minded and seeking out information, you're a confirmation bias victim from the minute you wake up until the minute that you stop fantasizing about the day when a CNN narrative is proven to be fact-based. 

I knew exactly what your opinion on this movie would be as soon as I saw other leftards popping off about it. Isn't that weird, Beave? Shouldn't people think that "One day, Beave might have an opinion that differs from what they're saying on CNN."

Well we don't. I'd fall off my chair if you ever caught CNN lying (or admitted to it), and they lie 24/7. You just have to have an IQ over 60 and a memory longer than that of a goldfish to catch them.  

Quote

Children are far more likely to be abused by their the priests and pastors in their own church than by anything shown in this movie 

Who was shown to be abusing children in the movie, Beave? 

How many children do you think were abused in the Catholic church in the last 5 years, Beave? 

[reason10]

On 7/25/2023 at 8:29 PM, WestCanMan said:

WTF do you mean nobody? What's wrong with you? 

Why are you so adamantly against a movie exposing pedophilia and human trafficking that you just can't help but chime in to go against it? 

FYI the top grossing films of 2022 were:

Avatar: The Way of Water

Top Gun: Maverick

Jurassic World: Dominion

Dr strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Minions: The Rise of Gru

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

The Batman

Thor: Love and Thunder

(It was a good year for the colon. It's in 6 of the top 8 movies lol)

Are you trying to say that Sound of Silence isn't worth watching compared to the shit above?

I saw Avatar, Top Gun, Gru and Thor and that was 4 movies too many. None of them were really worth watching with the benefit of hindsight. I just went out of habit.

Are you gonna go see Barbie instead MH?

You are trying to debate with the POSTER OF THE LOWER COLON.

Forget the YEAR of the colon. This guy has bat guano for brains.

[reason10]

On 7/25/2023 at 10:47 PM, Michael Hardner said:

I have known for a long time that people believe that the things they see in action movies are realistic.

Not the stunts and explosions but the social commentary, especially explanations of how governments and large organizations work.

Hey IDI0T. The movie doesn't engage in social commentary, except after all the credits have run at the end (where Jim Caviezel talks about child trafficking and  puts it on the same level as SLAVERY.)

You haven't seen it IGNORAMUS, so you don't know what the fck you are talking about. (It doesn't count when your ONLy exposure to a movies is that racist NAZI WHOOPIE GOLDBERG BITCCHING about it.)

As I tried to 'splain to the non Downs Syndrome Crowd here, Sound of Freedom is NOT a political movie.

Either go and see it or STFU.

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, reason10 said:

You are trying to debate with the POSTER OF THE LOWER COLON.

Forget the YEAR of the colon. This guy has bat guano for brains.

Seems to, at least in this thread.

I can't understand why anyone would be so adamantly against a film which is in opposition to pedophilia and human trafficking.

It's as if the topic is taboo. 

[Deluge]

On 7/24/2023 at 4:02 PM, reason10 said:

Originally I wasn't going to bother seeing this movie. It meant sitting through a good 45 minutes of adolescent ads that my adult daughters would feel too old for. But it was well worth the wait.

This movie is about the true story of Tim Ballard, an agent with the US Department of Homeland Security, who arrested pedophiles and decided to quit his job and go after the children who had been kidnapped and were made to have sex for money. In other words. SLAVES. The girl's picture you're looking at was kidnapped along with her brother. I'll leave that story there because it's worth watching.

There was NO religious undertone in this flick. It was not a RUSH LIMBAUGH Institute For Advanced Conservative Studies type of thing. Of course, the left wing PRO PEDOPHILE rags like Slate and NPR (National Pedophile Radio) were quick to bash this movie. If you EVER wondered how the left feels about pedophilia and child trafficking (and didn't get a hint with the Unelected Joe regime) the left's reaction to this movie says all that needs to be said.

The movie would have SUCKED if it had been political. It had not on iota of politics in it, whatsoever. (Benji was more political, by contrast.) And it was very tastefully done. (as in no lurid overtones of actually children being raped.) The movie was dark. It wasn't a rousing and uplifting adventure flick. It was just a story that needed to be told.

Three points to take away from this flick.

1. God's children should not be for sale.

2. Jim Caviezel (in a message after the credits) said the MESSAGE was the true star of this show. Just as Harriet Beecher Stowe gave a message with Uncle Tom's Cabin, which led to the overturning of slavery in the United States, he hopes the message of this movie will lead to overturning the SLAVERY OF THE 21ST CENTURY.

3. For the idi0ts who are STILL whining about slave reparations, just remember that Africans sold Africans into slavery, adults as well as children. And Africa is STILL engaged in slave trade. MILLIONS of CHILDREN are being trafficked into sex slavery and they were kidnapped into it. And it is a greater evil than any other slavery of the past.

