Rue

No. The 35 version we would purchase would not.

Tories are committed to the 35 and Trudeau because of Bombardier will never deal with Boeing and the modified 18 for it's money has too short a shelf life before it is replaced making it impractical money wise.

No pilot wants to replace their own eyes and rely on simulated vision. You have bought in to over reliance on technology to replace basic skills. Natural vision is basic and necessary. To replace it is arrogant and foolish. Have you seen the blindspots on the 35? If that helmet does not work then what? You have a blind bird. I call that a turkey.

Well its a good thing you are there to defend Omar's recycling of the Jews and their money control the US Congress through AIPAC canard hours before the son went down on the Sabbath. Lol and thanks for your "selective" lecture on the origins of AIPAC. Let's start with the origin of the anti-Semitic canard about Jews and money controlling the US: https://www.middleeasteye.net/discover/jews-money-anti-semitism-hate-myth-was-born-jewish-museum-london The canard about AIPAC is constantly rebuked and proven false but hey why not repeat it: https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/The-antisemitic-myth-of-Jewish-control-is-alive-and-kicking-595998 http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/24346 https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/jewish-control-of-the-federal-reserve-a-classic-anti-semitic-myth http://www.danielpipes.org/1011/jewish-control-between-reality-and-myth As for Spanky's claim that AIPAC was created to circumvent FARA Law I would like to see his explanation. AIPAC is not a Political Action Committee (PAC). But let's back up a second because Omar is not the first nor will be the last to accuse AIPAC of bribing US politicians which she did. In Omar's case back in 2012, she sent out on twitter a brilliant message that Israel had “hypnotized” the world. Then after people questioned her for that comment she back-tracked and stated : “It’s now apparent to me that I spent lots of energy putting my 2012 tweet in context and little energy in disavowing the anti-semitic trope I unknowingly used, which is unfortunate and offensive. Then in Feb. of 2019, defending an anti Israel journalist she stated “It’s stunning how much time US political leaders spend defending a foreign nation even if it means attacking free speech rights of Americans.” ...before adding...: “It’s all about the Benjamins baby,” complete with a music note emoji to the end of her tweet. Hey old habits are hard to break you know...But wait when Batya Ungar-Sargon, asked Omar about what she meant by the all about the Benjamins quote and asked her to explain who is is paying American politicians to be pro-Israel, Omar quoted back “AIPAC!” again advancing the canard AIPAC bribes US politician As it has been repeated infinitum, AIPAC IS NOT a political action committee (PAC)and DOES NOT endorse or give money directly to any politician or polical campaign so please Spanky have Omar tell us which senators and congresspersons were paid by OPAC. So far any article that has accused AIPAC of bribing officials or politicians has never been proven and are in fact opinion pieces with no facts. I can tell you right now if I ask Spanky to produce evidence of AIPAC paying a US politician he will not produce one with any documented proven link. Let's deal directly with this AIPAC controls Washington statement trotted out continuously by anti Israelis and trendy leftists. To start with the support of Israel's existence in the US comes from 3 factors: 1Tthe military industrial lobby networks who employ hundreds of thousands of US citizens and generate trillions of dollars from Israeli technological alliances because they have Israeli firms develop their hardware so -if you are going to trot out its all about the Benjamins, how is it AIPAC is singled out for bribes of politicians and yet this network is never discussed or any other lobby group of any other nation? 2-Evangelical and other Christian groups have always had a deep grass roots supported network that supports Israel due to their religious beliefs-never once in the canard of Jewish AIPAC controlling the US is this mentioned; 3-The so called Jewish vote would come from the Jewish population which is roughly 6 million Jews (how ironic) or about 2.3% of the total US population-so do the math-even if every Jew was of voting age and voted how does that control the US? When Omar again was asked how it is only AIPAC concerns her and no other foreign lobby group she again back-tracked and said: “Anti-Semitism is real and I am grateful for Jewish allies and colleagues who are educating me on the painful history of anti-Semitic tropes.” Now why does Omar and for that matter Spanky explain how they compared AIPAC in the US with the so called petro-diplomatic complex or lobby network and tell me who has more money and influence. Please show me how this Petro network was dwarfed by AIPAC in influence and how this petro lobby network controlled by Muslim nations that have never been pro Israel does NOT influence US foreign policy and is of no concern to Omar and never once been singled out by her? Does Omar speak up about them and how they assure undemocratic corrupt regimes that commit human rights offences and in fact discriminate against Palestinians are of concern to her? Can we get real with this canard. Who has more influence Jews or oil executives please tell us Spanky because if its all about the Benjamins why is it only about the Benjamins when it comes to AIPAC and no one else? That is the point.

