Michael Hardner Posted July 20, 2022 Report Share Posted July 20, 2022 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: 1. asking why the 5 or more ice ages and 5 or more melts in earth history are not discussed and are not compared. 2. Was that enough? If not , what is enough. What caused the preceding ice ages than the climate change melted? 3. I agree that many, if not most scientists have proof of climate change and the earth is getting hotter but it has in the past too. 4. all news sources seem to agree with climate change and some other events but where they differ is on political issues. Some report and some do not, some slant and others do not even mention. 1. They're not controversial or mysterious in climate science. The controversial articles you see don't come from climate science, but outsiders with marginal involvement with science, promoted and puffed up by online magazines who want clicks. 2. No, there are very few fast events that have lingering questions about warming. 3. The reasons are largely known. But also, there's no proof, not will there ever be. The reasons are that proof, ie. irrefutable evidence, can never be established in a real world with infinite unknowns. For practical reasons, we have to make decisions based on risk. 4. Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.