Moonlight Graham

Was that commie Pierre or Justin Trudeau? Klaus Schwab?

You should move there (lots of commies). I have never voted Green (not a commie).

Yeah being popular (allegedly) makes them not communist. You seem to be really upset for me calling him a commie lover for someone who isn't a commie lover. But you're right, they're communist. He's a commie, he loves commies, you love commies, you get upset for me calling him a commie lover. #CastroForever

Do you vote NDP? Do you live in the hippie-commune known as British Columbia? Would you like to move to CHAZ/CHOP?

Its socialism. Nothing wrong with some socialism here and there, but call a spade a spade. He's a communist sympathizer.

Do you love communists?

Well they licked Castro's balls for one. Also, daycare, Dental care, pharma care. Ordering public servants to get vaccines even if they work from home full-time. Going into people's bank accounts without consent on 2 separate incidents. Tracking everyone in the country's location via their cellphones without their consent. https://globalnews.ca/news/4608105/trudeau-defends-statistics-canada-move-to-collect-banking-info-of-500000-canadians/ https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadians-trips-to-liquor-stores-pharmacies-tracked-via-phones-during-pandemic-1.5890563

I think Pierre Trudeau and his son are commie lovers and ki$$ a$$ to the wealthy elites. And they like being God-like leaders who think they know better than everyone and tell them what they need while behaving sometimes like tyrants. I think Harper only ki$$es a$$ to the wealthy and is just your regular ordinary tyrant. I also think Justin is a coward. Pierre didn't seem like a coward, to his credit. Fidel and Pierre were buddies, they had a lot in common. Trump and Putin were buddies, they had a lot in common. This isn't hard to figure out.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-taiwan-china-canadian-envoy/ Commie-loving cowards.

Representing the King doesn't mean you get to live like one from the 1500's on the taxpayer's dime.

What?

The PC police governing Canada failed to protect this country in the early days of the pandemic. To his credit, these things didn't concern Trump, and Biden is on record against the travel bans even in Europe in early March 2020. He backtracked later that month. Fortunately the Trudeau gov and Biden admin have adapted better to the threat. Risking offending someone should generally not prevent people from doing the right thing. Leaders need to risk taking some small hits in order to make the tough calls and stop putting their fingers in the wind.

I think anything that by nature causes inflammation in your body isn't 100% safe.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/health/more-than-2-7m-paid-to-50-claimants-of-serious-injury-connected-to-a-vaccine-in-canada-1.6205187 Also I'm pretty sure I developed mild Bell's Palsy after one of my COVID vaccines and it hasn't gone away.

Never trust the government to look after you. Look after yourself. You care a lot more about yourself and your family than the government does. The politicians don't care. They have privileged access to the healthcare system. They will NEVER wait to get their kids looked at. Rich people can also go to the US to get treatment. No 2-tier my butt.

The problem is they want to increase spending (the politicians on the left) but they don't want to increase taxes to pay for it. Increasing spending is popular, and increasing taxes is not. Being fiscally responsible if clearly not a priority at the polls. We can have whatever programs and spending we want as long as we're also willing to pay for it. The provinces can fix the healthcare system tomorrow because its caused by a staffing shortage. The solution is to temporarily increase pay for medical staff in hospitals until the health pressures caused by the pandemic is over. However, the provinces don't want to fix the problem, because it costs money. They would rather wait for the feds to bail them out and give them the money...until it starts hurting the premiers in the polls. Let's never forget: most of our politicians, especially the ones who have had any success, are self-interested careerist sociopaths. It's very hard to get to be powerful by being nice or ethical. I'm sure the back benchers for the NDP are mostly nice people.

Read a book. People from South Asia and East Asia were often called Indians back then.

This thread is fake news.

