Border crossings for some but not for others.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

There is a lot of debate over how many the Mongols killed, some of the claims are ridiculous like the one about killing 1.78 million people in one hour. That would mean killing almost 30,000 a minute. Even the NAZI's with all their death camps and Einsatzgruppen couldn't come close to that. Between 70 and 85 million died as a result of WW2.

Well the main problem with being an illiterate barbarian horde is the record keeping is frankly atrocious

But as a percentage of the population of the world i think they did more damage. The population was something like 1.7 billion people around world war 2 - the population during the mongols was more like 250 million world wide. And there's little doubt they killed millions.

5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

If taxme wants to save the white race they better start having babies because we would be turning into a declining population of geezers without immigration.

And that's really not happening anywhere. Below replacement birth rates are pretty much universal in every "white" country, and many countries are struggling to get their native populations to have more children.

I doubt it'll happen - the way things have played out you now need to have two incomes to get ahead in life.  You can't afford to be taking one of the earners off the line for a few years at a time very often. People are having one or two kids max and that's it, and even with a good survival rate that's just not going to keep us growing.

[Aristides]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well the main problem with being an illiterate barbarian horde is the record keeping is frankly atrocious

But as a percentage of the population of the world i think they did more damage. The population was something like 1.7 billion people around world war 2 - the population during the mongols was more like 250 million world wide. And there's little doubt they killed millions.

And that's really not happening anywhere. Below replacement birth rates are pretty much universal in every "white" country, and many countries are struggling to get their native populations to have more children.

I doubt it'll happen - the way things have played out you now need to have two incomes to get ahead in life.  You can't afford to be taking one of the earners off the line for a few years at a time very often. People are having one or two kids max and that's it, and even with a good survival rate that's just not going to keep us growing.

There was no record keeping, just opinions of historians who were usually on the losing side who tend to exaggerate. Still, it was a big number.

Below replacement birthrates will mean white cultures will decline regardless of how much taxme rants about immigration. He better hope there are enough young people to look after him in his old age, because there won't be enough white folks to do it, most of them will be old like him.

[CdnFox]

33 minutes ago, Aristides said:

There was no record keeping, just opinions of historians who were usually on the losing side who tend to exaggerate. Still, it was a big number.

Below replacement birthrates will mean white cultures will decline regardless of how much taxme rants about immigration. He better hope there are enough young people to look after him in his old age, because there won't be enough white folks to do it, most of them will be old like him.

There can be no doubt that white populations will decline in the foreseeable future. Right now canada's native born population is not replacing itself in general, never mind just whites. Without immigration we'd be in decline, and most european countries are in the same boat.

And that's directly tied to GDP. Check out the chart below - it's a ratio of fertility rates (children per woman) vs GDP. In order to produce more GDP you need more women in the workplace - and that means fewer kids. The most successful countries by gdp tend to be white. You need at least 2 kids per women just to maintain a population and because not all will survive that actually isn't even enough.  Somewhere between 2 and 3 is needed and that's without growth.

And you'll notice that all the countries that have birth rates much above 2 are all poorer non white nations.

https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate  (click on interactive charts)

Edited May 19, 2023 by CdnFox

[taxme]

18 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

So, someone with darker skin than you has less value?

 

Where did I say that in my comment? 

[taxme]

15 hours ago, Aristides said:

Built? By destroying other civilizations.

White men were also responsible for the two most destructive wars in history.

So you are a white supremacist.

The white people also helped other civilizations to enter into the modern civilized world. No race is perfect. Again, it was the white race that stopped native Indians from killing each other. Was that not a great white humanitarian thing to do? The trouble with anti-white people like yourself is that you always want to find the bad things about what the white race has done. 

The wars were all about politics. The wars were not about just wanting to start a fight with some country. The wars were started by some white elite globalist like scumbags that wanted a war to get rid of some opponent. Germany was always their enemy for some reason. 

So a sign that a white person is proud of their white heritage and race and they suddenly become and are called white supremacists. Such lefty liberal bull chit indeed. So, Are you an anti-white racist? 

[TreeBeard]

31 minutes ago, taxme said:

Where did I say that in my comment? 

It’s a question.  
When you see one of these: ?   It means the words form a question, not a statement.  

[taxme]

On 5/19/2023 at 12:33 PM, TreeBeard said:

It’s a question.  
When you see one of these: ?   It means the words form a question, not a statement.  

I have never said such a thing. Does that work for you now? ?