Is Anti-White Racism Now Systemic?

[Zeitgeist]

I never would’ve believed just a few years ago that organizations would begin openly discriminating against people on the basis of race.  That seems to be happening at school boards like Hamilton District School Board with “racialized-only” job postings (whites need not apply) and further evidence from the Toronto District School Board:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/canada/article-tdsb-spending-millions-on-administrative-leave-for-principals-data/

Edited February 11, 2023 by Zeitgeist

[Nationalist]

18 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

I never would’ve believed just a few years ago that organizations would begin openly discriminating against people on the basis of race.  That seems to be happening at school boards like Hamilton District School Boards with “racialized-only” job postings (whites need not apply) and further evidence from the Toronto District School Board:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/canada/article-tdsb-spending-millions-on-administrative-leave-for-principals-data/

Isn't it amazing that, in Canada of all places, bald-faced racism is being driven by our own institutions? Hell by our own Prime Minister. Why?

Well for one thing, it endears Canada to the globalists. That's really the bottom line here, isn't it.

Porous and open borders to all western developed nations. Why?

To dilute the nationalistic tendencies of those who are proud of their nation and people. To tear a cavity in the social fabric. To cause discontent among the public.

All designed to anger people. To set them in opposition to each other. To foment hatred.

To prime the population for war.

Edited February 11, 2023 by Nationalist

[Zeitgeist]

10 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Isn't it amazing that, in Canada of all places, bald-faced racism is being driven by our own institutions? Hell by our own Prime Minister. Why?

Well for one thing, it endears Canada to the globalists. That's really the bottom line here, isn't it.

Porous and open borders to all western developed nations. Why?

To dilute the nationalistic tendencies of those who are proud of there nation and people. To tear a cavity in the social fabric. To cause discontent among the public.

All designed to anger people. To set them in opposition to each other. To foment hatred.

To prime the population for war.

I’ve never seen the country so divided.  It’s really irresponsible how people are being distinguished along lines of race and other qualities that were deemed of far less importance than character. It’s racism cloaked in the rhetoric of equity.  It’s not about equal treatment under the law and employment policy now.  It’s organizations making qualitative judgments about people based on superficial features like skin colour.  The excuse given is, “Well racialized people endured mistreatment and underrepresentation, so now it’s your turn” [even though in Canada racialized numbers were very low until about 40 years ago].  I don’t see how this new discrimination is acceptable under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but apparently that document applies loosely these days.  

Edited February 11, 2023 by Zeitgeist

[Nationalist]

27 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

I’ve never seen the country so divided.  It’s really irresponsible how people are being distinguished along lines of race and other qualities that were deemed of far less importance than character. It’s racism cloaked in the rhetoric of equity.  It’s not about equal treatment under the law and employment policy now.  It’s organizations making qualitative judgments about people based on superficial features like skin colour.  The excuse given is, “Well racialized people endured mistreatment and underrepresentation, so now it’s your turn [even though in Canada racialized numbers were very low until about 40 years ago].  I don’t see how this new discrimination is acceptable under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but apparently that document applies loosely these days.  

Indeed. But why? What possible reason could be so important, that governments, institutions and big businesses would act in tandem to foment anger?

1. Scare the b'jeebres out of the population with extinction.

2. Throw open the borders in Europe.

3. Release a global pandemic. Not enough to kill a lot of people, but enough to heighten the fear and anger.

4. Trample on the global source of energy, causing magnified anger.

5. Dump massive amounts of funny-money into the global economy, thus agrivating an already leaky economy. More anger.

6. Throw open the borders in America (US and Canada) and cause more anger.

7. Foment war on the eastern edge of Europe. 

8. Escalate all the above abrasive policies AND start a world war with enemies on both sides of us.

9. Because of elevated anger, the public is more willing to support said war. Tolls reach dizzying heights.

10. A certain organization presents the world with a solution to the war. The population accepts the offer in the name of peace.

Et voila...how to take absolute control of the human race.

Now...I know points 8, 9 and 10 are pure conjecture, but this idea has been floated many times by many very powerful people...and organizations. It's the Grand Daddy of conspiracy theories. Yet...it's also completely plausible and current events do fit like a wet t-shirt.

Edited February 11, 2023 by Nationalist

[Zeitgeist]

I can’t process that kind of scheme.  I don’t think it’s healthy to imagine that an unaccountable cabal is plotting humanity’s fate because a) I have no way of knowing and b) If such a scheme is afoot, I’d rather keep life simple for myself and my family and friends by living life according to my values. “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s”.

That doesn’t mean that people shouldn’t be very concerned about government overreach and push back against it.  It’s very important to recognize and actively assert the rights laid out in our Charter to protect the safety and expression of people of all different races, faiths, etc.

When we allow people to be mistreated, even in an attempt to “make up for past injustices” caused by different people from past generations, we create new injustice and discord.  

[I am Groot]

Where've you been? It's been systemic for many years. It started in academia and quickly spread to government and media, then to other public sector companies and now into the private sector. But it's strongest in academia, which has largely managed to eliminate almost anyone with conservative or even moderate beliefs from its ranks and is intent on indoctrinating the next generation behind them. Witness the clown show that is Dalhousie's law school. Bear in mind these easily outraged little snowflakes will be the people future governments select judges from.

https://globalnews.ca/news/9475253/dalhousie-law-students-walkout-racism/

Edited February 11, 2023 by I am Groot

[Zeitgeist]

14 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Where've you been? It's been systemic for many years. It started in academia and quickly spread to government and media, then to other public sector companies and now into the private sector. But it's strongest in academia, which has largely managed to eliminate almost anyone with conservative or even moderate beliefs from its ranks and is intent on indoctrinating the next generation behind them. Witness the clown show that is Dalhousie's law school. Bear in mind these easily outraged little snowflakes will be the people future governments select judges from.

https://globalnews.ca/news/9475253/dalhousie-law-students-walkout-racism/

What’s incredible is that not even one incidence of racism at Dalhousie is explained or described. It’s like this mob is on a mission to find someone or some act of disgrace.  It’s an inquisition alright that feels very much like McCarthyism or the Salem witch trials.  Older faculty, like the principals in the TDSB on leave without just cause, are basically waiting in silent desperation for the Jacobite tyrants to choke on their own toxicity.  I love how the lead law student’s name is Cromwell.  How perfect.  The universal radical ideologue returns.  It’s Umbridge from the Ministry of Magic on a rampage.  

We’ve lost the plot in Canada, though it’s in America too.  I feel like this is what happens when little is expected of younger people and everything that they do and want is affirmed.  We basically create monsters.  

Edited February 11, 2023 by Zeitgeist

[OftenWrong]

45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Because of elevated anger, the public is more willing to support said war.

I've been thinking about this same point, but in other contexts. It's how a hitler finally gets elected. Willingly, full embrace. The people shall call for a strongman to rule them. And kill the fook outta the other guys!

[Guest]

 

[OftenWrong]

1 hour ago, Zeitgeist said:

Older faculty, like the principals in the TDSB on leave without just cause, are basically waiting in silent desperation for the Jacobite tyrants to choke on their own toxicity.  I love how the lead law student’s name is Cromwell.

I have (some) faith that the majority of old-school Canadians know what poopoo smells like, and will do the right thing. Get rid of Turdeua.

I see it as white leftist angst and self-lioathing, seeking a way to purge themselves , so they may walk again in purity. It's too bad it amounts to sfa to the actual blacks in the ghetto.

As a Canadian I say, show me real action not bravado. Not circuses, not divisive gestures and empty words.

[OftenWrong]

6 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

 

Was it not Beitish colonialism that subjucated non-whites the world over? The strength and power of Brittania is built upon the bones of the dead.

Which is where you're from, I believe.

Die on your own swords now, all toxic leftists. 

 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, OftenWrong said:

Was it not Beitish colonialism that subjucated non-whites the world over? The strength and power of Brittania is built upon the bones of the dead.

Which is where you're from, I believe.

Die on your own swords now, all toxic leftists. 

 

Can I finish my breakfast first?

[Moonlight Graham]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Isn't it amazing that, in Canada of all places, bald-faced racism is being driven by our own institutions? Hell by our own Prime Minister. Why?

Well for one thing, it endears Canada to the globalists. That's really the bottom line here, isn't it.

Porous and open borders to all western developed nations. Why?

To dilute the nationalistic tendencies of those who are proud of their nation and people. To tear a cavity in the social fabric. To cause discontent among the public.

All designed to anger people. To set them in opposition to each other. To foment hatred.

To prime the population for war.

That's not why they do it.  That's a ridiculous conspiracy theory. They're very tolerant naive idealists, that's all.

[Moonlight Graham]

Racist discrimination against white people and sexist discrimination against men is legal in Canada, literally guaranteed in the Charter of Rights.  Yay equality.

[suds]

Interesting thread, except where's the evidence of any systemic anti-white racism?

[Army Guy]

19 minutes ago, suds said:

Interesting thread, except where's the evidence of any systemic anti-white racism?

How is it we can live in a systemic racist country according to our PM and many on here, but some how there is not anti white racism...Are you saying there is no evidence of racism on both sides of the fence. 

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Racist discrimination against white people and sexist discrimination against men is legal in Canada, literally guaranteed in the Charter of Rights.  Yay equality.

It's not about equality. It's about 'equity'. 

[Moonlight Graham]

13 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

It's not about equality. It's about 'equity'. 

In order for all racial groups to have more similar incomes you have to discriminate against the ones who do better than others.  Same with the sexes.

Equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity.  Any disparities in income or other socioeconomic outcomes and racism, sexism etc is assumed, without proper evidence.  Bad, lazy social science.

That doesn't mean racism and sexism don't occur.  But you need to isolate the variables and prove a problem exists if you're going to start discriminating against people to fixed a claimed problem.  And the goal should still be equality of opportunity, not equal outcomes.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

That's not why they do it.  That's a ridiculous conspiracy theory. They're very tolerant naive idealists, that's all.

They're destructive. 

[Moonlight Graham]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

They're destructive. 

More like self-destructive.  But they don't even realize it.  They think everyone is as tolerant as they are, but they aren't.  And they are so nice and tolerant that they would sacrifice their own culture to accommodate other cultures.  They are weak and submissive.  They're so self-loathing they don't even think there's much worth defending.  They will bend over backwards to help indigenous peoples protect their own culture, but protecting their own culture is oppressive, racist, and evil.  One day they will turn around and little will be left.  Post-national state.

Chinese all move to Markham, and south asians all move to Brampton, and that's not racist.  But whities move to Oakville and Barrie and its "white flight" and toxic racism.  This is how they think.  Riddled with guilt and self-loathing, double-standards for everyone.

[I am Groot]

The social contract is based on largely like-minded people with common values and history helping one another, cooperating, and compromising. But when people stop feeling like their community is full of people like them and is instead full of strangers and those with completely different values, beliefs, interests, and loyalties that social contract frays and breaks. A government report found that Canada's ability to absorb new immigrants was reaching capacity, that ethnic enclaves were growing and more and more immigrants were choosing to not bother learning English or French, just staying among their own kind. The government responded with a huge increase in immigration. 

Edited February 11, 2023 by I am Groot

[suds]

55 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

How is it we can live in a systemic racist country according to our PM and many on here, but some how there is not anti white racism...Are you saying there is no evidence of racism on both sides of the fence. 

I'm not really sure what you're getting at but I hope this helps...

systemic racism (cambridge).... policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization, and that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others based on race:

[eyeball]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Well for one thing, it endears Canada to the globalists. That's really the bottom line here, isn't it.

Porous and open borders to all western developed nations. Why?

How about free unregulated trade?

Oh wait a minute, that's globalism. So completely different it's a wonder globalismists don't refer to the Earth as a cube just to underscore the difference.

[Zeitgeist]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

It's not about equality. It's about 'equity'. 

Equity means whatever the equity committee decides.  

[Zeitgeist]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

The social contract is based on largely like-minded people with common values and history helping one another, cooperating, and compromising. But when people stop feeling like their community is full of people like them and is instead full of strangers and those with completely different values, beliefs, interests, and loyalties that social contract frays and breaks. A government report found that Canada's ability to absorb new immigrants was reaching capacity, that ethnic enclaves were growing and more and more immigrants were choosing to not bother learning English or French, just staying among their own kind. The government responded with a huge increase in immigration. 

This important fact is actively suppressed by government.