Cameron

Uhm, calling you an idiot isn't a personal attack. It's more of an observation.

Yea, I'm with Argus...I've told Cagerattler, who started using CON servative, that if he wants to be taken seriously he should start acting like it. I think we should all drop the childesh rhetoric when refering to political parties and grow up.

Even if the CPC get elected they will never be a government for ALL Canadians. Not even close. You can't have a government that apeases all people. If you do then you are not governing, you are just a hand-out machine. You need to have a government that makes decisions that are for the country, even if it pissed off some people. We had a hand-out machine in NS, his name was JOHN BUCHANAN

Whatever....here is your sign Cagerattler.

Until and unless it is confirmed. Don't treat rumours as facts. We are not supposed to discuss that illegally released editorialized testimony.

HERE HERE Argus!

You are joking right? Uhhhhhhhh, Nope not joking.

CAGERATTLER: I'm not taking you or your post seriously any more because of the childish spelling of conservative. I'm not just picking on the spelling on my party, It distracts from the maturity of the forums if any parties name is misspelled intentionally (Lieberal, Fiberal, etc.). If you want to be taken seriously, then act it.

It was in the news almost everyday, now there is nothing more of T.S. I know she died, but it's funny how the media moves on quicker now adays.

My goodness! How masochistic! Well it's fine if they want to separate, but don't expect AYNTHING from Canada after they sign the deal. Once you are out, you are OUT. No money, no help, no support. They want to play this little game, well, we can play as well. If they need money, I'm sure Ontatio would be more than happy to sell them their garbage.

THANK YOU!

Then we can send in the Military and take it back by force. EDIT: 50% kidding about the military take over.

Please elaborate on the Albertan comment. And good to Quebec, glad to see the youth taking interest in politics.

Let's see some links to articles? Or the family name, I'm not aware of this.

Oh Mulroney....now why did you go and do that.....were you trying to make a better Canada..if you were, that's not allowed! PS - You posted the WHOLE article, so I'm going to pick it apart just like you. Mulroney was one of the greatest prime ministers of all time. It's too bad most Canadians are blind to that. Thanks for the article though, always looking for a good Mulroney speach.

Here. Here! Redneck! Good points, I like it!!

Hey welcome to Liberal land, where we the sell everthing out from under you. The Libs don't give two flying sh*ts about you and your wharf, Digs. We are not big enough to care, not enough votes down this way. All they care about is selling this country out to the lowest bidder and not caring about the people of this fine country we have built (John A. was a con. good for him). If we all want change, we gotta vote them out. The people in Ontario should get up out of their Adarondaks and screw their heads on and see whats happening. Conservative #1: Hold people accountable! (WOW! Amzing theory....maybe we should pass it on to the Liberals...naa they'd probably loose it just like the $ billion....) Yheee, Hawwww, the liberals are here.

Stay on topic, what the hell is the topic. You started off the topic header with Mike Harris, and then you went on to criticize the conservatives. I don't see ANY leadership from the pack mules in power now...At leased Mulroney had a plan to turn this country around (and it did, because we are using the models that he had created). We are a better country because of conservatives. The liberals have done nothing but screw us. It's nice to see that we were pulling in these huge surpluses in the mid 90's, where the f**k is the money now...why didn't they put it back into the country. They just kept bringing in surpluses (it's good to know the liberals can make money and profit, nice of them to share it with us) The conservative platform was to make people accountable for their actions (the Liberals don't even try....useless). You hold people accountable, you will see a change in people (you know you will go to jail for murder, so you don't do it...wow, amazing concept isn't, too bad the Liberals haven’t caught on...but they probably won't) And for the fact that the conservatives didn't get into power, well maybe this country is going to hell in a hand basket, who knows. Obviously you people in Ontario have sucked back too much smog and have been lounging around in the Muskokas a little bit too much, but what else is new. Bring it! http://img19.exs.cx/img19/8193/liberal5cd.jpg

I don't know why we have to go down this stupid road of changing up the names of the parties. Just call them Liberal, Conservative, Bloc, NDP, etc. Stop acting like a 3 year-old with your childish word games.

I suspect that the only reason Greg decided to crack down on "Fiberal" was that a certain crybaby decided to complain. (see the more recent "Scumbag" controversy for more details.) Personally, I find it kind of cute. It reminds me of Maplesyrup's ranting. The good old days. -k The good old days were when Craig Read was on. (he is now banned because of disregarding forum rules). He was someone who gave alot to the board and his posts were always interesting to read (and he was conservative ) Why is Maple banned?

What's an ITQ? Who do you blame for the iregularities in the industry? The lack of government control? The rotten fisherman and shoddy government enforcement? How would you change the east coast fishing industry?

What they needed to do last election is keep with the positive platform and not go down the road that the Liberals went down near the end of the election. If Harper and crew decided to keep with the positive message and renforce it near the end, the outcome could have been different. Where I think they went wrong is when the libs and cons started to attack each other and it tarnished the whole process. The cons moved away from their original plan.

I may be a conservative, but that is just cheap TV. She said nothing that she can back-up. Diarreah of the mouth, that's all. And Tucker (from the CNN clip) was let go by CNN because Cross-Fire sucked, because he rambled on everyday and didn't really make sence. His "democrat" debater was just boring to watch. All these people are just jarring for air time, and it works. Look at the ammount of press she got for saying those things. Nothing more than stations looking to make money, like the rest of us.

"As I walk through the valley where the PC's onces roamed, we screw everything up...making ourselves look like fools....livin' in a Liberal paraside....ohhh, ohhhh, ohhhh..."

That's what I was going to say. Good point.