Moonlight Graham

Abortion rights involve the control and autonomy a person has over their own body, even if it results in the death of another human life. What is the difference with body autonomy with covid vaccines? Besides an abortion guaranteeing the death of another human life while not being vaccinated only increases the chances of another getting sick with a virus that has a very low death rate. Anyone who is pro choice on abortion but anti- choice on covid vaccines is a hypocrite who only cares about their own interests because the ethics is entirely inconsistent to each other. It's in your interests to want abortion rights in case you're involved in a pregnancy, and it's in your interests to support vaccine mandates so that you're safer. Isn't that convenient! Nice to know the Canadian justice system also makes decisions with no ethical consistency.

Well there you go. More tyrants trying to control people's bodies and health decisions. Disgusting.

I don't ever recall vaccines being a term of employment in sectors where it doesn't apply more than any other. But the federal government required all public servants to get jabbed even if they were working from home full time, and required truckers even though they mostly worked alone isolated in a truck cab all day. Tyrants.

If you're working with vulnerable people like in a hospital or long term care home, requiring vaccines makes some sense. Otherwise they can bugger off. The only employer I know that has required covid vaccines outside these sectors among the regular workforce is the federal government. Because they are tyrants, and hypocrites about control over ones body (abortion).

Yeah they'll just threaten to take away their livelihood. No coercion happening there.

What is your evidence for this?

Exactly. You can't make a conclusion about a police interaction that doesn't show the leadup to the interaction.

People should have the basic human right to decide what medicine is injected into their bloodstreams and that of their children. If we're not in an emergency situation then this should remain a decision between a person and their doctors.

A lot of cops are crapbags who lie constantly. What you posted isn't evidence, its just a claim. They also claimed he was reaching for their gun, another lie they often use. If he didn't run maybe he'd be alive. But there was still zero need for them to kick him in the head twice while he was on the ground and punch him multiple times with haymakers to the head. If 5 large black cops can't put cuffs on a skinny black dude they suck at their jobs. The only fact you've shown is that you're a bootlicker.

That's right. It is to encourage going to local 15m walkable businesses in order to discourage driving for climate reasons, and "traffic" they allege.

Ya but then.... https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/03/15-minute-city-stickiness/

Not true in some proposals: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kentonline.co.uk/canterbury/news/amp/radical-plan-to-ban-drivers-crossing-neighbourhoods-275055/

No you need to be within 15m walking distance of everything not driving distance. The lefties are trying to limit car use for the climate and stick car tolls everywhere to enforce it. But maybe some cities aren't doing the tolls (because it's insane)

BUILD BACK BETTER

After the first year of the pandemic I think we did pretty good, besides some of the unnecessary vaccine mandates. I think we can manage things better for the young people that had schools locked down etc. I think we understate the negative health impacts of lockdowns, like increase in obesity, heart disease, mental health issues etc.

Depends what they define as "professional conduct". In this case i don't have any idea what she said

If you say "I hate trans people" yeah there's a problem. If you disagree with certain rights then it's fair game. Jk Rowling hasn't said she hates trans people, she says biological women shouldn't have biological men in their changerooms and bathrooms.

Wow a Lizzo purple M&M.

Anyone who cares about the gender makeup of the M&Ms mascots is a crazy loser. This includes the makers of M&Ms.

1. I don't see how saying something offensive affects trust. The guys who write South Park might be very trustworthy people. 3. Depends on the take. 4. If you hate all black people its hard to treat black people fairly. If you don't agree with trans women in female bathrooms this is just a political take. But I don't know EXACTLY what this nurse said, other than a billboard. 5. They're cowards. They'd rather fall in line so the PC police don't get after them. If we as a society can't ever say anything that might offend or reflect poorly on POC, LGBT, women etc or even might go against their interests in some way then we aren't allowed to say the truth if the truth does that. That means society is dysfunctional. The truth is more important than feelings, and sometimes we need to risk offending in order to figure out what the truth is and listen to different takes on issues. Instead of banning and canceling and censoring everyone how about we just speak their mind as long as it isn't illegal (harassment, threats etc). Twitter means everyone has a voice and some people just can't take it. Who literally gives a rat what JK Rowling thinks of trans rights???

1. I didn't say no moral code or speech restrictions. I said it has to relate someway to their ability to do their job well and do it ethically, treat clients ethically etc. Being a fraudster might have something to do with their ability to do their job ethically, and treating clients ethically and whatnot and being put in a position of trust with clients, especially if you're an accountant or some other money professional. Private opinions about trans rights doesn't fall under this from what I can see, unless there's something specific where it does apply. 2. The person said trans stuff on twitter and whatnot, over a number of years? This is my impression of what has happened. How did what they do or say have any impact and the nurse's ability to do their job? If this person said "I hate black people" and they have to go treat black people then yeah I can see an issue. If they say "trans women shouldn't be using the same changerooms as women" I don't see the issue. If kimmy were a nurse should she be hauled in front of the inquisition for her "TERF opinions" if she were an otherwise good/ethical nurse?

I would think if a professional does something that is related to the performance of their job it matters. If it has nothing to do with their job then it doesn't matter. "Making the profession look bad" is totally subjective and not at all relevant, and why should anyone have to live their private lives under some draconian standards that have nothing to do with their jobs? You're either a good nurse that does their job well and ethically and treats clients ethically or you don't. Everything else is nonsense. Why should anyone care what a nurse feels about JK Rowling? What a waste of time.

We have a shortage of nurses due to covid overwork so at the very least delay all this inquisition stuff by 5 years.

She put up a sign and is now being investigated apparently, which seems ridiculous. Apparently you have to be pro-trans everything to be a nurse? Doesn't make any sense, it has literally nothing to do with her job.

Freedom of speech = beging charged with crimes and being dangerous (with firearms)? Hello wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_MacKenzie_(activist) He's also a member of a far-right extremist group. And this guy went into a local Nova Scotia business and waved a handgun around apparently: https://globalnews.ca/news/8593064/ns-man-ottawa-convoy-protest-firearms-charge/ So if I were Scotiabank I would also close all business associations with him and ban him from all banking locations, although I would kinda fear being shot up in retaliation. As for the Omar Khadr comparisons...sure I wouldn't be in business with him either.