At Fox News "Facts" Disappear Quicker Than an Ethiopian Chicken

[TomT]

Fox News Sets a New Record

The skill sets required to continuously invent conspiracy theories at Fox News is truly amazing. Their mastery of high-volume right-wing echo chamber orchestration is known, if not admired, world-wide. Not only are they creative, but have set a new speed record for the very difficult “180 flip.” It can now only to be measured in nanoseconds.

For weeks and weeks, the multi-millionaire talking heads at Fox News have waxed eloquent 24 hours a day about how Biden and the Democrats are protecting Sam Bankman-Fried, the failed founder of FTX, a digital coin scam. 7x24, Fox News has described ad nauseum a myriad of “facts” proving  Democrats are “protecting Sam from prosecution because his is a big contributor to Democrats. Their major theme is “if you are a big contributor to Democrats, they will protect you from prosecution for your crimes.” i.e. Democrats are criminally corrupt…

Then old Sam was arrested and charged with 8 felonies associated with his crimes. Before the ink was even dry on the arrest warrants, the “Spin Masters” at Fox News announced that “new facts” prove Sam was only arrested to prevent him from “talking.” Implying, Sam was going say something ugly about Democrats…. So, as usual, speaking to their worshiping viewer base, Fox News was able to go from “The facts are that Democrats are protecting Sam and will never arrest him” to “The Facts are Democrats are only arresting Sam to keep him from talking….” “And this time we mean it….” At Fox News, “facts” disappear faster than an Ethiopian chicken.

Of course, the Fox Bull Horn failed to cover the “news” that old Sam contributed about as much to Republican PACS and down dark money Republican rat holes as he gave to Democrats. But you will have to actually go to a real new source to get “Fair and Balanced” coverage without an Echo. (evil Democrats) Echo. (evil democrats) Echo. Ditto.

[Michael Hardner]

The coverage of the mid-terms that I saw included two examples of FOX News on-camera personnel referring to the Republicans as "we", as in "what do we need to do to win" 

Everybody knew that the MSM had a liberal/corporate lean... and that led the way for "fair and balanced" Orwellian news.

And now even worse, people post material from offshore propaganda mills and screetch like treed weasels if you try to decry their basement YouTube sources as being 'biased'.

 

[Rebound]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

The coverage of the mid-terms that I saw included two examples of FOX News on-camera personnel referring to the Republicans as "we", as in "what do we need to do to win" 

Everybody knew that the MSM had a liberal/corporate lean... and that led the way for "fair and balanced" Orwellian news.

And now even worse, people post material from offshore propaganda mills and screetch like treed weasels if you try to decry their basement YouTube sources as being 'biased'.

 

How can a “corporate lean” be liberal? 

[Michael Hardner]

5 minutes ago, Rebound said:

How can a “corporate lean” be liberal? 

"liberal" means pro-freedom, pro-business... classical liberal in other words

the networks loved Reagan by his 2nd term, given what he was doing for them

[TomT]

Michael Hardner

Somebody must have spiked your tobacco. You are saying that Fox News looking at Trump and Biden, said "what do we need to do to win?"

Is there a January 6th on your Canadian calander?

[Infidel Dog]

What a racist whoever wrote that title is.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

What a racist whoever wrote that title is.

What is racist about Ethiopian chicken?

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, TomT said:

Michael Hardner

Somebody must have spiked your tobacco. You are saying that Fox News looking at Trump and Biden, said "what do we need to do to win?"

Is there a January 6th on your Canadian calander?

No, looking at the midterm election results.

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, TomT said:

Michael Hardner

Somebody must have spiked your tobacco.  

What are you doubting?

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

What is racist about Ethiopian chicken?

He’s not wrong, an Ethiopian would rightly be offended.

[Aristides]

Just now, BeaverFever said:

He’s not wrong, an Ethiopian would rightly be offended.

He would be more happy just to have a chicken.

[Infidel Dog]

31 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He would be more happy just to have a chicken.

There you go R&R. Aristides was generous enough to offer you up an illustration of how a Prog can be racist and think he's being clever.

Get it, yet?

I'll give you another hint. When you're thinking of a starving Ethiopian, you're not thinking of a white one. I'm sure they exist. So what is it about a black man in Ethiopia starving to death that makes you want to chuckle? What about even the black Ethiopians that aren't starving? Do they make you laugh? Why not, do you think? Maybe because in the Prog mind all a black Ethiopian is capable of doing is starving. Think that might be it? Think that might be a little racist?

 

Edited December 17, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[Aristides]

3 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

There you go R&R. Aristides was generous enough to offer you up an illustration of how a Prog can be racist and think he's being clever.

Get it, yet?

I'll give you another hint. When you're thinking of a starving Ethiopian, you're not thinking of a white one. I'm sure they exist. So what is it about a black man in Ethiopia starving to death that makes you want to chuckle? What about even the black Ethiopians that aren't starving? Do they make you laugh? Why not, do you think? Maybe because in the Prog mind all a black Ethiopian is capable of doing is starving. Think that might be it? Think that might be a little racist?

 

How is a starving person having a chicken racist.

[Infidel Dog]

"Having a chicken?"

What's that? Like having a baby boy?

Why? Who had a chicken?

If you mean why is the title racist. I explained that. Why? Are we going to be pretending you don't understand now?

Edited December 17, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[Infidel Dog]

Hey...

The British have an expression - goes somethin like 'taking the p1ss out of.'

 You should look it up because you just got it.

Except I'm lost now. Where do I go from here? What do I do now to be one of you? Do I go take out an account on Instagram or Tik Tok or something them make some friends and we all dox you and we get you cancelled somehow or something like that?

