Jump to content

Bob Macadoo

Member
  • Posts

    1,690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bob Macadoo

  1. Exactly. Same as an identified group. They don't get more protection than you......hate crime legislation is reactionary.
  2. What makes you think they haven't? I've noticed repeated recognizable character tells. I can't chaulk it up to similar mindsets.
  3. ....except bail conditions. This isn't "Law & Order" Canadian Victim's Unit.
  4. .....so a person with a record automatically puts the public at risk?
  5. .....and the identification that a crime against an identifiable group is something we emphasize is a crime against society to discourage or educate the populace....not the perpatrator.
  6. If there is a belief it may be ignored you bringing attention to it would be counterproductive. Lawyering ain't rocket science.......
  7. If it is a must in court proceedings then it becomes a point of focus, attention and dispute....thereby lending evidence in its ability to delay bail decisions. Both improving a guilty's 2-1 pretrial incaceration....and delaying justice for the innocent. If its not a mandatory inclusion....although used by the judge anyway....win win. I notice people only want things over regulated and prescribed when they think it won't affect them.......otherwise discretion and judgement should reign.
  8. Why do the punishments of those convicted of crime against police differ from other classes?
  9. Who said when asked what he has in common with his daughter he said "sex"?
  10. I think you're right. With Hamas having to soften their positions recently they want to ensure no party supporter can be prosecuted for finding common cause with "the enemy". I personally dislike such nuanced legal phrasing "in general". I like my legislation to be vague and opaque so I can use it as a speech chiller if I don't agree with it.
  11. You don't get paid if no one replies to your topic distractions?
  12. Yes. Then I would expect the police spend every effort to capture the criminals not lecture me.
  13. Get north of Manchester and its all drawls and gibberish.
  14. You're reaching DoP/BC level of "pavlovianous". The topic is a christian sect.....no need for thread drift.
  15. So the criticism is fair but the response is unacceptable....or is it the volume of response......there are that many people who disagree?
  16. "Proper" is subjective. I would think GM not being expected to continue paying taxes.....was proper compensation.
  17. The catalyst was Islamaphobia, the mandate of the motion was all anti-religious irrational behaviour.....anti-semitism included....I would even venture the anti-sikhism (They're going to kill someone with that ceremonial dagger) that is sometimes displayed.....here and anon.
  18. .....you mean a PMO office that blocked/screened scientists from speaking on topics that were intolerant to that gov't?
  19. Ye Actually it's neither....just ignorant. Research in Saudi Arabia and the UAE would dispute that. Now if you said poor islamic countries have favoured humanity studies as opposed to more expensive scientific research that could be argued......but that's not the kind of nuanced brown debate you want to have. Islamophobia would be more like...."those dumb arabs will want to teach my child sharia instead of math because that's all they study over there"......irrational fear of some made up transgression
  20. I never said all seniors....you just said hate speaking old curmudgeons aren't prevalent and then went on to say it's not their fault its their generation. The best old geezers, like internet heroes, who are pleasant and grandfatherly to their face and then spout their "browns are taking over this country" rhetoric as soon as they turn their backs.
×
×
  • Create New...