Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like we're in for a few lean years. The Bank of Canada is now saying that we can expect at least 2 years of near zero growth. Fortunately, we have some elasticity built into the system. Anybody care to guess what it might be?

...

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Sure, that elasticity is the Banks pulling the rubber band to get covered by the govt for all the dumbass loans they made to losers who cant pay it back.

..or...

The boing boing rise in user fees to cover themselves.

Posted

Take a vacation! C'mon Canada...SPEND! Please...for the love of humanity...spend...

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

I'm having my best year ever. My last best year was last year.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

If all the newscasts just quit telling everybody there was a recession, nobody would know and things would just tick along as usual. It's all the doom and gloom, it feeds on itself... I bet if all the media started announcing the recession is over, things are good, etc. etc. it would be :)-

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted
Looks like we're in for a few lean years. The Bank of Canada is now saying that we can expect at least 2 years of near zero growth. Fortunately, we have some elasticity built into the system. Anybody care to guess what it might be?

Is it that we saved up in the previous years, and cut all the excess spending as to have money to spend in the down times. Wait no wait our government has made it do we will surely have a deficit in the coming years.

Posted
Same here, what do you do?

I work in media...marketing to the c-suite

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Guest FrootLoops
Posted

My dad says that teh the guys in power now need to start doing things like conservatives and not like teh Librals.

Posted

I'd like to see more tax cuts. Mostly income tax cuts. And I'd also like to see some spending cuts, or at least a slower rate of growth. And depending on inflation, a cut in interest rates.

Posted

I refuse tax cuts with out spending cuts it is just doesn't work which is what I don't get is happening from our shitty minority government. That is not a Dig the Conservatives either, even though I vote NDP, this stupid minority government and that includes all parties are promising us the world and then cutting taxes it is stuipd.

Guest FrootLoops
Posted
I refuse tax cuts with out spending cuts it is just doesn't work which is what I don't get is happening from our shitty minority government. That is not a Dig the Conservatives either, even though I vote NDP, this stupid minority government and that includes all parties are promising us the world and then cutting taxes it is stuipd.

That is a small c conservative point of view and a good one. The NDP would raise spending and taxes.

Posted
If all the newscasts just quit telling everybody there was a recession, nobody would know and things would just tick along as usual. It's all the doom and gloom, it feeds on itself... I bet if all the media started announcing the recession is over, things are good, etc. etc. it would be :)-

Yep, dishonesty will solve all our problems. :rolleyes:

Look at the US: PDF

Just imagine how effective our political system would be if the media only told us good news stories about politicians: no ad scam, no RCMP raiding CPC HQ, no Flarherty ethics investigation etc...

I bet if the media started announcing that politicians are being held accountable that it would be :)

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

Contrary to popular belief it is not spending that drives economic growth but saving.

We are undoubtedly heading into some tough times. Actually we've been in relatively tough times for the last thirty years, compared to other developed nations. Due to horrible economic policies which are shared by all the major political parties (I think it's really time to acknowledge we only have one political party, the party of high taxes, wasteful spending and government control over the economy and your life) our economy has been relatively stagnant, especially in terms of wages of workers (a product of productivity, which has been pretty much flat for a long time).

A crash course towards freedom is probably the only thing that can stop pretty serious economic problems, especially if the American economy continues to decline (and if there is a serious move amongst oil producing nations to switch to the Euro as their reserve currency (as has already happened / is happening in Iraq, Iran and Venezuela) this will be assured). Get rid of half the federal government. Abolish the income tax. Fire 3/4ths of the bureaucrats that rule this country. Deregulate and sell off as much land / industry that is owned by the state as possible...

obviously none of this will happen, as it is anathema to the policies and philosophy of the political parties that rule our country.

Oh well... at least we can enjoy the decline, as Canada claims it's place as a rightful honorary member of the third world.

Posted
I'm having my best year ever. My last best year was last year.
The TSX has been good to me too.

There are ups and downs but anyone who thinks the system is "fundamentally flawed" is someone who never saved and is now jealous. My only fear is that such people devise a scheme to tax the "fundamentally flawed" system (ie. devise a way to tax people like me.)

If the economy is headed for the dumper, there are many moochers who will be out of luck.

Posted

Geez, you'd think no one ever heard of the business cycle before. Our economy is SUPPOSED to have a recession every now and then. It's normal. What's not so normal is the climbing food prices and the climbing gas prices. I guess we'll just have to spend more of our disposable income.

Posted

"Geez, you'd think no one ever heard of the business cycle before. Our economy is SUPPOSED to have a recession every now and then."

Is it? Why is that? You'd think YOU'VE never heard of the Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.

