waldo Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 Dude, I've never stated wether he is making it up or not. I've asked a simple question of you - that's all. I'm not saying there has or hasn't been ISIS flags/photos on any refugee cell phones, but if there was, would that raise a red flag over an individual in your mind? So, do you have an answer? dude, you want an answer to what, without corroboration, is just more fear-mongering from the man-baby; i.e., made-up shyte! I purposely used that reference to "thousands upon thousands of Muslims in New Jersey cheering the WTC towers coming down" - as I read fact-checking sites, Trump was adamant he personally saw it... when he began to be challenged on his BS he reverted to saying he saw it on TV coverage... which eventually became he saw it in a picture". So... even if YOU'RE willing to accept unsubstantiated fear-mongering from Trump, let's suppose Trump saw a picture of an ISIS flag on a phone... where did it come from/sourced from... was that an American refugees phone... how many phones/refugees against the total number in this latest piece of man-baby diaper crap? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 dude, you want an answer to what, without corroboration, is just more fear-mongering from the man-baby; i.e., made-up shyte! I purposely used that reference to "thousands upon thousands of Muslims in New Jersey cheering the WTC towers coming down" - as I read fact-checking sites, Trump was adamant he personally saw it... when he began to be challenged on his BS he reverted to saying he saw it on TV coverage... which eventually became he saw it in a picture". So... even if YOU'RE willing to accept unsubstantiated fear-mongering from Trump, let's suppose Trump saw a picture of an ISIS flag on a phone... where did it come from/sourced from... was that an American refugees phone... how many phones/refugees against the total number in this latest piece of man-baby diaper crap? . You just won't answer the question. Let's say Trump was lying about ISIS pictures on phones - OK! Now, If there was pictures of ISIS flags seen on a refugees phone by anybody allowing refugees into Canada, would that be a red flag to you? P.S - The man-baby thing is getting so over done, you're starting to embarrass yourself using it in every post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 You just won't answer the question. Let's say Trump was lying about ISIS pictures on phones - OK! Now, If there was pictures of ISIS flags seen on a refugees phone by anybody allowing refugees into Canada, would that be a red flag to you? dude, why the need to deal in a hypothetical? You can't substantiate the man-baby's statement... and you're now willing to speculate, "Trump was lying". show me a Canadian refugee's phone with an ISIS flag on it - when you do that, I might entertain your entertainment! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 dude, why the need to deal in a hypothetical? You can't substantiate the man-baby's statement... and you're now willing to speculate, "Trump was lying". show me a Canadian refugee's phone with an ISIS flag on it - when you do that, I might entertain your entertainment! . How weak! I knew you wouldn't answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 You just won't answer the question. Let's say Trump was lying about ISIS pictures on phones - OK! Now, If there was pictures of ISIS flags seen on a refugees phone by anybody allowing refugees into Canada, would that be a red flag to you? A relative of mine was approached by police officer a few months ago. The officer was responding to a report that he was flying the ISIS flag from his car. It turns out it was a Boston Bruins flag, but thankfully we have vigilant citizens working to keep us safe. In my opinion, Bruins fans need to be on a watch list anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 The police should be issued with the number of a decent Optometrist. Still, better safe than sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 (edited) c'mon... with the money small-hands Trump has, there are no obstacles! hey now! Creationist evolutionary evidence, yes? . Well maybe he doesn't feel insecure having small hands.....he's learned to accept and live with his physical flaws. He takes it like a man, so to speak.......he goes way above the petty. This "man-baby" term is misused. Despite his "baby" hands......he doesn't think and act like a kid. Those who call him man-baby......are the proven baby whiners, imho. Edited May 17, 2016 by betsy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Guy Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 The police should be issued with the number of a decent Optometrist. Still, better safe than sorry... I assume that was said tongue-in-cheek. I would assume that an ISIS infiltrator into Canada might decide that flying the ISIS flag on his car might blow his cover. Besides, is it illegal to fly an ISIS flag anywhere in Canada? How about a Nazi flag? Or Palestinian or Israeli flag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 Not to get too off topic, but usually when the police pull someone over for a weird reason or "misunderstanding", it's usually because they wanted to check that person out but had no real reason to do so. Buddy with the Bruins flag, maybe raised suspicion