Climate Change

[robosmith]

Record for hottest day ever recorded on Earth broken twice in a row

Quote

We have just experienced the hottest day ever recorded on Earth – for the second day in a row. The average global air temperature recorded 2 metres above Earth’s surface hit 62.92°F on 4 July, according to data from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and compiled by the University of Maine.

The two consecutive days of record-breaking global heat confirms scientists’ warnings that 2023 is likely to be one of the hottest years on record, as the twin effects of climate change and a warming El Nino climate pattern drive temperatures to new highs. 

 

 

I hesitate to post this UNPRECEDENTED news about WEATHER, in a thread that PRETENDS to be about climate. LMAO

[CdnFox]

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Record for hottest day ever recorded on Earth broken twice in a row

 

 

I hesitate to post this UNPRECEDENTED news about WEATHER, in a thread that PRETENDS to be about climate. LMAO

That's not possible - we have a carbon tax!!

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You... ahhhh .... you realize he's just as much of an expert as you are, right?

 

There's something very telling in this.

You seem to think that people who post on this thread think they're experts. 

None of us are experts, but some of us cite experts.

 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

There's something very telling in this.

You seem to think that people who post on this thread think they're experts. 

None of us are experts, but some of us cite experts.

 

I'm sure all of us are experts at SOMETHING, most people aren't ENTIRELY useless or unskilled (ok - mabye robo but the rest must be good at SOMETHING).

However - you have misread it.  The reference to experts is sarcasm. He pointed out that someone else is not an expert.  i pointed out that he's every bit the "expert" as robo was, which is to say robo wasn't an expert either.

Sorry for the confusion, i'll spell it out a bit more next time.

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

^Keeps digging that Dunning Krueger hole. Weather is NOT climate. Nor are the changes in seasons. Duh.

When are you going absorb the FACT that you know next to nothing about this issue? LMAO

Weather is not Climate? They're not even connected somehow? Well if you take weather out of the equation, where does that leave Climate? In Joe Biden's basement? 

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Climate Change is real and caused by humans due to CO2.

The Greenhouse Effect is real.  Humans pump CO2 to cause it and temps go up.  There's no other explanation for the increase in temperatures.

"Owning the libs" has caused you to embrace fantasy, which to me is a sign of something wrong.

Climate Change is bullshit. There is no change in the climate.

Sure, you ldiots love to point out wildfires in some obscure part of the planet, but the weather's still great where I am. How do you explain that, Professor Pronoun? 

[Hodad]

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Climate Change is bullshit. There is no change in the climate.

Sure, you ldiots love to point out wildfires in some obscure part of the planet, but the weather's still great where I am. How do you explain that, Professor Pronoun? 

Sure. And smoking doesn't cause cancer. And sugar isn't really linked to diabetes. 

Pretty much anything you can't see or understand it's a case of all the scientists being out to get you.

So pretty much everything. 

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You... ahhhh .... you realize he's just as much of an expert as you are, right?

There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE of that. Deluginal has not posted ONE SHRED of evidence for the OPINIONS he posts here. Though, it is OBVIOUS that he believes HE KNOWS better that the world's foremost experts.

Dunning Krueger in ACTION. LMAO

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And you're drooling again.

"Duh," does NOT mean drooling. It means abject disbelief that the person has to be told what's OBVIOUS. Duh.

It is unfortunate that applies so OFTEN to YOU.

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Deluge said:

Weather is not Climate? They're not even connected somehow? Well if you take weather out of the equation, where does that leave Climate? In Joe Biden's basement? 

As YOU WERE TOLD BEFORE by a cite to EXPERTS at the WMO, Climate is the LONG TERM (30+ years) average of weather for a given region.

AKA, Short term weather, including seasonal changes, IS NOT CLIMATE.

How many times do you have to be told, to get that through your thick head? Duh

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That's not possible - we have a carbon tax!!

The MEASUREMENTS do not respond to your carbon tax in the short term.

The BEST we can hope for is that the carbon tax will eventually change behavior that affects the LONGER TERM.

Of course, we KNOW that you are just a TROLL here, and don't really understand how serious the issue is, or anything at all about it.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I'm sure all of us are experts at SOMETHING, most people aren't ENTIRELY useless or unskilled (ok - mabye robo but the rest must be good at SOMETHING).

