Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.dailywire.com/news/former-pedophile-advocacy-group-spokesman-writes-bloomberg-hit-piece-on-sound-of-freedom?fbclid=IwAR2A2Fi3C6V-4R2qUQofjUJZfvMEUm-fFqEnXWYX3dH5ZiIP77r1lZdA93w

Former Pedophile Advocacy Group Spokesman Writes Bloomberg Hit Piece On ‘Sound Of Freedom’

A former spokesman for the pedophile advocacy group Prostasia wrote a hit piece in Bloomberg against the new anti-child trafficking film “Sound of Freedom.”

Noah Berlatsky served in 2021 as communications director for Prostasia, a group that calls itself “a new kind of child protection organization,” but works to remove the stigma surrounding “MAPs” or “minor-attracted people.”

On Saturday, Bloomberg published an opinion article authored by Berlatsky, titled “QAnon and ‘Sound of Freedom’ Both Rely on Tired Hollywood Tropes.” The article was reprinted by The Washington Post.

In the article, Berlatsky, who is also a former NBC contributor, bashed “Sound of Freedom,” which has been hailed by conservatives since it premiered last month. The film is about a federal agent who saves a sister and brother from child trafficking and is based on a true story. The movie stars Jim Caviezel and was produced by the same studio that made the faith-based series “The Chosen.”

Berlatsky claimed the film has been “embraced by the far right and Christians,” who he complains have “helped boost it to more than $50 million in receipts at the box office.”

Berlatsky also claimed “Sound of Freedom” is linked to the conspiracy theory QAnon. The movie’s creator recently called allegations that the movie has a QAnon connection “sick,” and Caviezel, the film’s star, said he was unaware of the conspiracy in 2018 when the movie was filmed.

“But the truth is that the conspiratorial right and the Hollywood default aren’t that different — which is why, perhaps, our polity has had such difficulty rejecting QAnon, Trump and fascism,” Berlatsky wrote.

Critics have accused Prostasia, the pedophile advocacy group, for years of trying to normalize pedophilia behind a thin smoke screen of “child protection.”

So somehow being OPPOSED to pedophelia and child abuse is QAnon?

Thing is, in the 90s we were joking about child molesters actually getting some favorable mainstream press. Back then, there was a group called NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) Who ever thought it would have come to this.

I imagine the left wingers HERE have a problem with children being rescued from child traffickers.

(By the way, a sizeable portion of those illegal alien animals who violate our borders ARE CHILD TRAFFICKERS THEMSELVES. But I guess the liberals here have no problem with selling a child into prostitution, huh?)

https://www.cbp.gov/frontline/border-crisis-cbp-fights-child-exploitation

It’s a situation Border Patrol Agent Hermann Rivera faced far too often: an adult illegal alien approaching him with a child in tow, seeking asylum in the United States.

“He initially stated that the child was his kid,” Rivera said. But after carefully checking his documents and pressing the issue, the man admitted the truth. “’I’m not sure whose child this is,’” Rivera said the man told Border Patrol agents when he finally revealed the truth.

During a news conference Oct. 29, in El Paso, Texas, Acting Commissioner Mark Morgan explained the role of transnational criminal organizations in driving the surge in illegal migration. “[Illegal aliens] were coached and mentored and given what to say by the cartels and the human smuggling organizations: You grab a kid, and that is your U.S. passport,” said Morgan. “That will guarantee you entry into the United States. And guess what, they were right.”

And the goose stepping pro PEDOPHILE liberals here have no problem with this.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The 1diots who support this ridiculous film accused AMC of poisoning them through the candy concession stand.

No, I am NOT kidding.

How to ensure that your next crackp0t conspiracy film doesn't get distribution...

  • Haha 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The 1diots who support this ridiculous film accused AMC of poisoning them through the candy concession stand.

No, I am NOT kidding.

How to ensure that your next crackp0t conspiracy film doesn't get distribution...

I thought it was based on a true story, The film is about a federal agent who saves a sister and brother from child trafficking and is based on a true story. Are you suggesting we should disragard it becuase of the candy acusation, or the story itself..       

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

I thought it was based on a true story, The film is about a federal agent who saves a sister and brother from child trafficking and is based on a true story. Are you suggesting we should disragard it becuase of the candy acusation, or the story itself..       