You're saying with 2 similar candidates the tiebreaker will often unconsciously be biases like same race, gender or other categories. But with "diversity" hires the tiebreaker is also determined by race, gender and maybe other categories determined by policy. Either way someone is being unfairly discriminated against based on categories like what identity group they belong to like race or gender. Little is being solved here, just different problems created. What someone looks like or how they spell their name etc should not be considered during hiring. This is the whole point. Train people to be less biased instead of training them to be more biased. People are being told to hire based on race and sex, and to feel good about that, it's insane.

Sure, these white male bigots are racist and sexist and should lose their jobs. I am interested in getting rid of racism and sexism, not promoting another flavour of it. Two wrongs don't make a right. Someone's sex or gender (what they look like) should not be a criteria for hiring.

You're making a whole bunch of racist and sexist assumptions. Saying a person will be a better fit for an organization simply because of their skin colour or gender is a racist and sexist statement. You're discriminating against people and making hiring decisions based on their race and gender. But of course you can't challenge this in a court of law in Canada because discriminating against white people and men is protected in our Charter of Rights, while all other groups are protected from discriminatory hiring practices. Your biases are as real as the people you claim "hire based on commonalities". People shouldn't typically be discussing personal interests and whatnot during a job interview. If you have people hiring employees they have things in common with (ie: are hiring based on common race and sex, or in other words are being sexist and racist) rather than the best person for the job they should be sent for bias training or fired, because discriminating against people based on their sex or gender is wrong. If you have employees or recruiters who have racist or sexist biases you should be training them on how to remove these. Instead you're doing the exact opposite, you're training people to be consciously sexist and racist. Everyone who walks into an interview at your organization will be judged on their skin colour and gender, it is quite disgusting. The cover of "diverse organizations perform better" is racist and sexist nonsense created by people who want to socially engineer our society through means like employment discrimination. Organizations often don't factor "diversity" in other ways, like age, socioeconomic background, where in the country they grew up, marital status etc. They typically only factor race and sex, or possibly sexual orientation in some cases, because the agenda isn't diversity it's "social justice"

Kids deaths are extremely rare. My understand is the health risk to kids and the general population of getting the vaccine are lower than if they didn't get the vaccine. For anyone of any population, if your health risks of getting the vaccine are lower than if they didn't get the vaccine, then logically you should get the vaccine. It's that simple. it's a simple cost-benefit analysis. If anyone is unsure if they should vax their kids they should consult their doctor instead of non-doctors and non-scientists on the internet.

Define "representative"? The racial and gender makeup of a company and its hierarchy are the same proportion to the general population? That doesn't work. People like Asians and Jewish people will be discriminated against, because they achieve education and career success at higher rates per capita than others. The only fair way to hire is to hire the best person for the job regardless of race or gender, unless the job qualifications specifically would benefit from someone of a certain background. Joe Biden did exactly that with his VP pick and Supreme Court pick. Trudeau did exactly that with his cabinet picks and both GG picks. Define "organic". From what I see it just seems like people pulling decisions on diversity hires out of their butts with no clear or consistent criteria for justifying selection whatsoever. It's pretty random and based on "feelings". But this is "ok" because people don't feel bad about discriminating against white people, men, or asians apparently. They still sleep at night and even pat themselves on the back. Meanwhile Keith the white guy doesn't have a job because he wasn't the right skin colour or had the wrong sex parts, or Fukodomo doesn't have a job because he wasn't the right skin colour. You're not hiring the best candidate based on merit if that's what you're doing. This is discrimination based on racism and sexism if you're making hiring pool decisions based on race and gender. These things shouldn't matter in hiring decisions, unless the qualifications of the job would specifically benefit from someone of a certain background (ie: school with majority black children that has little to no black teachers).

2. Sounds racist. You're cancelled.

The best way to solve the issue is for people to not re-elect a government if they don't like their policies. Democracy means we get a chance to guillotine our rulers every few years via election, peacefully and bloodlessly. There is no political system possible where everyone gets the policies they want, people will always disagree. We don't have a perfect system, but rule by majority with peaceful transitions is about as good as it gets.