Hunter Biden Laptop: No Crime Occurred. Prove Otherwise

[West]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^This OPINION does NOT make it "the truth." 

Since YOU NEVER post EVIDENCE, you have NO CREDIBILITY.

The truth is that Hunter Biden sat on the board of an energy firm known for corruption while his business partner says he was holding money for Joe Biden. 

That you can't acknowledge the facts is baffling. You are living in denial

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, West said:

The truth is that Hunter Biden sat on the board of an energy firm known for corruption while his business partner says he was holding money for Joe Biden. 

That you can't acknowledge the facts is baffling. You are living in denial

The mere CLAIM of "his business partner" carries no more credibility than YOUR CLAIM. 

Where is THE EVIDENCE, like BANK RECORDS?

You do know that "holding money" means NOTHING, don't you? 

Maybe when you HAVE EVIDENCE it was actually GIVEN TO JOE, you might have a case.

Right now, there is NO REPORTING that is even being investigated by the DoJ, except PERHAPS by some "guest" on Fox, which is NOT under oath.

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, West said:

No lie at all.. you just reject the truth.

Oh? Then how come, every single time I ask you to provide the proof of what you’re saying… you don’t. Ever. 
Or you put up a link to a 20 minute-long YouTube video of a white guy screaming.  HINT: A YouTube video is not “proof” of anything.  

[sharkman]

Did anyone bring this up yet?  In 2016 Biden threatened the Ukrainian president.  He told him to stop the investigation into Hunter’s company, or he wouldn’t get the billion in loan guarantees( crazy times back then, eh?  Only 1 billion, and a loan at that?  Come on, man!)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived/

The video of Biden bragging about it was actually on YouTube for a few months.  I looked just now and it’s been wiped from YouTube and the net.  Now searches only bring back ‘fact-check’ propaganda and the like, claiming it never happened.

But you can take it from me, the video of Biden bragging about the blackmail was actually on YouTube.

[West]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

The mere CLAIM of "his business partner" carries no more credibility than YOUR CLAIM. 

Where is THE EVIDENCE, like BANK RECORDS?

You do know that "holding money" means NOTHING, don't you? 

Maybe when you HAVE EVIDENCE it was actually GIVEN TO JOE, you might have a case.

Right now, there is NO REPORTING that is even being investigated by the DoJ, except PERHAPS by some "guest" on Fox, which is NOT under oath.

Hunter doesn't have to turn over his bank records. You should know that

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, West said:

Hunter doesn't have to turn over his bank records. You should know that

He is being investigated for tax violations; so I'm sure his bank records are already "turned over" by subpoena.

YOU should know that.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, sharkman said:

Did anyone bring this up yet?  In 2016 Biden threatened the Ukrainian president.  He told him to stop the investigation into Hunter’s company, or he wouldn’t get the billion in loan guarantees( crazy times back then, eh?  Only 1 billion, and a loan at that?  Come on, man!)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived/

The video of Biden bragging about it was actually on YouTube for a few months.  I looked just now and it’s been wiped from YouTube and the net.  Now searches only bring back ‘fact-check’ propaganda and the like, claiming it never happened.

But you can take it from me, the video of Biden bragging about the blackmail was actually on YouTube.

Placing conditions on aid is NOT "blackmail." Aid that hasn't be specifically earmarked by Congress is completely OPTIONAL.

Too bad all you have is an OPINION piece, of course NOT under oath.

But from your OPINION piece:

Quote

Subsequent to the publication of this op-ed and the election of a new president in Ukraine, Yuriy Lutsenko was removed from office and criminal proceedings opened against him for possible abuse of power; he also subsequently told the Los Angeles Times that he’d seen no evidence of wrongdoing by the Bidens. 

____________

During impeachment testimony, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent said there was the “possibility of a perception of a conflict of interest” regarding Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma and then-Vice President Biden’s role in Ukraine affairs for the Obama administration.

Yes, there was an APPEARANCE of a conflict of interest. Just like there have been DOZENS in the Trump admin.

[sharkman]

30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Placing conditions on aid is NOT "blackmail." Aid that hasn't be specifically earmarked by Congress is completely OPTIONAL.

Too bad all you have is an OPINION piece, of course NOT under oath.

But from your OPINION piece:

Yes, there was an APPEARANCE of a conflict of interest. Just like there have been DOZENS in the Trump admin.

Brother, how can you be so blind, it’s all there in front of you…

Anyway, forcing the leader of another nation to interfere in criminal proceedings.  If you can’t see what’s wrong with that, then there is no helping you.

[Nationalist]

Poor Libbies. They all dog-piled on the Trump impeachment and now realize there will be consequences. 

"You have no proof!"

Ahhh...but we do Young Libbies. Lots of it. A laptop full of it. Whistle blowers. Bobulinsky. 

When this is over, your imbecile POTUS will be utterly destroyed. 

Merry Christmas. 

[Rebound]

11 hours ago, sharkman said:

Did anyone bring this up yet?  In 2016 Biden threatened the Ukrainian president.  He told him to stop the investigation into Hunter’s company, or he wouldn’t get the billion in loan guarantees( crazy times back then, eh?  Only 1 billion, and a loan at that?  Come on, man!)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived/

The video of Biden bragging about it was actually on YouTube for a few months.  I looked just now and it’s been wiped from YouTube and the net.  Now searches only bring back ‘fact-check’ propaganda and the like, claiming it never happened.

But you can take it from me, the video of Biden bragging about the blackmail was actually on YouTube.

Merry Christmas. 
The prosecutor that VP Biden had fired was well-known for not prosecuting corruption.  The World Bank also told Ukraine they would not provide any more loans unless he was removed from office, and the European Union wanted him removed as well.  So this makes many people doubt that the prosecutor was fired because he was prosecuting corruption, or that it was because of Hunter Biden. If anything, Burisma would have wanted this prosecutor to remain. 

[West]

17 hours ago, Rebound said:

Oh? Then how come, every single time I ask you to provide the proof of what you’re saying… you don’t. Ever. 
Or you put up a link to a 20 minute-long YouTube video of a white guy screaming.  HINT: A YouTube video is not “proof” of anything.  

Where did I post a YouTube video? Left wing denial and lies.. all you got

[West]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

Merry Christmas. 
The prosecutor that VP Biden had fired was well-known for not prosecuting corruption.  The World Bank also told Ukraine they would not provide any more loans unless he was removed from office, and the European Union wanted him removed as well.  So this makes many people doubt that the prosecutor was fired because he was prosecuting corruption, or that it was because of Hunter Biden. If anything, Burisma would have wanted this prosecutor to remain. 

Your delusions make no sense.. Biden actually wanted him to prosecute his sons energy company.. sure if you say so... ?

[robosmith]

14 hours ago, sharkman said:

Brother, how can you be so blind, it’s all there in front of you…

A bunch of OPINIONS posted by by John Solomon (notorious right wing pundit) are NOT FACTS unless backed with EVIDENCE. 

14 hours ago, sharkman said:

Anyway, forcing the leader of another nation to interfere in criminal proceedings.  If you can’t see what’s wrong with that, then there is no helping you.

Just cause you accept those CLAIMS as FACT does not mean they are TRUE. The US and other world governments are telling a different story. Sorry you've missed that.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Poor Libbies. They all dog-piled on the Trump impeachment and now realize there will be consequences. 

"You have no proof!"

Ahhh...but we do Young Libbies. Lots of it. A laptop full of it. Whistle blowers. Bobulinsky. 

When this is over, your imbecile POTUS will be utterly destroyed. 

Merry Christmas. 

That laptop has NO verified evidence custodial history which would be required for it hold up in court.

At most it justifies AN INVESTIGATION which AFAIK has NOT been announced (and should not be until indictment per FBI rules).

Your predictions are worth as much as your childish calendar reading. LMAO.

[WestCanMan]

https://nypost.com/2022/05/19/hunter-biden-raked-in-11m-from-overseas-biz-deals/

Hunter did business business directly with the gov't of China, America's #1 geopolitical adversary, and they showered him with money.

The gov't of China paid him amounts of money that were outrageously high compared to his qualifications and experience. 

Joe Biden lied to Americans on video many times, claiming to be completely unaware of Hunter's overseas business dealings. Why did Joe lie about it if it was all on the up and up?

Why did the FBI lie about it if it was all on the up and up? 

If the FBI (who have a court-documented history of committing crimes on behalf of the Dems) are busy lying for him, what are the chances that they will do a proper investigation into his shady dealings with former gov'ts? 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

https://nypost.com/2022/05/19/hunter-biden-raked-in-11m-from-overseas-biz-deals/

Hunter did business business directly with the gov't of China, America's #1 geopolitical adversary, and they showered him with money.

The gov't of China paid him amounts of money that were outrageously high compared to his qualifications and experience. 

Joe Biden lied to Americans on video many times, claiming to be completely unaware of Hunter's overseas business dealings. Why did Joe lie about it if it was all on the up and up?

Why did the FBI lie about it if it was all on the up and up? 

If the FBI (who have a court-documented history of committing crimes on behalf of the Dems) are busy lying for him, what are the chances that they will do a proper investigation into his shady dealings with former gov'ts? 

