User

Science doesn't have to do anything. Many scientific theories have been challenged and moved on from over time as we learn more and do more experiments. There is no amount of time that somehow makes a scientific theory no longer challengable. Even then, "climate change" certainly isn't something like the theory of relativity either. It is best guess on models and assumptions right now.

No, its because you are a coward. You lie over and over and over again on here and don't like getting called out for it. so you run away.

You don't think the SecDef and others on the National Security team talk about these things? Of course they do. The only issue here was that they mistakenly added Goldberg to the chat. As I explained before, there is a difference between sensitive and classified information. "No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. No classified information." ~ Sean Parnell

Yet again, Hegseth was very clearly only contesting the loaded language being used, not that there was even a chat on signal at all. That is such an absurd proposition you are making here.

What exactly was classified and what do you base that on? No names, no targets, no routes, no units, no locations, no methods. Except... there was no major clusterfark. The only mess up was including Goldberg. Otherwise the mission was a huge success.

That is how science works... If we only stuck with the implications we liked and never challenged or tested anything... um, a lot of scientific innovation and progress would not have happened or would have taken a whole lot longer. The whole point of science is to test and for it to stand up to scrutiny and challenge.

Finally to the phase of the discussion where you just pretend you don't know anything. Nope.

Labeling something science doesn't make it an indisputable fact of life. The "science" behind climate change is primarily based on imperfect models with varying degrees of accuracy based on presumptions. Even then... what we know is not anything catastrophic either, yet the folks who push this "science" mostly fear-monger with it.

That is not all you asserted at all. It certainly is not leveled by people on the record. Nor was it 10 people as claimed at Fox. Nor is it corroborated when it is anonymous sources. That is you... now you run and hide like usual.

Let me know when your magical plan has anyone to enforce it.

So evident you can't explain it or quote it... It is an issue because what you asserted is not true. 10 people at Fox? It is relevant because you keep defending Robosmith and that is one of the false things he claimed.

Yes, I despise terrorist scum. Separating them is not enough. With Hamas in control an entire generation of people have been brainwashed into hating Israel now.

So... what is the over / under on myata posting again here before the 29th?

They have not ever tried. Due to international pressure, they always stop short. It is working out pretty well in the West Bank at the moment, but once they get finished with Hamas in Gaza, we will see.

You have us on ignore because you are a liar and when you get caught in your repeated lies you run away. Hegseth has a ton of people on record refuting the anonymous allegations against him. Lets see those 10 people at Fox Robo claimed existed that said Hegseth was drunk that you defend then. The only stubbornness here is on your side. It is not weird, it is just a dishonest schtick and game you guys play.

What does that have to do with your assertion that Hegseth corroborated the accusations that he was drunk at work at Fox? I am well aware of the assertions... but that Guardian article did not outline 10 people making the accusations either, as Robosmith claimed and you defend. I think at this point, as in other threads, you are making baseless assertions and defending something that is not true and are going to obfuscate like you always do when called out for it. You claimed Hegseth did something he did not.

Peace comes after you destroy your enemy and force them into submission.

No, its not. The Guardian did not make the assertion you did. I did not call you a liar here... but your assertion is not true and you have offered no argument to support it. The issue isn't with a dictionary definition.

That is your take...

Yeah, because he claimed there were 10 people. Who? Neither of you can back that up and you defend him. No, he didn't. Let me know when you can do more than just make the same baseless assertion. Nope, that is you. As usual.

How many Jews lived in Gaza under Hamas? Lets face reality here. If Palestinians had the military capacity Israel does and Israel did not have what they do... The Arabs/Palestinians would have killed every last one of them or driven them into the sea.

There can always be more done. I have not ran away from that, I have responded to that point already. You say he keeps legitimizing Putin's propaganda... OK, when was the last time?

Nothing was announced. So... what is your point here?

There is already a thread dedicated to mindless posting memes.