First a trickle....Now a flood

[Goddess]

Just now, User said:

So... no, you can't. Like just about every time I call you or West out, you balk and can't back up your stuff. 

No.  You don't get to do that.

I don't take homework assignments from you.

I already did the homework, posted it here over and over and discussed it.

You do your own homework.

Except you never do any homework.  You just pop up here to harass the people who are doing theirs and demand they let you peek.

There's 81 pages of research here.  I worked hard on it.  Painstakingly.  

All you have to do is.......read.

If you're too lazy to do that......not my problem.  

[User]

10 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No.  You don't get to do that.

I don't take homework assignments from you.

I already did the homework, posted it here over and over and discussed it.

You do your own homework.

Except you never do any homework.  You just pop up here to harass the people who are doing theirs and demand they let you peek.

There's 81 pages of research here.  I worked hard on it.  Painstakingly.  

All you have to do is.......read.

If you're too lazy to do that......not my problem.  

Of course I get to do it, you are here pushing it right now and this is the dumb game you play regardless. You make assertions then refuse to back them up. 

I have done my homework on this, which is why I know you are pushing garbage. 

I have also been in this thread before now, challenging you. 

What you have put here is hardly "research" and if you can't back it up, that is on you, not me. 

In the time it took you to write out this crap response, you could have easily gotten whatever link to whatever study you claimed existed. 

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, User said:

You make assertions then refuse to back them up. 

I have an 82-page thread on a topic that I have busted my a$$ researching for years.  And gawd only know how many pages of discussion on a myriad other related threads here.

How is that "refusing" to back up my assertions?

[Goddess]

I've provided all the sources, all the cites, all the discussion.

If you're genuinely interested, they are all there.  If you choose not to read them, that's on you. 

If your big victory is "I refuse to scroll", then congrats, I guess.

Laziness as a debate strategy is something I expect from eyeball, the 12 year old, etc.

[User]

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I have an 82-page thread on a topic that I have busted my a$$ researching for years.  And gawd only know how many pages of discussion on a myriad other related threads here.

How is that "refusing" to back up my assertions?

Wow, you are so famaliar with your research here, you can't easily cite a piece of it when needed?

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I've provided all the sources, all the cites, all the discussion.

If you're genuinely interested, they are all there.  If you choose not to read them, that's on you. 

If your big victory is "I refuse to scroll", then congrats, I guess.

Laziness as a debate strategy is something I expect from eyeball, the 12 year old, etc.

No, this is not the first time you have played this game with me. You make baseless assertions, then when called out, balk. 

 

[Goddess]

Just now, User said:

Wow, you are so famaliar with your research here, you can't easily cite a piece of it when needed?

I did cite it.

I'm just not scrolling the whole thread or searching through my files because you demand I do.

[Goddess]

Your "win" by being lazy, along with its imaginary trophy, is of no concern to me.

[User]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Your "win" by being lazy, along with its imaginary trophy, is of no concern to me.

I am no more lazy than you are here. It was your assertion and you are too lazy to back it up. 

 

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, User said:

I am no more lazy than you are here. It was your assertion and you are too lazy to back it up. 

 

Actually, you're lazier.

It was ME who subscribed to many scientists, doctors, researchers, epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists so I could be up-to-date on the latest research & studies as they emerged.  It was ME who actually found the study when it first came out, took the time to read it, checked the credentials of the authors, evaluated opposing views, listened to scientists discuss the study, compared the data to other similar studies, condensed it to pertinent parts and put it into layman's terms, screenshotted charts for posting, took the time to create a well-thought-out post and posted it.

YOU......refuse to scroll.

[User]

18 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Actually, you're lazier.

It was ME who subscribed to many scientists, doctors, researchers, epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists so I could be up-to-date on the latest research & studies as they emerged.  It was ME who actually found the study when it first came out, took the time to read it, checked the credentials of the authors, evaluated opposing views, listened to scientists discuss the study, compared the data to other similar studies, condensed it to pertinent parts and put it into layman's terms, screenshotted charts for posting, took the time to create a well-thought-out post and posted it.

