Jump to content

CSIS: Liberal MP is alleged Chinese agent, Trudeau ignored warnings


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I'm simply responding to your posting at me

 

Well that's the thing - you're not.  You're noticing i'm not buying your nonsense and you feel compelled to try to explain yourself at great length to justify your position.

I don't do that. I just respond essentially with 'yeah  well whatever' and don't really care. You become emotionally invested and frenzied to convince people your vision of reality has some merit.

Sorry - too late to go back and fix that now.  Like i said I'm not your threrapist, you'll have to learn how to live with your views on your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dougie93 said:

again, this is simply ad hominem,

Again - desperate and frantic to convince others.  Sigh

Oh - and that's not what "ad hominem" means.  It's not 'ad hominem' in the slightest.  I'm not discounting your argument just because YOU are dumb, i'm saying it's a dumb argument.  At least bother to look up what words mean before you use them, if it's not too much trouble. You can start with Honour perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 you'll have to learn how to live with your views on your own.

I don't see what's wrong with my views

If had been directed to close with and destroy forces from a Commonwealth member country

I would have obeyed those orders, since the Commonwealth is not a military alliance

what's wrong with that ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Yup, definitely the Curriculum Vitae of someone that worked at DFAIT.  ? ?

Is a free market of ideas, do you allow me to question you the same way you questioned my citizenship?! Why are you so agitated? You did it to me, I do it to you. Physics. 

-> <-

Well it looks like Doug is willing to take you to court over your BS.

BTW...my "curriculum vitae" is pretty darn impressive. I've only divulged one of my accomplishments. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I don't see what's wrong with my views

 

And yet you must know SOMETHING is deep down - you keep coming back desperate to try to get someone to buy into them and agree with you.

Honest ideals held by honest men don't need others to justify them.

There is much wrong with what you've said, but if you have to explain the concepts to someone it's probably better that they just muddle along with their misconceptions. You're probably not hurting anyone with it. But it's like explaiing a joke to someone - they ain't gonna 'get it' if you have to spell it out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Well it looks like Doug is willing to take you to court over your BS.

I certainly reserve the right to defend my reputation

when someone is defaming me as being a "Neo Nazi"

I don't subscribe to National Socialism nor anything like

I find it to be just as repugnant as Soviet Bolshevism

I advocate for American freedom

which was in fact what defeated both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

1. I don't think "Dougie" or whoever he is, he did give me a fake name and rank once, has any idea what he is doing. I am starting to think, there might be other issues there going on and sometimes is best to leave someone like that to go about his way, is bad Karma for me to keep exposing his lies and screenshots. Oh boy, the material that I have, his own words, some still there, the 2019 material is the best. 

2. Oh yah, I am sure, which is your type of writing, for sure, you are a true role model for everyone. Just the fact that you agree with someone that said Canada is a fake country, and you call yourself a Nationalist, shows me that also, it might be something wrong upstairs. 

We all have issues man, you know mine, with the whisky, but it gives me hope when I see people that are sober, is 11 AM in the morning, so I am assuming you are sober, think this way. Not that bad myself, then. 

I have never thought such people exist, even on the internet, truly, is a comedy daily. 

Another problem you have is logic.

I never said I agree Canada is a fake country, nor have I agreed about that. But I can agree with some points Doug makes and not others. Hell you and I have agreed with points the other has made. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Do the work, get a job, hire a detective, find me, and then proceed that way if you would like. Then the judge can talk about satire, our screenshots, etc, etc, etc. 

Until then, can you consider this thread without your consecutive posts non-sense? Or this is your corner now and you run around the fire thinking you own the place? 

The inclusivity that was given to you. Good for this society, this is why I came here too because is more tolerant. Is great other people rather than me lead it, that's for sure. I see my limitations. 

you are declaiming me for saying I would go to war against the forces of a Commonwealth country if attacked

I'm saying there is nothing wrong with that,

because the Commonwealth is not a military alliance, just a cultural organization, to include many hostile countries

then you are declaiming for for saying that Canada is not a real country

that's just my opinion, Canada doesn't meet the threshold of a Westphalian nation state in my view

then you are declaiming me as being a MAGA Republican

that's no crime where I come from, MAGA is the motto of Ronald Reagan,

the Republican party are the only ones in America who defend & uphold the constitution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Another problem you have is logic.

I never said I agree Canada is a fake country, nor have I agreed about that. But I can agree with some points Doug makes and not others.

I don't oppose you being a Canadian Nationalist

I simply say that I don't even know what that means anymore

I can read the Constitution Act of 1982

it says right at the top that HM King Charles III is the Sovereign, Head of State & Commander-in-Chief

then Canadians will tell me that is "crazy"

so I am at a loss, is there some secret constitution they are referencing, which I am not aware of ?

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I don't oppose you being a Canadian Nationalist

I simply say that I don't even know what that means anymore

I can read the Constitution Act of 1982

it says right at the top that HM King Charles III is the Sovereign, Head of State & Commander-in-Chief

then Canadians will tell me that is "crazy"

so I am at a loss, is there some secret constitution they are referencing, which I am not aware of ?

