Shady Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Paradox because Liberalism also can't find fault with the cultural/religious beliefs of visible minorities. Bingo!
Boges Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) I'd like to highlight that this thread was started because of a handful of isolated hate crimes in the wake of the Paris attacks that have not proliferated to widespread acts of hatred towards Islam. Conversely, any examples of Radical Islamist doing horrible things (Cologne, Burkino Faso etc) are thought of as isolated incidents by people who think Islamophobia in Canada is a big problem. Edited February 2, 2016 by Boges
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Waldo, did you think that they were going to try and get full-blown sharia law established across Canada when they were less than 10% of the population? The point is that after living here all this time and becoming familiar with our laws, and knowing the inequity in their old system of laws they still wanted to get as much sharia as they could. It shows a terrible lack of character and liberal values to try and gain a foothold for such an abysmal code in North America. That would be like rolling the clock of civilization back at least 500 years. the radical idea of religious people having their religion dictate the terms of their marriages and families.
WestCanMan Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 I see you and Argus are of a similar mind when it comes to outrageous assumptions. At least he has some backup, somewhere. You're talking about outrageous assumptions ogtf? How about the liberal, peace-loving ways of Islam for an outrageous assumption? None of you guys has a single cite for that, or even a clue about the foundations of that religion yet you are here flinging around accusations against people who have heaps of information for you to ignore. If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 I'd like to highlight that this thread was started because of two isolated hate crimes in the wake of the Paris attacks that have not proliferated to widespread acts of hatredExcept the random assaults, the mob of people who attacked children, the dude on the bike who pepper sprayed refugees......etc etc
WestCanMan Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Yoohoo, Big Guy. 3321: There's nothing wrong with any of that, but the Gov't in Canada cannot endorse sharia law in any way, shape or form. The pressure on women born and confined to Islam will be too much for them to resist. Many of them will have to choose between ostracism and accepting the ruling of that kangaroo court. Anything? If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
Boges Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) Except the random assaults, the mob of people who attacked children, the dude on the bike who pepper sprayed refugees......etc etc For every example of Islamophobia, I can provide an example of horrifically immoral/criminal behaviour from an Radical Islamist. I'm not justifying either, I'm just putting both in their proper perspective. Edited February 2, 2016 by Boges
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Yeah. "Perspective" So your point that there were no more attacks against Muslims was wrong as there's been numerous reports of innocent Muslims, refugees escaping hell even, being abused.
WestCanMan Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Except the random assaults, the mob of people who attacked children, the dude on the bike who pepper sprayed refugees......etc etc Ok, let's allow your criticism to stand. It's still a drop in the bucket compared to what the muslim minority is doing. One more thing - muslim clerics aren't universally condemning the illegal and immoral actions of their followers, some of them are actually endorsing them. Noone here said that canadians should attack muslims, we just shouldn't be bringing them over here in droves. They should be staying in the middle east and receiving aid just like other people in the world who were displaced by war. If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Yeah. "Perspective" So your point that there were no more attacks against Muslims was wrong as there's been numerous reports of innocent Muslims, refugees escaping hell even, being abused. Cite. If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
Guest Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Yeah. "Perspective" So your point that there were no more attacks against Muslims was wrong as there's been numerous reports of innocent Muslims, refugees escaping hell even, being abused. The people doing bad things to Muslims are awful. The Muslims doing bad things to people are much worse.
Boges Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) Yeah. "Perspective" So your point that there were no more attacks against Muslims was wrong as there's been numerous reports of innocent Muslims, refugees escaping hell even, being abused. Where was I discussing refugees? This thread is about the apparent rampant Islamophobia in Canada according to some. Is questioning the tenants of Islamic doctrine now a "phobia"? If so then the people who rail against Pro-Life Christians on this site are also exhibiting phobia. Edited February 2, 2016 by Boges
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 The people doing bad things to Muslims are awful. The Muslims doing bad things to people are much worse.So we're talking about a difference of degree rather than kind. Regardless, all I'm pointing out is that the statement that attacks against Muslims didn't continue is wrong. They continue and are still happening.
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Where was I discussing refugees? This is the point you made that I am responding to right now:the Paris attacks that have not proliferated to widespread acts of hatred towards Islam.
Guest Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 So we're talking about a difference of degree rather than kind. Regardless, all I'm pointing out is that the statement that attacks against Muslims didn't continue is wrong. They continue and are still happening. Absolutely. But pointing out Islamic excesses isn't one of them. It sometimes seems that doing that is the equivalent of a cycle by peppering on here.
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Now's the part where you wriggle out of that by making a definition for widespread that ignores evidence of the random acts of violence against Muslims in the West.
On Guard for Thee Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Ok, let's allow your criticism to stand. It's still a drop in the bucket compared to what the muslim minority is doing. One more thing - muslim clerics aren't universally condemning the illegal and immoral actions of their followers, some of them are actually endorsing them. Noone here said that canadians should attack muslims, we just shouldn't be bringing them over here in droves. They should be staying in the middle east and receiving aid just like other people in the world who were displaced by war. Stay in the ME and let the bombs continue to fall on their heads. Great idea, would you do it?
Boges Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 They continue and are still happening. As with all crime. But we're talking about the the commonality of such crimes. We had member waldo trying to put a perspective on the cologne attacks saying that it was only 500 of 1 million refugees in previous pages.
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 To be so vague is a disservice to everyone. How many hate crime assaults on random innocent people is an acceptable number?
Guest Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Now's the part where you wriggle out of that by making a definition for widespread that ignores evidence of the random acts of violence against Muslims in the West. Me?
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Me?No, Boges. You got your reply in between posts.
Boges Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 To be so vague is a disservice to everyone. How many hate crime assaults on random innocent people is an acceptable number? Zero, but how many terrorist attacks is an acceptable number as to where we should take note that Radical Islam is an immense threat to the world. Hate crime is a crime and should be persecuted as such. What should be done about terrorism?
cybercoma Posted February 2, 2016 Report Posted February 2, 2016 Radical Islam is a threat to the world. Who said it wasn't?
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts