Jump to content

Leafless

Member
  • Posts

    5,177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Leafless

  1. Yeah sure, maybe in Quebec that is. The English language is the Lingua Franca of Canada and of the world.....get used to it. What provincial rights are those? It will be a long time if ever, I get used to Nazism and racist language policies. English never infringed on the rights of Canadians to chose another language. That is if you are stupid enough to chose another language other than the English language. If you think troublesome segregated, fractionated linguistic cultural societies are the right of Canadians, then I think Canada is headed for major problems, if we are not already there to a large extent. Most immigrants come over to Canada to work and contribute to the Canadian way of life unlike the French who have been nothing more than a cancer on society. And that is the official problem ....OFFICIAL STATUS dictated by mere politicians rather than decided by Canadian citizens themselves by referendum. Because the federal government will not allow it. The federal government has been shackled by Trudeau's language policies since they were implemented and must uphold them ..for now that is. But I predicate when the feds abolish costly transfer payments and the provinces will have to look after their own programs and policies, bilingualism will no longer exist and French will be contained only in Quebec. And if that fails look at all the English kids in English speaking provinces in French immersion ....they will have the jump on anything coming out of unilingual Quebec. Think of all those federal jobs out of reach from unilingual Quebecers. And only the stupid meaning you would not recognize a language policy as corrupt and discriminatory because your minority French and think that is perfectly acceptable. A lot of this has already been covered in this thread and a reply would be quite lengthily. There are also other threads on the same subject. Why don't you initiate a new topic on the subject. It is not that I am envious but am angered and disappointed, as to why the federal government would allow Quebec to flaunt their own linguistic rules while disallowing English speaking provinces the same right. You better see some one about your serious inferiority complex as it is apparent you cannot handle topics of this nature.
  2. It is difficult to take you seriously using language like that. It is also evident you support fascism, or better still Nazism.
  3. There are many languages spoken in Canada but the English language is the primary language of buisness and communication in Canada. Language is the reponsibility of provinces in Canada and should be and which I may add, without federal interference. The propagation of the English language in Canada is simply nation building. It seems you are against unity and approve of troublesome segregated, fractionated linguistic cultural societies. Other than the English and French languages, all other languages are officially ignored. I don,t approve of this. It is either a single official majority language or have all languages officially represented, rather than be discriminated against. Don't you agree with this? Absolutely. Why should English speaking provinces be denied the linguistic right of not making themselves officially English and not be forced by federal linguistic interference to cater to minority French concerns? Quebec is provincially officially French and ignores the realities of the majority English language in Canada/Quebec and get away with it. Certainly, and that difference is simply made possible by racist language laws. Numbers mean nothing when you have racist language laws working in the favour of francophones. Says who....you? Dreaming in colour again CANADIEN. And why do you find this so strange? Quebec started it and benefited from it and get away with it. Why shouldn't all other provinces have the same benfits? I have demostrated many times throughout this thread the existence of Quebec provincial and federal language discrimination. You just refuse to comprehend and are miffed because the French language does not have the same all around importance as the English language in Canada.
  4. Firstly, prior to the implementation of the federal OLA all Canadians had the same rights pertaining to language. There were no laws relating to language in Canadian society. Some Canadians had to learn the majority English language in order to become functional in Canadian society. What else would one expect in a free democratic society. Outside of some federal entities there was nothing within the BNA Act that stipulated that English and French languages, or any other languages are to be used throughout Canadian society. English speaking Canadians never demanded that the English language in Canada be officialized. The English language was and still is the language of choice that serves the large majority of Canadian citizens despite the federal 'official status' which does little to propagate the English language throughout Quebec. What the federal liberal government OLA accomplished, was that it created an elite minority group (French Canadians) transforming them into a majority group. Now at that time, the federal liberal logic was French majority + English majority = equality. This is outright discrimination and is laughable if it was not so serious. There are many other groups in Canadian society that would certainly enjoy the same linguistic advantage as francophones. The high cost associated with the maintenance and protection of any language makes 'language' a national issue that should be decided by Canadians (referendum) and not by governments. Up to now some estimates range around the 1-trillion dollar figure to support federal and associated cost of the OLA and associated official bilingualism in Canada. It is English speaking Canadians that had their rights violated (freedom of expression) with the implementation of the Official Languages Act/Official bilingualism, reducing them to second class Canadians in order to gain employment in the federal public service, provincial government, municpal government and spilling over into private industry.
  5. What Quebec wants is nothing short of being a official independent French nation-state in North America, otherwise known as a country. To bad the federal government does not have the fortitude to tell them once and for all.....
  6. ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES-bullshit! You are making it ABUNDANTLY clear democracy ends at the ballot box in Canada. We are no better off in Canada politically than the people in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan they have to contend with the Taliban. In Canada we have to contend with the political disruptive antics of Quebec and a federal government that caters to Quebecs extreme forever ongoing cultural fantasies at the expense of the English speaking majority of Canada. Firstly- the language laws were imposed, as no one should have the right in a free and democratic society to implement laws of this nature without a national referendum. These language laws were well thought out by Trudeau who very well knew what the end result would be. Secondly-Those language laws laws were NOT implemented all at the same time and no one at that time had any idea what the end result would be at a later date, outside of Trudeau that is. I gave you the definition of race and you continue to deny it. What are you a freaking dummy? There is nothing to get into. Official Languages and Official Bilingualism ARE of the 'JUST SOCIETY' type, SOCIALIATIC LANGUGE LAWS that have been also CONSTITUTIONALIZED again WITHOUT the consent of Canadians by way of a national referendum.