Again while I think you are insane and weird someone should read you carefully. You again state dead on what is fact. Conventional armies have been replaced with small rapidly mobile elite specially trained units. With today's technology having large, loud slow moving poorly trained soldiers and complex logistic support lines which are sitting ducks for guerillas is outmoded. People who talk about wars and invasions do not understand the cost of huge slow moving armies compared to elite fast moving units, aircraft, drones,. Warfare has changed. Soon we will have dna cloned soldiers all looking like Justin Trudeau as well but that is another story. Now I have argued from the get go as have some others on this forum that the Griphen was the best jet per cost and money. However if they had intended to choose it they would have done it by now. There is no competition. The F35 lobby network has a lock on its bloated contract. At best if Trudeau is relected the idiot will continue with his old F18's complete with incompatible old F18's from Australia continuing the tradition of always having an armed force that is a joke to the world because its leaders who claim to be trendy leftists rely always on the US's defence umbrella. The corruption in Trudeau's regime in regards to navy and air procurement let alone allowing the decay of the army is a tradition that continues in Canada since the end of WW2. There is zero excuse. A griphen fleet could have replaced our aging F18's plus leave money left over for navy purchases. We have no navy. Our airforce runs on a miracle and our soldiers have bad equipment but hey who cares because once we put them in dangerous situations and bring them back we have $10 million for Omar Kadr but pennies for soldiers with serious post trauma wounds and injuries. That's our priority. I have zero trust in any government in this regard but you know out of the lot, out of default I have to vote Sheer. It would be irresponsible to waste my vote. What a joice. A studdering closeted spoiled idiot, a man who never worked a day in his life claiming to be a champion of the working class, some idiot with the i.q. of a doughnut who leaves sensitive info lying around while he shags some motorcycle groupie chick spying on him and some guy with dimples who always looks like he farted and is embarrassed about it. Run for office Dougie. We need an insane person. The only sane people on this planet are insane people like you. Your responses to Taxme on the other thread were gems man. No one handles the crap like you. Problem is I will vote for Army Guy first. At least he will wear clothes at his inauguration. You I am not sure. Serously back to what you said, dead on but I am a Griphen supporter. We do not need an F35 and never did. We need a quick interceptor with low maintenance that can land in isolated small spaces. It can use all the old F18 weaponry, requires only 5 men maintenance crews, can land on ice, and can we get serious if the Chinese or Russians came across our air space we need interceptors until the Raptors get there. The Griphen is mobile enough to intercept and cause shit until Raptors got there. What we need are icebreakers for the North, a properly financed and trained Ranger unit to patrol the North as well, submarines and state of the art fast moving naval vessels for coastal patrols against drug smugglers, illegal fishing boats, and submarine detection. It is inexcusable we have no navy. As for the infantry God bless them but wars today are fought by elite small moving units, helicopters and fighters. I also even question tank squadrons. As for invading cities and using soldiers as police its foolhardy. Using soldiers as garrisons to control sprawling territory is antiquated. Today you control people with drugs, cell phones, junk food, currency control.

