Jump to content

About those tax breaks for the 'rich'


Argus

Recommended Posts

It seems that if you make more than $250k a year you're rich, and any tax breaks you receive are horrific and unconscionable and damaging to the entire social fabric of Canada!

Unless you're the prime minister, of course. Then it's perfectly fine to use tax breaks for yourself and your family. Nobody quite knows how much Trudeau is worth because of all the careful games he's been playing to hide his wealth. He owns full or partial interest in several numbered accounts as well as land, family trusts, offshore accounts, and personal corporations, and nobody knows how much he pays in tax - if anything. But his PM salary is $340k to start. I wonder if he has to declare that he gets free housing, groceries, heating, hydro, phone service and transportation? On top of that he has millions in assets bringing in nobody knows how much more. And when asked about it, he avoids answering.

Now ain't that just like those filthy rich people? 

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeau-dodges-questions-about-taxes-on-his-family-wealth/article36319389/

Edited by Argus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He stepped in deep doodoo when he said he was not involved in the management of the "family fortune". (He must have bit his tongue hard after he used those terms.) Being the beneficiary to a family fortune places him in the very best position to close legal venues for the wealthy as they attempt to lower their tax rate, since his financial advisers use those very same advantages to lower his own taxes payable.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

What does that mean? Is this different from other PMs or ... ?

It means he is a wealthy man who uses tax 'loopholes' to shield as much of his wealth from taxes as possible while calling out much less wealthy people and taking away their shield. Why should family trusts be able to shield income? Do poor people need family trusts for their wealth? How many numbered and oversees accounts does he have? How many does Morneau have? If we're to make things 'fair' shouldn't the 'tax loopholes' they use be closed?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Argus said:

It means he is a wealthy man who uses tax 'loopholes' to shield as much of his wealth from taxes as possible while calling out much less wealthy people and taking away their shield

I was asking for details.  Lots of PMs owned corporations, and how is this different from them or other Canadians ?

24 minutes ago, Argus said:

Why should family trusts be able to shield income? Do poor people need family trusts for their wealth? How many numbered and oversees accounts does he have? How many does Morneau have? If we're to make things 'fair' shouldn't the 'tax loopholes' they use be closed?

Ok... "family trusts" "overseas accounts".  Yes, now I get it.  Your specificity is what the discussion needed.  It's not the same as a "numbered corporation" which many Canadians have and which will be subject to the new tax rules.  Thank you for the clarity.  I doubt that Trudeau has offshored his money, although if he did I hope that comes out as it would be a major scandal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

 I doubt that Trudeau has offshored his money,

According to Trudeau, he is not involved in the management of his "family fortune". The question is, would the financial gurus handling his fortune advise him if that was the case?

Quote

although if he did I hope that comes out as it would be a major scandal.

Robert Fife et al have already uncovered the details of some Trudeau holdings and investments as per the OP's link. They are actively digging for more details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, capricorn said:

According to Trudeau, he is not involved in the management of his "family fortune". The question is, would the financial gurus handling his fortune advise him if that was the case?

Would they advise him ?  No they would advise whichever party is managing the funds.  It they were offshored, it would have been done way back, I suspect.

2 minutes ago, capricorn said:

Robert Fife et al have already uncovered the details of some Trudeau holdings and investments as per the OP's link. They are actively digging for more details.

Paywalled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, capricorn said:

According to Trudeau, he is not involved in the management of his "family fortune". The question is, would the financial gurus handling his fortune advise him if that was the case?

Robert Fife et al have already uncovered the details of some Trudeau holdings and investments as per the OP's link. They are actively digging for more details.

 

Remember, Quebec was where the bulk of the pre-French Revolution wealth ended-up.

Off with their 'heads and all that...

The 'Old Money'....

Edited by DogOnPorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, capricorn said:

According to Trudeau, he is not involved in the management of his "family fortune". The question is, would the financial gurus handling his fortune advise him if that was the case?

Robert Fife et al have already uncovered the details of some Trudeau holdings and investments as per the OP's link. They are actively digging for more details.

When fife gets his teeth into something watch out. And I have a feeling we will find out trudeau's wealth is a lot more then he has led us on to believe.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PIK said:

When fife gets his teeth into something watch out. And I have a feeling we will find out trudeau's wealth is a lot more then he has led us on to believe.

 

The billionaires do want him in their club....but those socks!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The resource minister was taking the questions today and he would not answer the questions as usual. Al, he did was rant about the enviro minister being called barbie. But it you acted like barbi ,you will be called one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how other MPs handle their finances but that's not the point.  The PM is calling small businesses tax cheats while at the same time enjoying loopholes for the rich, therefore avoiding taxes he wants other people to pay, many with lesser income.  It's about Trudeau and Morneau  standing behind their privileges while trying to remove them from others as PM Trudeau receives dividend payments from a private corporation as part of his family fortune, yet, it turns out that Trudeau has admitted he will not be impacted by the tax hikes he’s bringing in. So, it seems his corporations and others among his 1 %er friends, are exempt from the increases he’s imposing on others.

It's about hypocrisy and not being the open transparent gov't he promised, and, some big fish are allready moving their money out of Canada.

Meanwhile, back at the trough, Top Trudeau aides Butts, and Telford managed to expense over $200,000 for moving homes - what was that again about the Senate !

Edited by scribblet
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I was asking for details.  Lots of PMs owned corporations, and how is this different from them or other Canadians ?

Ok... "family trusts" "overseas accounts".  Yes, now I get it.  Your specificity is what the discussion needed.  It's not the same as a "numbered corporation" which many Canadians have and which will be subject to the new tax rules.  Thank you for the clarity.  I doubt that Trudeau has offshored his money, although if he did I hope that comes out as it would be a major scandal.

I was going to say read the cite, but I think it might be behind a paywall.

The Globe and Mail has been investigating Mr. Trudeau's personal wealth and numbered corporations where his assets are held. It has proven difficult to find out detailed information on these numbered corporations.

Mr. Trudeau's disclosure form for the Office of the Ethics Commissioner says he earns dividends from a company named 7664699 Canada Inc. He has sole ownership of 7664699, which also holds "a significant interest" in another company, 176078 Canada Inc.

The sole director of 176078 is Louise Houle, a wealthy Montreal tax lawyer, whose website says she has "extensive experience in family trust and offshore trust matters." Ms. Houle is the secretary of the Pierre Elliott Trudeau foundation, among others. That foundation operates with the help of a $125-million endowment granted by Jean Chrétien's Liberal government.

The Prime Minister is also a joint owner with his brother, Alexandre, of 9190-0563 Quebec Inc. The corporate profile says its activities in the Laurentian countryside include real estate development and the production and sale of timber and firewood. Its most recent evaluation for property tax (2017-19) was $2.73-million.

The property includes two lakes and a cottage designed by Arthur Erickson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, scribblet said:

some big fish are allready moving their money out of Canada.

It's only the beginning. John Manley weighs in.

Quote

Manley, a former Liberal finance minister in the Chretien government, said the elements of the government's plan to tighten rules on passive investment portfolios and the transfer of family businesses have created worries for some members of his organization, the Business Council of Canada.

The financial concerns have been compounded by the government's accompanying messages that Manley believes have "vilified" higher-income Canadians.

Many of his members, he added, have been taken aback by rhetoric that they see as pitting the middle class against the wealthy.

"I don't get it at all — I thought that one of the successes of Prime Minister (Justin) Trudeau was that he was the unifier, he was bringing people together," said Manley, who noted the broader economy would eventually feel the sting of losing too many big job creators.

http://www.bnn.ca/big-fish-moving-money-out-of-canada-because-of-tax-proposals-manley-1.863592

This current Liberal government is pitting Canadians against each other. No good can come of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Divide and conquer.  Trudeau doesn't care about Canada, he only cares about elevating himself to the U.N. - and his socks.

I don't believe he's evading taxes, he's avoiding them,  just as small business people are doing, heck, doctors incorporated after their earnings were capped, can you blame them?   I don't blame anyone for doing what they can to legally to cut back on taxes, but it's hardly right or fair for a PM to pick on small business owners calling them 'cheats' when he's doing something similar himself while keeping the tax loopholes open that he uses.     The point isn't that he's doing something illegal, it's that he's so hypocritical  - did you know that he had 3 registered businesses   (one now defunct for his speaking engagements) - there's only one reason for that,to use loopholes to save taxes.  No more QP tho because Trudeau is swanning off again to the U.N. maybe he'll show up for Question Period one of these weeks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Whoops.  Is the PM evading taxes ?   The offshore part is the only thing I see here that would blow back on him.

What I'd like to know is why we can all roundly and rightly criticize Donald Trump for being opaque about his finances and refusing to divulge his taxes and how much he pays but give Trudeau a buy. What is his total income - not how much he actually declares after all his 'tax loopholes' have been used, and how much does he pay? I mean, he's the guy who's making such a big deal about how everyone has to pay their share, and how the wealthy can afford to pay more. What is his tax rate?

Edited by Argus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it is just me, but I thought, obviously in error, that anyone making more than $70K a year is rich and should pay more taxes, Trudeau, Sheer, Singh and I included. On the one hand, we bitch about deficits and on the other we complain that governments are not funding the services we use. We all want to go to heaven, but we don't want to die to get there.  

Edited by Queenmandy85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Argus said:

What I'd like to know is why we can all roundly and rightly criticize Donald Trump for being opaque about his finances and refusing to divulge his taxes and how much he pays but give Trudeau a buy. What is his total income - not how much he actually declares after all his 'tax loopholes' have been used, and how much does he pay? I mean, he's the guy who's making such a big deal about how everyone has to pay their share, and how the wealthy can afford to pay more. What is his tax rate?

I think that you're trying to say give Trudeau a 'bye'.  I'm not sure why 'we' - by which I assume you mean 'the press' - does that.  I expect that it's because the media hates Trump and loves Trudeau, together with the fact that nobody has found anything strong enough to stick to him yet.  This could be it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I guess it is just me, but I thought, obviously in error, that anyone making more than $70K a year is rich and should pay more taxes, Trudeau, Sheer, Singh and I included. On the one hand, we bitch about deficits and on the other we complain that governments are not funding the services we use. We all want to go to heaven, but we don't want to die to get there.  

Those making over 70k per year already pay about 90% of income taxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Argus said:

Those making over 70k per year already pay about 90% of income taxes.

My 2016 tax return indicates the highest federal tax rate ( On taxable income over $200,000)  is 33% and Sask. Provincial tax rate maximum is 15%. I am curious where the 90% comes in.

If your taxable income is 70,000, you pay 20% and 12% you pay $, leaving you with $47,600. That is a pretty good sum.

If you are paying 90%, on behalf of Canada, we appreciate your financial support.

Edited by Queenmandy85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,750
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Betsy Smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...