However - you have misread it.  The reference to experts is sarcasm. He pointed out that someone else is not an expert.  i pointed out that he's every bit the "expert" as robo was, which is to say robo wasn't an expert either.

Sorry for the confusion, i'll spell it out a bit more next time.

I'm the one who had to explain to Deluginal what the difference is between climate and weather with a CITE form the WMO. Duh.

Did you completely MISS that post? No wonder you STILL don't know ANYTHING about climate.  LMAO

Edited July 6, 2023 by robosmith

[reason10]

14 hours ago, robosmith said:

Record for hottest day ever recorded on Earth broken twice in a row

 

 

I hesitate to post this UNPRECEDENTED news about WEATHER, in a thread that PRETENDS to be about climate. LMAO

And there is ZERO EVIDENCE that human activity on FOURTEEN FCKING PERCENT OF THE EARTH'S SURFACE IS THE REASON FOR THE PLANET HEATING UP, WHEN THE PLANET HAS HEATED AND COOLED LONG BEFORE HUMANS EVER GOT HERE.

You are DANGEROUSLY stupid.

[reason10]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

I'm the one who had to explain to Deluginal what the difference is between climate and weather with a CITE form the WMO. Duh.

Did you completely MISS that post? No wonder you STILL don't know ANYTHING about climate.  LMAO

You Nazis are always dragging out that dumbass "climate/weather" argument when you don't know what the fck you are talking about.

Climate is defined as prevailing weather patterns in a particular area over a period of time. On the planet, MOST OF THE SURFACE OF WHICH IS WATER, there are MANY climate zones. There is no such thing as a global climate.

I don't care how many graduates from left wing diploma mills want to push higher taxes on us as a way to lower the temperature of a planet, THE SCIENCE IS CLEAR. Humans cannot raise or lower the temperature of even their own climate zones. Humans CANNOT cause it to rain or snow, nor can humans STOP rain or snow. Humans can't even divert a Category Five hurricane.

Sometimes, I wonder if you goose steppers every made it out of kindergarten.

12 hours ago, Hodad said:

Sure. And smoking doesn't cause cancer. And sugar isn't really linked to diabetes. 

Pretty much anything you can't see or understand it's a case of all the scientists being out to get you.

So pretty much everything. 

Explain to us the link between medical issues and weather issues.

Are you REALLY that stupid?

(Take your time in trying to answer that.)

[reason10]

12 hours ago, Deluge said:

Climate Change is bullshit. There is no change in the climate.

Sure, you ldiots love to point out wildfires in some obscure part of the planet, but the weather's still great where I am. How do you explain that, Professor Pronoun? 

These Nazis never took a science class in their entire lives.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate

the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years

When they try to use that bullshit climate versus weather thing, you gotta wonder if they ever made it out of the blue state second grades they dropped out of.

 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE of that.

Yes there is. Tonnes of it.

Quote

Deluginal has not posted ONE SHRED of evidence for the OPINIONS he posts here. Though, it is OBVIOUS that he believes HE KNOWS better that the world's foremost experts.

Which is EXACTLY the same as you. So he's every bit as much of an expert as you are.

Quote

Dunning Krueger in ACTION. LMAO

You should have that as a bumper sticker on your car  

 

Quote

"Duh," does NOT mean drooling.

Sure it does.  It's what nearly comatose !diots say.  Duhhhhhhhhh (drool drool)

You should really try to be a little smarter.  Or get a bib.

 

Quote

It is unfortunate that applies so OFTEN to YOU.

I see you found your mirror again  

[reason10]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

As YOU WERE TOLD BEFORE by a cite to EXPERTS at the WMO, Climate is the LONG TERM (30+ years) average of weather for a given region.

AKA, Short term weather, including seasonal changes, IS NOT CLIMATE.

How many times do you have to be told, to get that through your thick head? Duh

Weather is not climate?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate

the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/climate

the general weather conditions usually found in a particular place:

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/climate

The climate is the general weather in a particular region.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/climate

[countable, uncountable] the regular pattern of weather conditions of a particular place

 

You're just blue state stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

[reason10]

Boys and girls, if it SNOWS in Miami in July with temperatures dropping to the teens, THAT IS A CHANGE OF THE CLIMATE. If the temperature gets to 100 in January in Alaska, causing rain storms, monsoons, hurricanes, THAT IS A CHANGE OF THE CLIMATE.

