Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I find it interesting you'd use Omar's own words as 'proof' he was forced to go on high adventure with his father. Let's ask Manson if he was framed by 'whitey' while were at it.

That's just Omar's perspective.

The "proof" is his age: He was a minor child under parental control.

No further "proof" is needed.

  • Replies 696
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Proof was not provided. A statement by Khadr was provided.

So what, in your view, would constitute sufficient evidence for the truth of the claim?

The point remains: your claim and others is that he was dragged kicking and screaming while mine is that kids like to do things with their dads.

I have not made such a claim.

Perhaps you can devote your energies towards proving that children do not love their fathers before you start making anymore football analogies.

Even if your theory was correct and young Omar went along of his own free will, it is irrelevant in light of his status as a minor.

Posted

So what, in your view, would constitute sufficient evidence for the truth of the claim?

The same stuff that would prove Manson was framed by 'the Man'.

I have not made such a claim.

Of course you haven't.

Even if your theory was correct and young Omar went along of his own free will, it is irrelevant in light of his status as a minor.

Again, only applies in Canada and certain other nations. Not so in Waziristan. You're of age if you can load an AK-47.

Posted (edited)

I have not made such a claim.

No, you just let communists like jacee make that claim for you, and then engage in nonsensical argumentation against those like DogOnPorch who challenge that stupidity. You're like a parasitic poster.

Even if your theory was correct and young Omar went along of his own free will, it is irrelevant in light of his status as a minor.

What about his behaviour since he ceased being a minor eight years ago? Does that matter? Being a minor doesn't absolve one of responsibility for crimes, and Canadian sovereignty certainly doesn't extend past our borders. I guess you want Khadr to be treated in accordance with the Young Offenders Act?

Edited by kraychik
Posted

The same stuff that would prove Manson was framed by 'the Man'.

A nonsensical answer.

Of course you haven't.

Can you show me where I have said such a thing?

Again, only applies in Canada and certain other nations. Not so in Waziristan. You're of age if you can load an AK-47.

That is irrelevant.

Posted (edited)

Again, only applies in Canada and certain other nations. Not so in Waziristan. You're of age if you can load an AK-47.

Not legally adult.

By definition, child soldier under adult control.

Edit - oops!

Edited by jacee
Posted

That works only in the West. Coming of age is a lot different in places like Waziristan. Girls can be married at ages we'd call way too young.

Am I to believe government lawyers will also try to fly this sort rationalization past the Supreme Court of Canada?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

Not legally adult.

By definition, child soldier under adult control.

(Aside ...FYI name-calling/personal attacks are violations of board rules.)

If we use the UN's definition of child soldier, which a communist like you must be in favour of, then child soldiers are defined as those aged fifteen and under. Khadr was sixteen when he murdered American army medic Christopher Speer.

Posted

If we use the UN's definition of child soldier, which a communist like you must be in favour of, then child soldiers are defined as those aged fifteen and under. Khadr was sixteen when he murdered American army medic Christopher Speer.

Khadr was captured on July 27, 2002. His birthdate is September 19, 1986.

Posted

If we use the UN's definition of child soldier, which a communist like you must be in favour of, then child soldiers are defined as those aged fifteen and under. Khadr was sixteen when he murdered American army medic Christopher Speer.

You need to contact the Supreme Court and let them know they're wrong to call him a minor.

Good luck with that.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

Khadr was captured on July 27, 2002. His birthdate is September 19, 1986.

My mistake, he was two months away from his sixteenth birthday. Also, I need to edit my earlier statement: The UN's definition of "child soldier" applies to those under the age of fifteen. So by that standard, he doesn't qualify.

Posted

You need to contact the Supreme Court and let them know they're wrong to call him a minor.

Good luck with that.

So your reading comprehension is non-existent. Good to know.

Posted

Khadr was captured on July 27, 2002. His birthdate is September 19, 1986.

You friggin' lefties with your irrelevant math.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted (edited)

If we use the UN's definition of child soldier, which a communist like you must be in favour of, then child soldiers are defined as those aged fifteen and under. Khadr was sixteen when he murdered American army medic Christopher Speer.

Except for the fact that Khadr was 15 years old when he was involved in the firefight and captured:

Khadr was captured on July 27, 2002 by American forces at the age of 15 following a four-hour firefight in the village of Ayub Kheyl, Afghanistan[9] and detained in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp

Khadr was born Sept. 19, 1986, captured July 27, 2002, Speer was pulled from life support Aug. 7 2002. Anyway you do the math, which you clearly didn't (as is typical of all leftists like you) Khadr was 15.

Edited by Moonlight Graham

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

My mistake, he was two months away from his sixteenth birthday. Also, I need to edit my earlier statement: The UN's definition of "child soldier" applies to those under the age of fifteen. So by that standard, he doesn't qualify.

No he doesn't. Which is a bit ridiculous since the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as: "every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier".

http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted (edited)
[T]he UN Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as: "every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier".

Still, it also deems it okay for persons over 16 to join a military, though it discourages governments from recruiting them.

[ed.: corr.]

Edited by g_bambino
Posted

My mistake, he was two months away from his sixteenth birthday. Also, I need to edit my earlier statement: The UN's definition of "child soldier" applies to those under the age of fifteen. So by that standard, he doesn't qualify.

Nope. The UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict sets 18 as "the minimum age for direct participation in hostilities, for recruitment into armed groups, and for compulsory recruitment by governments. States may accept volunteers from the age of 16 but must deposit a binding declaration at the time of ratification or accession, setting out their minimum voluntary recruitment age and outlining certain safeguards for such recruitment."

Posted

Nope. The UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict sets 18 as "the minimum age for direct participation in hostilities, for recruitment into armed groups, and for compulsory recruitment by governments. States may accept volunteers from the age of 16 but must deposit a binding declaration at the time of ratification or accession, setting out their minimum voluntary recruitment age and outlining certain safeguards for such recruitment."

The key word here, of course, is optional. Details like that sort of slip past you, it seems. Now try to connect that to Khadr situation.

Posted

Except for the fact that Khadr was 15 years old when he was involved in the firefight and captured:

Khadr was born Sept. 19, 1986, captured July 27, 2002, Speer was pulled from life support Aug. 7 2002. Anyway you do the math, which you clearly didn't (as is typical of all leftists like you) Khadr was 15.

Like I said, even using the UN's definition of child soldier, Khadr wouldn't qualify because he was over the age of fifteen.

Posted

The key word here, of course, is optional. Details like that sort of slip past you, it seems. Now try to connect that to Khadr situation.

Funny way you have of admitting you were wrong about the UN definition.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...