Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Or they commit SERIOUS crimes and DEMONSTRATE HOSTILE TO THE LAW INTENT.

THIS OpiNiOn IS USeLESS WiThOuT PROOOOOOFFF!!!

Hillary committed a serious crime.  Unless you're going to argue that keeping classified documents and destroying evidence is not a  serious crime.  I'm sure mr trump would love your support on that :)

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump's DEMONSTRATED HOSTILITY TO THE LAW INTENT is contravention of tradition.

No, it's the same as hillary's.  Sorry kiddo.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, West said:

Hunter and Joe should get the death penalty for their treasonous behavior like selling out the USA to China for a pound of cocaine

Yeah, that's NOT treason and you have to have EVIDENCE for that charge. You don't. LMAO

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

THIS OpiNiOn IS USeLESS WiThOuT PROOOOOOFFF!!!

Hillary committed a serious crime.  Unless you're going to argue that keeping classified documents

Keeping UNMARKED post classified documents does NOT demonstrate INTENT. Duh.

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

and destroying evidence is not a  serious crime. 

She didn't destroy anything. She MAY HAVE ordered destruction BEFORE it was "evidence" subpoenaed by Congress (NOT a court).

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm sure mr trump would love your support on that :)

No, it's the same as hillary's.  Sorry kiddo.

Yes, you are a sorry excuse for a TROLL.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

He's never gonna win if he keeps spouting STUPID SHIT like the "truth" quoted above.

You believe death penalty for late tax filing is "reform"? That is delusional. LMAO

Death penalty? Naw too easy.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Keeping UNMARKED post classified documents does NOT demonstrate INTENT. Duh.

The FBI noted that some of them were in fact marked, and she absolutely should have believed many of the others were classified.

And you're drooling again. I realize that thinking about this is probably overheating your brain but don't injure yourself.

Quote

She didn't destroy anything. She MAY HAVE ordered destruction

LOLOL  - you can't keep your story straight for even a single line :)

She destroyed the evidence.  Then she lied about what was on the drive she destroyed - and was found out when most of the data (and we'll never know if it was all the data) was found on another laptop.

And the law does NOT require intent to be applicable, a fact many legal experts have noted.

And you might want to have that drooling looked at ... constantly drooling and speaking gibberish could be a sign of brain damage.  Or being a liberal :) 

 

 

 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 hours ago, Rebound said:

For accuracy, can you fine me example of anyone else actually being convicted because they filed their Federal taxes just one year late?  Should be very easy to do, if it’s happened.

Hunter wasn’t accused of tax fraud, just late filing. Twice.  Not uncommon.  

To call it late filing really is sugar coating it. Apparently he was repeatedly warned about his serious tax delinquency issues over a period of years. It seems clear that he did not want to disclose all his income.

Email to Hunter Biden raises fresh questions about his tax dealings (nbcnews.com)

What do you think of his tax deduction strategy?

 Hunter Biden deducted payments to prostitute, sex club from his taxes: whistleblower (nypost.com)

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The FBI noted that some of them were in fact marked, and she absolutely should have believed many of the others were classified.

One was erroneously marked confidential when it WAS NOT.

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And you're drooling again. I realize that thinking about this is probably overheating your brain but don't injure yourself.

You're LYING AGAIN.

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOLOL  - you can't keep your story straight for even a single line :)

My story is straight. Simply put, YOU'RE LYING.

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

She destroyed the evidence. Then she lied about what was on the drive she destroyed

No, she did NOT. She didn't even have the computer. Duh

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 

- and was found out when most of the data (and we'll never know if it was all the data) was found on another laptop.

And the law does NOT require intent to be applicable, a fact many legal experts have noted.

Comey was authorized to decide, and he was the FINAL authority, so it doesn't matter what other irrelevant people CLAIM.

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And you might want to have that drooling looked at ... constantly drooling and speaking gibberish could be a sign of brain damage.  Or being a liberal :) 

You're LYING AGAIN. Stop that.

Posted
8 hours ago, ironstone said:

To call it late filing really is sugar coating it. Apparently he was repeatedly warned about his serious tax delinquency issues over a period of years. It seems clear that he did not want to disclose all his income.

Email to Hunter Biden raises fresh questions about his tax dealings (nbcnews.com)

What do you think of his tax deduction strategy?

