First a trickle....Now a flood

[Goddess]

DR. PRASAD'S SUBSTACK TODAY:

If public health wants to regain trust, it has to take an honest assessment of what it got right and got wrong. It can’t celebrate errors. Sadly, it appears that public health is not interested in that task. Take a look.

Walensky wins the Fauci award?! Wow. Here is just a short list of what each of them got wrong

Walensky:

When she was in Brookline, she advocated for school reopening, but when appointed by President Biden, who campaigned on the idea that schools were dangerous, she reversed that stance.

She met privately and discussed CDC guidance with the teachers unions.

She was dishonest about myocarditis. There is no way this was true by the end of April 2021.

The Israelis reported a rate of 1 in 3000 by February, and the EMA would soon confirm the safety signal.

Once she accepted myocarditis exists, she made no effort to lower it. No trials of spaced doses, lower or omitted doses.

She lied constantly about the evidence for masking. She lied to congress stating there was not equipoise for a trial testing if masking worked in children. This was clearly false given that the European CDC and CDC had divergent recommendations— and member states had a range of policies (e.g. Sweden never masked <12, US masked 2+). A divergence of practice is the definition of equipoise.

Walensky supported vaccine mandates, which were unethical, as COVID vaccines had never established a third party benefit.

Walensky pushed vaccines in people who had COVID— a strategy that may even be harmful.

Walensky pushed boosters in low risk populations, a decision that led to the resignation of Gruber/ Krause at FDA.

Walensky’s communication on TV was a constant mess of flip flopping and insecurity; she was a notoriously bad communicator. She even hired an outside consulting firm to help her communications, using taxpayer money.

What did she get right? I am actually not sure. I suppose she was correct that COVID is caused by a virus and that many vitamins don’t work— facts that a high schooler would know— so she got the bare minimum right. But on any policy decisions, particularly those that used the force of the state, she got it wrong.

She famously refused to throw away 6ft of social distancing (a distance pulled from someone’s ass), when when we begged her to do so, as it was stopping school reopening. More on what she got wrong here.

And she gets the Fauci award.

What did Fauci get wrong?

Fauci was of course initially told the truth that multiple RCTs of community masking showed it didn’t help, then he lied about it. He never opposed masking 2 year olds.

He exaggerated the risk to kids. He opposed DeSantis in spring 2020 when DeSantis wanted to reopen schools.

Fauci was wrong about giving 2 doses to fewer people over 1 dose to more people.

Fauci was wrong to not meet with and discuss different ideas with the authors of Great Barrington Declaration.

Fauci was wrong about double masking.

Fauci was wrong about vaccine mandates and ignoring natural immunity.

Fauci was wrong about boosters for young people, vaccines for people who already had COVID.

Most notably, Fauci appears to have used Gmail to evade federal FOIA laws to conceal NIAID’s role in funding the laboratory in Wuhan to conduct gain of function research in sars-coronaviruses.

Public health has a choice. It could actually aspire to have dialog and discussion and pursue the truth, or it could keep promoting the people who were wrong. If it continues to do the latter, I suspect trust will continue to fall.

If I were giving out awards, I would give Rochelle Wallensky the Fauci award for clever and effective propaganda at a time of crisis that polarized a nation and undermined faith in science.

 

[Goddess]

I encourage you to read the article Dr. Prasad cited in his substack above:

How the CDC Abandoned Science - Tablet Magazine

[Goddess]

Consensus by force and censorship is not consensus.

 

 

[Goddess]

Next time, we better demand to see the science.

 

 

[Goddess]

This is a 10+ minute clip of a longer interview that Viva Frei (a lawyer) had with Dr. Jessica Rose.  She explains the DNA contamination and SV40 promoter in the injections and what the ramifications of that are.

This lady is one of Canada's smartest people.  She does well at explaining very technical scientific ideas to lay people.

Dr. Rose is one of quite a few incredibly intelligent Canadians who are currently being invited to speak on this topic all over the world, most recent was, I believe, Japan.

It's astonishing to me how ill-informed Canadians are and, frankly, not the least bit interested in these experimental injections.  The childish arguments put forward here by deliberately ill-informed people have been long-rejected by most of Europe and other countries.