At one point she said she did not mean where Israel today is, is occupied Palestine unlike the other 2 after being challenged by Pelosi BUT she then backtracked from her backtracking after Pelosi challenged her and reverted back to the very same anti Israel dialogue but at one rally when she was told Jews were there stated she was Jewish. For me freedom of speech means they can say what they want. However if you are an elected US politician and you support terrorism and openly challenge any state's right to exist as they have Israel then be prepared to be challenged, That is why these 2 people support BDS and let's not couch what BDS is. BDS was started by an operative in the Palestininian Authority with the express purpose of recruiting students in campuses across the West to finance their mission. Their mission is not to simply boycott Jaffa oranges. It is the express denial of a Jewish state in pre 1967 Israel using any means necessary including terrorism and violence. These two congress members couch their references. They both do NOT believe Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state but believe Muslims should have as many Sharia la states as they want. Its time people actually read what these two stand for. No US politician has to blindly defend Israel. No Jew like myself anywhere in the world has to blindly defend Israel which Trump's poor choice of words could have been construed to mean and will be by some but I do not beiieve was his intention. That is not the issue. Looking the other way and expecting a country to welcome in politicians who preach their country should not exist was the issue. The US and Canada and all countries screen out people coming to their countries they know will state things that could incite violence or hared against the state. I understand what Trump was saying although he said it in his illiterate half assed way, and that is as a Jew or an American or as an Israeli but especially anyone, period, politicians that uphold one standard for their people but another for Jews, should be challenged and you bet I agree with him that why would Israelis welcome such people in their country. Trump did not lecture Israel he was simply being his blunt self and his bluntness to Jews should not be misconstrued. This is the same man who once said he did not expect any Jew to vote for him ever given their strong ties to the Democrats. He's made plenty of disparaging comments about Jews and yet he is the first to hire them or have a daughter who is one. The best way to describe Trump is he is rude and intolerant of everyone equally which makes him an ignorant insulting bafoon but not only to just some....so in that sense I can take him a lot more then I can a phony Democrat playing leftist anti Israel trendy sentiment while pretending to be neutral. That said Trump gave these two idiots exactly what they wanted a platform and victimhood by using his poor choice of words. As for these two congress people and for that matter Bernie Saunders, all 3 have made statements that have fueled and incited terrorist organized riots on the West Bank and as we speak yet again Hamas is shooting missiles into Israel proper as it incites its people to try crash the border screaming Israel is their ancestral land. Israel aint about to cater to terrorists, extremists and two people catering to Muslim extremist voters who hate Jews and Israel in the US. I listened to this Ali woman. She is a gutless liar. When asked directly did she believe Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state anywhere on the planet, she would not answer. As for the other one claiming to be a Palestinian and victim of Israel she openly supports Hamas and Fatah and terrorism and calls it legitimate self defence and she does not believe Israel should exist unless it takes back in anyone who claims they are descended from Palestinians as long as those Palestinians are not Jews and then turn the state into a majority Sunni Muslim state. As for Bernie Saunders he has made some very anti Israeli comments he knew would cater to trendy leftists and incite anti semites and terrorists. Any political platform that challenges the legitimate right of sufferage of only one ethnic group in the world (Jews) and is passes it off as trendy liberal beliefs is bullshit. As some have said on this forum, Democrats have lost control of their members and these wing nuts will get Trump re-elected as moderate middle of the road Democrats don't turn out to vote. Trump knows exactly what he is doing calling them names. He mobilizes his vote while Democrats see their left wing splinter from its right wing. Pelosi should have reigned these two in long ago. As for Cortez she got in under unusual circumstances and there is no reason to believe she will win again. She was technically not voted in by the majority of her constituency. Her riding has a lot of blue collar people who do not agree with her elitist university socialism views. She also did not make points putting on fake ethnic accents. She is an immature spoiled millennium however she plays her looks for publicity. She knows how to flip her hair, stand with her hand on her hip and when to smile or pout for the cameras. If she is not re-elected she will have a career as a CNN anchor and will be on Dancing with the Stars for sure. The US likes its instant celebrities. She is the Kim Kardashian-JLo of politics.

Outrageous. This is precisely why China treats Canada like a joke, arrests people illegally and has cut off all our trade while Trudeau caters to them. Trudeau is spineless. He has not a clue how to deal with China. For starters the idiot had no business going to the media bragging how he does not get involved in criminal proceedings to China while doing exactly that with Lavalin at the same time. That is priceless idiocy. Next this idiot who prior to the election stated how he admired China's efficiency showed what a sheltered rich boy he was with no clue of real life. China is constituted by an ethic that wants but does not give. They are obsessed with having he last say and power imbalance in any trade deal. This comes from many centuries of exploitation by the West or fellow Chinese. Its an entrenched intense method of doing work and the weakness Trudeau shows is ridiculous. China operates business like cancer cells. It grows and infiltrates and is structured exactly as a cancer cell grows and is structured. You either contain such growth or it destroys your economy. Trudeau's solution to a cancerous tumour is to feed it not contain it or cut it out of certain sectors or try shrink it. To have announced what he did was to placate and cater to Chinese ethnic voters prior to the election. This of course is part of Trudeau's attempt to buy his way back into office relying on pandering to ethnic voters. He figures this will win back Chinese voters. He also is convinced his recent payoff to milk farmers will grab conservative votes. He will before we are done make many more prostitution moves to try get votes. Trudeau will perform any act you want for a vote. His mouth is overflowing with questionable content.

