User

What has already started? Trump can continue to round them all up and process them out.

OK... and? Are you now opposed to finding all the lawfully cast votes in an election?

I look 20 years younger than I am and I love a nice grilled steak.

Nah, outright ignoring them will only derail things faster. They are still moving forward just fine without the act.

How is the Democratic Party going to be banned, let alone soon?

Yes, you will live a long life filled with much running away. Congratulations.

Trump isn't ignoring them now. The cases are making their way through the system and he is winning slowly.

That certainly is the left-wing bogus talking point.

Oh great... You are some crazy vegetarian now? Humans have been eating and surviving on "animal flesh" for all of their existence, but sure... you have the magic formula and special knowledge to know its toxic. ROFL

Do you pay any attention to what you say here? You said: "...45 colleges under investigation by the Trump Admin..." No, this is what happens when you are not specific and just ramble off a list of things.

No, I do not agree with your absurd assertion at all. The President acting on executive authority over executive branch agencies are not all US institutions or some limit on freedom or the end of freedom. A lot less? What measurements are you using there to quantify that precisely? Certainly nothing you have posted here shows that. I mean, perhaps your large measure of freedom is that schools can flaunt Title 9 law and destroy fair competition for women? Boo hoo. Expecting men to compete with men is not making the US a lot less free.

So... Government agencies are controlled by the executive branch. Yes, educational institutions are subject to federal law - nothing new with Trump. So, back to your point: The US continues to be free, this is no cultural revolution like those of authoritarian dictatorships that actually controlled everything.

I mean, how would you know? You post lies, I call you out, then you run away.

You know, you don't have to spam the thread? Just highlight a relevant section or a comment or two of interest. Provide the link, we can go read the rest if we want to.

Nope. You must be living in a basement with access only to far left fear-mongering. I live in reality. I base my positions on facts, logic, and reason. You do not. Which is why you ignored my question asking you to specify what institutions and why you are hiding behind such absurd vagueness.

Yes genius, but being akin to international law doesn't make it international law...

Taking over... what? The Trump administration is not taking over "institutions in the US"

Thus, your whole argument falls apart, predicated on a bogus, vague generalization.

What about it?

No shit. You can apply all you like, doesn't mean you get a free pass to come in and then abscond from your hearing like these open borders leftists support.

Um... no. The "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" is not binding law.

Well, this is a different discussion now, not what you were ignorantly claiming before. There is nothing decent about opening up a nation's borders to the entire world to simply claim asylum.

There isn't. Just because you show up and say you want asylum, doesn't mean anything. It has to be valid. Yet again, there is nothing binding from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Do you just not bother to read or care about these facts?

Gee... what did I already say? "Sure... anyone can claim asylum" Also, the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" is not binding law.

Sure... anyone can claim asylum, but there is no right that all claims are to be taken seriously and at their word and then must be allowed into the country while we spend years processing them. Nor is there any right that all must be granted asylum just because they ask for it.