 Hunter Biden deducted payments to prostitute, sex club from his taxes: whistleblower (nypost.com)

I think you ought to cite a legitimate source, cause NYP is no more credible than the National Enquirer. LMAO

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

I think you ought to cite a legitimate source, cause NYP is no more credible than the National Enquirer. LMAO

Hunter Biden tried to deduct sex club membership and prostitutes on taxes, IRS whistleblowers say | Washington Examiner

Hunter Biden Deducted Payments to Hooker and Sex Club From His Taxes, Whistleblower Says (freebeacon.com)

This allegation was made in a few other news sources. 

Do you not believe Hunter uses escorts often? How about him belonging to some kind of sex club? To me, it doesn't seem that much of a stretch that he would declare them as deductions.

Wait, do you believe anything from the negative Hunter stories out there? Is he not a longtime crackhead? Is it false that he makes millions from foreign governments?

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

One was erroneously marked confidential when it WAS NOT.

So? It was still marked that way.  And tonnes of them that weren't, were very confidential and she should have known.

And several had partial markings which should have been a giveaway too. It's not like it was her first day on the job.

Quote

You're LYING AGAIN.

You're the one drooling - don't blame me.

Quote

My story is straight. Simply put, YOU'RE LYING.

Your story is less straight than richard simmons.

Quote

No, she did NOT. She didn't even have the computer. Duh

Yes shedid. Whether she tells someone to or pushes the button it's the same thing

And you're drooling again :)   I guess your brain really is melting.

Quote

Comey was authorized to decide, and he was the FINAL authority,

And was pressured into making a political decision.  Which is unfortunate.  But - there you go,

Now wipe your chin and try to cope :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So? It was still marked that way.  And tonnes of them that weren't, were very confidential and she should have known.

Sorry kiddo, but NO ONE was ever charged for the "should have known" offense. Post pub classification means that even the originator didn't know it should have been classified. *Duh

But speaking of that, EVERYONE knew that call schedules' classification EXPIRES after it was scheduled. Except YOU. *Duh.

*Duh means that again you had to be told THE OBVIOUS due to your IGNORANCE.

Posted
39 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Sorry kiddo, but NO ONE was ever charged for the "should have known" offense

It literally happens every day.

If you break the law, in most cases ignorance of the law is no defense.  You "should have known".  In a handful of laws 'Mens Rea" is necessary - a guilty mind. This is not one of those offenses,

And you basically just admitted to knowing NOTHING of the law whatsoever :)  LOLOL - "Nobody has been charged for 'should have known"!  LOL  - Damn kid, you find new and interesting ways to prove your level of stupid every day ':) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

When you're dead, you don't know that you're dead. It's only the living who are bothered by your death.

The same things applies to stupidity. 

"Twump sed stuff that mayed me cwy agen! ?"

?

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted

"There's grifting and then there's Trump grifting": Trump super PAC paid Melania $155,000
 

"Trump is shameless," said GOP opponent Chris Christie, calling the Trumps the "undisputed champs" of grifting
 

A super PAC aligned with former President Donald Trump made a $155,000 payment to Melania Trump in late 2021, an atypical transaction that was not available in the group's reports and only came to light Thursday in a personal financial disclosure filing by Trump, The New York Times reports. In the new filing, the money was listed as pay for a "speaking engagement" by Melania Trump sent on Dec. 2, 2021, by Donald Trump's then-leading super PAC Make America Great Again, Again. 

The super PAC's report showed two payments made to "Designer's Management Agency," which identified Melania Trump as a client on its website, on Dec. 2 and Dec. 3, 2021, for $125,000 and $30,000. The PAC's filing also denoted the payments as "event planning and consulting," according to Federal Election Commission records. Charles Gantt, who served as the now-defunct super PAC's treasurer, told the Times that it had "complied with all applicable reporting obligations." Another unnamed representative for the PAC said that Melania Trump had been hired and paid for "design consulting" for the group's 2021 fundraising dinner event and additional services rendered outside of the first contract.

Former New Jersey governor and 2024 presidential candidate Chris Christie called out Trump as "shameless" online Thursday evening. "Trump is shameless. A billionaire using donor money to pay personal legal fees, and now paying his wife more than 2x what the average American makes just to pick some tableware," Christie tweeted. "There's grifting and then there's Trump grifting. Undisputed champs."
 