for something else and the police just wanted a little looksy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 17, 2016 Report Share Posted May 17, 2016 I assume that was said tongue-in-cheek. I would assume that an ISIS infiltrator into Canada might decide that flying the ISIS flag on his car might blow his cover. Besides, is it illegal to fly an ISIS flag anywhere in Canada? How about a Nazi flag? Or Palestinian or Israeli flag? It probably isn't illegal to fly any flag you want to. I don't know. I imagine the Confederate flag might upset a few people, as would a Nazi party flag. So would the ISIS flag. If the local constabulary received a complaint about any of them, I would expect them to use their discretion, and I would, of course, support them in whatever action they decided to take. I can't imagine a Palestinian or an Israeli flag causing any consternation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 the man-baby has chosen a most peculiar attack target - ratcheting up his references to the 90s indiscretions of Bill Clinton. Talking head media-types question such a rationale with a Trump campaign needing to reverse his ~70% unfavorable rating with women. More pointedly, when Republicans took a similar direct aim at Bill Clinton in the 90s, Bill Clinton's approval numbers increased. They said things about me which were very nasty. And I don’t want to play that game at all. I don’t want to play it — at all. But they said things about me that were very nasty. And, you know, as long as they do that, you know, I will play at whatever level I have to play at. I think I’ve proven that. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 so a couple of days ago, Trump's is being interviewed by Jimmy Kimmel and passes on a Sanders challenge to ask Trump if he was willing to debate... Trump throws down the debate mantle to Bernie Sanders... telling Kimmel that, "If we paid a nice sum for the charity, I would love to do that". Shortly after Sanders jumps up on twitter and says, "Game On"!earlier today the Sanders campaign released a statement saying that its candidate was ready for the debate. "Our campaign and the Trump campaign have received two offers by broadcast television networks to host the Sanders-Trump debate that we suggested. Both offers include a major contribution to charity," the statement read.yesterday, Trump had raised the stakes (set his ransom level) to identify an actual amount that would be required before he was willing to debate Sanders - setting it at $10-to-$15 million for a women’s health charity. Then a tech-company, Traction and Scale, called Trump's bluff by offering to put up $10 million... which was bettered by Top Rank CEO Bob Arum who offered to promote a Sanders / Trump debate on pay-per-view, pledging that at least $20 million would be donated to a charity of the candidates’ choosing, with moderators agreed upon by the candidates. oops! The man-baby is called on his bluff... Sanders agrees, TV broadcast networks agree to host, money is pledged. Next thing we know, Trump begins to walk it back through a series of statements today - "that it just wouldn't be appropriate for him to debate the 2nd place Sanders". man-baby down! The hashtag #ChickenTrump began trending on Twitter almost immediately after Trump’s backpedaling. Sanders blasts Trump: 'What are you afraid of?' . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 What's Hillary afraid of? She backed out of the debate that Bernie is now trying to fill with Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 What's Hillary afraid of? She backed out of the debate that Bernie is now trying to fill with Trump?Probably he same thing Trump is afraid of. Being destroyed by the best candidate available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 Probably he same thing Trump is afraid of. Being destroyed by the best candidate available. Afraid of crazy Bernie? I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 Afraid of crazy Bernie? I doubt it. "crazy Bernie"? Oh right, that's what Trump calls him... that and "socialist Bernie". Good to read your parroting is ever at the ready! But c'mon Shady - all that Trump bluster, agreeing to debate Sanders, setting a ransom price, TV networks and money lines up to call the Trump bluff... only to have Trump chicken-out! Man-baby down, Shady... man-baby down! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 I don't think either Trump or Hillary can gain anything by debating Sanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 "crazy Bernie"? Oh right, that's what Trump calls him... that and "socialist Bernie". Good to read your parroting is ever at the ready! But c'mon Shady - all that Trump bluster, agreeing to debate Sanders, setting a ransom price, TV networks and money lines up to call the Trump bluff... only to have Trump chicken-out! Man-baby down, Shady... man-baby down! . Why did crooked Hillary chicken out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 Why did crooked Hillary chicken out? where does that label "Crooked Hillary" originate? Who uses that label (essentially) every time he refers to Hillary Clinton? When you similarly take up that label, what label could be applied to you? And yes, I am also parroting Jon Stewart and his man-baby labeling of Trump... but I think I reserve that almost exclusively to this thread - the man-baby thread! as for a debate between Clinton and Sanders, they have debated many times already - in recent days she has begun to shift (Sanders says prematurely) into 'general election' mode... offering comment about relishing opportunities to debate Trump. Sanders desperately wanted a debate before the California primary on Tuesday - he won't get it from Clinton or the chicken-backpedaler Trump who had his bluff called! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 where does that label "Crooked Hillary" originate? Who uses that label (essentially) every time he refers to Hillary Clinton? When you similarly take up that label, what label could be applied to you? And yes, I am also parroting Jon Stewart and his man-baby labeling of Trump... but I think I reserve that almost exclusively to this thread - the man-baby thread! as for a debate between Clinton and Sanders, they have debated many times already - in recent days she has begun to shift (Sanders says prematurely) into 'general election' mode... offering comment about relishing opportunities to debate Trump. Sanders desperately wanted a debate before the California primary on Tuesday - he won't get it from Clinton or the chicken-backpedaler Trump who had his bluff called! . But crooked Hillary agreed to debate before the California primary a long time ago? Why did she chicken out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 But crooked Hillary agreed to debate before the California primary a long time ago? Why did she chicken out? more... yet more of the 'crooked' labeling? You mistake me for someone who cares; again, other than being anti-Trump, I could care less who the Democratic candidate is - I'm not an American or a wannabe! In any case, as I read it... there was a debate challenge Sanders put to Clinton in May - there was no agreement as I read it. In any case, as I said, it appears she's moved on into general election mode; you know, probably because it's viewed Sanders can't best her delegate count (inclusive of pledged super-delegates). since you've asked twice now... and I've responded twice now, how about you suggest why the man-baby Trump went through his latest charade, only to have his bluff called and responded by backing down/away? Why so, hey? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 more... yet more of the 'crooked' labeling? You mistake me for someone who cares; again, other than being anti-Trump, I could care less who the Democratic candidate is - I'm not an American or a wannabe! In any case, as I read it... there was a debate challenge Sanders put to Clinton in May - there was no agreement as I read it. In any case, as I said, it appears she's moved on into general election mode; you know, probably because it's viewed Sanders can't best her delegate count (inclusive of pledged super-delegates). since you've asked twice now... and I've responded twice now, how about you suggest why the man-baby Trump went through his latest charade, only to have his bluff called and responded by backing down/away? Why so, hey? . As usual you're wrong. Crooked Hillary agreed to a California debate. But has now backed out.Clinton, Sanders agree to debates in Michigan and California http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/02/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-debates-michigan-california-218691 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 since you've asked twice now... and I've responded twice now, how about you suggest why the man-baby Trump went through his latest charade, only to have his bluff called and responded by backing down/away? Why so, hey? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 since you've asked twice now... and I've responded twice now, how about you suggest why the man-baby Trump went through his latest charade, only to have his bluff called and responded by backing down/away? Why so, hey? . I don't know, I've never heard of a winning nominee debating the losing one from the other party. Can you think of another example? Anyways, why would crooked Hillary back out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 I don't know, I've never heard of a winning nominee debating the losing one from the other party. Can you think of another example? are you saying that's why Trump went through his charade... only to have his bluff called resulting in his chickening-out? Are you saying that the man-baby Trump "never heard"? Oh my, Shady! . Anyways, why would crooked Hillary back out? notwithstanding your want to really, really deflect from Trump's big-time backpedal, I've told you I could care less about who wins the U.S. Democratic candidacy. You've asked twice now, and I've given you 2 responses - I've responded to each of your asks! I can't help it if you don't like my answers. In any case, let me add to your deflection: I read the supposed agreement termed 'tentative... theoretical', which was all the result of debate negotiations in early February that set in motion all the prior Clinton-Sanders debates held - as for a California debate, nothing concrete was ever established. I could quote you from the DNC directly on that, but... who cares! Not me - but it was worth reading you state, "I, as usual, was wrong". You're great comic relief, if nothing else! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts