Jump to content

Racist black activist Angela Davis discovers her descendants were on the Mayflower and actually own SLAVES


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

This is a new low... The troll army believes that a Black activist should be embarrassed about an ancestor (known to them as a descendant) was raped by a white man.

 

Please, some of you put just one of them on ignore and make my day...

You believe everything that makes whites look inferior to blacks. That is your CONSTANT low. 

Now go ahead and put us all on ignore and make your own day. ;)

Edited by Deluge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aristides said:

How do you think black people got slave owners in their family tree's?

Then you admit that I never said that "it's delicious that slave owners treated their slaves as sexual objects to be used at their whim." 

So why in the hell did you bring that up in the first place? Did you not comprehend what I said, or did you just have an emotional outburst? 

Edited by Deluge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Then you admit that I never said that "it's delicious that slave owners treated their slaves as sexual objects to be used at their whim." 

So why in the hell did you bring that up in the first place? Did you not comprehend what I said, or did you just have an emotional outburst? 

You said it was delicious she had slave  owners in her family tree. What's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, reason10 said:

I understand that you write at a Florida third grade level, and that you've never actually done anything intelligent in your life.

It's not namecalling. It's definition of character. If you act like a Nazi, you're going to be called a Nazi.

No reason to believe ^this STUPID OPINION. But you're right; feeding  you TOP TROLL is NOT intelligent. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristides said:

You said it was delicious she had slave  owners in her family tree. What's the difference?

The difference is that I was pointing out the irony of a white hating meat head having slave owners in her family tree. 

Hopefully she'll pull her head out of her ass and focus on reparations for the descendants of the slaves of her descendants. 

that's the responsible thing for a screaming race hustler to do. 

Edited by Deluge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The difference is that I was pointing out the irony of a white hating meat head having slave owners in her family tree. 

Hopefully she'll pull her head out of her ass and focus on reparations for the descendants of the slaves of her descendants. 

that's the responsible thing for a screaming race hustler to do. 

If a white man on the Mayflower raped her ancestor, that is just ONE MORE reason her hate is justified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

If a white man on the Mayflower raped her ancestor, that is just ONE MORE reason her hate is justified.

If her descendents raped their slaves, that is the despicable act that she needs to address first.

Clean your own house before you show up with cleaning supplies at another's house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Seriously why are you bothering with this?  It's Zellers-level trolling at best...

Michael Hardener is one of those pseudo-intellectuals who pretends to not bother with other forum posters, but it's obvious that he is highly bothered by other forum posters. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

If her descendents raped their slaves, that is the despicable act that she needs to address first.

Clean your own house before you show up with cleaning supplies at another's house. 

Her descendants didn't own slaves. That was her ancestor who was on the Mayflower. AKA the title is farked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

If her descendents raped their slaves, that is the despicable act that she needs to address first.

Clean your own house before you show up with cleaning supplies at another's house. 

That makes no sense. How would her descendants be slave holders?

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

 

You said "sexual relationship" NOT "consensual" and no one said the former is impossible.

Consensual is IMPOSSIBLE for a master/slave. Just like for a adult/child.

Lol...it happens to be very possible. 

Ever heard of Elenore Butler?

How about Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sure you are.

You're also the one who claims the be able to view the past in minute detail.

If one party has the power of life and death over another, you can't assume anything that happens between them is consensual. That should be obvious to even the dimmest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,750
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Betsy Smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...