For ones like eyeball, who are still arguing that his vaccines aren't working because others didn't get them so everyone should be forced to, is insane and has absolutely no basis in science.  Third-party benefit for these injections has NEVER been shown, which was the whole point of the mandates.

I sometimes just can't wrap my brain around how astonishingly stupid these people are.  And they are dangerous.  Because en masse, they force governments to enact unscientific policies on the rest of us.

I've written to all the Canadian senators and MPs in protest of Bill C-293.

The scope of its policies are so ill-defined and broad that in the event of a mild cold, the government could enact policies that would make the covid era look like a birthday party.  And people like eyeball will cheer it on.

[Goddess]

I think he meant to be facetious at the time but @WestCanMan was right.

The govt cure for c0v1d vax injury is MAID.

[Goddess]

Pharma Paid $1.06 Billion to Reviewers at Top Medical Journals - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

“The traditionally opaque nature” of peer review has hindered the evaluation of peer reviewers, “despite their crucial role in academic publishing,” the authors wrote.

The typical conflict-of-interest policies most journals have for authors — requiring only that they disclose their conflicts — do not usually apply to peer reviewers, according to the JAMA study.

Journal editors may inquire about those conflicts, but they rarely publicly disclose them — even though many reviewers for top journals may have industry ties....

This had led to:

1. Complete abandonment of independent clinical judgment to embrace unproven protocols.

2. Allowing money to be the sole driving factor in the management of patients.

3. Dismissal of oaths in favor of profit margins.

This is why peer-review is not empirical - being able to reproduce results is what counts.

[Goddess]

Imagine if there was a food item on the shelves in grocery stores that killed an unknown number of Canadians and no one was keeping track of how many and they still allowed it to be consumed?

 

Edited October 26, 2024 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

I think he meant to be facetious at the time but @WestCanMan was right.

The govt cure for c0v1d vax injury is MAID.

Look at that... it's a "controversial" post covid-19 vax syndrome. So they have to write in their title that "science doubts that this syndrome is even real."

'Cause, you know, science is a sentient being now with its own universally accepted opinions. 

BS. That's called "compelled speech". It goes like this: "There are a lot of people who know about this know - we haven't been able to keep this story under wraps - so we have to give the impression that we're following it or it will blow up in our faces, but we have to do it in the most low-key way possible, and we MUST cast doubt on it. So write your little story but you must write "We think this is most likely a crackpot conspiracy" somewhere in the title."

• The cult-handlers have two top-level buzzwords that they use to trigger their shriekers these days: "Russian disinformation" and "conspiracy". As soon as they use one of their words, the cultists know that it's time to get on top of a story and chuck sh1t like mad. 

So here's how modern medicine and science work now: if you sneezed on Jan 12th and then died of of your stage 4 cancer on Jan 21st, right on schedule, they could just instantly diagnose you as "a covid death", no questions asked. BOOM! Solid!. That guy died "of covid", no questions asked.

But years later they're still having a hard time correlating the link between the jab and the crazy symptoms that people suddenly got within a week to two weeks. Why? Because there's no money in that correlation. In fact, it's really bad for big pharma's bottom line, and we don't want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg, do we @eyeball? @ExFlyer? @Hodad? It's also bad for the LPOC, the Demis, and everyone else who forced people to take the jab. 

I was hearing reports of young kids getting myocarditis from the jabs for a really long time before the MSM ever acknowledged it at all, and then when they did it was in a hush-hush way where they never interviewed anyone who was impacted (1st rule of MSM (aka fake) journalism: never put a 'face' on sufferers of a tragedy if it hurts your main narratives) and they never put numbers to it, and they never explained that THOSE KIDS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO GAIN FROM VAXING.

There was some BS excuse that "kids suffer long-term with covid and get permanent injuries. That happens less often from the vax than it does from covid." BULL-sh1t. Bullshit.

