Jump to content

Omar Khadr


wulf42

Recommended Posts

Pretty much every modern society has different "ages" when certain rights and obligations are granted... under (I think) 8 and you can't be charged with a crime at all. Over 18 you can be charged as an adult. Legal drinking age is 18 or 19 (depending on province). Age of consent is 16. There is no magic age after which an individual suddenly becomes "responsible" in all things, whereas one day earlier they were considered "not responsible".

I'll add this here.

Those age limits are also different from each other in many provinces and states.

Of course he did. He fought with Al-Quida. Geneva Convention CLEARLY specify who is a legal combatant. All other "fighters" can be shot on the spot, no legal requiremenht to hold them as P.O.W.

What Afghan law did he break? Remember that during this time it was a transitional government and the laws were being written.

So what law did he break?

The Child soldier argument is a myth in Omars case....if it had any truth to it Omar would have used it as part of his defense...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39945319/ns/us_news-security/

Khadr was prohibited under the deal from calling witnesses at his sentencing hearing who would support defense claims that he was a "child soldier," forced into fighting the U.S. by a radical father who was an associate of Osama bin Laden.

Legal principles 'long since abandoned'

"The fact that the trial of a child soldier, Omar Khadr, has ended with a guilty plea in exchange for his eventual release to Canada does not change the fact that fundamental principles of law and due process were long since abandoned in Omar's case," Edney said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Geneva Convention CLEARLY specify who is a legal combatant. All other "fighters" can be shot on the spot, no legal requiremenht to hold them as P.O.W.

You need to read more before posting.

Not since prior to the Hague convention. You need to read more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what will soon change. We don't need bunch of foreigners with citizenship and alegiance to other countries who only call themself "canadians" to use our pssports.

hmmm like the 800,000+ Canadians living in the USA?
You'll get it soon as the difference between law and justice get clearer to many younger generation Canadians.
younger generations thinking like you? I can't see that day coming anytime soon...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently,being Canadian these days means not even having to reside in Canada at all,which is truly moronic.It seems that there are a lot of people who are Canadians of convenience,like Omar Khadr or the one's that live most of the time in Lebanon for example.They don't pay taxes here and contribute virtually nothing to this country,but when the sh*t hit the fan in Lebanon a few years ago,they suddenly became Canadians in need.

What is it about this country that we feel that our citizens can do whatever they bloody well like in other countries and only be subject our very lenient justice system after all is said and done?

an estimated 2.8 million Canadians live abroad do you have issues with only those that choose Lebanon? what about the UK, Aus, USA, Mexico, Costa Rica?...when the shit hits the fan in any country how do you propose to differentiate between who should be helped and who should be ignored?...because you have a second residence/job in another country do you suggest Canada should not help you?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was that you're picking and choosing. How long someone or their ancestry has resided in a given geographic area is a different thing from their citizenship. You can have a historic tie to a place that has no connection to the citizenship of a specific officially incorporated country.

Khadr is either a citizen of Canada (in which case, he's should be tried for treason upon his return), or he's not and we have to reason to repatriate him.

do you want to explain how he can be charged with treason?

here's the Criminal code for treason-"Every one commits treason who, in Canada, A- uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province; B- without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada"

did he commit either offense? nope...

Edited by wyly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

an estimated 2.8 million Canadians live abroad do you have issues with only those that choose Lebanon?

1) Live there because of work contract, being Canadinas only?

2) Are they former foreigners whom came to Canada just to get SECOND citizenshinp and passport?

3) Are the Mohammed Atta type of "citizen"?

what about the UK, Aus, USA, Mexico, Costa Rica?..

What about them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. he fought against Canada and Allies.

Worse offence than desertion.

reading comprehension issues?

once again just for you here is the criminal code for treason

Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

a- uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;

B- without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada"

Edited by wyly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada"

[/b]

What about, doing so for safety or defence FROM Canada? Since the apparent offences occured in another country.

--> "without lawful authority..."

Whose authority was he working for?

It also excludes the word "willingly..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Socially liberal, yes...

and ethically, criminally, economically, politically, everything evolves...we are not the same people/country we were 30 years ago...

and Canada in 30 years from now will be a very different place again today's liberals will be tomorrows conservatives but not because they are more conservative but because today's conservatives will be extinct...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about, doing so for safety or defence FROM Canada? Since the apparent offences occured in another country.

--> "without lawful authority..."

Whose authority was he working for?

It also excludes the word "willingly..."

are you deliberately ignoring the rest of the wording?

"communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada"-when has he done any of those?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just look at the differences between the sentencing of Khadr and US Johnny Walker who was a US citizen and twenty years old.

The most obvious one is that John Walker went to Afghanistan on his own as an adult, whereas Khadr was pressed involuntarily into Al Qaeda when he was eleven years old. The other glaring difference is that Walker was charged, tried and convicted in a real court of law and justice instead of a kangeroo court in a gulag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most obvious one is that John Walker went to Afghanistan on his own as an adult, whereas Khadr was pressed involuntarily into Al Qaeda when he was eleven years old. The other glaring difference is that Walker was charged, tried and convicted in a real court of law and justice instead of a kangeroo court in a gulag.

BS...he was following and emulating his father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most obvious one is that John Walker went to Afghanistan on his own as an adult, whereas Khadr was pressed involuntarily into Al Qaeda when he was eleven years old. The other glaring difference is that Walker was charged, tried and convicted in a real court of law and justice instead of a kangeroo court in a gulag.

Does raise some questions don't it. I hear ya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Live there because of work contract, being Canadinas only?

2) Are they former foreigners whom came to Canada just to get SECOND citizenshinp and passport?

3) Are the Mohammed Atta type of "citizen"?

What about them?

There are approximately 20,000 Canadian citizens living in Israel

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tin foil....get some

You assume wrong.

Tinfoil for what? Are you not aware that the Khadrs and bin Laden were close? They were invited to his daughter's wedding.

I base my assumption on Ahmed Said Khadr warned the government of retaliation if they got involved. What do you base your assumption that I'm wrong on? Let me guess... nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,736
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Demosthese
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • NakedHunterBiden earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • User earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • User went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • JA in NL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • haiduk earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...