"Disregard" what ?  It's entertainment.  The term 'based on a true story' still means it's fiction.

So watch or don't.

----

My concern is that the worst predictions of the postmodernists is turning life itself into fiction, and that those "UFOs are REAL" shows on A&E in the 1990s are now a blueprint for designing the political sphere.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The 1diots who support this ridiculous film accused AMC of poisoning them through the candy concession stand.

No, I am NOT kidding.

How to ensure that your next crackp0t conspiracy film doesn't get distribution...

Probably trying to knock out the children to harvest their adrenochrome!

We live in very strange times. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The 1diots who support this ridiculous film accused AMC of poisoning them through the candy concession stand.

No, I am NOT kidding.

How to ensure that your next crackp0t conspiracy film doesn't get distribution...

 I support this film and I know I didn't accuse AMC of poisoning me through the candy concession stand. No one I know has accused AMC of that either. 

I'm NOT kidding EITHER: do you support human trafficking? 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

 

Legato quoted some stats that are quite misleading.  I think people should ask why folks are pushing some new emergency about missing and abductions.

About one case in 10,000 is a nonfamily abduction.  90% of kids are found soon and also most are abducted by family.

https://www.missingkids.org/ourwork/impact

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Legato quoted some stats that are quite misleading.  I think people should ask why folks are pushing some new emergency about missing and abductions.

About one case in 10,000 is a nonfamily abduction.  90% of kids are found soon and also most are abducted by family.

https://www.missingkids.org/ourwork/impact

A. Q said to

B. Internet memes are always definitive and authoritative. Why would someone paste text into an image if it weren't infallible?

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

"Disregard" what ?  It's entertainment.  The term 'based on a true story' still means it's fiction.

So watch or don't.

----

My concern is that the worst predictions of the postmodernists is turning life itself into fiction, and that those "UFOs are REAL" shows on A&E in the 1990s are now a blueprint for designing the political sphere.

 

Michael your the one that is making the claim that it is a conspiracy movie...you as well as most of the left wing media... As i have not seen the movie i was simply asking you a question. I thought your opinion carried some weight around here, and i was wondering are you just howling into the wind, or know something we don't... 

Police services in Canada reports just under 3000 cases of reported trafficking in Canada, that they are aware of most go un reported. The case load increases when the age bracket is expanded to 25 and under...

Trafficking in persons in Canada, 2020 (statcan.gc.ca)

Countless victims remain undetected every year making it difficult to determine actual numbers. A long-standing 2002 report by the International Labor Organization estimates that up to 1.2 million children may be trafficked each year.

Child Trafficking | UNICEF Canada: For Every Child

 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted

Human trafficking and pedophilia are among the worst of all crimes.  There’s no justifiable place for either, not anywhere in the world.  
 

It is sad that we have a lunatic poster here who revels in waving around false accusations of pedophilia whenever he disagrees with anyone.  Best explanation?  Because he’s a pedophile himself, perhaps.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Legato quoted some stats that are quite misleading.  I think people should ask why folks are pushing some new emergency about missing and abductions.

About one case in 10,000 is a nonfamily abduction.  90% of kids are found soon and also most are abducted by family.

https://www.missingkids.org/ourwork/impact

I don't like that there is ANY trafficking, and neither does any other normal person. It's always leftists that disparage what is really going on, and that's what raises the important questions. 

https://www.dhs.gov/blue-campaign/what-human-trafficking?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=rg.search-fy23.wdatip&utm_content=general&utm_term=ad1

https://www.myfja.org/the-human-trafficking-epidemic/#:~:text=Studies have shown that up,sex trafficking reports every year.

 

Posted
21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The 1diots who support this ridiculous film accused AMC of poisoning them through the candy concession stand.

No, I am NOT kidding.

How to ensure that your next crackp0t conspiracy film doesn't get distribution...

You think a movie about people who rescue children from pedophiles is ridiculous? Are you a pedophile?

Posted
17 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

If I answer no, will you believe me?

Nope. You still have some weird compulsion to speak out against the opposition to human trafficking, and it makes you look suspicious. ;)

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

1. I don't like that there is ANY trafficking, and neither does any other normal person.  

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

2.  You still have some weird compulsion to speak out against the opposition to human trafficking, and it makes you look suspicious. ;)

1. OK, well why is a campaign like this a priority then ?  I don't like it either.
2. I think it looks suspicious for people to dress up the latest F*** Trudeau campaign as #SaveTheChildren.  