Covid wasn't killing kids at all and it wasn't doing the long-term harm that they talked about. I've never personally heard the story of a single kid affected like that from covid from anyone in my personal sphere, and we have son in school and our daughter is a teacher. Between all his extracurricular activities and the people we know from them, and all of our daughter's students and her friends' students, etc, etc, I've never heard of a single person saying "This guy that I know has a kid who got so sick from covid they thought that he was gonna die, and now he has permanent injuries from covid". Not one, ever. 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, Goddess said:

I think he meant to be facetious at the time but @WestCanMan was right.

The govt cure for c0v1d vax injury is MAID.

I don't think it's just MAID. I'm pretty sure that the vax-injured woman that they were going to juice in the first story that I read was also offered some financial assistance for her funeral. 

[WestCanMan]

On 10/25/2024 at 6:25 AM, Goddess said:

Dr. Rose is one of quite a few incredibly intelligent Canadians who are currently being invited to speak on this topic all over the world, most recent was, I believe, Japan.

If I was her I'd make sure that I didn't get on the same plane with too many other people who were talking about the same thing. 

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

Pharma Paid $1.06 Billion to Reviewers at Top Medical Journals - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Vaxtards: "Why does that matter?"

NEJoM and The Lancet: "Uhhhh, it doesn't. Go vote for Kamala NOW, dummies."

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Imagine if there was a food item on the shelves in grocery stores that killed an unknown number of Canadians and no one was keeping track of how many and they still allowed it to be consumed?

 

Are the vaxtards here still calling it "safe and effective"? 

Yep.

They're so f'ing brainwashed that they'll just say "Sure, vaxxing killed a few kids who never even had anything to gain from taking a vaccine if there was one that worked, but it saved a hunnerd billyun peeple!"

I hate vaxtards more than I hate cancer. 

[eyeball]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Covid wasn't killing kids at all.

Bullshit. COVID killed over 17000 kids and its still a leading cause of death amongst kids.

A new study led by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Department of Computer Science has found that, between 2021 and 2022, COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in children and young people in the United States, ranking eighth overall. The results demonstrate that pharmaceutical and public health interventions should continue to be applied to limit the spread of the coronavirus and protect again severe disease in this age group.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-01-31-covid-19-leading-cause-death-children-and-young-people-us

 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Bullshit. COVID killed over 17000 kids and its still a leading cause of death amongst kids.

A new study led by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Department of Computer Science has found that, between 2021 and 2022, COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in children and young people in the United States, ranking eighth overall. The results demonstrate that pharmaceutical and public health interventions should continue to be applied to limit the spread of the coronavirus and protect again severe disease in this age group.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-01-31-covid-19-leading-cause-death-children-and-young-people-us

 

 

It's not remotely a leading cause of death among kids. It doesn't even make it on the list. 

Current Causes of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States | New England Journal of Medicine

 

The chart stops as 2020 but according to the article it's pretty much the same.  And it doesn't even show up on the charts in Canada

 

Edited October 27, 2024 by CdnFox

[Goddess]

LOL

17000 in the entire world died "of covid" and eyeball thinks that's the #1 cause of child death.

Holy fuque.

How many of that 17000 were like the kid who had terminal brain cancer in Alberta, but somehow died "of covid"?

Gawd, you people are gullible.

[Goddess]

A bunch of people at work have had what everyone presumes is covid.....again.  For the last 3 weeks.

They're all really really tired and lethargic.

This time, the only other unjabbed person at work got it.

Coworker:  "This is pissing me off.  This is the 3rd time I've had it. I'm not getting any more boosters.  Goddess, how come you never get it?"

Me:  "I listen to the "bad" doctors."

[Goddess]

eyeball has to pretend like he cared about the kids all along because he supported all the over-reaction and insanity and forcing an injection on them that damaged them far more than the virus, including bankrupting many of their parents.

[CdnFox]

51 minutes ago, Goddess said:

eyeball has to pretend like he cared about the kids all along because he supported all the over-reaction and insanity and forcing an injection on them that damaged them far more than the virus, including bankrupting many of their parents.

The type of person who is the type to react to something rather than reason it through is also going to be the type of person who is going to react with emotion to having that decision challenged.