This is based on a Fraser Institute Study of 2011 based on a 2006 census and a SAMPLE of tax filing for immigrants between 1987 and 2004. In fact there is no statistical info to prove or draw a connection between how immigrants or for that matter any other demographic group benefits from social programs. This study was quoted by Maxime Bernier. What this study does not show or discuss is the report on labour trends among immigrants that found 2/3rds of them were responsible for national employment gains in 2016-2017. In fact the unemployment rate for immigrant men who have been in Canada 5-10 years was 4.8% lower than Canadian born males who were at 5.6% The Conference Board of Canada estimates economic growth would slow from about 1.9 to 1,3 oer cent annuallyw ithout immigrants and if Taxme had his way and we had no immigration at all, by the year 2040 26.9 percent of the population would be over 65. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business has stated that we have to address a job vanacy rate of 3.2 percent for the last 4 consecutive quarters, 429,000 private sector jobs need to be filled. So that busts the myth about immigrants stealing jobs. Legitimate immigrants coming in on the express entry system as federal skilled or federal skilled trade workers, entrepreneurs or provincial nominee categories have to show in a point system they speak English or French, have adequate skills, a job waiting for them and are not taking the job from a Canadian and no matter what government has been in power, this immigration system does the same thing because we need people to generate our economy and grow it. This is why no business interest group or anyone who knows anything about economics would quote a 2006 census and a sample of tax filings to make such statements and conclusions,. Legal immigrants are needed and have never been the issue. In the anger over certain people jumping the legitimate immigration entry systems thanks to the Liberals, it enables anti immigration people who are anti immigrant period to like Bernier pick up on the sentiment. It doesn't help when Trudeau deliberately calls anyone who questions what he has done on our borders with illegals a racist. It further polarizes the debate and fuels people like Taxme who hate any immigrants and then could the issue. I would say to Argus he needs to read up to date studies and understand the assumption immigrants simply come and take more than they provide is bullshit. The sample of tax filings does not provide an accurate analysis or basis to extrapolate any of the assumptions he has made. It also does not take into consideration that illegals and frauds who misuse our medical system may be US citizens. As for his assuming people make less money then they take from OHIP would Argus have us believe that does not happen with people born in Canada? Let him provide the statistics of Canadians awaiting citizenship versus rejected refugee applicants versus born in Canada people who use OHIP plus Americans with fake OHIP cards. Until he has such stats, the above article reported by Bernier is a joke and this is why I call Bernier a flatulent moron. He spews negativity to try get votes. He tries to exploit any emotion he thinks will whip up anger. He appeals to people who want to complain and be angry about others because it reflects his own petulant feelings he was unfairly treated by the Tory party. He needs to take his bottle and go home to Mama.

I suspect Lisa Laflamme. She has a low voice and a flamboyant name. Vladimir Putin is in fact a lesbian.

Where did Joe go? Lol.

Hi guys. Clearly Egg and X have a personal stake and appear on the different sides and part of me does not presume to tell Chinese what is good for them. I believe that the majority of people in HK we're brought up with a different approach to life and extent of gov. Intervention than mainlanders and do not want to be assimilated. I sympathize with their fears and X the attempts to play them all off as terrorist zombies is dumb. If you want to do that then it's fair to call you a mindless Borg. Please find out what the Borg are and know resistance is not futile. That would be illogical. Regards, Bones McCoy.