Lol...no. it is what it is. The crown is simply a figurehead. I'm no constitutional scholar but, doesn't the Canadian government retain the ultimate control of the military?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...no. it is what it is. The crown is simply a figurehead. I'm no constitutional scholar but, doesn't the Canadian government retain the ultimate control of the military?

according the Constitution Act, the Canadian Government is actually a person, named Charles Wales

that is how the Constitutional Monarchy works

the nation is embodied by a person, who is the heir to the throne of England

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...no. it is what it is. The crown is simply a figurehead. I'm no constitutional scholar but, doesn't the Canadian government retain the ultimate control of the military?

bear in mind, when Canada "Patriated" the constitution in 1982

that gave Canada the option to change the Constitution Act without the approval of the British government

but Canada did not actually remove the monarch as Sovereign,  Head of State & Commander-in-Chief

quite the opposite, Canada reasserted that the King of England is the King of Canada, in 1982

Canada could remove the King from the constitution if Canada chose to do so

but Canada hasn't chosen to do that yet

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I'm no constitutional scholar but

okay, but if you ask me what American nationalism is

I can easily explain it

it is defending & upholding the Declaration of Independence and associated Constitution

then you can simply go and read all that in writing, to determine what it is that Americans defend & uphold

so if I ask you what Canadian nationalism is 

how would you explain that to me ?

lay it out for me, what does it consist of ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

according the Constitution Act, the Canadian Government is actually a person, named Charles Wales

that is how the Constitutional Monarchy works

the nation is embodied by a person, who is the heir to the throne of England

So how did Canada stay out of Iraq then?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So how did Canada stay out of Iraq then?

but Canada didn't stay out of Iraq

first of all, the Canadian Forces did deploy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003

Canada simply did not deploy ground forces, only the RCN & RCAF

but furthermore, Canada was in Iraq for years in fact, with boots on the ground

under Operation Impact, deploying CANSOFCOM

JTF2 snipers hold he world record longest kill

that shot was taken in Mosul Iraq, in support of the Iraqi National Army

CANSOFCOM has only suffered one Operator killed in action

which was Blue on Blue, when he was killed by fratricide by the Kurdish Peshmerga, in Erbil Iraq

Canadian CF-18's & CP-140's also conducted an air campaign against ISIS in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

but Canada didn't stay out of Iraq

first of all, the Canadian Forces did deploy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003

Canada simply did not deploy ground forces, only the RCN & RCAF

but furthermore, Canada was in Iraq for years in fact, with boots on the ground

under Operation Impact, deploying CANSOFCOM

JTF2 snipers hold he world record longest kill

that shot was taken in Mosul Iraq, in support of the Iraqi National Army

CANSOFCOM has only suffered one Operator killed in action

which was Blue on Blue, when he was killed by fratricide by the Kurdish Peshmerga, in Erbil Iraq

Canadian CF-18's & CP-140's also conducted an air campaign against ISIS in Iraq

Yet Canada was not part of the "coalition of the willing".

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

training Iraqi army & police post occupation, providing funding to the Coalition Provisional Authority

That would be party to the after-conflict. That would not be party to the conflict.

If someone were to bomb a country, and canada went in and provided aid afterwards, you could not say Canada bombed the country or participated in the bombing.

In fact we had no participation in that war and spoke against it. We provided aid afterwards.  That is not even remotely the same as participating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hmm...

is this part of your explanation of Canadian nationalism ?

that Ottawa vacillated on Iraq ?

first claiming that they  needed the UN's permission to participate

then flip flopping and participating without UN authorization after all

what does that say about Canadian nationalism ?

I'm not seeing it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

is this part of your explanation of Canadian nationalism ?

that Ottawa vacillated on Iraq ?

first claiming that they  needed the UN's permission to participate

then flip flopping and participating without UN authorization after all

what does that say about Canadian nationalism ?

I'm not seeing it

 

You appear to have a rather large chip on your shoulder. Can't say I blame you after the last decade. But Canada does control its own military. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

is this part of your explanation of Canadian nationalism ?

that Ottawa vacillated on Iraq ?

first claiming that they  needed the UN's permission to participate

then flip flopping and participating without UN authorization after all

what does that say about Canadian nationalism ?

I'm not seeing it

 

This is pretty simple. Canada didn't want to participate in the war. The war went on without us. After the war canada took on many roles to help the country recover. That is different.

You're trying to conflate the two and it's just not the same thing at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You appear to have a rather large chip on your shoulder. Can't say I blame you after the last decade. But Canada does control its own military. 

I'm simply asking what you are nationalist about exactly

you diverted off into the Iraq War, I'm not seeing the connection

with respect, as your friend, I'm just asking a question

why are you a Canadian nationalist ?

I have found it to be a fool's errand, and I can articulate exactly why

I'm just wondering what your argument would be, for Canadian nationalism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nationalist said:

 But Canada does control its own military. 

but control of a military does not a nation make

there are plenty of non state armed forces in the world

NATO being the most prominent

NATO is not a country,  yet it has control of all armed forces under its command

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,815
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    UKTelcoLTD
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • phoenyx75 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Chrissy1979 went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Randyjohnson71 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Mathieub earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...