User

You jumped into this discussion saying that yes, Trump is to blame.

This is a thread about criminal scumbags in Canada shooting up a US Consulate. What does blaming Trump here have to do with anything?

Yes, you and others here keep blaming Trump in a thread about criminal scumbags in Canada shooting the US Consulate.

No, the scumbags who chose to shoot the consolate are to blame for their actions. This is not hard.

You were the one who pushed this on me. Here I am and now you want to move on when your stupid antics here get called out.

It was only as lame as your comments... which was the point. Where was I backpedaling from anything? See, just more dumb games from you again.

Talk to me about what? You were the one who repeatedly refused to acknowledge women were being impacted by men pretending to be women in their spaces, talking about hypotheticals.

You are the one here blaming Trump for YOUR criminal citizens shooting up our consulate.

Damn straight it is the woman's fault she got raped! <- You

Where do you get your country is finally keeping up from? The Article outlined how you were still falling short. If you actually read the article it wasn't saying that there was an order to plant trees to be counted, but that a lot of different things were being counted so it could appear you were spending more... and it was not just trees that were outlined. Can you dispute any of the facts presented? Because it certainly does show that a lot of accounting changes were made that make it seem like more money was spent, when in reality it was not.

I kind of did!

In the future, a simple Thank you will suffice. ==== You are welcome.

Well, big picture, we have a system of government designed as checks and balances on each other: Legislative - Writes the laws Executive - Executes the laws Judicial - Interprets the law What we call Congress comprises the legislative branch. It was originally designed to represent the states (senators) and people (house representatives). This changed to senators also being elected by the people, but still allocated based on states, 2 each. This was meant to empower the federal system, in which both the people and the states had representation. So, for something to pass, it must pass both the Senate and the House. Each chamber makes their own rules based on majority vote or how they operate... and the Senate created a loophole back in the early days that kind of allowed for unlimited debate, which was taken advantage of to filibuster by people holding the floor. The filibuster historically was a stalling tactic, it was that a member could hold the floor for as long as they could hold the floor to stop progress. It was agreed to change the rules to a "cloture" to stop debate, which basically meant that you needed 60 out of 100 to do so. Today, it is not as much a filibuster in the traditional sense it is simply that those 41 Senators of the minority party can oppose cloture and not advance any legislation. It stops a simple majority. It is like MAD now, mutally assured destruction, with nuclear weapons, because both parties know the Senate flip flops back and forth every few years and neither party wants to stop cloture because then they have no leverage when they are out of power. So the argument lately seems to be a push to say the other party is going to do it anyway when they get power, so lets do it first!

Sigh... Over and over again you did: Then you turned to mocking me when I responded with multiple examples. I forget... you don't care about facts. Are you unable to follow the discussion you are in now? Just another obfuscation tactic to avoid being called out for your contradictory comments.

So... it is not fake news, you are just justifying the practice and yet still ignore the point that even counting all that shit, your country still isn't keeping up.

How about you stop being a coward and respond to the list of ANTIFA incidents I posted.

You mean like, you know, Canada is full of lawless scumbags like this that would shoot at the US Consulate? That doesn't surprise you?! How little you think of your own country.... Ah yes, the classic, the girl deserved to get raped argument. WTF is wrong with you man? This is a thread about how the US Consulate was shot, and somehow still you clowns can't stop hating Trump.

You have repeatedly claimed it was just a hypothetical and that you have never seen it impact your family. I have never seen a murder nor had one impact my family... so I guess murders do not happen and no big deal! Just a hypothetical. Well, you should care because a lot of folks on your side push that this is a crisis. I am glad to see you agree it is not one. Yet again you play this dumb game that you have not seen it... when just about every major government get together in the last decade talking about climate change used Greta Thunberg as their prop who does push the crisis narrative. No, I simply don't ignore reality, and I am not ignorant of the things happening. Then why spend so much time on here acting like none of this is happening, saying it is a hypothetical you have never seen?

Classic Beaver, where you respond to something as if it were about something it never was. It was YOUR argument that not wearing a hat is a matter of instinct when talking about Trump, and now you switch to talking about Biden. This was not a funeral. It was a dignified transfer. He is the President. It doesn't bother me. So it is not about saluting... as you go on to cry about saluting. The point I was making was to simply point out that leftists did gripe about his saluting. Exactly. If it was not the hat, you would be making it about the hair. What you don't give a shit about is the actual dead service members, it is just whatever political attack you can make out of it. Must hate Trump. Fox disputes that assertion.

Equivocating? You: DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ERMERGAWD REPUBLCIANS ARE ONLY ONES DAT DO DIS DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Me: Um, no, Democrats too. You: DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR WHY IS U EQUIVOCATIN DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR This is just your BS subjective and vague opinion on what constitutes a "some global emergent or event"

Here you go @Michael Hardnerand @LinkSoul60 someone inferring an “extinction level event” now… But of course, where do we get these ideas from that folks on your side are saying thing like this?

Well… the issue here is that your side plays these games to obfuscate… So, to be clear, you agree that trans men, dudes who think they are women, should not be able to play in womens sports? Or be in womens only spaces?

I was pointing out the stupidity of your repeating the same thing but replace murder with dudes who think they are women impacting women in their spaces… No, but you and others here have acted like you have no idea where we are getting it from that people on the climate change is bad side do in fact make those crisis claims.

I’ve never had anyone in my life or my close friends or family murdered…. Oh well, I guess murders don’t happen and are no big deal.

And yet you still pretend you don’t know anything about how women and girls are impacted by trans men in their spaces… There is no room for them… they go make women uncomfortable in theirs. Also, if you want to brag about “The Science! TM” then it’s fair game to bring up how you don’t follow it either.