They stole the name from a charity.
They stole the look from Every Child Matters.

They're trying to do a new F*** Trudeau but somehow make it about some QAnon conspiracy tied to Liberals and Democrats.  And anti-vax stuff of course.  And anti-LGBTQ, anti-Pride, anti-COP...

It's very dishonest and dishonourable.

 

  • Like 2

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. OK, well why is a campaign like this a priority then ?  I don't like it either.
2. I think it looks suspicious for people to dress up the latest F*** Trudeau campaign as #SaveTheChildren.  

They stole the name from a charity.
They stole the look from Every Child Matters.

They're trying to do a new F*** Trudeau but somehow make it about some QAnon conspiracy tied to Liberals and Democrats.  And anti-vax stuff of course.  And anti-LGBTQ, anti-Pride, anti-COP...

It's very dishonest and dishonourable.

 

Perhaps it's time for lefties to get onboard rather than fight the opposition. It'd sure make them look a helluva lot less suspicious. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Perhaps it's time for lefties to get onboard rather than fight the opposition. It'd sure make them look a helluva lot less suspicious. 

Nobody's fighting it.  Some are a little jaded by the selling of this thing, understandably so.

Like I say, there's a boatload of hidden agendas there... 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
27 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Perhaps it's time for lefties to get onboard rather than fight the opposition. It'd sure make them look a helluva lot less suspicious. 

If conservatives cared about children, they would work in a bi-partisan fashion to implement policies to improve the lives of children.

 

But conservatives don’t care about children. They grab issues like pedophilia and attach it to homosexuality and transsexuality, when we know there is no such relationship and we know that persecuting minorities is not the solution to this problem. 

  • Thanks 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted

Another reason that I have such disdain for politics and especially politicos is the binary thinking. If one is not 100% in line with their views then there is only one conclusion.. you must be the enemy and therefore be in 100% support of ALL things that I oppose. If i say that I do not like the film in the OP then I must be in 100% support of human/child trafficking. This low-IQ mentality is the MO of most politicos hence they come here because in person they would get laughed off. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

If I answer no, will you believe me?

We think you DO support it, otherwise you'd have trouble with illegal aliens, (who are the biggest child traffickers of all.)

Posted
10 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Another reason that I have such disdain for politics and especially politicos is the binary thinking. If one is not 100% in line with their views then there is only one conclusion.. you must be the enemy and therefore be in 100% support of ALL things that I oppose. If i say that I do not like the film in the OP then I must be in 100% support of human/child trafficking. This low-IQ mentality is the MO of most politicos hence they come here because in person they would get laughed off. 

The OP is not about whether people like Sound Of Freedom or not. The box office stats show that people kinda LIKE it.  (Sound  Of Freedom cost 14 million to make and has so far grossed 85 million. You can dislike ANY aspect of the movie (which would only work if you actually saw the movie and didn't listen to what some dumbass blue state pedophile has to say.)

If you actually took the time to INTELLIGENTLY read the first post, you might have discovered that the people who are complaining about this film are ACTUAL PEDOPHILES. They consider themselves MAP, (Minor Attracted People.)

I'm not necessarily bashing any group, but if MAPS act on their urges, they are CRIMINALS. If they even order the type of  pornography they would need to beat off to, they are CRIMINALS.

Nobody has accused you of that.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, reason10 said:

We think you DO support it, otherwise you'd have trouble with illegal aliens, (who are the biggest child traffickers of all.)

I don't think that I have said much if anything about that topic.

If that's the basis for you thinking I'm ok with child abduction, let's see how that works logically...

"Hmmmm... MICHAEL doesn't post much about condemning illegal immigration... and since that's a source of trafficking, that must mean he SUPPORTS it"

Ok, well no it doesn't work logically.

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't think that I have said much if anything about that topic.

If that's the basis for you thinking I'm ok with child abduction, let's see how that works logically...

"Hmmmm... MICHAEL doesn't post much about condemning illegal immigration... and since that's a source of trafficking, that must mean he SUPPORTS it"

Ok, well no it doesn't work logically.

Also notice that he blames illegal immigrants for human trafficking without providing any evidence. 

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,023
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Fred Kurtz
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...