The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle says that economies are not SUPPOSED to have recessions every now and then, but rather the business cycle is a product of artificial manipulations of the interest rates, and the malinvestment that is a result thereof.

Let me break it down for you.

Interest rates are artificially lowered (the 'real' interest rates should be determined by the market and it's determined by the percentage of savings) creating the boom. Entrepreneurs are fooled into making investments that look profitable, but aren't. Eventually these investments are proven to be uneconomic, and so they are liquidated. This is the bust.

If we abolished the Bank of Canada and went back to sound money there would be no more business cycle.

Posted (edited)

Sorry, I can't resist.

If we abolished the Bank of Canada and went back to sound money there would be no more business cycle.
Define "sound" money. And business cycle - what's that? Women menstruate but female cats don't. Why should economies have a "cycle"? Are economies female - but not female cats?

Zachary, we use money, sound or not, to trade. The world is a better place if more people can trade and cooperate. If money helps us trade and work together, then money is a good thing. I don't see any cycle in this. Can you?

Edited by August1991
Posted
Sorry, I can't resist.

Define "sound" money. And business cycle - what's that? Women menstruate but female cats don't. Why should economies have a "cycle"? Are economies female - but not female cats?

Zachary, we use money, sound or not, to trade. The world is a better place if more people can trade and cooperate. If money helps us trade and work together, then money is a good thing. I don't see any cycle in this. Can you?

The guy is a libertarian what he means by sounds is money either back by something like gold so every bit you have floating out there you have some gold in a vault somewhere saying it is worth something. OR You actually just use gold as your money. NOOOOO THANK YOU.

Posted
That is a small c conservative point of view and a good one. The NDP would raise spending and taxes.

See I am ok with that becuase if you raise spending you should raise taxes. Seems like the big C conservatives don't get that.

Posted
See I am ok with that becuase if you raise spending you should raise taxes. Seems like the big C conservatives don't get that.

This is what the NDP never seem to get! They take the efficiency of government for granted.

If you and all your neighbours needed a park built in your neighbourhood you'd pass the hat to come up with the money. Some poorer folks might contribute in labour. It's like the old barn-building bees in pioneer days. Let's pull a number out of our collective butts and say that the park would cost $10,000.

Now, if the government says it will build us a park things are quite different. First, there are at least a few hundred thousand dollar reports that must be done, to see if we truly want a park, if the park will be ecologically a benefit to the community and most important, how to build the park so it will withstand earthquakes and tornadoes, even if it's not in an earthquake or tornado zone.

The work must all be done by CUPE contractors, even if they cost double what other firms will charge. Some of those contractors will have connections to various politicians, of course. Money will change hands both ways.

When all is said and done that $10,000 park will likely cost somewhere around a million and a half! Where will the money come from? TAXES, OF COURSE!

Please don't even try to deny that's the way the system works. I'm 55 years old and have been watching this time after time after time for my whole life! You might as well try to convince me that the sun rises in the west.

This is why I could never vote NDP. They live in dreamland.

"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

Posted
This is what the NDP never seem to get! They take the efficiency of government for granted.

If you and all your neighbours needed a park built in your neighbourhood you'd pass the hat to come up with the money. Some poorer folks might contribute in labour. It's like the old barn-building bees in pioneer days. Let's pull a number out of our collective butts and say that the park would cost $10,000.

Now, if the government says it will build us a park things are quite different. First, there are at least a few hundred thousand dollar reports that must be done, to see if we truly want a park, if the park will be ecologically a benefit to the community and most important

how to build the park so it will withstand earthquakes and tornadoes, even if it's not in an earthquake or tornado zone.

The work must all be done by CUPE contractors, even if they cost double what other firms will charge. Some of those contractors will have connections to various politicians, of course. Money will change hands both ways.

When all is said and done that $10,000 park will likely cost somewhere around a million and a half! Where will the money come from? TAXES, OF COURSE!

Please don't even try to deny that's the way the system works. I'm 55 years old and have been watching this time after time after time for my whole life! You might as well try to convince me that the sun rises in the west.

This is why I could never vote NDP. They live in dreamland.

http://www.fin.gc.ca/toce/2005/frt_e.html

The report shows that NDP governments have balanced the books 46 per cent of the time.

Liberals have the worst fiscal record overall. Liberal federal, provincial and territorial governments have posted year-over-year budget deficits an astonishing 79 per cent of the time.

Conservative governments have only a slightly better record than the Liberals, logging deficits 65 per cent of the years in which they’ve been in power.

Posted
The report shows that NDP governments have balanced the books 46 per cent of the time.
Since when is "balancing the books" a measure of government competence?

If I take 75% of what you earn and spend it on stuff you don't want, I have "balanced" the books. Does that make me competent?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...