If ALL OF AFRICA is buried under a BLIZZARD that lasts from May to August, with below zero temperatures, THAT'S CLIMATE CHANGE.

So far, none of the global warming nazis are coming close to that here.

[Deluge]

39 minutes ago, reason10 said:

These Nazis never took a science class in their entire lives.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate

the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years

When they try to use that bullshit climate versus weather thing, you gotta wonder if they ever made it out of the blue state second grades they dropped out of.

 

Their schools were hijacked by activists, and their parents or legal guardians were either in on it, or too disconnected to care. It's a sad story, really, but that doesn't change the fact that wokeness needs to be wiped out. 

[Deluge]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

As YOU WERE TOLD BEFORE by a cite to EXPERTS at the WMO, Climate is the LONG TERM (30+ years) average of weather for a given region.

AKA, Short term weather, including seasonal changes, IS NOT CLIMATE.

How many times do you have to be told, to get that through your thick head? Duh

Your "experts" are activists. Get that through your fat head. 

There's nothing funny going on with our climate. I'm fine, you're fine, everyone's fine - now get on the right side of this debate and help save fossil fuel and nuclear production before we're flung back to the Stone Age. 

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, Hodad said:

Sure. And smoking doesn't cause cancer. And sugar isn't really linked to diabetes. 

Pretty much anything you can't see or understand it's a case of all the scientists being out to get you.

So pretty much everything. 

Oh no, smoking does cause cancer and sugar is actually linked to diabetes. 

What isn't real is Climate Change.

[Rebound]

15 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Your "experts" are activists. Get that through your fat head. 

There's nothing funny going on with our climate. I'm fine, you're fine, everyone's fine - now get on the right side of this debate and help save fossil fuel and nuclear production before we're flung back to the Stone Age. 

According to many decades of continual satellite monitoring, the arctic ice is definitely melting long term.  It’s fact.  I already linked to the data. 
 

Activists don’t own their own satellites. Facts are facts. 
 

Here, try teaching yourself something.  This is really interesting stuff:

https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/sea-ice/quick-facts-about-sea-ice

Unfortunately, 2023 is the worst on record, by far.  It’s a serious problem   

https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo/data/current-state-sea-ice-cover

Edited July 6, 2023 by Rebound

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

According to many decades of continual satellite monitoring, the arctic ice is definitely melting long term.  It’s fact.  I already linked to the data. 
 

Activists don’t own their own satellites. Facts are facts. 

And who's going to verify that data besides more climate activists? 

You see, pervert, no one who is trustworthy can verify what you're saying. All we can do is trust our own perception; and my perception is saying that you people are full of shit. 

Nothing has changed, and it's not going to change. 

But I'll tell you what: the minute Beijing's pollution punches a hole through the ozone and the sun burns that city to a crisp, I'll be among the first to get onboard with you moonbats.

[Michael Hardner]

21 minutes ago, Rebound said:

According to many decades of continual satellite monitoring, the arctic ice is definitely melting long term.  It’s fact.  I already linked to the data. 

Seriously how much time are you going to waste with this person?

[Rebound]

5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

And who's going to verify that data besides more climate activists? 

You see, pervert, no one who is trustworthy can verify what you're saying. All we can do is trust our own perception; and my perception is saying that you people are full of shit. 

Nothing has changed, and it's not going to change. 

But I'll tell you what: the minute Beijing's pollution punches a hole through the ozone and the sun burns that city to a crisp, I'll be among the first to get onboard with you moonbats.

Its NASA, not “climate activists.” 
And it is reviewed by scientists around the world.

Here’s the thing about science: It’s all about publishing results which can be verified by anyone with the proper training. The satellite imagery is available to view.  

Edited July 6, 2023 by Rebound

[Deluge]

14 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Its NASA, not “climate activists.” 
And it is reviewed by scientists around the world.

Here’s the thing about science: It’s all about publishing results which can be verified by anyone with the proper training. The satellite imagery is available to view.  

Dude, it's no secret that you wokies are keen on science. The problem is that you're keen on skewing science. It's only obvious that NASA and the entire science community has been overrun by activists. 

No, the thing about science is that it's been corrupted by woke activists. One has to look pretty hard to find something that hasn't been tainted by you wackjobs. 

Edited July 6, 2023 by Deluge