I would say Trump is a racist elitist sexist and any other ism or ist. Most American politicians have at least some kind of ism and ist. As do all humans. In Trump's case he is open about it. He does not favour you wimply because you are white although he certainly manipulates certain whites by making them angry towards others who may or may not be white. He certainly does intentionally incite division and hatred. He leads not through inspiration but by appealing to difference and competing interests and making people feel insecure. He's a fascist pure and simple. He is no different than Mussolini. He is Mussolini reincarnated right down to the body posture, lip pursing, and meaningless speeches full of burping and farting. Then again the only difference between Reagan and Trump is Reagan swallowed his burps and blamed any farts on Nancy standing next to him. As for your leader in Quebec, to me he is just reincarnated Réal Caouette -Marcel Duplessis and is anti anything that does not fit his criteria of what a Quebecois is which at this point in time is a very ambiguous definition. The closest thing I can equate it to are Nordiques fans who want another NHL team but would never invest their own money in it.

Lol not to get off subject but yah Dougie if one reads the Bible particularly the Old Testament literally it presents the concept of a divine source in a manner I believe reflects the prevalent human psyche at that time. I would like to think to find the definition of the source of all sources the closest one gets is a glimpse if they listen to Janis Joplin. I also think once Boy George started wearing his hat the way he did, it ruined it for Hasidic Jews forever.

Yah so you die from a gun so I can live in a nation where I do not have to have a gun. You see my problem. Its hard to thank you when you are dead Dougie. So I do it now.

Yes they interpret laws and yes especially on the second part using the Charter to define "cruel and unusual" but so far its only been used to allow people who commit serious crimes in other countries who flee to Canada not to be deported back to their countries where they committed the crimes.

Yes. I also get your strong defense of civil rights and distrust of authority. I respect it don't confuse my hatred of guns with that. You know what makes this ironic Dougie? Its people like you we always ask to do the killing and die because we are assholes and can't learn to use reason. I am tired of asking people like you to die for what? The right to carry a gun? Oh phack that. Whether you believe it or not, what you did or served to be more accurate means many more of us do not die from guns or have to use guns. Its an irony that does not pass me by and you bet I appreciate it.

First off Judges do not create laws, elected officials do. Judges only interpret and enforce laws, they do not create them. Secondly actual terms are created by the elected politicians. Judges can only enforce them. On a scale with a low to high level, on the first offence they sentence low, second mid range, third high range. The case law has set that precedent. Judges have very little say in the range of sentences and they can not overthrow minimum sentences on a first offence. So sorry the Judges are not and have never been the issue any more than blaming police is. Politicians are who we delegate to create and pass our laws. Politicians reflect the constituents in their ridings. Politicians wanting to get re-elected often talk tough on crimes but the very same politicians will not sound as tough when told how much our taxes will go up if we actually build prisons. The issue has always been very simple-if you do not want many prisons or increasing taxes to build more prisons and maintain them, there is no where to place convicted felons and so they have to be let out early which they are from ANY sentence. The average jail sentence is automatically sliced in half simply because prisoners must be released because of overcrowding. There is nothing cruel and unusual about a jail sentence for a gun conviction. Guns used in crimes always increase the sentence and that is not cruel and unusual it in fact differentiates the level of danger in the crime to society. Thanks but I do not fear the American republic nor do I want a police state. Please don't be so quick to assume what I think...but yes I have good reason to understand that guns flow in from the US...its a fact. Also if you want to point a finger accusing someone of fear point it at gun owners who think owning a gun protects them from totalitarianism. That is illogical and based on fear. People buy guns because they fear. Guns were created to kill.. so let's stop with the bullshit they are anything but a tool to kill. Prison industrial complex? Come on Spare me the rhetoric Dougie. I am a lawyer who knows the weaknesses and failures of our legal system and no I do not support a police state or stripping people of civil rights but as I said, you can't have it both ways. The same civil liberties and rights that protect the innocent, also can enable those with guns to commit crimes because of search and seizure procedures, warrant requirements, and how "reasonable cause" is now being construed and a Charter of Rights. I spoke directly with Prof. Hogg who wrote that Charter. He said neither he nor Trudeau had any idea it would become widely used or interpreted by the Supreme Court of Canada as it is now. Not a clue. You want freedom of speech, be my guest. You want the freedom to carry a gun as part of that expression of belief, yah I have a problem and it doesn't make me a fascist or communist, just a shmuck who pays taxes and hates bullets. I have no political ideology when it comes to guns. I hate all of them and yes I believe in longer sentencing for gun offences.