  7. Then it is clear you supported a traitorous government. Then I will make it simple for you. Trudeau was a traitor who worked for the province of Quebec, unless of course you can prove otherwise.
  8. Why don't you move out of the past. Ancient history is done and over. Any reference I made To Nazi or Nazism is the dictionary definition and has nothing to do with genocide or your ancient history or Godwin's law.
  9. Word Web definition of Nazi: "Relating to or consistent with or typical of the ideology and practice of Nazism or the Nazis" Nazism: "A form of socialism featuring racism and expansionism and obedience to a strong leader" I did. You are blind to facts. I don't care about culture, but it seems the feds and people like you do care about the culture of a previous foreign enemy of Britain. So in turn I have to defend the rights of the majority culture of Canada that mostly all English speaking Canadians take for granted and normally could not even take the time to talk about it.
  10. I call them Nazi-type policies because the three Liberal imposed policies, Official Languages/Official Bilingualism/Official Multiculturalism mimic Nazi Germany's totalitarian principle of government relating to racial superiority and or authoritarianism. I don't have to get into specific clauses since the three policies together could very well be considered a French conspiracy to advance the political fortunes of Quebec by utilizing culture to combat the natural majority English speaking language of Canada. Unless you can prove otherwise, these policies could have been designed to reduce the importance of the majority English language/society/jobs, by greatly over emphasizing the importance of French culture, with language laws relating to the French language and by flooding the country with third world immigrants, thus further diluting the importance of the majority English language/customs and culture.
  11. Which only proves how stupid you are in not knowing what a racist is. I will say it again. In calculating racial majorities and minorities in Canada, your calculations must include races from the entire country. You will find that Francophones are a sub-majority (minority) in Canada. Use another word to describe your friends in Quebec. Our political system to-day is based on minorities/majorities. Majority rule. Then why to you put such emphasis on culture...CANADIEN? That is water under the bridge. We all know what has politically transpired in this country, with federal politicians playing their personal little games while laughing in the face of English speaking Canadians. That is why you will not be arrested. See above! Strange, I see myself as Canadian but could not care less about my culture, language, identity since I see myself as being more American than anything else. I think you are the one that should move back to France.
  12. You are the catalyst in my thread, I am simply rebutting your never ending moronic extreme socialistic replies.
  13. It is obvious the best part of you ran down your old man's leg, which accounts for you being such a low bred moron.
  14. Again! Wait no more. Official Languages,Official Bilingualism, Official Multiculturalism.
  15. Someone has to teach savages the English language and a little math so they can compete for jobs like other educated Canadians. Majority rule was the thing in those days and should still be the thing to-day, like in Quebec. It works in Quebec so why should other English speaking provinces be denied the same opportunity. They found a Quebecer who used to drive his motorcycle throughout the Quebec countryside dressed in Nazi garb named Trudeau who fixed that up. Sure, traitors need not assimilate, right? If I remember correctly the French lost the war on the Plains of Abraham and Quebecers therefore had a duty to contribute to Canada like any other Canadian utilizing the culture of the majority.
  16. The low life gay boy is back spewing another load of non-productive crap.
  17. The type of linguistic policies Trudeau imposed, which was a form of socialism featuring racism,imposing country wide cultural laws and obedience to a strong leader.
  18. Natural majority English speaking Canadians NEVER required any type of language policies prior to Trudeau's imposed totalitarian language policies and if not for Trudeau's draconian language policies would not require any to-day. Most Canadians simply accepted the existing majority cultural situation and freely complied to assimilation.
  19. Explanation: If it wasn't for Trudeau's Nazi type Language policies the natural English speaking majority would rule....just like they do in Quebec.
  20. Look in the mirror CANADIEN, look in the mirror. The spelling makes a difference. One is a prefix to a word the other is simply a word. I already told you that it is a new word. The definition I gave you is correct. Franco-Ontarian= French "Hilarious gem"---- sounds kind of frogish to me.
  21. You already did and without using the word 'majority'. Then you must realize I created a new word for your reading pleasure. I am not misusing the word submajority, you are. The word I use is sub-majority. And besides that you have previously claimed, using a simple google search, that there is no official 'submajority'. The word sub-majority is an English word and has meaning and it is clear you do not understand the use of a prefix. Sure! Surely you cannot believe that a twerp French supremacist troll like yourself gains any level of respect from members of this site...that is of course excluding other French sympathizers who think like you.
  22. Yes it is simple when you use that type of terminolgy that avoids confusion and conflict as with the word majority. Perhaps you should know what the term sub-majority means before misusing it. For your reading displeasure Your link contains no information other than to download unspecified material which I do not do. Feel free to post your official definition of the word sub-majority. I am using the prefix (sub-) to modify the word majority to indicate that sub-majority means that this type of French majority is secondary in nature, in order to avoid confusion and conflict with the large English speaking majority of Canada.
  23. My basic mathematical concepts tell me that English speaking Canadians are the large majority in Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Canada If you wish to continue using the word 'majority' as applicable to groups of Francophones in areas where they outnumber English speaking Canadians, you can at least use the proper terminology and use 'sub-majority'in reference to French speaking majorities.
×
×
  • Create New...