Smallc Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 the post had nothing to do with you... it clearly dealt with results from the poll. Your Captain Obvious point wasn't necessary. My point is that whether or not Harper is telling the truth about this is most likely not the deciding factor for most people that were going to vote for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 with a focus shift to the audit, how can Conservative Senators Gerstein, LeBreton, Tkachuk and Stewart Olsen not be called? I have read Ezrant state he's to be a Crown witness... I'd like to hear from Novak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepitsimple Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 I'd like to hear from Novak. Me too. Ask yourself why he is not on the Defense's list of witnesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Thread drift- we already have a Duffy thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Exactly. This thread isn't about $90,000 paid back. It's about $2.7 million dollars still owed to tax payers by Mulcair's NDP. They're offer of 10% is insulting and a slap in the face to all Canadians. Mulcair needs to stop hiding under his desk and answer questions. Explain to Canadians why this is fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Shady, it became the 90,000 pay back, when the RCMP charge Duffy with taking a bribe and not Wright, which many Canadians questioned how can one be charged with a bribe and yet the one giving it is not?????? Harper is the head of this department and remember Baird said the department head is the one that answers, so Harper himself should be the one answering to Canadians in the court and by NOT doing so Canadians in the court of public opinion, thinks he lying and knows more. The NDP will be dealt with later, so chill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Shady, it became the 90,000 pay back, when the RCMP charge Duffy with taking a bribe and not Wright, which many Canadians questioned how can one be charged with a bribe and yet the one giving it is not?????? It's really simple and it's about motive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalton Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 And yet Harper uses taxpayer funds to run ads against his oponents... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Shady, it became the 90,000 pay back, when the RCMP charge Duffy with taking a bribe and not Wright, which many Canadians questioned how can one be charged with a bribe and yet the one giving it is not?????? Harper is the head of this department and remember Baird said the department head is the one that answers, so Harper himself should be the one answering to Canadians in the court and by NOT doing so Canadians in the court of public opinion, thinks he lying and knows more. The NDP will be dealt with later, so chill. How convenient. Later on, maybe after the election right? It's not Harper so everybody chill. It's obly 20 times the amount of money Duffy's about, but everybody chill! Lol! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 Why does Mr. Mulcair feel that Canadian tax payers should pay for the parliamentary rules broken by him and his party? Why does he think that that's fair? Why does he care more about somebody else's $90,000 dollars than his party's own $2.75 million tax dollars? even if one were to give your ongoing screech on this any credence (at least 10 status updates all including the exact same verbiage), the issue is nothing more than the location of support staff... resident in Ottawa or in satellite offices outside Ottawa, closer to the actual constituents. Do you have anything to support your implication that significant additional funding... funding other than what would have occurred in Ottawa, existed within the satellite offices? that IBOE ruling is being appealed - why do you deny a fundamental tenet in Canadian law? If some party doesn't believe they've breached an internal rule... and an appeal process is available to that party, what right do you stand by to disallow that appeal process? by the by, care to comment on why you believe satellite offices outside of Ottawa... closer to constituents... is a wrong/bad thing to undertake? There was nothing secretive about the offices; their openings typically received significant local media coverage in the respective areas? Why would you be against satellite offices? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted August 23, 2015 Report Share Posted August 23, 2015 If those funds were spent in accordance with the laws that are in place. These aren't laws. They're internal regulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddy Posted August 24, 2015 Report Share Posted August 24, 2015 These aren't laws. They're internal regulations.noted. Thanks for the clarification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted August 24, 2015 Report Share Posted August 24, 2015 Does anyone know if those liberals that did not pay off their leadership bills, ever get them paid. They were given so many chances, where if it were the conservatives ,they would have been charged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted August 24, 2015 Report Share Posted August 24, 2015 Exactly. This thread isn't about $90,000 paid back. It's about $2.7 million dollars still owed to tax payers by Mulcair's NDP. They're offer of 10% is insulting and a slap in the face to all Canadians. Mulcair needs to stop hiding under his desk and answer questions. Explain to Canadians why this is fair. Given the matter is before the courts, I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for comment. Or maybe do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.