hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) Your typical brilliant science once again. I'm nonplussed. And your logic, just WOW! Describe how Windsor Tower fits into your science again, would you? How did those explosions on the north face of WTC2 come to be? Edited April 18, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 14 minutes ago, hot enough said: How did those explosions on the north face of WTC2 come to be? Big piece falls down... Bumaye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) 22 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: Big piece falls down... Bumaye You have to look at the video so that you don't make a fool of yourself. And when you look closely you can also see explosions at the impact zone. Edited April 18, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: You have to look at the video so that you don't make a fool of yourself. I seen them years ago. Even saw one where somebody painted a devils face in the smoke cloud. Is that the one you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: I seen them years ago. Even saw one where somebody painted a devils face in the smoke cloud. Is that the one you mean? As I mentioned, you have to look at the video so that you don't make a fool of yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinkinoutsidethebox Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 14 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: What conclusions ? Did Silverstein come out ahead with the insurance payments ? My reading indicates he did not when you look at the numbers, eg. when you take into account loss of revenue. Furthermore, one would have to question how a landlord could pull something like this off and what the costs would be. In the end, you have to conclude that the landlord being behind this is just ridiculous. You're right, it is ridiculous, it would take a group of the elite to make this work. The problem with these individuals getting this rich and powerful is lower class human beings become dispensable. And god knows how they contribute to world turmoil in the name of profit. http://listverse.com/2014/02/14/10-shocking-ways-the-west-abuses-developing-countries/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/26/legal-aid-bill-exploit-poor and locally is this happening? https://worldmercuryproject.org/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare/ then there's ag in the third world https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/jun/24/gm-crops-african-farmers or the wars in the middle east http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-hartung/who-will-profit-from-the_b_5915794.html Is it so ridiculous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) There. It was not GW Bush. Edited April 18, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) #2 explains it. No wonder, I'm now labelled a "deceiver." I must be an "agent out here helping to conceal the truth." Edited April 18, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) 15 hours ago, hot enough said: No one said it was GWB. Then, who do you think was behind it? Edited April 18, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Have you seen George W Bush describing the bombs and explosions at WTC after the "plane impacts", Betsy? Why wouldn't a responsible press report on the impossibility of that occurring according to the USGOCT? You are familiar with the US government official conspiracy fable, aren't you? What about those explosions going off on the north face of the South Tower? What about the nanothermite, the molten and vaporized steel? Are you content with living a life of lies? Why do you continue to deceive, you purportedly a christian, why do you continue to support those who bear false witness against millions, those who have murdered millions, the child killers, deeply evil people who seek to murder millions more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) Because the science says the alleged hijackers couldn't have caused all the impossible things that happened at WTC on 911, it follows logically that there were no hijackers. No hijackers means that the likelihood of there being planes is also low. When one looks at all the highly improbable events surrounding "da plane da plane', it, like all the rest of the USGOCT [us-go-ct], doesn't make any sense at all. Quote "The wings would break off immediately upon contact and the plane would explode. It would not enter the tower and then explode. The plane would simply be obliterated to pieces by the steel box columns and steel and concrete floor trusses before it got anywhere near the inside of the tower." Edited April 18, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Question: have you ever been in a highrise building? Do you know the term 'curtain wall'? That was two questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) How does a building that has just been punctured by the strongest part of the wings of a jet aircraft self heal so the steel structure is the same as it was ten minutes before? "Half in half out - no break in building between fuselage and left engine." That simply is not possible! Edited April 18, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 So Everyone who filmed and photographed the planes hitting the WTC the are in on the scam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) Oh darn. I thought this is about United Airlines. Should've checked out the author.... Edited April 18, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Boges said: So Everyone ... "Half in half out - no break in building between fuselage and left engine." How is that possible, Boges? Edited April 18, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 It's possible because millions of people saw it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash74 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Yup. Tens of thousands of people including children are all in on it. Greatest act of special effects ever seen. Flat Earthers have science on their side too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Ash, Boges, look at the picture, from CNN. How can the exterior wall of WTC2 be in pristine shape? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Don't we already have a 9/11 thread? Realistically, how many do we need? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash74 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 So what did the damage ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 8 minutes ago, capricorn said: Don't we already have a 9/11 thread? Realistically, how many do we need? Why are you all so damn afraid of discussing the actual issues? Look at the picture, capricorn. It is from CNN, a supporter of the USGOCT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash74 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Realistically. If you take away your hatred for all things that is the U.S. How do you explain the thousands and thousands of people and the people watching live at home seeing the second plane crashing? Yeah never mind. sorry I posted anything. Have at it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, Ash74 said: So what did the damage ? Do you agree there is no damage there where the strongest part of the wing has already entered the building? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ash74 said: So what did the damage ? The first layer of explosives they installed a week before without anyone noticing. Duh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.