Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just tried to email CNN but get blocked and believe that this has to be coming from our country. Does anyone here possibly know why this is the case? 

If you can, test it for yourself: email: [email protected] 

I'm wondering if others are having this problem too or if this is just me. Just send a simply text message there and see if you get a return. 

Thanks.

Posted
1 minute ago, 500channelsurfer said:

648.44

are we testing text or e-mail?

 

(text might not work for multiple reasons including international wireless agreements which might not be specifically political in this instance)

I'll have to check my provider first and get back here if it is not determinable.  I was testing email and 'text' is more correctly, "plaintext" given some sites can opt to block html or richtext. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Get a VPN and use a US server.

I've been putting this off but probably should. But even this may still not work securely because here in Canada, we lack the same security options that the U.S. has. The law here I believe has formally commanded the providers be able to monitor our access and so VPNs may itself be 'virtual' here. 

All our internet goes first through our ISPs before we can access the world wide web. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

"Recipient address rejected: Access denied."

I'm assuming it's DoS attack protection.

That's why I mentioned 'text' (plain) but that didn't work. I'll try again by some other route. Thanks again.

Posted
14 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

"Recipient address rejected" should mean the recipient. In other words not you, because you are the sender.

Is it possible the recipient, CNN, might be rejecting some Canadians by CNN's own choice, or perhaps CNN is unaware and CNN's network provider is doing this; or even perhaps Scott Mayers' device is rejecting CNN's address as his device has some software or network block from his ISP or manufacturer?

Posted
1 minute ago, 500channelsurfer said:

Is it possible the recipient, CNN, might be rejecting some Canadians by CNN's own choice, or perhaps CNN is unaware and CNN's network provider is doing this; or even perhaps Scott Mayers' device is rejecting CNN's address as his device has some software or network block from his ISP or manufacturer?

Here you go fella, ask the magic eight ball.

afd8e2cb-0ed1-4072-9c59-9b485b94b1fb.__C

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Scott Mayers said:

I've been putting this off but probably should. But even this may still not work securely because here in Canada, we lack the same security options that the U.S. has. The law here I believe has formally commanded the providers be able to monitor our access and so VPNs may itself be 'virtual' here. 

All our internet goes first through our ISPs before we can access the world wide web. 

A good VPN encrypts your data right on your computer and sends it to a server in the country you choose, which then decrypts it and sends it to the destination. Our government has no control over ones based in places like the Cayman Islands, Panama and other such places.

Some websites will not accept data from a VPN server but they are rare. For instance Canadian Tire won't recognize mine but just about every other retailer does.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

A good VPN encrypts your data right on your computer and sends it to a server in the country you choose, which then decrypts it and sends it to the destination. Our government has no control over ones based in places like the Cayman Islands, Panama and other such places.

Some websites will not accept data from a VPN server but they are rare. For instance Canadian Tire won't recognize mine but just about every other retailer does.

I haven't (yet) bothered to determine the depths of encryptian/decryption but can rationally recognize that you need a means to first assure each party has the same encryptian key/code. On trivial attention that I paid to it thus far, I understand that two keys are needed, a 'public' one and a 'private' one. The 'public' one I can only guess needs some downloaded software. The coding of it by its compiled nature would make it possibly this 'public' key and would be difficult to determine how it might make a private key without knowing how the progam was compiled. But if one's Internet activity is itself monitored WELL, then this can determine what one is doing by the intermediate provider. Then (if prepared) they could redirect one to download an apparent VPN software you think belongs to the named company, and given you are using their own tweeked program that is used to make your own privately shared key can be determined.

The odds are low now probably but in principle this could occur. I'll have to learn about encryptian to see what they use to assure this can't occur. But I'm likely being too overly concerned. (?)

Posted
4 hours ago, Scott Mayers said:

I've been putting this off but probably should. But even this may still not work securely because here in Canada, we lack the same security options that the U.S. has.

 

I'd simply mail them a letter adding a spoon of rat poison.  Should get through fine and send the correct message.?

$1.30 for postage, but saves you all electronic hassle and is usually treated with a higher degree of attention.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...