cybercoma Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 ya think! Of course the Shady member himself said as much... and then, in turn, applied the same rationale towards Clinton. Shady did; he did that. The issue the member Shady doesn't like is acknowledging it was the Trump blusterBus that set in motion this past weeks events... first agreeing to debate Sanders on the Jimmy Kimmel show (Wednesday). Everything else flowed from there, including the ransom amount Trump subsequently set before he would participate. The member Shady clearly doesn't like the sequence of events highlighted and the result emphasized when Trump's bluff was called. Man-baby down! . I don't give a crap about Shady. I didn't even read his posts that you're referring to. I'm saying Trump is right not to debate Sanders. It is below him, until Sanders secures the nomination. Trump may very well have agreed to the debate, until his team of advisors informed him that it would be a bad idea. So he changed his mind. Trump doesn't unilaterally make decisions about his campaign any more than any other modern-day presidential candidate has. They have teams of people that plan every bit of minutiae. In this case, he had to backtrack...and imo for good reason.
?Impact Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 I don't give a crap about Shady. I didn't even read his posts that you're referring to. I'm saying Trump is right not to debate Sanders. It is below him, until Sanders secures the nomination. Trump may very well have agreed to the debate, until his team of advisors informed him that it would be a bad idea. So he changed his mind. Trump doesn't unilaterally make decisions about his campaign any more than any other modern-day presidential candidate has. They have teams of people that plan every bit of minutiae. In this case, he had to backtrack...and imo for good reason. I agree that he should not be debating, but the point is this just illustrates what a fraud he is. He is all full of bluster, until his bluff is called and then he runs away.
cybercoma Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 Runs away from what? Should Justin Trudeau or Tom Mulcair debate Kevin O'Leary because he claimed he might run for CPC leadership? Should they debate any of the CPC leadership candidates? I don't think they should. Their leadership campaign is between them and their supporters and it's beneath the other federal leaders to be debating mere candidates, as opposed to party leaders.
WestCoastRunner Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 It's ridiculous to think trump or Hillary would debate sanders. Game over. I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou
cybercoma Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 What are you talking about? Of course Hillary should be debating Sanders. He's the one she's competing with and losing badly in the polls at the moment. Especially when you consider she's under criminal investigation. You might overlook that, but it's a big deal. At least Trump isn't facing a criminal investigation from the FBI.
WestCoastRunner Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 What are you talking about? Of course Hillary should be debating Sanders. He's the one she's competing with and losing badly in the polls at the moment. Especially when you consider she's under criminal investigation. You might overlook that, but it's a big deal. At least Trump isn't facing a criminal investigation from the FBI. This is exactly why she shouldn't be debating him. I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou
cybercoma Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 If you mean she shouldn't be debating because she should be dropping out, then I agree 100% with you.
-TSS- Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 He's a jackass but what does his success tell you about the republican voters or more importantly the quality of his opponents? I feel a bit sorry for Jeb Bush because, unlike his brother, he's a smart guy but people justifiably decided that enough with Bushes.
PIK Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 No one ever slags Trudeau We do, but then the boards snitch rats us out and we get banned. Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
PIK Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 I know just what you mean. When a hamfister squeezes hard I'm given pause to think... why? Why am I just so significant to you that you feel the need to unload a bruiser hand-shake on me? Regular grip and pressure is just fine, thank you very much. Unfortunately, with those man-baby hands of his, Trump will project weakness in his less than regular grip/pressure capabilities when greeting other world leaders. And of course he'll over-compensate for that by guaranteeing his man-babyHood - guaranteeing world leaders that there's no problem there! . Because real men give real handshakes. You would not want to shake hands with me, because it sounds like you have trump man baby hands yourself. Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
cybercoma Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 We do, but then the boards snitch rats us out and we get banned. Riiight. I'm sure criticizing Trudeau is why you get banned.
waldo Posted June 2, 2016 Report Posted June 2, 2016 Because real men give real handshakes. You would not want to shake hands with me, because it sounds like you have trump man baby hands yourself. the passing of 'squeeze to you bleed', hamfisted, oldstock-type handshakes can't come soon enough... well... that coupled with the insistence on holding on just a tad too long and expecting longing eye-contact --- it's just too much! .
waldo Posted June 2, 2016 Report Posted June 2, 2016 wearing his ever-present outdoor attire, the red ball cap to counter wind messin' with his comb-over, Trump launched into a tirade against the U.S. Federal judge (Gonzalo Curiel), who is presiding over one of the two class action lawsuits pending against Trump/Trump University. Trump dedicated an incredible 12 minutes of his campaign speech to slam Curiel. First, Trump demanded the judge recuse himself because he was a "hater" who had been nominated by President Obama. Then, only a short time after the crowd had been chanting "build that wall," Trump told his rabid fans that Curiel was a "Mexican." But then Trump added, "I think that's fine." (For those who care about actual facts, Curiel is not Mexican; he was born in Indiana.) the reason for the man-baby's campaign trail tirade reflects upon the judges actions in regards document release that will impact upon two California class-action lawsuits against Trump/Trump University... and the separate $40 million lawsuit filed in 2013 by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, alleging that Trump had defrauded more than 5,000 individuals through Trump University:Judge directs internal Trump University documents to be released A federal judge has ordered the release of internal Trump University documents in an ongoing lawsuit against the company, including “playbooks” that advised sales personnel how to market high-priced courses on getting rich through real estate.The Friday ruling, in which Judge Gonzalo Curiel cited heightened public interest in presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, was issued in response to a request by The Washington Post. The ruling was a setback for Trump, whose attorneys argued that the documents contained trade secrets.Curiel ordered that the playbooks and other records, numbering about 1,000 pages, be released by Thursday, June 2, allowing time to redact telephone numbers and other personal information about the company. .
PIK Posted June 3, 2016 Report Posted June 3, 2016 Runs away from what? Should Justin Trudeau or Tom Mulcair debate Kevin O'Leary because he claimed he might run for CPC leadership? Should they debate any of the CPC leadership candidates? I don't think they should. Their leadership campaign is between them and their supporters and it's beneath the other federal leaders to be debating mere candidates, as opposed to party leaders. Excellent post. Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
PIK Posted June 3, 2016 Report Posted June 3, 2016 the passing of 'squeeze to you bleed', hamfisted, oldstock-type handshakes can't come soon enough... well... that coupled with the insistence on holding on just a tad too long and expecting longing eye-contact --- it's just too much! . And the country goes with us. Because the new leaders do not have what it takes to be great. Too much whining and all the me, me, me, crap that goes on. And we are seeing it happen now. Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
GostHacked Posted June 3, 2016 Report Posted June 3, 2016 He's a jackass but what does his success tell you about the republican voters or more importantly the quality of his opponents? I feel a bit sorry for Jeb Bush because, unlike his brother, he's a smart guy but people justifiably decided that enough with Bushes. Fool me once (with one Bush) shame on me. Fool me twice (with another Bush) .. you can't get fooled again. Or something like that. Jeb may be a good guy, but his family already ruined any chance he would have had of being POTUS.
taxme Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 It's ridiculous to think trump or Hillary would debate sanders. Game over. Why would it be game over for Trump?
taxme Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 Did Trump not just bail out on a debate with Sanders that he agreed to? No need to debate Sanders anymore. Trump has wrapped the nomination. Why should Trump give the lame duck corporate media any excuse to try and find something else for them to whine about if Trump debated Sanders. And we know that the media will try too. The media despises Trump as he despises them. That they both can agree on.
waldo Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 No need to debate Sanders anymore. Trump has wrapped the nomination. Why should Trump give the lame duck corporate media any excuse to try and find something else for them to whine about if Trump debated Sanders. yeesh! Give it a rest... this particular debate aspect and the details around it, was all manufactured and fueled by Trump himself. .
waldo Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 23 follow-up questioning attempts to get the man-baby Trump to finally respond to the question asking if his (Trump's) attacks on the U.S. Federal judge (the American from the U.S. State of Indiana... who Trump repeatedly refers to as "the Mexican")... if his attacks are racist?Jake Tapper asked Donald Trump if his judge attack was racist — then followed up 23 times The CNN anchor posed the following question to Donald Trump on Friday: Let me ask you about comments you made about the judge in the Trump University case. You said that you thought it was a conflict of interest that he was the judge because he is of Mexican heritage, even though he is from Indiana. .
Shady Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 23 follow-up questioning attempts to get the man-baby Trump to finally respond to the question asking if his (Trump's) attacks on the U.S. Federal judge (the American from the U.S. State of Indiana... who Trump repeatedly refers to as "the Mexican")... if his attacks are racist? Jake Tapper asked Donald Trump if his judge attack was racist — then followed up 23 times . Has crooked Hillary held a press conference yet this year?
Icebound Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 (edited) At least Trump isn't facing a criminal investigation from the FBI. Not yet. But he IS going to trial on the Trump University / Trump Entepreneur Initiative class action fraud case. Plus the State-of-California and New-York-State AG actions against him on the same issue. And he IS known to have "donated" to other AGs after dropping similar cases in their own states: http://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11838554/trump-university-fraud-abbott-bondi If any or all of those suits gain some traction, the DOJ may get interested, if they aren't already. Edited June 4, 2016 by Icebound
waldo Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 Has crooked Hillary held a press conference yet this year? not sure why you care to ask me that question; however, I'll keep reinforcing to you that I don't care and I don't have a preference as to who Americans choose for the Democratic nomination. I would presume Clinton is controlling the media access - ya think? Trump's control is to a different level... he quite literally has the U.S. press acting, overall, as his 'press agent'! Sure he takes an occasional hit, but they are... well were... few and far between the passes the U.S. press gives him. It would appear of late, though, the press is finally finding itself and taking efforts to hold Trump accountable. Of course, the problem is seen in that exchange I just referenced... it took 23 follow-up attempts for the reporter to get Trump to respond to the original question. The man-baby is very slippery! .
Shady Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 not sure why you care to ask me that question; however, I'll keep reinforcing to you that I don't care and I don't have a preference as to who Americans choose for the Democratic nomination. I would presume Clinton is controlling the media access - ya think? Trump's control is to a different level... he quite literally has the U.S. press acting, overall, as his 'press agent'! Sure he takes an occasional hit, but they are... well were... few and far between the passes the U.S. press gives him. It would appear of late, though, the press is finally finding itself and taking efforts to hold Trump accountable. Of course, the problem is seen in that exchange I just referenced... it took 23 follow-up attempts for the reporter to get Trump to respond to the original question. The man-baby is very slippery! . Answer. Crooked Hillary Clinton has yet to hold a press conference in 2016.
waldo Posted June 4, 2016 Report Posted June 4, 2016 Answer. Crooked Hillary Clinton has yet to hold a press conference in 2016. if you knew the answer, why ask? But yes, Trump has been tweeting up a storm of late over that absence of Clinton press conferences... he feels the press is being very unfair to him! I note you haven't yet actually responded to the post specifics that had the reporter required to try 23 follow-ups to get Trump to answer the question... that the "Mexican judge" only released the TrumpU related documents because of... because of... Trump's claimed intent to "build the wall"... and, "make Mexico pay for it"! Nothing to say about that, hey Shady? .
Recommended Posts