You might as well cite the National Enquirer or Fox since the NY Post is no more credible.

You can't even see that Trump lied about rain when RAINDROPS were CLEARLY SHOWN to YOU from VIDEO YOU CITED.

Dry APPEARING hair does NOT negate a half dozen pics SHOWING RAIN DROPS.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You might as well cite the National Enquirer or Fox since the NY Post is no more credible.

You can't even see that Trump lied about rain when RAINDROPS were CLEARLY SHOWN to YOU from VIDEO YOU CITED.

Dry APPEARING hair does NOT negate a half dozen pics SHOWING RAIN DROPS.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/analysis-hunter-bidens-hard-drive-shows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462

There ya go, snivelly brat. 

And FYI it's probably in your best interest to stop referring to the time when all of leftard America cried: "TRUMP IS A LIAR FOR SAYING THERE WERE JUST A FEW DROPS OF RAIN DURING HIS INAUGURATION!!! ?"

[West]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You might as well cite the National Enquirer or Fox since the NY Post is no more credible.

You can't even see that Trump lied about rain when RAINDROPS were CLEARLY SHOWN to YOU from VIDEO YOU CITED.

Dry APPEARING hair does NOT negate a half dozen pics SHOWING RAIN DROPS.

You folks pick some bizarre claims to show people "lied". Makes you look like lunatics 

[Hodad]

12 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Poor Libbies. They all dog-piled on the Trump impeachment and now realize there will be consequences. 

"You have no proof!"

Ahhh...but we do Young Libbies. Lots of it. A laptop full of it. Whistle blowers. Bobulinsky. 

When this is over, your imbecile POTUS will be utterly destroyed. 

Merry Christmas. 

This is as grounded in reality as your juvenile, ad nauseum midterm projections, and likely to end the same way.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

This is as grounded in reality as your juvenile, ad nauseum midterm projections, and likely to end the same way.

Who the hell are you to talk about "grounded in reality"?

You think the most important covid stat is "How many people have to get positive swabs in order for x number of people to die?" You don't even care if the number of deaths goes up or stays the same, you just care about your precious swabs. 

It's bizarre, and even a bit ghoulish. 

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That laptop has NO verified evidence custodial history which would be required for it hold up in court.

At most it justifies AN INVESTIGATION which AFAIK has NOT been announced (and should not be until indictment per FBI rules).

Your predictions are worth as much as your childish calendar reading. LMAO.

Lol...merry Christmas 

[Hodad]

22 hours ago, sharkman said:

Did anyone bring this up yet?  In 2016 Biden threatened the Ukrainian president.  He told him to stop the investigation into Hunter’s company, or he wouldn’t get the billion in loan guarantees( crazy times back then, eh?  Only 1 billion, and a loan at that?  Come on, man!)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived/

The video of Biden bragging about it was actually on YouTube for a few months.  I looked just now and it’s been wiped from YouTube and the net.  Now searches only bring back ‘fact-check’ propaganda and the like, claiming it never happened.

But you can take it from me, the video of Biden bragging about the blackmail was actually on YouTube.

Your facts are more like fictions. Everyone in the US wanted Shokin fired because he *wasn't* investigating corruption in Ukraine. It wasn't Biden's pet project or special favor. Nor was it any kind of secret. Burisma wasn't under investigation at the time, so "stopping" the investigation would have been impossible. 

The clip *has not* been "scrubbed" from the Internet, lol. There are dozens of them. Watch to your heart's content or until you climax or whatever.

Oh, and the Senate Republicans already did this investigation and found no evidence of wrongdoing.

Edited December 26, 2022 by Hodad

[Nationalist]

25 minutes ago, Hodad said:

This is as grounded in reality as your juvenile, ad nauseum midterm projections, and likely to end the same way.

I hope so. I predicted a Democrat house and it is.

[Hodad]

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Who the hell are you to talk about "grounded in reality"?

You think the most important covid stat is "How many people have to get positive swabs in order for x number of people to die?" You don't even care if the number of deaths goes up or stays the same, you just care about your precious swabs. 

It's bizarre, and even a bit ghoulish.

Yeah, I'm one of those crazy kooks who measures efficacy with outcomes and incidence rather than just looking at a big dumb raw number. Me, and everyone who measures efficacy.

People who wear seatbelts are like 7x less likely to die in a car accident, but for folks with your math skills the real measure of seatbelt efficacy is how many people die in auto accidents each year. ?

[Hodad]

37 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I hope so. I predicted a Democrat house and it is.

I think we're all know that's bullshit. You weren't doing a stupid, smug countdown to a slight majority in one body of the legislature. That's no kind of reckoning.