Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, kactus said:

They very fact that Trump's impeachment is being discussed in open should surely send the warning signs to the White House....

It was being discussed before he was inaugurated. He's probably the most divisive politician I've ever seen. 

BUT the actions of a Neo Nazi group that you cite in your OP certainly isn't reason enough to impeach him. 

Edited by Boges
Posted
1 minute ago, Boges said:

It was being discussed before he was inaugurated. He's probably the most divisive politician I've ever seen. 

BUT the actions of a Neo Nazi group that you cite in your OP certainly isn't reason enough to impeach him. 

How long is the piece of string? Or let me put it more eloquently.....what else is it that you want to see from this president to make the impeachment a possibility? Because let me tell you deporting a whole lot of people as the article says just based on their religion is pretty darn going that direction....

Posted
4 minutes ago, kactus said:

How long is the piece of string? Or let me put it more eloquently.....what else is it that you want to see from this president to make the impeachment a possibility? Because let me tell you deporting a whole lot of people as the article says just based on their religion is pretty darn going that direction....

I'm not American. Like most things American, it's great entertainment. One thing you can say about Trump is that he's not exactly a Hawk, so perhaps the chances of starting WW3 is actually lesser now. 

I'm more concerned with the clown he's going to meet next Monday and what he's doing here. 

I'm hopeful that his isolationist tactics aren't going to hurt Canada, but we'll see. I've seen no Anti-Canadian rhetoric yet from the Trump Administration, we'll see how next week turns out. 

Posted

Bigotry in the U.S. (and Canada) hasn't changed at all because of President Trump. 

Whatever well documented bigotry that existed in either country is not increased beyond what it already was/is.  

  • Like 1

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Boges said:

I'm not American. Like most things American, it's great entertainment. One thing you can say about Trump is that he's not exactly a Hawk, so perhaps the chances of starting WW3 is actually lesser now. 

I'm more concerned with the clown he's going to meet next Monday and what he's doing here. 

I'm hopeful that his isolationist tactics aren't going to hurt Canada, but we'll see. I've seen no Anti-Canadian rhetoric yet from the Trump Administration, we'll see how next week turns out. 

Well I guess we will find sooner rather than later how the ban is going to play out with Geoff Sessions the attorney general giving a press conf.

For sure there will be more fire crackers to expect next week...

Posted
58 minutes ago, kactus said:

How long is the piece of string? Or let me put it more eloquently.....what else is it that you want to see from this president to make the impeachment a possibility?

Democrats might try to impeach him if they happen to retake Congress in 2018. Until then, I don't think there's anything he could do that would make the Republicans try to impeach him. I think he could literally kill a child with his bare hands on video and not be impeached. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Boges said:

I'm not American. Like most things American, it's great entertainment. One thing you can say about Trump is that he's not exactly a Hawk, so perhaps the chances of starting WW3 is actually lesser now. 

I'm more concerned with the clown he's going to meet next Monday and what he's doing here. 

I'm hopeful that his isolationist tactics aren't going to hurt Canada, but we'll see. I've seen no Anti-Canadian rhetoric yet from the Trump Administration, we'll see how next week turns out. 

Maybe Trump ism't a hawk, I'm not so sure but:

Bannon was conducting an interview on Breitbart radio with conservative author Lee Edwards when he said:

We’re going to war in the South China Sea in five to 10 years, aren’t we? There’s no doubt about that. They’re taking their sandbars and making basically stationary aircraft carriers and putting missiles on those. They come here to the United States in front of our face—and you understand how important face is—and say it’s an ancient territorial sea.
Posted
50 minutes ago, Omni said:

Maybe Trump ism't a hawk, I'm not so sure but:

Bannon was conducting an interview on Breitbart radio with conservative author Lee Edwards when he said:

We’re going to war in the South China Sea in five to 10 years, aren’t we? There’s no doubt about that. They’re taking their sandbars and making basically stationary aircraft carriers and putting missiles on those. They come here to the United States in front of our face—and you understand how important face is—and say it’s an ancient territorial sea.

He's not wrong. China has long embraced 'alternative facts'.

  • Downvote 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
3 minutes ago, Argus said:

He's not wrong. China has long embraced 'alternative facts'.

Well Trump did say something a while back about why have nuclear weapons if you don't use them.

Posted

Anyone seen this?

 

Quote

 

Donald Trump was not wearing a translation earpiece as he nodded along and appeared to listen intently to remarks from Shinzo Abe, the Japanese prime minister, at the White House on Friday.

Asked if Trump had worn an earpiece, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House deputy press secretary, said: “I don’t believe during that time. But he did see the text and they spoke quite extensively before the remarks.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/10/shinzo-abe-donald-trump-earpiece-translation

Ofcourse since Trump has vested business interests in Japan everything that comes out of the Japanese Prime Minister should be music to your ear Mr Trump...no earpiece and nodding your head. Looks like America first is substituted for Trump's business first lost in translation. :lol:

Posted

There has not been much coverage about this and at the moment it is based on an opinion. However, given the recent tensions and rhetoric of war of words following Muslim ban from those 7 countries there is one hypothesis that determines the shape of the long term US strategy in the Middle East.

IMO the banning of Iranians to US is not a coincident and is something that has been planned by Trump...

Furthermore, no Iranian has ever attacked US soil in the past and to ban its citizens from entering the country for 3 months could mean one possibility.... The Trump administration is planning to attack Iran regardless if the Iranians comply or not. That decision has already been made and to ban Iranians from going to US is top preempt any attack that Iran can implicate on US soil.

I think if this scenario is true the Trump is doing a grave mistake involving a protracted war on no solid grounds. 

  • Downvote 1
Posted

People always complain how a nation is divided in elections. Well, with two main-candidates that is inevitable, isnt it? Would it be preferable if there was an election where one candidate received over 90% of the votes. Then the nation couldn't be called divided. However, that if anything, would be very worrysome.

Posted

Actions speak louder than voice...One month taking the office and this is the outcome. You gotta admit it doesn't help Trump to win the hearts and minds when the country has become so divisive....

 

A majority of Americans are embarrassed by President Trump

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/02/23/a-majority-of-americans-are-embarrassed-by-president-trump/?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.851bf7b23c22

IMG_4123.JPG.4cf88d0b144bdf45fb7ccef077792cf2.JPG

Posted
1 minute ago, kactus said:

Actions speak louder than voice...One month taking the office and this is the outcome. You gotta admit it doesn't help Trump to win the hearts and minds when the country has become so divisive....

 

Become ?   No, the United States was "divisive" long before Trump came along.   Obama only made it more divisive...so Trump can do the same.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Become ?   No, the United States was "divisive" long before Trump came along.   Obama only made it more divisive...so Trump can do the same.

Not to this extent. You cannot deny this. 

Oh I get it it's the fault of Democrats that Bush went to war with Saddam. It's Democrats fault that Trump is incapable to get one thing right. And if not Democrats why not play the Trudeau Carf and blame Canada...

Trump may have a bigger responsibility for sure but Amerucans being embarrased by him? Common!

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, kactus said:

Not to this extent. You cannot deny this.

 

Yes I can....U.S. history is filled with lots of "divisiveness".    It is an "American value".  

The Democrats had the very divisive Vietnam War...much bigger deal than Iraq.

Being "embarrassed" is a Canadian value.

Edited by bush_cheney2004
  • Like 1

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, kactus said:

IMG_4123.JPG.4cf88d0b144bdf45fb7ccef077792cf2.JPG

At first glance this graph appears to be `weighted``incorrectly. Assume that the democrat and republican bars cancel out, since they cover about the same area but in reverse. If they were compared exclusively the ``All`` would be at 50%. Independents are tilted towards embarrassed, hence the ``All`` essentially looks like the independent data. But the number of independents must be quite small compared to the total of Democrats and Republicans.

IE Fake data.

Posted
5 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

What is most astounding is that almost 80% of Republics are proud of Trump - that says a whole lot there.

 

Why wouldn't they be ?   Trump delivered the presidency to the GOP when all others failed, including Senator John McCain.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,908
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...