Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is there a need for a Space channel in Canada, when other networks also sometimes show science-fiction themed programming? Is there a need for a W channel in Canada, when other networks also sometimes show chick-themed programming? Is there a need for the Spike network in Canada, when other networks also sometimes show moron-themed programming?

I think that the "need" for a channel could probably be measured by its viewership. If people are tuning in, then it must be filling a need, right? They must be watching for some reason, yes?

If it tanks, then you can certainly come back to me and say "see, kimmy? It really wasn't needed after all."

Well, Space and W may be debatable. Geeks and women, after all, come in finite quantities. Stupidity, however, is infinite.

Academically though, it can be debated whether a given slate of programming fulfills a need, or creates a want. It is the difference between asking a person what sort of channels they would like to see, and them suggesting a Canadian equivalent to Faux, and asking a person directly whether they would watch a Canadian Faux.

Does it make a difference if current viewers of Fox watch such a channel? Probably not that much. What we are afraid of is people who could not give a rat's ass about Fox suddenly tuning into this new channel and lapping it up.

And by the way, I have to wonder if Fox deliberately tries to turn people into Rush Limbaugh watching drones. When I was young and we had the antenna, Fox (31 and 68) were two of the few channels we got locally. And it seems to me I remember seeing advertisements for Rush far more often that I should have if I was watching program aimed at 8-12 year olds...

  • Replies 524
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Alex Jones - of Prison Planet - is a triple synthesis of right-wing paranoia, left-wing paranoia, and pure undistilled crazy.

True, he pulls in a pretty broad spectrum of the gullible, ideologically speaking.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

Well, we are going to get this channel in Canada in one form or another since the application has already been submitted. Whether it succeeds or not is another thing, although all of the free advertising done through discussions on forums will aid its success.

Posted

Well, we are going to get this channel in Canada in one form or another since the application has already been submitted. Whether it succeeds or not is another thing, although all of the free advertising done through discussions on forums will aid its success.

That's a good point. Word of mouth via internet has become an important marketing tool.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

What we are afraid of is people who could not give a rat's ass about Fox suddenly tuning into this new channel and lapping it up.

"Afraid" of people watching television? Why?

And by the way, I have to wonder if Fox deliberately tries to turn people into Rush Limbaugh watching drones. When I was young and we had the antenna, Fox (31 and 68) were two of the few channels we got locally. And it seems to me I remember seeing advertisements for Rush far more often that I should have if I was watching program aimed at 8-12 year olds...

Depends on the market for those channels....rabbit ears from across the border doesn't apply.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Peladeau does what Peladeau does...

What kind of conservative views relating to Quebec can possibly be discussed, other than good and politically correct when Quebecor Media Inc. owns the show?

Looks like Quebec has already bought out the conservative viewpoint.

So much for the lame Foxnews North.

Posted
What we are afraid of is people who could not give a rat's ass about Fox suddenly tuning into this new channel and lapping it up.

"Afraid" of people watching television? Why?

BC, can you remember the response from the left WRT shows or content of highly controversial subject matter? The left's favorite response has always been, "If you don't like it you can always change the channel". Funny how numerous lefties on this thread find that this advice doesn't apply to them.

Posted

BC, can you remember the response from the left WRT shows or content of highly controversial subject matter? The left's favorite response has always been, "If you don't like it you can always change the channel". Funny how numerous lefties on this thread find that this advice doesn't apply to them.

Very good observation, as that has usually been the "Left's" contention when it comes to censorship. I'm not sure what was meant by "afraid", so await further explanation if it is forthcoming.

Fox News Corp is a well run shop...it is successful in many US markets. Comparisons to a new media outlet in Canada are superficial at best because the conditions are completely different.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I am going to assume that you, bc, unlike sharkman, actually understand nuance and say that I use " afraid " in the lighter senses. You know, " I am afraid that I locked my keys in my car, " " I am afraid that will not be necessary, " " I am afraid that I may have taped over your favourite movie, " and so on. " Afraid " in the regretful sense, the anxious or leery sense... Not the " OMG, get the censor! " sense.

Posted

I am going to assume that you, bc, unlike sharkman, actually understand nuance and say that I use " afraid " in the lighter senses. You know, " I am afraid that I locked my keys in my car, " " I am afraid that will not be necessary, " " I am afraid that I may have taped over your favourite movie, " and so on. " Afraid " in the regretful sense, the anxious or leery sense... Not the " OMG, get the censor! " sense.

It would appear from the tenor of his remark that he would indeed get that.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

Well, we are going to get this channel in Canada in one form or another since the application has already been submitted. Whether it succeeds or not is another thing, although all of the free advertising done through discussions on forums will aid its success.

That's right...

And I'm even going to watch...I hope they go as far to the looney tunes right as possible(and maybe even over the edge into Glenn Beck wackoville)...

The comedy will too sweet!

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

That's right...

And I'm even going to watch...I hope they go as far to the looney tunes right as possible(and maybe even over the edge into Glenn Beck wackoville)...

The comedy will too sweet!

I wonder if it will be a s funny as a Heather Mallick article?

Posted

Very good observation, as that has usually been the "Left's" contention when it comes to censorship. I'm not sure what was meant by "afraid", so await further explanation if it is forthcoming.

Fox News Corp is a well run shop...it is successful in many US markets. Comparisons to a new media outlet in Canada are superficial at best because the conditions are completely different.

Well, whatever was meant by 'afraid' is besides the point, which is that a right-of-center network would be bad for Canada, but if one doesn't like left of center programming, one should simply change the channel. Hypocrisy was never better illustrated than with this example.

Posted

Well, whatever was meant by 'afraid' is besides the point, which is that a right-of-center network would be bad for Canada, but if one doesn't like left of center programming, one should simply change the channel. Hypocrisy was never better illustrated than with this example.

Huh? Is Canada that fragile? Maybe you do need the CRTC after all.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I am going to assume that you, bc, unlike sharkman, actually understand nuance and say that I use " afraid " in the lighter senses. You know, " I am afraid that I locked my keys in my car, " " I am afraid that will not be necessary, " " I am afraid that I may have taped over your favourite movie, " and so on. " Afraid " in the regretful sense, the anxious or leery sense... Not the " OMG, get the censor! " sense.

I figured as much, but didn't want to assume anything. I am a foreigner and often don't understand Canadian nuance! ;)

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Is that a joke?

That was not a joke...

Thiose fair and balanced A-Holes actually aid that last year.Ironically,it came out the same day 3 dead soldiers came home and whose bodies were being transported on the Highway of Heroes...

Classless and clueless at the same time...

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Huh? Is Canada that fragile? Maybe you do need the CRTC after all.

No, we need wide open competition, and let the market decide which channels survive.

Posted

No, we need wide open competition, and let the market decide which channels survive.

Well, like I said: if it works, excellent, and if not, excellent. Either way is fine with me.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

Yes, but like I've said twice now, the left is not fine with it because they don't want right of center bias. And at the same time they tell those of us on the right not to censor when we don't like left of center programming. We are told to change the channel. But I don't think you can work up any remarks for that particular example of hypocrisy.

Posted

Yes, but like I've said twice now, the left is not fine with it because they don't want right of center bias. And at the same time they tell those of us on the right not to censor when we don't like left of center programming. We are told to change the channel. But I don't think you can work up any remarks for that particular example of hypocrisy.

Well, i can't speak for anyone else. I don't find the notion of a right-leaning news station to be some terrible threat to Canada. So, no issue, as far as I"m concerned.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...