For people who use reason and logic to begin with it's very easy to look back and reevaluate and say I made the best decision I could with the information at the time but I would make a difference decision if I had the information I do now. It's easy even to look at mistakes and say given the way it turned out although my decisions were the best I could do at the time there was an error in my logic or reasoning and looking forward I would probably be more cautious or would move in this direction.

But if your decision was based on emotion in the first place then likely your reaction is going to be emotion based.If you base your actions and your thoughts and your sense of self on emotion then obviously the last thing you want is to feel bad about your choices so you reject that notion.

Unfortunate, but the way that humans are designed. The only way around that is with a little bit of training in more advanced thinking and controlling your emotions and that is just something that is not part of our school system today

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

17000 in the entire world died "of covid" and eyeball thinks that's the #1 cause of child death.

Nope, I simply pointed out that Waste Can Man is full of crap when he said covid wasn't killing kids at all. 

And the report said 8th cause not first. You need to get a better grip on things as well.

Its weird how cavalier and dismissive you people get about real lives that were lost and families that were devastated when the fact they happened contradict your fevered diseased imagination.

[Goddess]

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nope, I simply pointed out that Waste Can Man is full of crap when he said covid wasn't killing kids at all. 

And the report said 8th cause not first. You need to get a better grip on things as well.

Its weird how cavalier and dismissive you people get about real lives that were lost and families that were devastated when the fact they happened contradict your fevered diseased imagination.

Your pedantic comments make discussion basically impossible with you.

You're a prosaic clod, who can't read between the lines or understand the deeper meaning of anything.

If only you had applied that same pedantry during the scamdemic, maybe you wouldn't have fallen for all the lies.

Watching you try to justify yourself for throwing kids under the bus to save yourself totally disgusts me.

[Goddess]

 

Pfizer Lots Starting with "E" Could Signify Serious Side Effects.

Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Lots starting with "E" are common on the entries. Jablonowski and Hooker report:

• Five lots had high outliers for death (EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, and EJ1686)
• four for serious (EK4176, EK5730, EH9899, and EJ1685)
• and five for ALL SAEs (EK5730, EH9899, EK4176, EK9231, and EJ1685)

These vaccinations were the first to be distributed in December 2020 and early 2021.

Turns out the whistlebowers who reported deplorable quality control were right.  Each batch of any product should be the same, this is especially true for vaccines.

Lesson learned: never be the first to line up for a new government-issued vaccine releasing the mRNA genetic code for a lethal Spike protein engineered by a US-Chinese team in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

 

[Goddess]

These injections are like a box of chocolates........you never know what you're gonna get.

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Lots starting with "E" are common on the entries. Jablonowski and Hooker report:

• Five lots had high outliers for death (EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, and EJ1686)
• four for serious (EK4176, EK5730, EH9899, and EJ1685)
• and five for ALL SAEs (EK5730, EH9899, EK4176, EK9231, and EJ1685)

These vaccinations were the first to be distributed in December 2020 and early 2021.

Thinking out loud....these would have been injected into the most vulnerable and healthcare workers.

[User]

5 hours ago, Goddess said:

These injections are like a box of chocolates........you never know what you're gonna get.

LOL. I hope you never drive a car... you are more likely to die doing that than from a Covid vaccine. 

[Goddess]

23 hours ago, User said:

LOL. I hope you never drive a car... you are more likely to die doing that than from a Covid vaccine. 

Pretty much everyone is at more risk driving to work every day than dying of covid.

Laugh away, ding dong.

This makes me happy 🙂
Congratulations to Dr. Jay Battacharya, professor of medicine, economics and Health Research & Policy at Stanford.  He also was the co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for focused protection of the vulnerable during covid and minimal NPI's.
The Zimmer Medal for Intellectual Freedom, for his resolute resistance to censorship and manipulation of life-saving science.  He stood up to massive amounts of intellectual bullying during the pandemic, when it was hard and most of his peers caved.  Fauci famously said he needed to do a "quick and devastating takedown" of Dr. Battacharya after he wrote the GBD.
Bravo!  I knew this day would come.

Edited October 29, 2024 by Goddess