Is that the way it works, you racist? 

Edited December 17, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[Legato]

Cluck

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

"Having a chicken?"

What's that? Like having a baby boy?

Are you an id iot? People "have a chicken" for dinner.

11 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Why? Who had a chicken?

If you mean why is the title racist. I explained that. Why? Are we going to be pretending you don't understand now?

Most everyone is starving in Ethiopia, right? It's not a slam against Ethiopians, let alone just the black citizens, to imply they are very hungry.

[Aristides]

It's interesting how a chicken is being used to deflect from the issue of Fox changing its "facts" on a daily basis.

[WestCanMan]

On 12/16/2022 at 1:12 PM, TomT said:

Of course, the Fox Bull Horn failed to cover the “news” that old Sam contributed about as much to Republican PACS and down dark money Republican rat holes as he gave to Democrats. 

Your OP was an unsourced farce, full of innuendo and BS, without any attempt at all to deal in actual facts until you crapped out that little nugget there.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-political-donations-2022/

SBF only put money into Republicans' primary races:

Quote

 He also said he made all of these donations during the primary contests.

By his own admission he didn't donate any money in an attempt to try to help any Republicans win any seats, he just tried to influence who'd be running for those seats against his Dems.

In some cases those could be RINOs, in other cases he could have just been helping candidates win primaries because they were believed to have had less of a chance of winning the actual election.

That's an odd assumption to make in most cases, but in this instance where he gave tens of millions to Dems for the actual election, and only helped out Republicans in the primaries, it's the only thing that makes sense.

SBF was a huge Dem, and it's obvious because he's such a skid.

[reason10]

On 12/16/2022 at 1:46 PM, Rebound said:

How can a “corporate lean” be liberal? 

Ask George Soros.

[reason10]

On 12/16/2022 at 1:12 PM, TomT said:

Fox News Sets a New Record

The skill sets required to continuously invent conspiracy theories at Fox News is truly amazing. Their mastery of high-volume right-wing echo chamber orchestration is known, if not admired, world-wide. Not only are they creative, but have set a new speed record for the very difficult “180 flip.” It can now only to be measured in nanoseconds.

For weeks and weeks, the multi-millionaire talking heads at Fox News have waxed eloquent 24 hours a day about how Biden and the Democrats are protecting Sam Bankman-Fried, the failed founder of FTX, a digital coin scam. 7x24, Fox News has described ad nauseum a myriad of “facts” proving  Democrats are “protecting Sam from prosecution because his is a big contributor to Democrats. Their major theme is “if you are a big contributor to Democrats, they will protect you from prosecution for your crimes.” i.e. Democrats are criminally corrupt…

Then old Sam was arrested and charged with 8 felonies associated with his crimes. Before the ink was even dry on the arrest warrants, the “Spin Masters” at Fox News announced that “new facts” prove Sam was only arrested to prevent him from “talking.” Implying, Sam was going say something ugly about Democrats…. So, as usual, speaking to their worshiping viewer base, Fox News was able to go from “The facts are that Democrats are protecting Sam and will never arrest him” to “The Facts are Democrats are only arresting Sam to keep him from talking….” “And this time we mean it….” At Fox News, “facts” disappear faster than an Ethiopian chicken.

Of course, the Fox Bull Horn failed to cover the “news” that old Sam contributed about as much to Republican PACS and down dark money Republican rat holes as he gave to Democrats. But you will have to actually go to a real new source to get “Fair and Balanced” coverage without an Echo. (evil Democrats) Echo. (evil democrats) Echo. Ditto.

Gee! I wonder why Fox is the highest rated news source in America? Maybe this post is full of schit.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, reason10 said:

Gee! I wonder why Fox is the highest rated news source in America? Maybe this post is full of schit.

Maybe cause they have LITTLE COMPETITION for the right wing propaganda they publish, and there are at least a dozen actual news sources competing with TRUE NEWS.

[reason10]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Maybe cause they have LITTLE COMPETITION for the right wing propaganda they publish, and there are at least a dozen actual news sources competing with TRUE NEWS.

Fox is the ONLY true news for now. It out competes the liberal rags (CNN, PMSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC) because people do not want to watch NOTHING BUT LIBERALISM 24/7.

Rush Limbaugh was perhaps the earliest pioneer of the idea of upending the left wing monopoly on public opinion, by putting together the most successful radio talk show in history. He expanded to hundreds of markets nationwide. Of course, he never pretended to be anything other than mainstream conservative, like most of America.

Fox pisses you goose steppers off because it gives EQUAL TIME to both sides of the aisle. That's why it kicks CNN's propagandan ass at every turn, in every time slot. (That and because Fox has the most professional production value on television.)

There are some right wing networks out there: OneAmerica. NewsMax. But be careful. They are expanding their markets and soon may be competing with Fox, when they expand the ideology pool. Already both of them are less political and biased as CNN and the other fake news rags.

It's all free market competition in action. And the public wins out in the long run, especially when most of the public is better informed. Fox is better at informing the public than any other source.

[reason10]

On 12/17/2022 at 1:48 PM, Aristides said:

It's interesting how a chicken is being used to deflect from the issue of Fox changing its "facts" on a daily basis.

Fox doesn't do that. The dumb ass liberals here try to do that. But Fox has the facts.

[reason10]

On 12/16/2022 at 5:40 PM, TomT said:

Michael Hardner

Somebody must have spiked your tobacco. You are saying that Fox News looking at Trump and Biden, said "what do we need to do to win?"

Is there a January 6th on your Canadian calander?

See, this is where the level of stupid here continues to break new ground.

Or is anyone else besides me aware of the fact that the "Never Trumper" movement began at FoxNews?