YOU......refuse to scroll.

No, you subscribe to a tiny select group of conspiratorial fear-mongers and frauds and selectively cherry-pick what they say and ignore most everything else. 

You did all that work, so you can push baseless assertions and, when challenged, balk at actually backing them up.

The real work is by people like me who suffer through the endless pages of lies, obfuscation, twisting of facts, to call you out on it.  

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, User said:

you subscribe to a tiny select group of conspiratorial fear-mongers and frauds

Like who?  Name the frauds I subscribe to.

5 minutes ago, User said:

The real work is by people like me who suffer through the endless pages of lies, obfuscation, twisting of facts, to call you out on it.  

Are you in danger?  Is someone holding a gun to your head, forcing you to read this thread?

Blink twice if you're in Milwaukee.

[User]

Just now, Goddess said:

Like who?  Name the frauds I subscribe to.

Name everyone you subscribe to. 

Just now, Goddess said:

Are you in danger?  Is someone holding a gun to your head, forcing you to read this thread?

Blink twice if you're in Milwaukee.

Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just gotten the link by now. 

[Goddess]

8 minutes ago, User said:

Name everyone you subscribe to. 

No.  You said I subscribe to frauds.  I don't know you got into my email accounts, but you made the assertion.  You must have the list. Who do I subscribe to that's a fraud?

 

10 minutes ago, User said:

Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just gotten the link by now. 

Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just scrolled and gotten the link by now.

[User]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

No.  You said I subscribe to frauds.  I don't know you got into my email accounts, but you made the assertion.  You must have the list. Who do I subscribe to that's a fraud?

No, you said:

"It was ME who subscribed to many scientists, doctors, researchers, epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists"

So, who?

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just scrolled and gotten the link by now.

If it exists. If I can figure out which one you were talking about. 

It is a wild goose chase for me. When you could just easily have posted it by now. 

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, User said:

It is a wild goose chase for me.

Amazing.

[Goddess]

[Goddess]

This paper, which was used extensively to discredit the use of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine) for covid, has finally been RETRACTED:

RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis - PubMed

 

It was a completely fake study.  And not just fudged numbers, either, it was entirely made up in order to sabotage HCQ as a treatment option so Pfizer could get the Emergency Use Authorization it needed for the jabs.

 

This was egregious because it delayed the publishing of many studies which confirmed the efficacy of HCQ for covid.

Winters: Approval delays in multi-country COVID-19 trials: the case of COPCOV and the risk of therapeutic inertia [HCQ]

Quote

The fraudulent Mehra et al. Lancet paper linking HCQ to cardiotoxicity, though quickly retracted, caused additional months-long delays across multiple countries. Authors argue these approval delays represent a "risk of therapeutic inertia" where bureaucratic risk-aversion overlooks the potential harms of delaying potentially beneficial treatments during health emergencies. 

 

COPCOV: Evaluation of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19 (COPCOV): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (Schilling) [HCQ]

The largest HCQ  randomized control trial (RCT) showed a 57% lower symptomatic PCR+ covid.

This is the Oxford 4,652 patient, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 

Authors also included a meta-analysis of 8 other RCT's confirming significantly lower symptomatic cases.

It took over 800 days to publish this because of the fake studies.

Quote

 

RCT 4,652 low-risk participants, published 820 days days after completion, showing significantly lower PCR+ COVID-19 cases with HCQ/CQ prophylaxis, p = 0.0004.

 

Authors include a meta-analysis of this and 11 other RCTs confirming significantly lower COVID-19 cases.

Authors conclude that HCQ/CQ could have been deployed with benefit early in the pandemic.

 

HCQ/CQ was well tolerated with no serious drug-related adverse events. There were significantly fewer severe adverse events with treatment. 

 

Edited January 26 by Goddess

[Goddess]

Sorry, charts from the above post:

 

 

[Goddess]

Important to note that the role of HCQ was to serve as a Zinc ionophore - it allows zinc to enter the cell more effectively and stop replication.

This is interesting because Ralph Baric (of Wuhan lab/coronavirus fame) knew this already.  He published this paper 10 years BEFORE the pandemic.

Zn2+ Inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity In Vitro and Zinc Ionophores Block the Replication of These Viruses in Cell Culture - PMC

 

Here, they report a significantly lower risk for severe disease, based on 14 randomized prophylactic RCT's.

That's not nothing.

HCQ for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 627 studies

 

Imagine how many people died because they suppressed HCQ and IVM as treatments?

Ah, but then they couldn't have gotten the Emergency Use Authorization and made $$ BILLIONS $$.  No early treatments could be allowed to get in the way of that.

Edited January 26 by Goddess

[Goddess]

I wonder what happened to the 2 million doses of HCQ that were donated to the Canadian gov't because the medical community already knew coronaviruses responded well to HCQ?

[Goddess]

I'm researching and confirming a recently published paper on the RNA:DNA hybrid contamination.  This one:

RNA:DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing

 

This is the best layman's explanation of the issue I have found so far.

Revelation about mRNA vaccines: RNA-DNA hybrids resist purification, significant underestimation of contamination | FranceSoir

This paper reveals not just incompetence on the part of Pharma manufacturers, but outright malfeasance.

 

After copying, all remaining DNA must be removed, as it could be dangerous (more on that later). An enzyme called DNase I is used, which cuts the DNA into small pieces to destroy it. But here's the problem: DNase I is extremely effective on single-stranded DNA (double-stranded), but 100 times less effective on RNA-DNA hybrids. As a result, a large portion of the DNA attached to the mRNA remains intact! Manufacturers and regulatory authorities (such as the FDA and EMA) set a limit: no more than 10 nanograms (ng) of DNA per vaccine dose.

The study shows that this cleanup is uneven : the unattached parts of the plasmid (such as the KAN gene) are well destroyed, but the hybrids (especially Spike) survive.

 

What are the consequences for the public?

These discoveries affect billions of vaccinated people with

• The health risks : the remaining DNA, protected by lipid nanoparticles (like oil bubbles), could enter your cells and attach itself to your own DNA, causing mutations . El-Deiry explains: “Small fragments represent billions of pieces, and if they reach the cell nucleus, they could activate cancer genes or block protective genes like P53”. Links are suspected with “turbo cancers" (which grow rapidly), via a decrease in immune defenses (IgG4) or activation of PD-L1 (which helps tumors grow).
   

• Manufacturing issues : Mass-produced vaccines (process 2) differ from those tested in clinical trials (process 1), containing more impurities. This could therefore contravene regulatory standards and violate official authorizations, warranting sanctions and review by the FDA.

• The missing information : vaccine leaflets admit to a lack of data on the risks of cancer or fertility. With these hidden inaccuracies, people have not been warned of the real dangers, which violates the fundamental right of individuals to truly free and informed consent. This point was discussed at length with Professor El-Deiry.
  

 

[Goddess]

Finally!  Some truth from Dr. Robert Redman, former director of the CDC.

This recording of an interview will be used in Dan Hartman's case.

 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Finally!  Some truth from Dr. Robert Redman, former director of the CDC.

This recording of an interview will be used in Dan Hartman's case.

 

 

What's the reader's digest version?

[Goddess]

It's only a 7.5 minute recording of a longer interview.

Redman admits the vaccine was oversold, that the public was misinformed about what it could and couldn't do, mocks the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" and "you're gonna kill Grama", children should have never been given it, pregnant women should never have been given it, only over 65 very high-risk people should, vaccines were never going to stop the pandemic, it's not a vaccine, Redman has stopped taking the shots, he doesn't prescribe it in his practice any more, natural immunity was real, they deliberately suppressed vaccine injury and the injury rate is very high, the myocarditis is real, the cancer is real, it turns your body into a spike protein factory which the spike is "very, very, very" toxic and they don't know how long it stays in your body or where it travels to.

Edited January 30 by Goddess

[Goddess]

The censored scientists were right about everything.