I appreciate Grizzlies are absolutely unpredictable and can circle back and stalk, etc. I appreciate some people in rural areas have to live with some of them. I won't discuss that with those people as they will do what they think they have to do to defend themselves. I can only speak of what I do know, black bears. Except for mating season and getting in the way of a mother and her cubs, most times they are not a problem. I mean any wild animal being attacked by black flies or clouds of mosquitoes can go nuts, and you leave food around especially bacon grease you will attract anything and everything, but pretty much for the most part black bears are not a danger. The problem is idiots feed them at the side of the road, or drive like idiots in the dark on highways or leave their garbage out. My problem is mostly with my own species homo sapiens. I think we are arrogant, infringe on the right of other life forms and do not respect our place in the scheme of things. The few encounters with black bears I have had were simple, I get under the canoe or climb a tree and wait for them to pass or go in the lake. I myself use an air horn with coyotes and bears if I have to. However back to guns, I believe we often confuse the concepts of regulating guns (gun control) with banning or blanket prohibition of guns. It is impossible to issue an absolute ban on rifles in Canada. They are needed by necessity hunters and people in rural areas. As for recreational hunters, the vast majority who I don't personally want anything to do with, follow the rules and bring in revenue. What we are really concerned with is how guns get into the hands of people who are violent and/or criminal. The reality is the guns come in across the border through reservations no different then how tobacco goes back and forth. Living next door to the US means they will come in. I laugh at people who say get to the root cause of guns, poverty. The vast majority of poor people do not have guns or turn to them which makes that idiot comment to me despicable. It uses poverty as an excuse for why people use guns illegally. People use guns illegally because our borders are not stopping them coming in and individuals make the choice to use them. Terms of sentencing for gun related crimes are now too light. That is because our politicians do not want to raise taxes to finance prison building to house criminals with longer sentences. That is the bottom line. Our existing prisons have no room for criminals so we reduced the sentences for using a gun. Either have sufficient prisons to place people in prison for longer sentences or have the lenient laws we have because of lack of prison space but you can't have it both ways. Also if police can't engage in active policing interaction on the streets with people in certain neighbourhoods, of course in those neighbourhoods there will be more shootings. No one will say it but gun shooting went up when carding went out. The same people who whine about racist police and carding and profiling are now whining about an increase in gun crimes. You can't have it both ways. If you want police to handle gangs who for the most part are responsible for the hand gun crimes, shaking people down on the streets as it was once called, is a necessity to keep gang members out of the wrong neighbourhood and to make sure they do not carry out in the day time as they now do. I know our system. I have been on both sides of the fence with criminal prosecution and defense. Stupid boys grow large petunias to compensate for their small dicks by carrying guns. It gives them instant manhood and they now are carrying them around in broad day light because they do not fear getting hand searched on the streets. That is the reality of being a cop. You do not role down the window and ask questions anymore. You don't stop these jack asses walking like they got a pickle shoved up their ass. If you stop someone and shake them down you get accused of being racist, etc., so cops have stopped. Shakedowns consisted of asking questions doing random body searches, it kept the streets somewhat under control. Someone with the wrong colours or in the wrong place, was picked up and taken back to their side of the neighbourhood. Now every loser has a gun and think it makes up for their atrophied testacles. I use such terms because go look at the stats and see how few women use guns in crimes. Guns and testosterone don't mix well.

Back to the thread. If I brought up Kamala Harris was Asian and Black in a debate it would be called racist and irrelevant. When she does it its self serving and ethnic pandering is it not? Why is it relevant? I happen to actually like her. Her being mixed is irrelevant to me and her being a woman is not relevant to me. Her mind and views are what matters. I do not like it when we ethnics use our identities to pander. We facilitate the bigotry of Trump et al in so doing. Just my opinion. For a country that is supposedly a melting pot the US is so hung up on its ethnicities as much as Canada if you ask me. She is a well spoken moderate. I like that. I don't find her any different than Mitt Romney in many views if you read them. She is more to the middle than some think. I prefer her to the other Demos at this point. I think she is not an accident. Someone is deliberately test driving a female Obama candidate now Biden has fallen apart. I think the Demo machine is ready tol push her to gp up against Trump in a re-match as an Obama + Hilary hybrid with no Clinton baggage. It seems quite obvious. I ask anyone to point out anything really outrageous she said so far. Her scripts are vented. She is being pushed like Obama was slow and easy. If the powers behind the scenes feel Trump has gone too far nothing surprises me with her. The thing is Trump seems to have a clear green light for another 5 years.

Thank you. If these detention centres have problems and they do, using scripts that incite shrill emotional reactions will not help simply show the persons using such words like concentration camp have never been to one or experienced one. No one is being forced to do labour,, starve to death, subjected to torture, execution. Over-crowding is the actual issue and the people who use references like concentration camp offer no solution from their sheltered neighbourhoods.

Your words do not show a concern for the world at all just a need to bash the US with one sided thread starters designed to incite anti American responses from leading questions speaks for itself, "Joe".... https://www.zdnet.com/article/iranian-social-network-scammers-impersonated-us-political-candidates/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/twitter-says-it-receives-half-a-million-of-spam-reports-per-month/ https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1?.intl=ca&.lang=en-CA&.partner=none&.src=fp http://www.politicaljack.com/threads/russian-troll-brigade-paid-to-spam-social-media-sites.82357/page-2 https://www.newsweek.com/2015/05/15/russias-greatest-weapon-may-be-its-hackers-328864.html https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/bending-internet-how-governments-control-flow-information-online Whether our name is Vasilchenko or Basilone is not the issue. Never was, "Joe"...its your script. Слон не может скрыть свой пенис.

If Canada has a close relationship with the US where is room in the bed for Justin with Donald when FatBoy Kim and Vladimir seem to be hogging the bed. This is a threesome not a foursome. Trudeau is on the floor playing with himself.

If you are going to repeat that bullshit canard back it up. What billions of dollars of aid. Provide your sources. In fact your canard has been proven again and again to be misleading. Israel receives military aid not foreign aid: https://theconversation.com/us-foreign-aid-explained-74810 Your comment does not reflect the difference.Military aid to Israel allows the US to co- develop military weapons or other technology it then can sell to other nations and your blanket statement does not explain then how that military aid actually helps generate new income for the US as a benefit of that alliance. You of course would like to promote this canard that Israel simply sucks the US tit and thr US is an idiot controlled by Israel. Here is an apolitical explanation of how the US benefits from foreign aid. American businesses unlike you are not blinded by any Jewish brainwashing but by economic investment principles: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Development/Foreign-Aid-Helps-Americas-Economy Here is a US State department site explaining what aid goes where and it would be nicei if you had the intellectual honesty to differentiate military aid from foreign aid assistance. https://www.foreignassistance.gov/explore By the way every one of our damn consumer products come out of spin off from the US military industrial complex so if you want let's shut it down. You might want to then look at the no. of patents that come out of Israel because of the US Israel economic alliance and the direct benefits to your lifestyle when you paste up the usual Israel crap on this or any thread. This thread is just a pretense for another Marcus anti Israel diatribe with no balanced discussion on global economics and relationships. Ask Marcus why instead of funding terrorism around the world and particularly in the Middle East, Iran does not take its money and build an infrastructure for all Muslim nations in the Middle East. It has zero excuses other than its theocracy hates Sunnis, Shiites, Bahaiis, Zoroastreans, Kurds, Yazidi, Jews, Christians and prefers instead to fight a Muslim on Muslim war with Saudi Arabia equally to blame. Using Israel as an excuse to detract from the bigoted hatreful ideologies of Shiite and Sunni governments fighting each other and their lack of economic planning and rampant corruption is a spent script. Just look in the eyes of the Ayatollah or yourself. Your pro Iranian bias is what fuels your response. Get back to me when you want to attempt a balanced discussion. https://theconversation.com/us-foreign-aid-explained-74810

Actually try Iran. He is a not so subtle Iranian devotee. As for looking in peoples' eyes, that about sums up how absurd this thread is.

Dom you will be accused of being part of the illumanati for your comments, i.e., population control because it will impact more on China, India and the third world thanIst world countries where birth rates continue to shrink. Interestingly nature agrees with you, Because of the amount of plastics we have thrown out, the estrogen from the plastics is in fact lowering the sperm count of all humans to the point where reproduction of our species without artificial insemination may be a fact in the near future.