 

Liberals, the movie won't make you uncomfortable. It's not a political screed for some conservative candidate. Unless you support having sex with children and child trafficking, you'll want to see this. (I won't say you'll like it, because there's no much to LIKE about this story. I didn't like the story.  It was very skillfully and expertly produced. And it had to be told. )

 

 

 

 

I haven't seen it yet, simply because I have kids and I don't even like HEARING about abductions. I don't disparage the movie itself, as I'm sure it carries a super important message, I just don't want to see it. 

[reason10]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Seems to, at least in this thread.

I can't understand why anyone would be so adamantly against a film which is in opposition to pedophilia and human trafficking.

It's as if the topic is taboo. 

I don't know why the goose steppers here claim it is political. There's not a POLITICAL nanosecond in the entire film. It's just a story, brilliantly written and brilliantly acted and screened.

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I haven't seen it yet, simply because I have kids and I don't even like HEARING about abductions. I don't disparage the movie itself, as I'm sure it carries a super important message, I just don't want to see it. 

This would be a good instance where a babysitter is in order. You DON'T want your kids to see this. As I said earlier, there isn't any sex, not too much profanity and not that much violence. But the subject matter will give your kids nightmares.

[reason10]

On 7/25/2023 at 10:47 PM, Michael Hardner said:

I have known for a long time that people believe that the things they see in action movies are realistic.

Not the stunts and explosions but the social commentary, especially explanations of how governments and large organizations work.

Excuse me, but this isn't a Terminator XXIX or a RAMBO flick. As I tried to 'splain (to those who HAVE graduated elementary school) the film was tastefully done. No sex, very little profanity and very little violence. TV cop shows from the Sixties had more actual shootings and killings.

Here's an original idea: GO AND SEE THE GODDAM MOVIE or shut the fck up.

As I tried to tell everyone else, it's NOT a political movie, so you won't want to contribute to a political candidate after seeing it. It's not a SEX movie, even though child trafficking is exclusively sexual. It's not really an action movie that much. Any action takes maybe less than two percent of the flik.

You are making a fool out of yourself with this Whoopie Goldberg shit. See the movie and judge FOR YOUR SELF. Don't just stupidly listen to THE VIEW and other Hitler outlets.

[Deluge]

On 7/24/2023 at 5:13 PM, Michael Hardner said:

God's children ARE for sale, because States are loosening child work regulations.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/teen-poultry-factory-child-worker-deaths_n_64b7ecbce4b0ad7b75f67af7

If you care about children, then care about child labour, education and healthcare not just abortion, Pride Flags and Democrat (but not Republican) pedophiles.  Sorry to those offended if I got political... maybe have a sit down and catch your breath...

Republican pedophiles are still pedophiles and they need to be lumped in with the democrat pedophiles so that they all can be thrown into the slammer together. 

child labor is dead wrong. Anyone who says otherwise is a degenerate. 

Given the Left's insistence on teaching bullshit like gender pronouns and the demonization of white kids, education has become a total mess. We need to get back to the basics and leave political agendas OUT of our kids' classrooms. 

Healthcare is super important, but government is trying to muscle fathers out of the family unit so that they can be the provider. THAT, of course, is dead wrong. Teach and empower fathers AND mothers to be responsible parents and families will largely, if not completely, take care of themselves. 

Continue the fight against evil causes like Pride month and abortion rights. 

Edited July 27, 2023 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

On 7/25/2023 at 7:47 PM, Michael Hardner said:

I have known for a long time that people believe that the things they see in action movies are realistic.

Not the stunts and explosions but the social commentary, especially explanations of how governments and large organizations work.

Have you ever heard of Epstein's island, MH? 

Was it just a brain-addled QAnon conspiracy theory that rich people went there and had sex with underage girls? If so, then why do leftists (like @BeaverFever ) always try so hard to link Trump to Epstein?

There's a whole thread where Beave was trying to act like they were buddies right up 'til the end, he even cited articles that tried to make that case, but nothing he could find put the two of them together in anything more than a random occurrence since about 2001. Still, to this day leftards refer to Trump/Epstein like they were BFFs. By contrast, Bill Clinton was a frequent flyer well after Trump had severed ties but leftists say: "Bah. Nuthin' ta see there folks. Bill's a solid guy who just flew the Lolita Express a dozen or so times."

So how long did Epstein's island operate for while all kinds of influential people, who were in the know, looked away? Do you know?

How is it possible that an island where the mighty, pure-as-the-driven-snow FBI held sway was a commonly known refuge for pedophilia? 

Regarding the people who kept the island's secrets, it's not like they were powerless, impoverished peons who saw all this vile debauchery unfold and kept it all secret because either they felt powerless to do anything or they had a fear of authority: these were the kinds of people who had access to high-level law enforcement officials whom they could meet with in complete secrecy.  Government officials. Royalty. The uber-wealthy. They had nothing to fear from Epstein at all.

I'm talking about people like President Clinton. Prince Andrew. Bill Gates. Etc. None of them stood up. For years. Maybe decades. They kept his secrets for their own reasons. Reasons like what? Nothing conspiratorial, right? 

I personally have no idea how long Epstein was pimping young girls out. Maybe it was just a few years between 2005 and 2009, maybe 2012 to 2014, or maybe it was within months of the day in 1998 when he bought his first island until the day he was arrested: https://www.thecut.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-virgin-islands-little-st-james-house.html

Quote

More than two decades ago, Little St. James Island, a small part of the U.S. Virgin Islands, began to change in ways that the locals on neighboring islands regarded with suspicion. Plants were cleared. Poles bearing American flags went up. Security guards lined the beaches.

These days nothing that happens in DC remains secret for long, but somehow Epstein's client list is as secure as Fort Knox. No one wants to speak up. The silence is: a) understandable b) disconcerting c) deafening...

The same people who wanna diss this movie also don't give a rat's arse about Epstein's island/client list. 

So I'm asking you seriously, do you think that "Epstein's pedo island" is mostly just a work of fiction/conspiracy theory? Were there maybe a few underage girls there for a little while? Was it a full-on pedo enterprise for years? Decades?

If Epstein was able to keep that island a secret, do you think there were other islands or remote areas where even worse things happened? 

If Epstein was able to keep that island a secret, do you think that there is no global conspiracy going on at all?

[Michael Hardner]

10 hours ago, Contrarian said:

1. this movie that you spit on, yet, I have not seen 1 commentary from you against the cultural warfare from the other side, the other side, the barbie deal. 

2. Did you watch both movies yourself? Have you seen the Barbie movie yourself? What are your views? 

1. What ?  That I spit on ?  I think you meant this for someone else.
2.  No, I have not seen it

[Boges]

On 7/25/2023 at 2:54 PM, reason10 said:

Right now, the film is outgrossing all the others. We'll all wait while you produce PROOF that people buying tickets aren't attending. Then again,  if you're dumb enough to post from Huffing ON A Crack Pipe Post, you'll believe anything.

That faggy Indiana Jones farce has crashed and burned. And that lesbianish Barbie will be lucky to earn back the production costs.

Oh, and the true story about a TRIUMPH in the war against child trafficking is hardly stupid, UNLESS YOU SUPPORT CHILD TRAFFICKING.

https://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/sound-of-freedom-is-a-box-office-hit-it-has-an-unusual-ticket-strategy/

Quote

More than 10 million tickets have been purchased through the app, called Pay It Forward. During the movie's July 4 opening, "Sound of Freedom" scored $11.5 million from direct box office sales and $2.6 million, or over 20%, from Pay It Forward ticket sales.

Chreestians did the same thing for the Passion of the Christ. 

Quote

 

A spokesperson for Angel Studios told CNN that these posts could be tied to group ticket sales.

When a business, group or church buys a group of tickets, they sometimes don't get everyone from their group to show up or show up on time, the spokesperson said.

For individual tickets, Angel Studios' system creates a code that allows another person to redeem a free ticket directly from theaters. Each person redeeming a code agrees that they will use the ticket.

 

 

Edited July 28, 2023 by Boges

[reason10]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/sound-of-freedom-is-a-box-office-hit-it-has-an-unusual-ticket-strategy/

Chreestians did the same thing for the Passion of the Christ. 

 

CBS News? Seriously?  The network where Dan Lather tried to use FORGED DOCUMENTS to curtail the George W. Bush presidential campaign?

[Boges]

1 minute ago, reason10 said:

CBS News? Seriously?  The network where Dan Lather tried to use FORGED DOCUMENTS to curtail the George W. Bush presidential campaign?

Here's the App the story references. 

https://www.angel.com/pay-it-forward

https://www.indiewire.com/news/business/sound-of-freedom-box-office-analysis-crowdfunding-pay-it-forward-1234881363/

 

Quote

Angel Studios calls it “Pay It Forward,” in which you can buy a ticket for “Sound of Freedom,” pay for another one, and someone else can apply to redeem it if they don’t have the financial means. A larger group of people buying tickets in bulk, such as for a company or a church, can even redeem a portion of their tickets for free. The distributor says of its $14.2 million haul, $2.6 million came from people overpaying through those Pay It Forward ticket sales.

It's like Stubhub, but for Free tickets.