 

https://www.salon.com/2023/07/14/theres-grifting-and-then-theres-grifting-super-pac-paid-melania-155000/

Posted
Just now, BeaverFever said:

"There's grifting and then there's Trump grifting": Trump super PAC paid Melania $155,000
 

"Trump is shameless," said GOP opponent Chris Christie, calling the Trumps the "undisputed champs" of grifting
 

A super PAC aligned with former President Donald Trump made a $155,000 payment to Melania Trump in late 2021, an atypical transaction that was not available in the group's reports and only came to light Thursday in a personal financial disclosure filing by Trump, The New York Times reports. In the new filing, the money was listed as pay for a "speaking engagement" by Melania Trump sent on Dec. 2, 2021, by Donald Trump's then-leading super PAC Make America Great Again, Again. 

The super PAC's report showed two payments made to "Designer's Management Agency," which identified Melania Trump as a client on its website, on Dec. 2 and Dec. 3, 2021, for $125,000 and $30,000. The PAC's filing also denoted the payments as "event planning and consulting," according to Federal Election Commission records. Charles Gantt, who served as the now-defunct super PAC's treasurer, told the Times that it had "complied with all applicable reporting obligations." Another unnamed representative for the PAC said that Melania Trump had been hired and paid for "design consulting" for the group's 2021 fundraising dinner event and additional services rendered outside of the first contract.

Former New Jersey governor and 2024 presidential candidate Chris Christie called out Trump as "shameless" online Thursday evening. "Trump is shameless. A billionaire using donor money to pay personal legal fees, and now paying his wife more than 2x what the average American makes just to pick some tableware," Christie tweeted. "There's grifting and then there's Trump grifting. Undisputed champs."
 

 

https://www.salon.com/2023/07/14/theres-grifting-and-then-theres-grifting-super-pac-paid-melania-155000/

Don’t pity those pathetic MAGA suckers who were fooled by Trump’s stolen election lies and gave his Super PACs their hard-earned money thinking it would be used to overturn the 2020 election.  It was obvious from the start that it was all a scam, you can’t save people from themselves when they refuse to be saved it really is a cult in every sense of the term. 

Posted
4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It literally happens every day.

If you break the law, in most cases ignorance of the law is no defense.  You "should have known".  In a handful of laws 'Mens Rea" is necessary - a guilty mind. This is not one of those offenses,

And you basically just admitted to knowing NOTHING of the law whatsoever :)  LOLOL - "Nobody has been charged for 'should have known"!  LOL  - Damn kid, you find new and interesting ways to prove your level of stupid every day ':) 

What you said was "should have known" about classification status.

That is NOT NEARLY the same as not knowing THE LAW which ANYONE can look up. Duh

It just shows how DESPERATE and IGNORANT YOU ARE.

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

When you're dead, you don't know that you're dead. It's only the living who are bothered by your death.

The same things applies to stupidity. 

"Twump sed stuff that mayed me cwy agen! ?"

?

Only to an ^IGNORAMOUS who does NOT RESPECT nor EVEN KNOW US LAW wrt classified documents.

Posted
1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

Don’t pity those pathetic MAGA suckers who were fooled by Trump’s stolen election lies and gave his Super PACs their hard-earned money thinking it would be used to overturn the 2020 election.  It was obvious from the start that it was all a scam, you can’t save people from themselves when they refuse to be saved it really is a cult in every sense of the term. 

Melania must know a lot inside shit, and must be kept QUIET.

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

When you're dead, you don't know that you're dead. It's only the living who are bothered by your death.

The same things applies to stupidity. 

"Twump sed stuff that mayed me cwy agen! ?"

?

LOL - if trump said ANYTHING it made them cry again. :)   i mean, i've seen political rivalry all my life but i have NEVER seen so MANY people lose their frikkin' minds and become irrational !diots  as i have watching the left and trump.

The man could say he liked blueberry muffins and they would take it as proof of Russian collusion, and demand the FBI search the bakery it came from for documents.

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What you said was "should have known" about classification status.

And what you said was "nobody ever got arrested for 'should have known".  Which is very stupid.

The law she was believed to have broken does NOT require intent.  It's been mentioned by MANY legal experts.

So there you go.  She got off for a crime she committed and you're an !diot.  So we're back to square one

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...